You know what I mean! Guys that spend the majority of their time at Center. Also guys that really can't play as PF's. Any of those requirements. There are indeed more than 12 guys like that.
No, honestly I don't. It sounds like you're looking to exclude some centers in order to make Curry look better. Can you post a link showing where he's 10th in rebounding?
I've already mentioned his defense. While that's an important factor, it's not the only thing, so you can't keep him from qualifying as a Center we can build around just cuz he's deficient in that category.
The defensive end is half the game. Why do you want to only judge him on the offensive side? Even then he's only a 19 pt a game player while offering nothing else, in terms of a team's offense.
How many 19 pt centers, who are below average on defense and rebounding, would you consider to be Franchise players that their teams built around and won?
In terms of him scoring 19 per, that's not a small thing. He's VERY effficient and he's also drawing fouls. He's also warping the entire defense of the opponent. Once we get it together that will prove to be a BIG plus for this team. No team wants to give up easy baskets and that's pretty much what we'd get if they didn't send a lot of help. See you want this to seem like his offense is of little consequence, but it's NOT. We're not even that good at getting him the ball yet. Likewise he's not yet as good as I think he'll be at passing it back out. I believe we'll get there tho.
Warping the entire defense of the opponent? Are you on crack? Here's the opponents defensive strategy for every game: Double Curry and put a body on him every time he touches it and force him to turn it over, take a tough shot, make a bad pass or committ an offensive foul. This has been going on for awhile now and Curry has yet to figure it out. You call it warped, others would call it smart and successful basketball.
You want to talk about easy baskets? With Curry at center, the Knicks give up more than twice as many easy baskets than Curry gets.
"I believe we'll get there tho"
that's your whole argument in a nutshell. You hope. Take an objective look at them and you would have no reason to.
[Edited by - islesfan on 04-09-2007 7:20 PM]
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System