[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

JO Wants to Be A Knick?
Author Thread
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
5/8/2007  9:34 AM
I know KG is on another level than O'Neil, that is why KG makes more sense for the KNicks if they are building around Curry. For some reason I see O'Neil as more of a center than a pf. And KG make everyone better so you will most likely see Curry continue to improve with KG rather than JO. What the Knicks need is a pf that can score rebound and pass.
AUTOADVERT
TheGame
Posts: 26657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
5/8/2007  10:10 AM
Posted by Vmart:

I know KG is on another level than O'Neil, that is why KG makes more sense for the KNicks if they are building around Curry. For some reason I see O'Neil as more of a center than a pf. And KG make everyone better so you will most likely see Curry continue to improve with KG rather than JO. What the Knicks need is a pf that can score rebound and pass.


I agree that KG is better, but he is also 3 years older. You have to factor that into the equation too. I would be happy with either one though as long as we don't give up too much. We have a nice core of young players that just need to develop their games. I don't want IT giving away all our youth and draft picks for a 31 year old KG or O' Neal.

Trust the Process
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
5/8/2007  11:12 AM
Posted by BigSm00th:
TrueBlue
Posts: 2875
Joined: 09-21-2006
Member: #1166

05-08-2007 03:45 AM Show Profile Reply with Quote Pacers will not be taking back Francis in any deal and they for surely will make ISAYUGH bend over on any potential trade. If it were to happen just be prepared for the inevitable unprotected Lottery Picks being given away. The Pacers have all the leverage at this point, they really don't need to trade J.O.


The Pacers have no leverage if JO demands a trade. Thats absurd. to say that "jo is under contract", um, do you guys follow the NBA or just spend your time on knicks message boards bashing isiah thomas? if players demnad trades they get traded. if said player demands a trade to NY, there's really nothing they can do about it.

plus i love the speculation killing by the goon squad of pecimissim, IE true blue (yea right is this an attempt at irony) and isles fan saying 'its sam smith, its just a rumor, IT's gonna get bent over backwards and give up a million draft picks, i hate the knicks, blah blah blah' when this is probably the 5th time i've seen a link saying JO might get moved, JO wants to play in NY with isiah.

if JO demands a trade to NY, bird cant call up Isiah and demand a bevy of draft picks and such, isiah will just hang up and say 'enjoy having a $20 million malcontent sitting out'.

exactly, and it is the very reason when Ewing asked for his freedom, we got bent over for the likes of eisley, anderson and Luc longley... Now Oneal is a younger player but what is Indy going to do? JO already feels he was duped by Bird when he made it seem like Isiah was staying and when JO resigned he canned Isiah. Pay back is a mutha!
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
5/8/2007  11:20 AM
When did KG enter the equation? If anything he's going to LA. JO is the guy with Isiah connections and the trade demands after how poorly that team destruced last season.

VMART the Knicks need a PF that can score and pass? I mean are ppl forgetting we're talking about Jermaine O'Neal, the dudes averaged 20/10/2 for like half a decade. It boggles my mind how some of you would not attempt a trade for a 5x all star that isnt giving up lee, balkman, or collins. for francis, jeffries, and frye!?!?!? for jermaine o'neal? where do i sign up? yea he's had injury problem but with all of the forwards this team has he could easily have to play only 30 minutes a night and not wear down. you see this guy trudging up and down the court this year? plays hard man, dont see why you wouldnt want him.
#Knickstaps
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/8/2007  11:41 AM
Posted by BigSm00th:

When did KG enter the equation? If anything he's going to LA. JO is the guy with Isiah connections and the trade demands after how poorly that team destruced last season.

VMART the Knicks need a PF that can score and pass? I mean are ppl forgetting we're talking about Jermaine O'Neal, the dudes averaged 20/10/2 for like half a decade. It boggles my mind how some of you would not attempt a trade for a 5x all star that isnt giving up lee, balkman, or collins. for francis, jeffries, and frye!?!?!? for jermaine o'neal? where do i sign up? yea he's had injury problem but with all of the forwards this team has he could easily have to play only 30 minutes a night and not wear down. you see this guy trudging up and down the court this year? plays hard man, dont see why you wouldnt want him.

If we're talking about keeping our best young prospects you can't have any problem with the trade. I am in favor of standing pat if we're talking about moving Lee, but if we keep him, Balk and Collins, what woud be the problem? If we make the trade smaller, say Francis and Frye, plus a future pick, that might be something that Bird would go for. It works financially and gives them some value in the future from the pick.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
5/8/2007  11:57 AM
It all depends on what you give up. The core at this point seems to be Curry, Balkman, Collins. Not sure who else is definitely part of that long-term core. So does it really hurt us to go after one of these guys? Who on this roster would we give up that would destroy our future? Anyone? Anyone that valuable?

To me unless you get rid of 3 or 4 young guys and destroy any type of future development, I have no problem going after one of these guys.
I just hope that people will like me
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
5/8/2007  11:59 AM
Posted by Bippity10:

It all depends on what you give up. The core at this point seems to be Curry, Balkman, Collins. Not sure who else is definitely part of that long-term core. So does it really hurt us to go after one of these guys? Who on this roster would we give up that would destroy our future? Anyone? Anyone that valuable?

To me unless you get rid of 3 or 4 young guys and destroy any type of future development, I have no problem going after one of these guys.

i think it's a bad decision to leave lee out of that core. he has a much better body of work than the rookies.
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
5/8/2007  12:05 PM
yea wtf why is lee not on that list he averaged 11 boards a game last yr.

if the deal is frye and then mixing and matching some contracts, whether its just frye and francis (the string of 4-straight 20+ pt games at the end of the season gives this deal hope), whether its frye, jeffries (the indiana thing has some legs to it, him going to school there and them needing to cater to their fans; we saw this with their trading jackson/harrington for two white dudes clearly inferior and to please their white fan base, im sure their fan base would also love to see jeffries come home), and francis and a #1 for JO and foster, i think you can get him without touching anything indispensable.
#Knickstaps
Nalod
Posts: 72408
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/8/2007  12:12 PM
With Ike and Murphy Indy has two bangers at forward. They don't need Dlee.

Plus with Dunlevy and Murphy what would make 3 white dudes on the team.
They could use a finese player like Frye.

They can take francis if we take a bad contract in return. This way we subsidize the deal for them.

If we get J.O. can we make fun of his ears or is that not cool?
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
5/8/2007  12:21 PM
Posted by Nalod:

With Ike and Murphy Indy has two bangers at forward. They don't need Dlee.

Plus with Dunlevy and Murphy what would make 3 white dudes on the team.
They could use a finese player like Frye.

They can take francis if we take a bad contract in return. This way we subsidize the deal for them.

If we get J.O. can we make fun of his ears or is that not cool?
Pacers Line-up next year

Steve Blake
Mike Dunleavy
Troy Murphy
David Lee
Jeff Foster

Coach : Larry Brown



islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
5/8/2007  12:27 PM
Posted by BigSm00th:
TrueBlue
Posts: 2875
Joined: 09-21-2006
Member: #1166

05-08-2007 03:45 AM Show Profile Reply with Quote Pacers will not be taking back Francis in any deal and they for surely will make ISAYUGH bend over on any potential trade. If it were to happen just be prepared for the inevitable unprotected Lottery Picks being given away. The Pacers have all the leverage at this point, they really don't need to trade J.O.


The Pacers have no leverage if JO demands a trade. Thats absurd. to say that "jo is under contract", um, do you guys follow the NBA or just spend your time on knicks message boards bashing isiah thomas? if players demnad trades they get traded. if said player demands a trade to NY, there's really nothing they can do about it.

plus i love the speculation killing by the goon squad of pecimissim, IE true blue (yea right is this an attempt at irony) and isles fan saying 'its sam smith, its just a rumor, IT's gonna get bent over backwards and give up a million draft picks, i hate the knicks, blah blah blah' when this is probably the 5th time i've seen a link saying JO might get moved, JO wants to play in NY with isiah.

if JO demands a trade to NY, bird cant call up Isiah and demand a bevy of draft picks and such, isiah will just hang up and say 'enjoy having a $20 million malcontent sitting out'.

You mean the way the Phoenix Suns had no leverage and were stuck with a $20 million malcontent but Isiah happily bent over for a player he desperately wanted to make a big splash?

You mean the way the Orlando Magic had no leverage and were stuck with a $20 million malcontent but Isiah bent over anyway?

You mean the way the Toronto Raptors had no leverage and were stuck with a $15 million malcontent but Isiah bent over anyway?

You mean the way the Chicago Bulls had no leverage and were stuck with a $10 million out of shape center with a heart ailment but Isiah gladly bent over anyway?

You're right, Isiah would never get taken like that.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
5/8/2007  12:38 PM
Posted by BigSm00th:

yea wtf why is lee not on that list he averaged 11 boards a game last yr.

if the deal is frye and then mixing and matching some contracts, whether its just frye and francis (the string of 4-straight 20+ pt games at the end of the season gives this deal hope), whether its frye, jeffries (the indiana thing has some legs to it, him going to school there and them needing to cater to their fans; we saw this with their trading jackson/harrington for two white dudes clearly inferior and to please their white fan base, im sure their fan base would also love to see jeffries come home), and francis and a #1 for JO and foster, i think you can get him without touching anything indispensable.


I would include him in my core. But I think Isiah would trade him in an instant. I was trying to include the guys that are young AND DEFINITELY NOT GETTING TRADED.
I just hope that people will like me
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/8/2007  12:41 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by BigSm00th:
TrueBlue
Posts: 2875
Joined: 09-21-2006
Member: #1166

05-08-2007 03:45 AM Show Profile Reply with Quote Pacers will not be taking back Francis in any deal and they for surely will make ISAYUGH bend over on any potential trade. If it were to happen just be prepared for the inevitable unprotected Lottery Picks being given away. The Pacers have all the leverage at this point, they really don't need to trade J.O.


The Pacers have no leverage if JO demands a trade. Thats absurd. to say that "jo is under contract", um, do you guys follow the NBA or just spend your time on knicks message boards bashing isiah thomas? if players demnad trades they get traded. if said player demands a trade to NY, there's really nothing they can do about it.

plus i love the speculation killing by the goon squad of pecimissim, IE true blue (yea right is this an attempt at irony) and isles fan saying 'its sam smith, its just a rumor, IT's gonna get bent over backwards and give up a million draft picks, i hate the knicks, blah blah blah' when this is probably the 5th time i've seen a link saying JO might get moved, JO wants to play in NY with isiah.

if JO demands a trade to NY, bird cant call up Isiah and demand a bevy of draft picks and such, isiah will just hang up and say 'enjoy having a $20 million malcontent sitting out'.

You mean the way the Phoenix Suns had no leverage and were stuck with a $20 million malcontent but Isiah happily bent over for a player he desperately wanted to make a big splash?

You mean the way the Orlando Magic had no leverage and were stuck with a $20 million malcontent but Isiah bent over anyway?

You mean the way the Toronto Raptors had no leverage and were stuck with a $15 million malcontent but Isiah bent over anyway?

You mean the way the Chicago Bulls had no leverage and were stuck with a $10 million out of shape center with a heart ailment but Isiah gladly bent over anyway?

You're right, Isiah would never get taken like that.

May I add where is Corey Magette playing currently? Oh that's right in Clipper Land after he's demanded to be traded the past 2 seasons. How has it worked out so far for Pau Gasol, who currently has stated the Grizzlies won't trade him?

The Pacers have absolutely nothing to fret over if J.O. truly demands a trade. They'll either get the value they need or he'll remain and change his tune. You make it sound like "uh oh J.O. wants out" Pacers can now only deal for Steve Bumchise LOL!

Oh and can you please site the 5 different references that actually come from Jermaine O'neal that says he wants to play here? And it's not earth shattering, most players want to play at the Mecca of basketball but nowadays the only way that happens is if we bend over.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
5/8/2007  12:52 PM
Correction: The Suns had about $40 million in malcontents with Marbury and Penny when Isiah bent over.

Who do people think has the leverage here?

The Knicks? Bird can trade JO anywhere and will have other suitors besides the Knicks.

JO? He has a little thing called a contract. If he sits he doesn't get a penny of that money. If he tanks, he lowers his price on a future contract and the Pacers can stick it to him by trading him to the Hawks. Then if he really wanted to go to the Knicks it would have to be as a free agent and he'd have to take the MLE which will NEVER happen.

The Pacers? They have a signed contract that keeps JO there for the next 3 years. They don't have to do a damn thing with him if they don't think it's worth it.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
RemBee76
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #89
USA
5/8/2007  12:53 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

I would include him in my core. But I think Isiah would trade him in an instant.

I agree, I'm a fan of Lee, so he is on my personal core.

But Isiah may believe that Balkman can bring everything Lee brings + better defense. And he might be right.

Say he is...how much sense does it make to have two pf-sf tweeners on your core bringing largely the same skill-set? How much sense does it make when one of them has (presumably) accrued quite a bit of trade value and may be used to acquire a far more useful piece, such as a shot-blocker or a jump-shooter?

I'm not in favor of trading Lee for a high risk older player who may not slide in easily to the burgeoning system we have in place. The risk that it not work out is just too high, and Lee will be out there producing for another team. But if the risk/reward is right, Lee isn't untouchable.
Its like a groupie website, or bitter ex-wives club. -Sebstar
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

5/8/2007  1:15 PM
Posted by RemBee76:
Posted by Bippity10:

I would include him in my core. But I think Isiah would trade him in an instant.

I agree, I'm a fan of Lee, so he is on my personal core.

But Isiah may believe that Balkman can bring everything Lee brings + better defense. And he might be right.

Say he is...how much sense does it make to have two pf-sf tweeners on your core bringing largely the same skill-set? How much sense does it make when one of them has (presumably) accrued quite a bit of trade value and may be used to acquire a far more useful piece, such as a shot-blocker or a jump-shooter?

I'm not in favor of trading Lee for a high risk older player who may not slide in easily to the burgeoning system we have in place. The risk that it not work out is just too high, and Lee will be out there producing for another team. But if the risk/reward is right, Lee isn't untouchable.

Good post
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
5/8/2007  1:19 PM
isles, true blue, my entire post was concluded with "if JO demands a trade to NY." i think you missed that.

how did the suns bend over the knicks for marbury? we gave them a bunch of trash and expiring contracts and got the piece isiah wanted to build with in marbury. what, you guys still upset about milos vujanic and maciej? gimme a break.

i think enough have been talked about re: the magic and that deal. what, we gave up an expiring contract which larry brown apparently wanted yadda yadda yadda, what'd we lose? penny, who retired, and ariza, who has been supplanted by balkman and lee. and now if francis yields JO, you still gonna be bitching?

the raptors trade was stupid.

the bulls trade he got bent over. he also got bent over by the agents of jerome james and jared jeffries.

that's a .500 track record to me. most of his moves are misguided (francis) and/or don't help the team (rose). to me, this is neither.
#Knickstaps
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/8/2007  1:20 PM
Posted by islesfan:

Correction: The Suns had about $40 million in malcontents with Marbury and Penny when Isiah bent over.

Who do people think has the leverage here?

The Knicks? Bird can trade JO anywhere and will have other suitors besides the Knicks.

JO? He has a little thing called a contract. If he sits he doesn't get a penny of that money. If he tanks, he lowers his price on a future contract and the Pacers can stick it to him by trading him to the Hawks. Then if he really wanted to go to the Knicks it would have to be as a free agent and he'd have to take the MLE which will NEVER happen.

The Pacers? They have a signed contract that keeps JO there for the next 3 years. They don't have to do a damn thing with him if they don't think it's worth it.


Isles after a few seasons from you and just 1 from me, so far we still have to dumb things down. The parts I bolded are classic elementary things. In regards to the tanking as I was saying he would also help their lottery positioning next yr. I feel the Pacers think with him on the team they can challenge only if they make the necessary changes and they'll keep him informed. If he were to come here Bird will do his best to either decimate this roster or it's future in exchange for him or they won't deal with us at all. It's just that simple. Remember in ISAYUGH eyes Bird is just a glorified overrated white guy.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/8/2007  1:24 PM
Posted by BigSm00th:

isles, true blue, my entire post was concluded with "if JO demands a trade to NY." i think you missed that.

how did the suns bend over the knicks for marbury? we gave them a bunch of trash and expiring contracts and got the piece isiah wanted to build with in marbury. what, you guys still upset about milos vujanic and maciej? gimme a break.


i think enough have been talked about re: the magic and that deal. what, we gave up an expiring contract which larry brown apparently wanted yadda yadda yadda, what'd we lose? penny, who retired, and ariza, who has been supplanted by balkman and lee. and now if francis yields JO, you still gonna be bitching?

the raptors trade was stupid.

the bulls trade he got bent over. he also got bent over by the agents of jerome james and jared jeffries.

that's a .500 track record to me. most of his moves are misguided (francis) and/or don't help the team (rose). to me, this is neither.



Dude they also traded away 2 lottery picks, while acquiring Penny's ugly contract only to have that dealt away to Orlando along with Ariza for Steve Francis who we almost bought out this yr and still may this summer LOL!

Dude how is Francis going to yeild J.O. when his market value has been set and declined since trading for him. Francis was traded for Penny who was on his last leg and Ariza...... value set. Then while on the Knicks he was almost bought out and exiled from the team during the season..... value almost totally shot. There's no conceivable way he gets this team J.O., not to mention he's not even an expiring contract.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 05-08-2007 12:32 PM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
5/8/2007  1:33 PM
Posted by BigSm00th:

how did the suns bend over the knicks for marbury? we gave them a bunch of trash and expiring contracts and got the piece isiah wanted to build with in marbury. what, you guys still upset about milos vujanic and maciej? gimme a break.

the key was dumping penny's deal in the process (just like the bulls dumped jyd's in the process for crawford). the cap space we provided phoenix allowed them to make a run at kobe + manu, who both turned them down, then went after nash and q.

if we don't take penny, then the suns probably don't make the deal. so did taking penny back hurt the knicks? no, b/c we were going to be way over the cap anyway. but the suns sure as hell got exactly what they wanted while the benefits yielded on our end were 2 extra home playoff games in 2004.

JO Wants to Be A Knick?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy