[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Is this more financial overkill?
Author Thread
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
7/31/2006  6:46 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

[quote]
Posted by Anji:


----> BUt the knicks will never be under the cap, because they are not willing to stink for three four years.



where have you been the last 5 years? we've stunk! average # of wins over 5 years=32.5! understand why some people have been hard and skeptical! its not like we trashed it and went for picks and lost weve TRIED to win and have always been #1 in payroll and still have lost quite badly! so at some point we get guys like trveor butler little nice young bit and pieces guys who cost nothing, yet were still out there OVERPAYING for either has been or overvalued players!

I'm not staying they haven't stunk, which is why the knicks ownership is hard to take. THey don't want to go into a season with zero chance of winning. And even though they haven't won and still made money, Knicks ownership still is unwilling to blow a season or three off in advance. I'm not saying it's right, but it is what they have been doing for a decade now.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/31/2006  7:22 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by crzymdups:

the thing the Knicks need to do is build a team that compliments one another. all we heard is that this team had too many guys who needed the ball to be effective, etc. Jefferies does not need the ball to be effective and fits into the running team this roster is molding into. he plays defense as well. will he mesh with the other guys? that's always impossible to tell until you see it on the court, but this team has plenty of offensive talent, it needs glue guys who make the team concept work. I'm not against this move at all.

but I do think Washington is matching this offer.
I agree. Jeffries doesnt need the ball to be productive. He would be a good fit. I doubt Washington matches. My only real fear is everything Isiah does usually sucks, so I'm wondering whats going to be wrong with Jeffries.

Its always a good laugh when people compare Isiah's moves to things the Yankees do. Thanks for that
What's the laugh? I bet Isiah could do as well (.550ish winning %, 0 championships) as Cashman's done over the past 5 years with no salary rules.

That's great. However, he's shown an INABILITY to adjust the salary cap rules that exist in the sport he's GMing for. But it's nice to know he'd be a good baseball GM. Maybe he should go try that.

(P.S.: I like the Jeffries signing overall, for the record)
It was more a comment on how awful Cashman has been over the past five years given salary rules and all the money he has than praise for Isiah. Cashman's made a couple of nice moves over the past few days, though. Maybe he'll turn it around. I can only hope!

fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/31/2006  7:45 PM
Cashman's been awfull?

He just got Abreu and a quality 4th starter for nothing. On top of it he got the Phili's to pay his $13mm option, so the Yanks get him for 2 years after this one at $7.5 per year.

He got ARod, one of the top 3 most productive players in baseball and got Texas to pay $60mm of his contract. Yankees are paying ARod less than Jeter and Giambi

I could go on and on with this but it obvious you know ZERO about Cashman has or hasnt done. Part of the reason the Yanks can afford to add a couple guys like Abreu and Liddle are because Cashman is such a good GM and ensures he gets the BEST DEAL POSSIBLE.

If Isiah traded for ARod he would have included Hughes, Cox, Duncan and 5 first round picks, but you probably dont know who those guys are either.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/31/2006  8:10 PM
Please. No smart person given $200 mil would have started the season with the pitching staff Cashman did. It's amazing how poor the results he's gotten over the past 5 years are considering he had all the money and salary freedom anyone could dream of. One good deal (the Abreu one) doesn't erase five years.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/31/2006  8:17 PM
OK Bonn
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/31/2006  8:18 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

OK Bonn

If you had $200 mil, would you put together a team with only three good pitchers out of the starting staff and bullpen *combined*? I mean, there are teams with one-fourth the budget that do better than that. I can't believe how many Yankee fans settled for mediocrity over the past five years. It's obvious Cashman's and Steinbrenner's ideal team is 9 all-star hitters and mediocre pitching and mediocre fielding.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07-31-2006 8:24 PM]
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/31/2006  8:26 PM
Bonn, you know I've been down on the pitching staff and I'm sure you know I can't stand that Randy JOhnston extension. However, you have to consider the most important things. Through all these trades, we still have a big time pipeline in Cano, Melky, Hughes, possibly Duncan plus all these nice veterans to mix them with. The bullpen is improving with Proctor and Farnsworth.

He made a good trade for Vasqez way back for a first baseman in Nick JOhnson who didn't have much of a future here b/c of Giambi. It's not Cashmans fault that Javiez pulled a Kenny Rogers and couldn't pitch here. And it's definitely not his fault that Pavano became this injury prone. And it's also not his fault that Dotel couldn't get off the DL. He was really supposed to stock up out BP.

And again I state, Cashman has been everything that I have been preaching for with the minor leaguers and seems to have convinced Steinbrenner to go with this. Patience Patience Patience. Supposedly we were supposed to give up Scott Proctor in that Abreu deal. We didn't. And that alone is pretty huge.

I was upset at first about the Abreu move, b/c I just felt Melky would lose his playing time, but I don't think that will be the case. Now, if the Yankees just bury him on the bench after giving Sheffield a major extension, then I'll start getting pissassed.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/31/2006  8:32 PM
And to answer your question about the pitching staff. We have hughes coming up for one, down the road. And for the past, ace pitchers are not easy to come by. Nobody just gives them up and nobody can afford most of the stars already on the team for the guys they are willing to give up, and Cashman is being smart and not dealing the important young guys.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/31/2006  8:37 PM
I'm sure you know I can't stand that Randy JOhnston extension.
Agreed
He made a good trade for Vasqez way back for a first baseman in Nick JOhnson who didn't have much of a future here b/c of Giambi. It's not Cashmans fault that Javiez pulled a Kenny Rogers and couldn't pitch here.
Vazquez -- a mediocre pitcher whose numbers in NY were comparable to those in the rest of his career.
And it's
No, but it is his fault for giving a huge contract to Pavano when had only one good season. I do think the team is FINALLY on the right track after five years that I'd rather forget.
[quote] And again I state, Cashman has been everything that I have been preaching for with the minor leaguers and seems to have convinced Steinbrenner to go with this.
If Cashman has finally decided to build a good farm system, then I'll give him credit even though it sure took long enough.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07-31-2006 8:48 PM]
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/31/2006  8:39 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

And to answer your question about the pitching staff. We have hughes coming up for one, down the road. And for the past, ace pitchers are not easy to come by. Nobody just gives them up and nobody can afford most of the stars already on the team for the guys they are willing to give up, and Cashman is being smart and not dealing the important young guys.
But the #4 picther for most of the year couldn't even go 4 innings. Remember back when the pitching staff was so solid that David Cone with a below 4 ERA was the #5 starter?
And that ignores the bullpen, which other than Mariano is garbage. He relied on either a guy who just had his elbow replaced to be the set up man or a guy who does nothing other than throw hard.



[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07-31-2006 8:39 PM]
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/31/2006  9:11 PM
WHo are you talking about with "Just throws hard". When Proctor has been fresh, he's been awesome and the same goes for Farnsworth. tell me Bonn, how would YOU improve the Bullpen?
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/31/2006  9:17 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

WHo are you talking about with "Just throws hard".
FarnsUNworthY

Who I'd have gotten over the past five years? Show me a list of the last five year's FA pitchers. That will refresh my memory as to who I had wanted. It's hard to say off the top of my head.
As for this year, though, imagine if the $100 mil spent on Damon, Farnsworth, and Abreu had been spent on quality pitching instead. You make an offer Ryan or Wagner (or Gordon as a third resort, but still higher than Farnsworth) can't refuse and I'm sure one of them would come to the Yankees to be a setup man. I like Damon a lot but the team was fine with Jeter as the leadoff man and could have spent that money on pitching. I posted at MSG frequently last summer about my concerns about the bullpen and no one can say I was wrong.




[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07-31-2006 9:30 PM]
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
7/31/2006  10:03 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by crzymdups:

the thing the Knicks need to do is build a team that compliments one another. all we heard is that this team had too many guys who needed the ball to be effective, etc. Jefferies does not need the ball to be effective and fits into the running team this roster is molding into. he plays defense as well. will he mesh with the other guys? that's always impossible to tell until you see it on the court, but this team has plenty of offensive talent, it needs glue guys who make the team concept work. I'm not against this move at all.

but I do think Washington is matching this offer.
I agree. Jeffries doesnt need the ball to be productive. He would be a good fit. I doubt Washington matches. My only real fear is everything Isiah does usually sucks, so I'm wondering whats going to be wrong with Jeffries.

Its always a good laugh when people compare Isiah's moves to things the Yankees do. Thanks for that
What's the laugh? I bet Isiah could do as well (.550ish winning %, 0 championships) as Cashman's done over the past 5 years with no salary rules.

That's great. However, he's shown an INABILITY to adjust the salary cap rules that exist in the sport he's GMing for. But it's nice to know he'd be a good baseball GM. Maybe he should go try that.

(P.S.: I like the Jeffries signing overall, for the record)
It was more a comment on how awful Cashman has been over the past five years given salary rules and all the money he has than praise for Isiah. Cashman's made a couple of nice moves over the past few days, though. Maybe he'll turn it around. I can only hope!

Really? I guess you aren't aware that Cash didn't make most of the player personnel decisions over the last few years. He was only granted that power in his last contract that he signed in October.

It was the Tampa faction, led by George, who has been unduly influenced by Emslie and Connors, that made the stupid decisions.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/31/2006  10:04 PM
Posted by Rich:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by crzymdups:

the thing the Knicks need to do is build a team that compliments one another. all we heard is that this team had too many guys who needed the ball to be effective, etc. Jefferies does not need the ball to be effective and fits into the running team this roster is molding into. he plays defense as well. will he mesh with the other guys? that's always impossible to tell until you see it on the court, but this team has plenty of offensive talent, it needs glue guys who make the team concept work. I'm not against this move at all.

but I do think Washington is matching this offer.
I agree. Jeffries doesnt need the ball to be productive. He would be a good fit. I doubt Washington matches. My only real fear is everything Isiah does usually sucks, so I'm wondering whats going to be wrong with Jeffries.

Its always a good laugh when people compare Isiah's moves to things the Yankees do. Thanks for that
What's the laugh? I bet Isiah could do as well (.550ish winning %, 0 championships) as Cashman's done over the past 5 years with no salary rules.

That's great. However, he's shown an INABILITY to adjust the salary cap rules that exist in the sport he's GMing for. But it's nice to know he'd be a good baseball GM. Maybe he should go try that.

(P.S.: I like the Jeffries signing overall, for the record)
It was more a comment on how awful Cashman has been over the past five years given salary rules and all the money he has than praise for Isiah. Cashman's made a couple of nice moves over the past few days, though. Maybe he'll turn it around. I can only hope!

Really? I guess you aren't aware that Cash didn't make most of the player personnel decisions over the last few years. He was only granted that power in his last contract that he signed in October.

It was the Tampa faction, led by George, who has been unduly influenced by Emslie and Connors, that made the stupid decisions.
Fish convinced me that responsibility lies on the GM! I've heard the rumors you're talking about. Give me some unequivocal evidence for them.

Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
7/31/2006  10:19 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Rich:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by crzymdups:

the thing the Knicks need to do is build a team that compliments one another. all we heard is that this team had too many guys who needed the ball to be effective, etc. Jefferies does not need the ball to be effective and fits into the running team this roster is molding into. he plays defense as well. will he mesh with the other guys? that's always impossible to tell until you see it on the court, but this team has plenty of offensive talent, it needs glue guys who make the team concept work. I'm not against this move at all.

but I do think Washington is matching this offer.
I agree. Jeffries doesnt need the ball to be productive. He would be a good fit. I doubt Washington matches. My only real fear is everything Isiah does usually sucks, so I'm wondering whats going to be wrong with Jeffries.

Its always a good laugh when people compare Isiah's moves to things the Yankees do. Thanks for that
What's the laugh? I bet Isiah could do as well (.550ish winning %, 0 championships) as Cashman's done over the past 5 years with no salary rules.

That's great. However, he's shown an INABILITY to adjust the salary cap rules that exist in the sport he's GMing for. But it's nice to know he'd be a good baseball GM. Maybe he should go try that.

(P.S.: I like the Jeffries signing overall, for the record)
It was more a comment on how awful Cashman has been over the past five years given salary rules and all the money he has than praise for Isiah. Cashman's made a couple of nice moves over the past few days, though. Maybe he'll turn it around. I can only hope!

Really? I guess you aren't aware that Cash didn't make most of the player personnel decisions over the last few years. He was only granted that power in his last contract that he signed in October.

It was the Tampa faction, led by George, who has been unduly influenced by Emslie and Connors, that made the stupid decisions.
Fish convinced me that responsibility lies on the GM! I've heard the rumors you're talking about. Give me some unequivocal evidence for them.

Do you dispute that Cash's new contract granted him decision making authority for the first time? If so, here's link:

http://www.nj.com/weblogs/yankees/index.ssf?/mtlogs/njo_yankees/archives/2005_10.html
Even more interesting is that Swindal's presence in negotiations is one of the most significant indicators that Boss George's stranglehold on the Bombers is waning. Cashman probably would not return to the Yankees without assurances of complete or near-complete autonomy, especially from the Tampa faction. Not only is Cashman's likely return big news because it assures continuity and familiarity in player operations and decisions, but it is also the loudest rumor yet that George is slowly giving way to Swindal.

Once we establish that he did in fact receive this power for the first time, it doesn't take much of a logical leap to realize that he didn't have it before.

Haven't you read Joel Sherman's articles in the NY Post over the last few years? He has chronicaled the way that Cash was marginalized in the decision making process until his most recent contract.

I can't link them because the NY Post now charges for archived articles.

Cash has publicly stated, on WFAN for example, that he wanted Vlad over Sheff, and Beltran over RJ, but was overruled.

Notice the change in the Yankees negotiating strategy since Cash has taken over. He got Damon for far less than Boras originally asked for, and has held on to Hughes and Tabata, despite other GMs demanding them in every trade negotiation.

Sherman mentions that change in the Yankees' operations in today's column:

http://www.nypost.com/sports/yankees/gillick_blinks__cashman_buys_yankees_joel_sherman.htm
The interesting item, though, is that this is the second time Cashman's skill at liar's poker and his newfound power saved major assets. In the offseason, he stressed he would play Bubba Crosby in center and waited out Johnny Damon. It still cost the Yanks $52 million for four years - more than anyone else was offering - but in the recent past, the impetuousness of The Steinbrenner Yankees would have had the organization out in November offering six- and seven-year pacts for millions more.

The old Yanks would have had Abreu, as well, but 3-4 weeks ago, when the prospect price would have been steeper. As the congenitally honest Damon observed, "We did not give up what the Phillies wanted" and "If you are us, you have to make that trade."
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/31/2006  10:40 PM
This is just some writer's speculation. I asked for *evidence*
Cash has publicly stated, on WFAN for example, that he wanted Vlad over Sheff, and Beltran over RJ, but was overruled.
"Overruled"? Really? I'd definitely like to see those quotes. It would somewhat change how I view Cashman.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07-31-2006 10:43 PM]
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
7/31/2006  10:48 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

This is just some writer's speculation. I asked for *evidence*
Cash has publicly stated, on WFAN for example, that he wanted Vlad over Sheff, and Beltran over RJ, but was overruled.
"Overruled"? Really? I'd definitely like to see those quotes. It would somewhat change how I view Cashman.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07-31-2006 10:43 PM]

How is being granted decision making authority in his contract for the first time, speculation?

What do you want, minutes from the player personnel meetings?






[Edited by - Rich on 07-31-2006 10:49 PM]
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/31/2006  10:51 PM
How is being granted decision making authority in his contract for the first time, speculation?
Words that indicate speculation about the contract are in bold:
Even more interesting is that Swindal's presence in negotiations is one of the most significant indicators that Boss George's stranglehold on the Bombers is waning. Cashman probably would not return to the Yankees without assurances of complete or near-complete autonomy, especially from the Tampa faction. Not only is Cashman's likely return big news because it assures continuity and familiarity in player operations and decisions, but it is also the loudest rumor yet that George is slowly giving way to Swindal.
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
7/31/2006  11:05 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
How is being granted decision making authority in his contract for the first time, speculation?
Words that indicate speculation about the contract are in bold:
Even more interesting is that Swindal's presence in negotiations is one of the most significant indicators that Boss George's stranglehold on the Bombers is waning. Cashman probably would not return to the Yankees without assurances of complete or near-complete autonomy, especially from the Tampa faction. Not only is Cashman's likely return big news because it assures continuity and familiarity in player operations and decisions, but it is also the loudest rumor yet that George is slowly giving way to Swindal.

You are raising the bar beyond the point at which it can be rationally overcome.

If after reading all the articles on the Yankees over the last few years, and listening to the interviews, and then observing the difference in how the Yankees have been run over the last year, you cannot detect the change in the decision making process, no one will ever be able to convince you that there has been a clear change in operations.

Absent subpeona power, I can't provide you with the information you are looking for.

But if you are aware of the way the Yankees have been run since 1991, when Steinbrenner was suspended for paying off Howie Spira in the Winfield affair, which permitted Stick Michael to assemble the core that won the four championships, and then how Steinbrenner became jealous of the credit Stick got, and removed him from power while making the decisions through the Tampa faction, you would understand how Cash has been shut out. Virtually every good reporter in NY has covered the story ad nauseum.

George is now getting old. He rarely makes public statements, choosing instead to have his PR guy, Howard Rubenstein, speak for him.

Is thath the Steinbrenner you remember? I would guess not. Things have changed in the Yankee universe over the last couple of year, and Cash's ascendancy to power is one main example.

Ask yourself: Why are the Yankees now promoting from within again (Cano, Wang, Melky)? Why are the Yankees keeping their best prospects?

Why aren't they making stupid trades?

The evidence you seek is really at your finger tips. You just need to acknowledge its presence.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/31/2006  11:11 PM
You are raising the bar beyond the point at which it can be rationally overcome.
Just post the quotes by Cashman with links that you're referring to about his decisions being overruled and that will surely start to "rationally overcome the bar"
I assume the norm (which is obviously that the GM controls roster decisions) unless shown clear evidence to the contrary. Some writer's speculation doesn't count but the quotes you're talking about would help

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07-31-2006 11:12 PM]
Is this more financial overkill?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy