Posted by martin:
5. Violating terms of contract: Going over Thomas' head to propose trades
When Brown was hired, he (as well as the media) was told he would have a large impact on personnel decisions. Which makes me wonder why he would do something as blatant as calling up teams and making offers over Thomas' head, which would be grounds for immediate dismissal if the team wanted (and also would have made Stern's ruling an open-and-shut case). If Brown was reduced to throwing out his own trades, I would imagine that it would mean that Zeke was not giving him that promised input, which could be a mitigating circumstance. Maybe he was trying to submarine certain moves that he didn't like, or maybe he was trying to prove to Zeke that the moves could be made. It doesn't make it right, but if Brown was given the input he was promised, he wouldn't have done it.
Verdict: Mitigating circumstances
I pretty much agree with the article. but this point is crazy to me and I don't agree with it at all. First we can't assume he wasn't given the input that was promised because there is every indication that he was. LB said so himself publicly on a many occasions, the most public of which was his 'juice card' which he flexed on Marbury. Both he and Marbs confirmed this in the media.
I believe Brown would have done it, because I believe his ultimate goal was to become GM, and all of his actions were consistant with that.