Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by Rich:
Posted by martin:
Posted by Rich:
Posted by islesfan:
I think 95 games is a good sample size.
82 of those games were played under Larry, who destoyed the confidence of even the hard working kids like Nate, Lee, and Frye.
Nothing can excuse that.
I don't remember any confidence being broken.
Really? Frye, for example, was shooting the lights out of the basket until Larry broke him down.
Lee started, the team did well, and then was benched. He later said it confused him, which couldn't have aided his development.
Nate was jerked around too.
does starting frye games and then benching him during 2nd half's count as being "jerked around?"
how about balkman's minutes? 6, 3, 21, 19, 12, 5, 5 - those are his minutes over the past 7 games. that could constitute being "jerked" around also, no?
and lee has yet to start when he's CLEARLY outplaying the #8 pick and the 2 #1's/$60 mil superstar in front of him.
but it's all good tho...the most important thing is that isiah has only used 2 lineups.
DJ, there is a difference in benching Frye and Lee now versus then. Then Frye and Lee were some of our best players at the time. Where as Frye was benched in one game (the SA game...I wasn't aware of another?) he and the rest of the starters gave SA a 20 point lead at MSG and then the bench brought the Knicks back in the game before the half. That's a TOTALLY different situation than last year where it was more game to game...the same for Lee.
As for Lee this year, you can make an argument that he should start, no question, and Balkman's minutes are also worth questioning. I think it is fair to say that this is an area Isiah has possibly not done what is right, although I somewhat understand his hesitancy to make too dramatic of a change, despite the ability to construct arguments against those decisions.
Coaching isn't all about benching guys as soon as they start struggling because that can have a negative effect on the team, and how a player feels playing under a coach. Management is tricky when you have players who you think have potential, have shown it, yet can't attain consistency, especially when they are young. The basic problem is that very few are stepping it up, and some who we are depending up to contribute aren't thus far.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...