You could argue Iverson is just as "needy".
How? I've never heard people say Iverson needs specific PFs and Cs to compensate for all his flaws. Maybe he needs ones who are willing to sacrifice some shots, but that's hardly the same as Curry needing a PF who does everything on defense because he does nothing. (I wouldn't build a team around Iverson, anyway, but that's a separate issue.)
Curry is a good player, brings alot to the table
No, he brings ONE thing to the table (excellent low post scoring) at the cost of being poor at everything else.