[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Best deal for Kobe we can give up?
Author Thread
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
6/16/2007  4:58 PM
Posted by bitty41:
what I think and logic doesn't mean shyt here... It isn't logical to trade kobe anywhere, he is the best player in the league, but that is not the case. Was it logical to trade shaq to miami for spare parts? But it happened

Thank you for bringing that up. Now the Lakers gave Shaq away for next to nothing which I just mentioned do you honestly think they would do it again for Kobe especially considering how much money he brings to that franchise for ticket sales, merchandise, and assortment of other things for what?
IN these type of trades, when does the other ever get an Allstar??? Who is the Allstar the sixers are show casing for AI, LOL

The Iverson trade was a long time coming. Philly wanted to rebuild because they weren't even making the playoffs with Iverson. He's always had a shaky relationship with management and in the end Philly got I think it was 4 draft picks, and Andre Miller which isn't all that bad. Miller is one of the most underrated point guards in the league and now they the money and picks to really reshape their team.

LOL, where's that kind of enthusiasm for our players???? The Nuggents 20plus picks are greater then Lee, Frye, Blakman, ect???

"Do you honestly think they would even consider giving up AI for almost nothing. They didn't even give an all-star caliber player nor would any of those guys who be picked at 20 plus or Andra Miller be considered players who have led what one might call explemary careers but yet the Sixers are going to pick up that phone and make a deal to send AI to Denver for what a ok point guard, or three 20 plus picks they would have to be retarded. If I were King for that kind of deal AI would stay in stay."

Players demaning to be traded almos all ways end up as bad trades. No saying he is coming to the knicks, but don't act like 45 million brain Grant, pot head odom and a ok player in Butler isn't the deal that will probably land kobe. Of couse we have a chance..... Id say a good one if kobe is demanding to be traded.



[Edited by - anji on 06-16-2007 5:02 PM]
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
AUTOADVERT
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
6/16/2007  5:04 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:

LA looks like this after the deal.

Bynum/Frye/Mihm
Lee/Brown/Cook
Odom/Radmonovic/Walton
Crawford/Evans/Vujacic
Farmer

With the 19th & 23rd pick they could come away with Splitter, Cook, Williams, Almond, Belinilli.
They would have 6 prospects in Bynum, Frye, Lee, Farmer & 2 first rd draft picks.

There longest contract would be Crawford & Radmon which goes until 2010/2011. There highest paid player would be Odom who has about 2yrs 28mil left.

While they may not get star power back. Crawford & Lee would provide fans. Bynum would provide hope. They would have a ton of flexability as well as a very good cap situation.

I don't think they would want Crawford. Kobe is leaving because They want to get under, they are aoing to trade Kobe and add payroll???? I don't think so.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

6/16/2007  5:10 PM
Why isn't it ok to dream?

Want to hear my dream? That same exact trade in the original post goes down. Kobe becomes a knick, and isiah laces the team with the perfect role players.

Here is the climax:

For the next 6 years the knicks meet the bulls in the playoffs and the knicks beat them every single time the bulls make the playoffs on route to 10 NBA championships in 15 years. At first kobe is the man then curry goes on a reign of terror where he totally dominates the league with his offensive game for 10 years. Curry retires at 37 and is a first candidate hall of famer. Curry's number goes up into the rafters. Surprisingly isiahs does too, since he was never fired during his term as knick president/GM.

Lmao. Marbury went on to coach the knick for the last 4 of the championships. Marbs also gets his name lifted up as a coach! Lmfao!

Kobe also retires a knick and his number also retired. He retired 10 years from now. Meaning curry got between 3-5 championships by himself!

Mmmwahahahhagaga!
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/16/2007  5:11 PM
The Lakers would obviously be looking to sell youth and the future to the fans. Starting a new regime. It's sometimes the best option when a team has ran it's course with a Star and has no other means to improve the team.
They could try to make a go with adding JO, but I really don't think that would do it. That move wouldn't guarantee them anything. They still would need to do more. Being in the West makes everything that much harder.

Kobe would likely prefer to move to an Eastcoast team just to increase his chances of getting out of the East and back to the finals. Even if you have a great team there's a chance you can get knocked off in the West. The comp is just that good. The problem with Chicago is that LA would want a good young player and they also have the problem of having enough big contracts to match. They'd be much more decimated than the Knicks would be since we have the kind of big contracts to make a good match. We could also absorb a contract they don't want. So if you add that to Kobe's desire to come to NY, that makes our position a bit stronger should LA decide to make a trade.
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

6/16/2007  5:29 PM
While they may not get star power back. Crawford & Lee would provide fans.

What fans? Outside of Knick fans no one even hardly mentions these guys.
LOL, where's that kind of enthusiasm for our players???? The Nuggents 20plus picks are greater then Lee, Frye, Blakman, ect???

Huh?
What exactly is your point but to answer your question yes a bunch of picks in this draft are more valuable than Balkman, Frye, and Lee.

"Do you honestly think they would even consider giving up AI for almost nothing. They didn't even give an all-star caliber player nor would any of those guys who be picked at 20 plus or Andra Miller be considered players who have led what one might call explemary careers but yet the Sixers are going to pick up that phone and make a deal to send AI to Denver for what a ok point guard, or three 20 plus picks they would have to be retarded. If I were King for that kind of deal AI would stay in stay."

Okay simple translation about the Iverson Miller deal. Philly has a scoring point guard they went to the Finals with that scoring point guard and had numerous successes with that point guard. However that scoring point guard is still scoring but all those successes have stopped. The team is at a stand still. So voila another idea pops in the GM's head maybe I need a pass first point guard because maybe that will be more beneficial to our developing players. A simple change in direction if you didn't understand why the deal was made.

Sure on paper assists don't look as hot as scoring titles but sometimes changes need to be made. Philly received cap relief, draft picks, and a solid vetran leader. Hmm I guess your not familar with the Knicks cluster-**** otherwise referred to as their salary cap. Than of course there is that 9th pick that would be great in deal if we actually still had it. Vetran leadership I suppose Marbury will fill that role which he's done so well throughout his career.
Players demaning to be traded almos all ways end up as bad trades. No saying he is coming to the knicks, but don't act like 45 million brain Grant, pot head odom and a ok player in Butler isn't the deal that will probably land kobe. Of couse we have a chance..... Id say a good one if kobe is demanding to be traded.

Better yet the brilliant master mind who was able to bring Jerome James, Jared Jefferies, trade for Steve Francis, and trade away two unprotected lottery picks; yea he's the man to pull of a franchise changing deal such as fooling the Lakers into taking bad contracts and average to above average talent for the likes of an MVP like player.

Nalod
Posts: 72414
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/16/2007  5:39 PM
LA can't accept 6 players and a pick for the roster.

Kobe-Marbury-Eddy is toxic. Great talent, but not the right talent.

They can have one of Lee or Frye, but not both.

They can have Craw, and please take Nay Nate.

Bulls can kill us on any deal, but I would not empty the house.
NYKresurrection
Posts: 20561
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/23/2006
Member: #1230

6/16/2007  5:55 PM
Bring H2O out of retirement, move Kobe to the SF spot.

C = CURRY
PF = MORRIS
SF = KOBE
SG = H2O
PG = MARBS

Depends on who is left on the roster as far as a bench goes.
GOD arose JESUS from the grave !!! Isiah arose the Knicks from their grave !!!
NYKresurrection
Posts: 20561
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/23/2006
Member: #1230

6/16/2007  5:58 PM
You now have shooters in H2O, an allstar in Kobe, post play with Curry and a distributer in Marbs who can shoot and defend the PG spot.
GOD arose JESUS from the grave !!! Isiah arose the Knicks from their grave !!!
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
6/16/2007  6:21 PM
Bring back Ewing, Clyde, and Dollar Bill while you're at it.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
TemujinKnick
Posts: 20771
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/3/2005
Member: #1022

6/16/2007  6:35 PM
Posted by EnySpree:

Marbs, kobe, curry is just as deadly as san antonio's Duncan, Parker and manu.

Key is, its a team game. That's why clevland got swept. Their staff didn't have their team ready. They had the players but their focus was all wrong.

Kobe could instantly fall into craws role and dominate from there. Marbs playing off the ball. Curry still the focal point. With that core, knicks need their own mikki Moore, pavlovic, Damon Jones, Robert horrys, or any mofo that's not intrested in stroking their egos and want to catch a ride playing a role in a championship team.

Rasheed Wallace?
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30367
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
6/16/2007  8:36 PM
Posted by bitty41:

[quote]While they may not get star power back. Crawford & Lee would provide fans.

What fans? Outside of Knick fans no one even hardly mentions these guys.

Crawford may get flack for not making playoffs and all that. But he draws fans with his crossovers, his scoring outputs, his clutch shots. Plus he is a good interviewer. He will draw fans. Lee will draw fans for whatever team he plays for because he rebounds the ball, he makes hustle plays, he can put up some highlight dunks with his athletism, and he is white. Crawford & Lee are cappable of putting on a show.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

6/16/2007  8:36 PM
http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=2901568&name=sheridan_chris

someone post!!
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
6/16/2007  9:06 PM
Kobe to Knicks? Could happen
posted: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 | Print Entry

The Kobe Bryant situation has been quiet for almost two weeks now, ever since Bryant and owner Jerry Buss spoke on the telephone and Buss released a statement expressing his desire to keep Bryant in a Lakers uniform.

Since Buss is now vacationing in China and is not due back for another week or so, expect things to stay quiet for a while longer.

One thing to keep in mind as this thing bubbles beneath the surface: Nobody except Buss and Bryant knows exactly what was said on their phone call, but a day earlier Buss had responded to Bryant's formal trade request -- which was made to general manager Mitch Kupchak by agent Rob Pelinka -- by issuing a public statement essentially saying he wanted to hear those words come out of Kobe's mouth.

So we don't really know with 100 percent certainty whether in his heart of hearts Bryant does or doesn't want out, although I'm hearing that the formal trade request remains on the table.

Now, if that trade request ever turns into a trade demand, there's a good case to be made that Kobe will end up with either the New York Knicks or Chicago Bulls.

Here's why, and how.

If Kobe really, truly wants out, the Lakers have almost no choice but to grant his wish.

Yes, they could play hardball with him and make him hold out when training camp arrives, but Kobe would then be holding the entire franchise hostage while he waited them out. He's the league's pre-eminent superstar, and he's not going to be pushed around.

He's also about as stubborn a person as the NBA has ever seen. Sometimes it serves him well, sometimes it doesn't. But he's stubborn. And if Jerry Buss plays poker against Kobe, he loses. And Jerry knows it.

"If I'm Mitch Kupchak, I'm looking right now to see where my leverage would be, and I'm not finding any," one NBA general manager told me.

A holdout would cost Bryant a lot of money and would be ruinous to all the image rehabilitation he's accomplished over the past year, but he'd make up for the financial loss many times over through his 15 percent trade kicker, and his image, as we've seen, is reparable no matter how bad things get.

So here's the next big thing: Kobe's no-trade clause.

Because Kobe can veto any trade, he can dictate where the Lakers must trade him by giving them a list of acceptable destinations. That is the power of the no-trade clause, and Kobe is the only guy in the league who has one.

Next you would look at where he might want to go -- and where the Lakers could accommodate him while still helping themselves.

I don't think Buss could live with trading Kobe to a Western Conference team and having him come into Staples to face the Lakers twice a year (and two times more to face the Clippers, plus, potentially, another set of visits in a playoff series vs. the Lakers), so I'm excising all West teams from my list of possibilities.

So we move to the East, and we look at where Kobe might want to play.

Philadelphia: One thought is Philly, because Kobe wants more than anything to be loved, and nowhere is he hated more than in his hometown (and nowhere would he be greeted as more of a hero). The problem is, it would take a minimum of Andre Miller and Andre Iguodala to get Kobe, and that would leave the Sixers with next to nothing other than Kobe. They've been down that path with Iverson, and anyway Kobe wants to win a championship.

Miami: Forget it. Not unless the Heat are giving up Dwyane Wade, which they aren't.

Atlanta: Too young. Years away from contending. Too far off the national radar.

Detroit: You never say never, especially after they looked old and done against Cleveland, but the market-size drop-off would be a problem for Kobe.

Boston: For Paul Pierce? Maybe, but they would still be far from a championship-level team, even with Bryant.

Chicago: This is the team I hear as one of the strongest possibilities, although its questionable whether John Paxson would be willing to gut the core of his team to get Bryant.

Paxson would probably have to start with Luol Deng and Ben Gordon, and perhaps Chris Duhon, and he would probably have to include a signed-and-traded Andres Nocioni or P.J. Brown to make the salaries work.

That would be an enormous amount for Paxson to surrender, especially given the way he has shaped the team's salary structure for the next 3-4 years.

New York: If Chicago is one of the logical places for Bryant to end up, that raises the question of which team could make a competing offer. That's where Knicks coach and president Isiah Thomas would come in.

I've known Isiah a long time, so trust me when I tell you he would go to the end of the earth and do whatever it takes to get a deal like this done. He wants his legacy to be something special in New York, and Kobe Bryant could help assure that. Furthermore, Bryant has previously expressed interest in lighting up Gotham.

As a trade partner, what the Knicks lack in quality, they have in quantity. In terms of volume, Isiah could overwhelm almost any other offer out there, starting with combo guard Jamal Crawford, rebounding machine David Lee, Knicks starting power forward Channing Frye, a pair of unprotected No. 1 picks (let's say 2008 and 2010) and sundry throw-ins, including Nate Robinson, Randolph Morris, Renaldo Balkman, et al.

Crawford can score 20 points a night, and he'll go prolific for you at least twice a month. Lee is a double-double man, and the most popular player on the Knicks, an energy guy who will easily play in the league for 10 more years if he stays healthy. He's far from a bum, and the same goes for Frye, who could start for the Lakers for the next seven seasons.

No, there's no superstar in here, but it's a lot of lumber. And if you're rebuilding, you need a cache of young talent. Lee, Frye and Robinson are still on their rookie contracts. Crawford has a reasonable long-term deal ($7.9 next season, with a contract that ends after he makes $10.08 million in 2010-11). The Lakers would actually have cap space, lots of it, after Lamar Odom's contract ends in the summer of '09.

Nothing, however, will happen unless Kobe forces Buss' hand. That hasn't happened yet, and it still might not happen if the Lakers can make a major deal to put some new talent around Kobe and placate him. Certainly we've all heard about the possibility of Jermaine O'Neal and/or other players joining Bryant in L.A.

But if that doesn't happen, I wouldn't be surprised if Kobe pipes up publicly again, this time demanding -- not requesting -- a trade.

And if that happens, I think he'll end up in Chicago or New York.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
6/16/2007  9:15 PM
Posted by bitty41:



Huh?
What exactly is your point but to answer your question yes a bunch of picks in this draft are more valuable than Balkman, Frye, and Lee.



The 21st and 30th picks are better then Lee, Frye and Balkman.......... that's pretty much all I need to know about your mind set....

[Edited by - anji on 06-16-2007 9:16 PM]
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/16/2007  9:21 PM
No matter how many times you go over the scenarios, it's a VERY likley chance that IF Buss has had it with Kobe, then NY has a real good shot. We don't have the sexy players, but that actually works in our favor, cuz we wouldn't be giving up any players that we can't win without. Chicago IMO won't want to completely shake up their roster like that and then still possibly be short a player or 2, necessary to make it all work.

The other thing is what can LA actually do to make Kobe happy? Would JO be enough to satisfy him and get that team over the hump against the Suns, Mavs and Spurs? I don't think so, since the Pacers are gonna want back some good young talent too. Possibly Bynum, Odom and a guard. It would seem that like other teams in the same situation, they don't have many real options to improve the team with Kobe. They'll have a better chance by using Kobe to get a lot of young talent and starting over. Get the picks from NY, lose big and draft high.
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

6/16/2007  9:42 PM
Posted by Anji:
Posted by bitty41:



Huh?
What exactly is your point but to answer your question yes a bunch of picks in this draft are more valuable than Balkman, Frye, and Lee.


The 21st and 30th picks are better then Lee, Frye and Balkman.......... that's pretty much all I need to know about your mind set....

[Edited by - anji on 06-16-2007 9:16 PM]

Okay you didn't understand my point I was referring to if we still owned our 9th pick and other picks they could be more valuable than Lee, Balkman, and Frye. But moreso I was speaking relative to what Philly did not what NY currently has.


[Edited by - bitty41 on 06-16-2007 9:43 PM]

[Edited by - bitty41 on 06-16-2007 9:44 PM]
nyk4ever
Posts: 41012
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/17/2007  12:59 AM
Kobe is officially on the block and his wishlist is the Bulls and Knicks. Isiah needs to do EVERYTHING and I mean EVERYTHING in his power to get Kobe, no matter what it takes. The trade Briggs mentions earlier in this thread should do it and then Isiah can use some vets with the MLE and I think you got something. Isiah, GET KOBE HERE.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
6/17/2007  2:21 AM
It's too bad Isiah was too busy Starphucking all this time when he could have been collecting lottery picks since 2004. Maybe then we'd actually have players that other teams wanted to trade for.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
6/17/2007  2:48 AM
Posted by islesfan:

It's too bad Isiah was too busy Starphucking all this time when he could have been collecting lottery picks since 2004. Maybe then we'd actually have players that other teams wanted to trade for.
Or we'd be a team like the bobcats that no one would want to come to.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/17/2007  4:56 AM
Posted by Caseloads:
Posted by islesfan:

It's too bad Isiah was too busy Starphucking all this time when he could have been collecting lottery picks since 2004. Maybe then we'd actually have players that other teams wanted to trade for.
Or we'd be a team like the bobcats that no one would want to come to.

EXACTLY! You know there's always this revisionist attitudes about what Isiah has done and yet we're still in a position to make something happen. If you've been sticking to the draft and only have youth, you don't really have anything BUT your best young studs and if you give them up then you don't really have much to win with. In our case we can absorb the loss and we STILL have enough talent to field a good team. We can add some MLE pickup and we'd be ready for war. We have assets and even if they aren't all great the fact that we are in NY, have money, don't mind giving up some young players, picks and maybe some cash, all makes our position stronger.

It's gonna be interesting to see how this all plays out. Kobe stands to make more money if he moves, due to the trade kicker and if he comes to NY i'm SURE that other revenue streams will open up for him instantly. It's the best move for him and his career. LA can't do anything for him anymore. Buss should really consider a trade to NY. We are on the East Coast so he won't have to deal with Kobe against his team, but once a year. You know we'll give up a lot of young talent and picks to get Kobe. Kobe would accept a trade here. He's not gonna get a better situation than that. You know Isiah's not gonna play hardball with him.
Best deal for Kobe we can give up?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy