Posted by Marv:
ah the predictability is blissful. earl with the passive-aggressive comment. presike with the faux intellectual follow-up. where o where is tomverve with the robotic statistic?
poor little lost boys of the times forum.
I guess that sums it up.
Was reading through the NY Times forums just because Andrew told me they were shutting it down and saw the discussion about UK.com and etc. Have to agree with DJ and think his perspective was spot on - we don't accept/reject readership and postership (there's the odd exception) and you do have to swim through some of the threads to get a good discussion and I personally do skip over some posts to get to the good stuff. I think that the NYTimes guys have had it lucky because of type of visitor that visits that newspaper's site: your next place will be neutral and once it hits a threshold of following, your collective posting will be diluted, trust me on that one.
Earl, you sure do march to your own beat and I do remember reading a bunch of your stuff and wondering how it added any value to the discussion. Never saw you post as an example to others and the way to a better debate/discussion but I have seen you bait some easy fish into the gutter with you. Thanks for that. I guess this goes for a few others too.