Posted by bobs3304:
^ No you don't and i have no idea what you're talking about.
Turnovers are turnovers.
What about Yao's?
Seriously...
Yes I do. I've never liked Marbs or Crawfords games.
I thought your point was the Knicks weren't getting him the ball enough. In which case turnovers matter. If he gets the ball and tries to get a shot off 16 times a game but turns it over 4 of those times - then the knicks still got him the ball 16 times.
Turnovers like any stats is not independent of other stats. That's why people pay attention to things like assist to TO ratios. It also depends on how often you have the ball - Curry isn't getting the ball enough and he still manages to turn it over 3.6 times a game.
I wasn't comparing him to Yao but if you want to make the comparison at this point Yao is much better. Yao along with being a better defender and rebounder is also a better offensive player and he manages to get off 5 more shots a game (more touches) with less turnovers.
Responding to your other posts. Curry is not dominant. Everything he gives you in shooting percentage he gives back in TOs, lack of rebounding and lack of defense. Curry is a guy who can score and has potential - but far, far from dominant.