Posted by Bippity10:
turnovers
Stephon Marbury career 3.15 last year 2.62(lowest in career)
Stevie Francis career 3.67 last year 3.06
Quentin Richardsoncareer 1.27 last year 1.02
Mo Taylor career 1.85 last year 1.54
Malik rose career 1.39 last year 1.11
Eddie Curry career 2.01 last year 2.49
Jamal Crawford career 1.95 last year 2.22
Jalen Rose career 1.60 last year 1.92
For the Group Career 16.89 last year 15.98(this group actually committed less turnovers than their career averages)
Five of our top 8 actually had a good year in terms of turnovers when you compare it to the rest of their carers. Stephon Marbury had a career best for turnovers. Stevie Francis cut his turnovers down significantly which followed a trend from the year before LB. Eddie Curry's jumped up from his career average but was actually lower than the season before in a Chicago uniform where he averaged 2.59 turnovers. Pretty much everyone else was right in line with their career averages with no significant dropoffs or rise in turnovers. Add in Frye, Lee and Robinson(rookies) and QWoods(like a rookie) and you have a team that did what it was supposed to do.
Now I know most people hate LB so much they have to blame him for everything. And anything that contradicts this opinion must mean that you want to bear his children. But reality is reality. We had a turnover prone team, added some rookies, slapped them together in a short period of time and then expected a coach to somehow magically make it all work in one year. In NY we blame the coach because that's easy. But the true evidence doesn't lie. If we want to lower the turnovers it will take the players taking it upon themselves just like in eveyr other sport to respect the ball, the game and understand the importance of not turning it over. The guys I mentioned above have 5-12 years experience. You can't blame these career numbers on LB. It's the players. They need to fix it. Excuses are over!!!!!!!!!
[Edited by - bippity10 on 09-12-2006 4:23 PM]
[Edited by - bippity10 on 09-12-2006 4:24 PM]
[Edited by - bippity10 on 09-12-2006 4:29 PM]
There is a lot wrong with your use of stats!
First off, if I were to make a comparison of turnovers, I would go by turnovers per minute- that might expose some real differences and players that look better (Malik Rose) under LB, might actually be worse, and conversely, a player like Crawford might actually have been as effective or better with the ball.
The other point you fail to take up is LB's RECORD setting use of different lineups. How can you factor that in? Obviously, the stats aren't at hand for something like measuring how many minutes each player played with the same guys vs prior years in league, but I have a feeling that the lack of a rotation had a big factor in turnovers.
Granted, we've got some bad passers on the team- it always seems to have been a problem since I have been a mature fan (Ewing on).
But, if you could do an experiment and replay the season with a more normal rotation, I bet you have 1-2 less turnovers per game-