The Hawks have those sexy Forwards, but as far as a team is concerned it's a strange group. If they had taken C. Paul , they would immediately improve. I generally like the talent they have and why shouldn't they have a lot of talent, with how bad they've been?

In comparison I think the Knicks have a lot of young talent too. Perhaps not as glitzy as the Hawks young players, in terms of upside, but in terms of how our young players perform, they do a very good job. We have more power guys, with Curry, Frye, Lee, Balkman and now Morris.
They have those stud Forwards who are so athletic. We have better young guards in Mardy and Nate.

The problem I have with just listing the talent and making a determination as to who's better is that's not what wins games. The Knicks actually make more sense right now than the Hawks. We're just looking to improve a couple of positions, but we have good Young players at pretty much every position. I believe the Hawks will FINALLY get their PG this year. If they blow this then there's no hope for them. I believe that Isiah should be able to find a player that will help us with one of our needs. I don't expect our positions to change much, I think we'll still be ahead of the Hawks.

Your on drugs if you would rather have our roster than theirs. Smith is better than any player on the knicks right now and that includes curry.

Johnson is better than guard on this team, childress is upcoming and showed tremendous growth this year. They have cap room and could easily make one move or a trade and get a supremem talent back in return. Marvin Williams, Childress, Josh Smith all have good value on the open market.....

Balkman, Lee are really the only knicks that have that value......