| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
Anji
Posts: 25523 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 4/14/2006 Member: #1122 USA |
http://videosearch2.nba.com/search/?sp_a=sp10038c44&sp_t=video&sp_q=nbacom/&sp_n=10&sp_s=postdate&sp_k=wmvasf
You can watch it again, he jumped first, but his hands went lateral, and Ciffys hands went Vertical. THat was a bad play by eddy because he jumped away from the ball instead of going after it, I think because he didn't knowwhere ciffy was and he didn't read the ball well. Not because he didn't jumpor where ya'll talking about now. Man he should have gotten that board This will be worth it if it makes CUrry a better rebounder. "Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
|
|
islesfan
Posts: 9999 Alba Posts: 37 Joined: 7/19/2004 Member: #712 |
Posted by Anji: What makes you think this time will be different from the other thousand times that Eddy has misplayed a board? If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
|
|
TheGame
Posts: 26656 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/15/2006 Member: #1154 USA |
Posted by Anji: Eddy made a mistake and did not go after the rebound hard enough. The main problem is that he did not have an awareness of the man behind him. That is where I think he really loses alot of rebounds. It is not that he is not trying to grab the rebound. It is that he is trying to grab it without an awareness of who else is trying to grab the board. He will never be an elite rebounder, but I think he has improved and can continue to improve. There have been some games where I have seen him really fight for and get some tough rebounds, so I know he has the ability. Trust the Process
|
|
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973 Alba Posts: 19 Joined: 7/16/2002 Member: #290 USA |
Posted by Marv: Probability theory? "The probability that an event A occurs given the known occurrence of an event B is the conditional probability of A given B; its numerical value is (as long as P(B) is nonzero). If the conditional probability of A given B is the same as the ("unconditional") probability of A, then A and B are said to be independent events. That this relation between A and B is symmetric may be seen more readily by realizing that it is the same as saying when A and B are independent events."[Edited by - basketballjones on 01-20-2007 16:17] https://
It's not so hard.
|