[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

i'm convinced Marbury cannot be a centerpiece for a brighter 2008 season
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/30/2007  4:55 PM
Posted by misterearl:

nixluva - well done on illustrating the yoot of the Knicks roster

Play Inside out

Hit the open man


you just don't get it dude... that's exactly the argument i'm presenting here... if we're building this thing around Curry, then playing inside out is the style of ball this team needs to implement... we can't have Marbury thinking he needs to take the weight on his shoulders & go away from the team concept to try & win games, because after 11 years in the league of failing to get his teams to where they want to be using that type of strategy, it's clear that he's incapable of elevating a team on his own no matter how well he's playing.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/30/2007  5:02 PM
Posted by codeunknown:

Upside isn't merely a function of age.

To be sure, but in most cases players usually get a little better as they move along from rookies and 2nd yr players. Just how much any one player improves is hard to predict. Still we have a group of guys that have NBA ability in at least one area and if just a few round out those skills they can become very good players for this team.

All I read is how we're so out of options to improve and when I look at the team I see so much young talent and more being added all the time. I don't get the idea that this team isn't just as full of promise as many of the other young teams out there. Counting our draft pick we'll have 11 players 27 yrs or younger. I would expect that we'll likely add someone else who is relatively young as well. We have a few key needs that I think will be filled this summer and then we'll take it from there.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/30/2007  5:26 PM
nix, i never said this team is out of options to improve... the whole premise behind this idea is to get this team in a better position TO improve... i just don't see any realistic improvement coming our way w/Marbury being 1 of the main pieces in the offense... i hope i'm wrong but based on the past 4 years of his tenure here, i don't think i am.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
3/30/2007  6:20 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by codeunknown:

Upside isn't merely a function of age.

To be sure, but in most cases players usually get a little better as they move along from rookies and 2nd yr players. Just how much any one player improves is hard to predict. Still we have a group of guys that have NBA ability in at least one area and if just a few round out those skills they can become very good players for this team.

All I read is how we're so out of options to improve and when I look at the team I see so much young talent and more being added all the time. I don't get the idea that this team isn't just as full of promise as many of the other young teams out there. Counting our draft pick we'll have 11 players 27 yrs or younger. I would expect that we'll likely add someone else who is relatively young as well. We have a few key needs that I think will be filled this summer and then we'll take it from there.


The NBDL is full of young players. And yet their entire upside is less than the Orlando Magic. Whether our count of young players comes to 11 or 12 is rather irrelevant to me. As you said, each of them has talent in one area. Unfortunately, we don't have the luxury of playing 8 players simultaneously to hide their collective deficiencies. Who out of our young players is likely to a all-star perimeter player? Who out of our young players can shoot the ball consistently? Who out of our young player can protect the lane? Do any of our young players have the capacity to contribute efficiently on both offense and defense?
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/30/2007  7:26 PM
Marbury ain't a cancer

TMS - hold up, if I'm forwarding the exact strategy for inside-out basktball that you are presenting then we don't have a problem so then what is the problem?

you need a hug or sumpthin'?

once a knick always a knick
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/2/2007  11:58 AM
i think it's been shown clearly over the last 2 games why i think Marbury can't be a centerpiece for this team if we want to build around Curry.

Marbury goes off & has the best game of his Knicks' career IMO vs. the best team in the NBA, & they still lose, while Curry struggles to find his game... then Curry goes off & has maybe the best game of his Knicks' career vs. the Hornets the next day, & they lose, while Marbury struggles to find his shot & is unable to effectively make an entry pass down low to feed Curry in the post all game long... Mardy Collins & Malik Rose were the only guys who could get the ball inside consistently... if the plan is to play inside out, then having Marbury here does not make much sense because he's a G who needs to play outside in if you want to take advantage of his skills as a ballplayer... making a trade for a KG or JO would make much more sense if you want to stick w/the Marbury experiment... if that's the case, give up Curry, Frye, filler contract(s) + draft pick & try to target 1 of those guys... sticking w/this current direction is not going to bring us a championship.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/2/2007  12:19 PM
I agree with TMS. If you are building around Marbs it's time to bring in a superstar and try to take advantage of Marbs last 3 good years(Well at least on the front end of back to backs). But if you are building around Curry than Marbs is nothing more than a piece that helps us to stay in the middle of the pack while we try to build. I prefer the idea of using all of our resources to put ourselves in position to get an up and coming star to put next to Curry 3 to 4 years from now.

Now this does not mean cut Marbs or not play him. It means that when y ou make offseason moves you don't make them based on Marbs. You basically ignore Marbs' presence on the team when making offseason moves and focus on Curry.
I just hope that people will like me
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
4/2/2007  1:54 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

I agree with TMS. If you are building around Marbs it's time to bring in a superstar and try to take advantage of Marbs last 3 good years(Well at least on the front end of back to backs). But if you are building around Curry than Marbs is nothing more than a piece that helps us to stay in the middle of the pack while we try to build. I prefer the idea of using all of our resources to put ourselves in position to get an up and coming star to put next to Curry 3 to 4 years from now.

Now this does not mean cut Marbs or not play him. It means that when y ou make offseason moves you don't make them based on Marbs. You basically ignore Marbs' presence on the team when making offseason moves and focus on Curry.

Great post. An occasional 40 point outburst doesn't add years to his career as some seem to imagine.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/2/2007  2:20 PM
Posted by TMS:

earl, re-read my first post in this thread... i outlined what i think the direction should be for next season... there is no "ideal" scenario because this team has too many holes to fill at this point... what i'm looking for is building towards an identity, commit to a certain direction... if the plan is to build around Curry, then we need to bring in the players who complement his game, as i noted in the first post... if the plan is to build around Marbury, then we need to go the opposite route & forego the whole youth idea, because Marbury needs another stud allstar player at his side if he's ever going to make a serious run in the postseason... right now, this team has no direction, no identity & no definable style of play... that's not an ideal situation to groom a bright future for any franchise.


Bippity????
I just hope that people will like me
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
4/2/2007  4:05 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

03/04 - 47 games, 25-22
04/05 - 82 games, 33-49
05/06 - 60 games, 18-42
06/07 - 68 games, 30-38

total: 257 games, 106-151 for a 0.412 winning %

i'll do marbury fans a solid and subtract off the larry brown season
he's 88-109 for a 0.446 winning %

that was prior to the orlando game (i think).

[Edited by - djsunyc on 03-30-2007 11:48 AM]

and we still owe Phoenix a pick that is steadily losing protection
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
i'm convinced Marbury cannot be a centerpiece for a brighter 2008 season

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy