[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

we're going with the same team that won 23 games--we are not winning more than 32
Author Thread
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/21/2006  8:47 AM
Posted by nixluva:

OF the players that You mentioned nyk4ever, Isiah only gave Jamal and James a contract the rest were all part of trades. More to the point Jalen and Mo are done this year as will H2O & Shandon's contracts.

Isiah gave Curry his contract with the Sign and Trade. Also, whether or not Isiah gave those other guys contracts or not, he still brought them in and added to the payrole fiasco. This point is not arguable.
Now you have to understand that this team isn't only the big contract players, but a nice bunch of young inexpensive players, who happen to be the future of this team. Don't just complain about bad contracts without mentioning the GOOD things that Isiah has done with this roster. Last season was supposed to have been the start of something new, but that didn't work out. I think we have good reason to feel good about things this coming season. Its not like we don't have players. We've got enough talent to compete with anyone in this league.


Isiah drafted a few nice guys since he's been here. I have continually given him credit for it, constantly actually. I'm sick of Isiah going out and getting high-priced primadona sour veterans, just sick of it. For all the good he's done by drafting Frye, Lee and Nate it's been overshadowed by horrible trades and laughable contracts given out to players with questionable pasts.
I'm gonna be looking for you later this year when the team jells and is winning games. I think you're gonna feel stupid about all this bitching about the team.

I'll be right here sweetie waiting for you. I hope I feel stupid, but I don't think I will. You can say whatever you want but if the Knicks are winning games and not playing any defense I don't want to hear you at all. Gotta play defense to win where it counts in this league and the Knicks are a roster full of players who haven't done so in the past.

I don't know whether or not to take your post seriously because I haven't seen you say one thing bad about the Knicks since you've gotten here, nothing. I know I'm not Mr. Optimism but I've been behind Isiah's Drafting since he's been here(other than Balkman) so it's not like I've just been nailed to one side like yourself in all these debates. If you can't find one thing to critique Isiah Thomas on than there will be no further discussion. Even RV has questioned some moves and he's the biggest fanboy I've seen in my life.


"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
AUTOADVERT
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/21/2006  8:48 AM
I can see it now. 40 wins. expansive optimism. Future traded for another overpaid big name next offseason. Taht's been our pattern. Pray that it will be different.
I just hope that people will like me
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
7/21/2006  9:07 AM
nyk4ever - the Knicks have a tasty core of eight players that are 26 and under. Eight. Add either Paulie Miller (Mike Doleac lite) or Kenny Adekele (under the radar) you have 9.

The carping about the salary cap is silly. It was inherited. You don't trade players - you trade CONTRACTS. NO team can simply cut players. This ain't the NFL.

When Allan Houston's (PRE-Isiah DOLAN) deal comes off the books the Knicks will look radically different.

Enjoy The Ride
once a knick always a knick
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/21/2006  9:14 AM
Posted by misterearl:

nyk4ever - the Knicks have a tasty core of eight players that are 26 and under. Eight. Add either Paulie Miller (Mike Doleac lite) or Kenny Adekele (under the radar) you have 9.
Mix that in with the longterm contracts of Marbury/Francis/JJ/Q/Rose. So I should be happy that the under26 players can be surrounded by malcontents who will bitch about playingtime once one of these Under26 players plays more than them or takes their starting job?
The carping about the salary cap is silly. It was inherited. You don't trade players - you trade CONTRACTS. NO team can simply cut players. This ain't the NFL.
How is it silly? The only guy that was inherited was Allan Houston. Everyone else has been brought in since Isiah got here, that is NOT how you fix a cap situation. Why does he have to add payrole? He couldn't let contracts come off the books? I understand maybe he could not let them run off the books but he could have been much more responsible while doing so aka, Jerome James, Eddy Curry contract, not bringing in Francis and Jales. etc etc etc.
When Allan Houston's (PRE-Isiah DOLAN) deal comes off the books the Knicks will look radically different.

How so? Marbury/Francis/Curry/JJ/Q/Malik will all still be on the team.



[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07-21-2006 09:16 AM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/21/2006  9:40 AM
Posted by misterearl:

what e said

Because of guaranteed contracts and the salary cap, this is the hardest pro league to turn around a franchise.

It is not as easy as you think.

When was the last time Boston was in a division final? Washington? Seattle?

You have watched the windows of opportunity for the NETS, SIXERS, KINGS, JAZZ and PACERS slowly open and shut over the past ten years now haven't you?

Many of these teams had no salary cap space issues to contend with and good veteran front office personnel in place and still just making the division finals has been elusive.

Get rid of guaranteed contracts and the JEROME JAMES of the NBA world would disappear and building a winner could be done in two seasons just like in the NFL and not take more than a decade to rebound from two or three bad contract signings.

Every sport must endure the inevitable bad signings. But baseball has no cap and the NFL does not guarantee anyone's contract. So you suck ...You're fired!

Not the case in the NBA.

We are still paying JYD's and AH's contracts to date. That's freakin' ridiculous, but it is a fact.

what I say

The Knicks will be respectably better in the win column and play inspired basketball in 07

This is fallacy and a farce. Isiah has spent 500 MILLION $ since being inserted into the starting line-up. You can NOT compare that to ANY situation ANYWHERE in sports history. How can we compare the Hawks who have a budget that= two Knick players? We have unprecedented financial advantage that only the NY Yankees enjoy in all of sport. the NY Yankees can absorb inury to vital core players and still contend. The Ny Knicks won 23 games with a 125 mm $ payroll, truly the worst $-W ratio in sports history. There was no BULL or Hawk rebuild job--what happened here was incoherent financial blastamy. Please don't slander the intelligence of the fan. the ship has done sunk.
RIP Crushalot😞
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
7/21/2006  9:44 AM

>>Mix that in with the longterm contracts of Marbury/Francis/JJ/Q/Rose.

Contracts my butt.

When the All-Star calibre Marbury was acquired, did you celebrate or moan?

Francis for Ariza - hmmm, lets see was than an upgrade or downfrade?

Jerome will come ready to play or be gone

Quentin WILL improve on his under 40 per cent from the field or be gone

Jalen Rose provides extra ball handliing and comic relief


Best five play
once a knick always a knick
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/21/2006  9:56 AM
what's with the inability to see a) the amount of money coming OFF the cap this year and b) the youthful core of the team added to the Knicks future?

There are 4 players brought in by Isiah that are "long term" contracts.

The rest are gone this year or next and/or were drafted.

Q, Curry and Crawford are REAL CONTRACTS for REAL PLAYERS...keeping in mind that only Curry and Crawford were signed to those contracts by Isiah.

I think crawford makes $6 mill this year, about the going rate for a 30 mpg scorer off the bench.

That to me is progress.
all kool aid all the time.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/21/2006  10:14 AM
Its not about the contracts and then when you look at the players this is a team that has enugh talent to win games and we'll continue to grow with. WHY keep making it seem like we have a bunch of bad guys on this team and yet ignore all the good young players we have? This team doesn't belong to only the old vets, but the young players who will still be here when the vets are gone.

Last year was supposed to be year 1 of a new beginning, but it got spoiled. However, THIS YEAR, we'll start to see the kind of team we really have. Its not a bad team like some of you keep harping on. We have Size, Quickness, athleticism and most of all a coach that WANTS, NEEDS to win badly. There won't be any of this we'll take 20 or more games just to figure out what we have crap. No more 42 starting lineups. No more offense that a high school team could defend. No more holding back our best players for no good reason. GET YOUR HEADS OUT OF THE SAND and wake up!!!! This is NOT LAST YEAR!!!
nyballer
Posts: 21019
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/4/2001
Member: #108
USA
7/21/2006  10:17 AM
Posted by misterearl:


>>Mix that in with the longterm contracts of Marbury/Francis/JJ/Q/Rose.

Contracts my butt.

When the All-Star calibre Marbury was acquired, did you celebrate or moan?

Francis for Ariza - hmmm, lets see was than an upgrade or downfrade?

Jerome will come ready to play or be gone

Quentin WILL improve on his under 40 per cent from the field or be gone

Jalen Rose provides extra ball handliing and comic relief


Best five play


Do you realize how ridiculous the contract situation is in new york? how about this:

Knick Guards Payroll
 
06-07 salary Player
----------------------------------
$20,718,750 Houston
$17,275,781 Marbury
$15,070,000 Francis
$8,500,000 Anderson
$6,960,000 QRich
$16,901,500 Jalen Rose
$7,200,000 Crawford
$1,185,480 Nate
$926,040 Collins
---------------------------------
$94,737,551 Total


Team Payrolls:
Knicks: $133,363,654
Sixers: $88,508,241


The knicks pay their guards more than any other franchise pays their entire team. If we made a team out of just our guards, they would have the second highest payroll in the league. Even if you take out shandon and houston (layden acquisitions) you have a payroll of $65,518,801 - that would be the 7th highest paid team (more than the spurs, suns, nets, pistons, bulls, etc.). And these are just the GUARDS!

[Edited by - nyballer on 07-21-2006 10:18 AM]
"easy like sunday morning..." - walt clyde
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
7/21/2006  10:17 AM
500 MILLION?

get real
once a knick always a knick
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/21/2006  10:19 AM
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by rvhoss:

you mean like frye, lee, balkman and mardy collins?

It's a start but it needs to be built upon. Setting our sites on a 40 win season means that Frye, lee and the rest are expendable. why? Because when we win 40 games we look for someone to blame for those 40 wins.
I beg to differ...if we win 40 games, there will be celebrations on broadway and a look to the future...you seriously believe that after the LB 23 win debacle, we make no moves in the off season, this means we have the SAME EXACT TEAM and then win 40 games (that's a 17 win improvement btw) that we are looking to fire somebody? Are you reading what you are writing? Oh, I forget, you are on a sportscenter tantrum, are you buying what you are selling?
We fire them if they don't show us more. So those people abandon their plans and trade the draft picks and the Sweetney's and the Ariza's and the Frye's and the Lee's for another overpaid vet.
ariza was all LB...remember, he was dillusional...so try not to ignore what is extremely obvious, LB hated Ariza, not dolan and not isiah, who are the one's that are still here driving the ship
I am asking for us to stop building around the Marbs and Francis' of the world.
we are NOT building aroudn marbs and francis
Build around the Frye's and the Lee's and use these vets as space filler. Take away thier power.
that is what we are doing...look at the roster, in 3 years it will be Frye's team
If they quit on us like they did last year, or make excuses or are insubordinate we don't cowtow to them, we take their playtime away. We show players that this is not tolerable. We don't blame the coach or any one guy. We blame all involved.
this is when you switch back to being a normal fan, and ofcourse, ignore the fact that this is NOT what LB did, you know LB, your favorite coach. Currently, the GM is the coach, if the coach doesn't think a player is giving his all, he can speak to the GM (same person for those not paying attention) and he's in a suit or somewhere in Memphis rehabbing or something.
Our young guys are a start. But rvhoss pay attention to recent history. We have had draft picks and promising young guys before.
I am assuming you mean BEFORE isiah...because everyone that is here was drafted by zeke or brought in by zeke and we have not quit on any of them, sweetney didn't play in Chicago of all places, so you say promising, I say had a ceiling
But because of the atmosphere of blaming and firings, GM's and coach's trade these guys in order to save their jobs. Don't think Isiah will not do this.

he won't...just bacause you think he will, doesn't mean it is so. You thought he'd resign Jackie B, and, ofcourse, you were wrong about that as well. This is the team, anybody over the age of 26 is on notice that they are not needed and are not part of the long term knick plans...if they want to give 110% then that's a BONUS for the current knicks as these would be the vets in place around our youthful CORE that you ignore when you go on your anti zeke and marbury rants, but come around and remember it when someone reminds you that they were all acquired by our GM and Coach.

remember, the players you love watching that you can't seem to remember are on the team until we remind you of the CORE 8 under 26
His career is on the line. The worst thing we can do is to base his job on wins. It must be based upon developing a plan and sticking with it. This is something he has refused to do.

What we are saying is that the development will lead to wins, not the other way around...we're expecting the Quick offense to take advantage of our 26/8 (8 under 26) and lead to chemistry, confidence and eventually WINS. We're not saying go out and get us 40 wins isiah, you guys are all saying it's 40 wins or he's fired, we're all saying that we would be DANCING IN THE STREETS for 40 wins...you bet your ass and this is undeniable, that if isiah get's 40 wins, he's coach of the year...no ifs ands or buts
It's time for him to change the the atmosphere here. Create an atmosphere of striving for a title. Not striving for the first round. Not making moves to win today. But making moves that build a team that can win forever. That means getting your promising rookies away from losing, quitting, excuse making vets. Lay down the law. LB is gone. No more excuses will be accepted. One excuse and you don't play. PERIOD.

Once again, you hater's have run out of things to say about this team and you have now fallen on the "if we don't win a championship then what's the point" or "Why are you guys ONLY asking for 40 wins".

Baby steps...the Met's have basically the same core team as last year and they are ON FIRE!

Rome wasn't built in a day and a championship contender isn't built in Under 3 years.

The culture has changed and if you can't see it then you aren't paying any attention to anything that is coming out of MSG...and if you are paying attention you have the same canned responses.

Recent history? Recent history? It's been 2.5 years and half the team is under 25...I don't remember EVER that being the case with the Knicks, let alone this decade.

This team is young and built for the future and that future is contending for a title. We have two young bigs, a hustle rebounding machine, a dynamic scorer off the bench and both offense and defense on the wing.

We are surrounding that core of youth with a shot blocking veteran of the playoffs, a scoring Point Guard(s).

If you hate the players that's one thing, but to deny that a player, regardless of how long he has been in the league, can become better when placed in a system that puts him in a position to succeed, then you've never watched the bulls and micheal Jordan BEFORE Phil Jackson.

New system, new team, 6 titles.

It's an extreme example, but also keep in mind, we only want 3 veterans to step it up this coming year and the rookies to continue to get better, if that happens we are well on our way.
In summary: Stop making excuses for quitters. They either play hard or we don't want them. As a Knick fan stop accepting the bill of goods being sold and force management to get players that want to play!!!

No excuses, just fact. The bill of goods being sold to me is a team with a core in their first or second year coupled with a second layer of youthful players that can put points on the board and currently being led by a 29 year old scoring point guard that averages 20/8 (pre LB).

To me, that's the goods I'm buying, and I'm more than happy to re-up my season package, regardless of the price.

Everyone else is gone...GONE GONE GONE.

If we are rebuilding and looking to the future, try looking past the last 2 years. Every name you bring up is expiring this year or next or is a role player brought in to fill a need.

You say you are sounding the alarm because you notice a pattern, I say, change has begun and we were in such a miserable position when it occurred that we needed to take 2 steps back to go 3 steps forward, or should I say 2 years back to go 3 years forward.

Starting lineup in 2009 - Crawford, Marbury, QRich, Frye, Curry
the bench mob - nate, lee, mardy, balkman, jerome the enforcer!

all kool aid all the time.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/21/2006  10:27 AM
Do you realize how ridiculous and shorted sighted this post is?

It's like a evaluating a hair cut half way through it and saying it sucks.
Posted by nyballer:


Do you realize how ridiculous the contract situation is in new york? how about this:

Knick Guards Payroll
 
06-07 salary Player
----------------------------------
$20,718,750 Houston GONE THIS YEAR
$17,275,781 Marbury
$15,070,000 Francis
$8,500,000 Anderson GONE THIS YEAR
$6,960,000 QRich (this is unreasonable?)
$16,901,500 Jalen Rose GONE THIS YEAR
$7,200,000 Crawford (this is unreasonable?)
$1,185,480 Nate TELL ME YOU ARE KIDDING!!!
$926,040 Collins see nate comment
---------------------------------
$94,737,551 Total
$46,119,650 GONE THIS YEAR!


Team Payrolls:
Knicks: $133,363,654
Sixers: $88,508,241


AFTER YEAR 3.5 of Isiah
Knicks: $87,244,004
Sixers: $88,508,241 (no expiring deals this year)


all kool aid all the time.
nyballer
Posts: 21019
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/4/2001
Member: #108
USA
7/21/2006  10:36 AM
Posted by rvhoss:

Do you realize how ridiculous and shorted sighted this post is?

It's like a evaluating a hair cut half way through it and saying it sucks.
Posted by nyballer:


Do you realize how ridiculous the contract situation is in new york? how about this:

Knick Guards Payroll
 
06-07 salary Player
----------------------------------
$20,718,750 Houston GONE THIS YEAR
$17,275,781 Marbury
$15,070,000 Francis
$8,500,000 Anderson GONE THIS YEAR
$6,960,000 QRich (this is unreasonable?)
$16,901,500 Jalen Rose GONE THIS YEAR
$7,200,000 Crawford (this is unreasonable?)
$1,185,480 Nate TELL ME YOU ARE KIDDING!!!
$926,040 Collins see nate comment
---------------------------------
$94,737,551 Total
$46,119,650 GONE THIS YEAR!


Team Payrolls:
Knicks: $133,363,654
Sixers: $88,508,241


AFTER YEAR 3.5 of Isiah
Knicks: $87,244,004
Sixers: $88,508,241 (no expiring deals this year)


I never said that we were doomed for years, I'm just pointing out how much money he's spent. You don't think its even a little bit over the top that this year our payroll for guards is more than any other team's entire payroll? And we were the second worst team in the league?

EDIT: it's also good to know that after all the contracts come off the books this year we still have the second highest payroll in the league (and only trail by a million or so)

[Edited by - nyballer on 07-21-2006 10:39 AM]
"easy like sunday morning..." - walt clyde
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
7/21/2006  10:44 AM
rvhoss - you GO boy

>>Baby steps...the Met's have basically the same core team as last year and they are ON FIRE!

And there were people at the start of the season who could only find fault in Omar Minaya because he signed too many players from countries other than the US. There were people last season who threw dirt on Wilie Randolphs every move that didn't conform to their opinion of that move.

>>Rome wasn't built in a day and a championship contender isn't built in Under 3 years.

Nah, in Isiah Thomas' case it must be done in less time and under budget, compared with any NBA franchise in recent memory that started OVER the cap to begin with.

Bring back Luc Longley, Clarence weatherspoon and Travis Knight
once a knick always a knick
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/21/2006  10:47 AM
rvhoss you have a serious deficiency in reading comprehension. I think you have trouble thinking in concepts and taking eveyrthing literally.

Just a couple examples.

I made it clear that our goals should not be about winning 30 or 35 or 40 games that we should be basing progress on cutting payroll and building around our young guys. If we win 23, 30, 40 games it is irrelevant coming from where we are now. You say that I am calling for going from 23 wins to a title. Where do you get this stuff? Your posts are so confusing.

In three years it will be Frye's team is your quote. I like that. Building around the young guys would be fantastic. Never once did I say this won't happen. What I have clearly said is that we have never done this in the past and that I hope that Isiah has gone away from past moves and decided to go this route of building around the young players. You clearly think this is what we are doing. That's fine. Never once criticized you for thinking that way(although for some reason you think I have, obviously lumping posters again). My take is slightly different. I hope this is what we are doing,, but past history tells me we will change our plan in the coming months.

You bring up LB 5 or 6 times in the post. My question is, what does anything that I had to say have to do with LB? Are you obsessed? Was he your favorite coach? This is about where we go from here. Do we commit the same mistakes of the very recent 125 million obvious past or do we move forward. My take on the excuse making is a legitimate one and noone(even yourself) has countered it. All the players have determined that LB is the cause for our uninspired play last year. Now he's gone. There are no more excuses. No more if this happens then I will play hard. There are no more excuses. This makes me happy. There is no defending a whiner or a complainer or a fat or a lazy guy this year.

This is the funniest one. You say "you thought he'd resign JB". First of all when did I ever say anything about JB? Secondly what does that have to do with the original point? I also did not say Isiah will definitely trade away young guys. I am making no predictiions on coming events although you take everything as a prediction because, well, I'm not sure. Isiah has an opportunity to do the right thing. He has a young core. If his job is on the line come the trade deadline I hope he will do the right thing. I don't know either way. But I'm also an adult and I understand that sometimes you have to protect yourself and if it comes down to it and his job is on the line don't be naive and think Frye and the rest are 100% safe in a Knick uniform.

Your last two paragraphs are most confusing. I have said over and over that win totals should not be used as a measurement. So thinking championships should not be a measurement either. Where do you get this stuff. The goal shsould be a championship in the LONG TERM GUY. LONG TERM. Of course 40 wins is a plus. But what happens after that is the question. Do we continue to build on top of that or do what we've done in the past. This is the question that remains out there and has never been answered. All I want is changes. I want them to do everything that you are positive that they are doing. Everythign you say is what I want. Do you understand that or will you gloss through this post as well. The only difference is that you are positive it will happen and therefore want noone to criticize management in any way shape or form. I on the other hand have seen this management change routes 50 times in 6 years. I want the heat to stay on them so they understand that striving for 40 wins and pretending we are a player away from a title even though we can't trade, sign or draft that player is not acceptable. I want the heat on so management understands that we should get near the cap. I want the heat on so there are no more Francis and JJ and Jalen trade/signings. I think this is Isiah's best offseason as a GM and he has done nothing. I want this to continue. For that you lump me in with some mythical group called the haters.

I love you hoss, but I'm to the point where it's getting boring reading your responses.
I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/21/2006  10:52 AM
I read all the posts pretty thoroughly. I am yet to read one person who says that the Knicks should go from 23 wins to a title. Yet Mr Earl and Hoss are convinced this is the case. Weird.
I just hope that people will like me
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/21/2006  11:07 AM
Bip, I'm just scared what Dolan thinks significant improvement is.

Another thing, I've been on Isiah's back as a gm for quite sometime, but as a coach, when he says the goal is to make the playoffs with the team he currently has, I think is still a good short term goal. I know the goal in the long term should be to build a championship. I want these young players competing like they are championship contenders. That's what I want to see out of the whole team really, but I don't trust a lot of our vets. Too primadonnaish.

But if Isiah does something stupid like go after K Mart, then I will be reeeeeeeeeeeeally pissassed.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/21/2006  11:21 AM
Well the real issue is that some of us are down on the team and Isiah and some of us feel that the team has a chance to make a big turnaround from last year and that isiah has brought in some very good young talent, which we didn't have when he got here 2.5 years ago. I think people really do forget just how short a time he's been here and how far we've come in that time.

Steph - 29
Francis - 29
Jamal - 26
QRich - 26
Curry - 23
Frye - 23
Lee - 23
Nate - 22
Balman - 22
Collins - 22

JJ is a backup C and that's all. Jalen, Mo and Malik are all gone in 2 years, so what's the big deal? The Rest of the team is either in their prime or younger. Heck Nash is 32 and Kidd is 33 and both are still considered bigtime PG's, so to me we should be able to get some great ball out of Steph and Francis for as long as their here. In Isiah's system I see a much improved team this coming year. Last year for about 10 games or so, that included the 8 game streak, we saw how potent this team can be offensively and I think we'll see that more consistently this year. Its not a perfect team, but certainly something to build off of. Isiah also isn't ignoring the defense as some might think. He clearly drafted for players that can play on both ends in his last 2 drafts, but so many seem to forget that when they think of this team.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/21/2006  11:30 AM
Posted by nixluva:

Well the real issue is that some of us are down on the team and Isiah and some of us feel that the team has a chance to make a big turnaround from last year and that isiah has brought in some very good young talent, which we didn't have when he got here 2.5 years ago. I think people really do forget just how short a time he's been here and how far we've come in that time.

Steph - 29
Francis - 29
Jamal - 26
QRich - 26
Curry - 23
Frye - 23
Lee - 23
Nate - 22
Balman - 22
Collins - 22

JJ is a backup C and that's all. Jalen, Mo and Malik are all gone in 2 years, so what's the big deal? The Rest of the team is either in their prime or younger. Heck Nash is 32 and Kidd is 33 and both are still considered bigtime PG's, so to me we should be able to get some great ball out of Steph and Francis for as long as their here. In Isiah's system I see a much improved team this coming year. Last year for about 10 games or so, that included the 8 game streak, we saw how potent this team can be offensively and I think we'll see that more consistently this year. Its not a perfect team, but certainly something to build off of. Isiah also isn't ignoring the defense as some might think. He clearly drafted for players that can play on both ends in his last 2 drafts, but so many seem to forget that when they think of this team.

when you are given leeway to spend over 500mmm $, you should have an array of talent. We have spent money recklessly[i guess that is being nice]inchorently--the need to spend 20mm per on Mo Taylor and giving up draft picks as he was sitting on the Houston IR for not hustling would be a prime example of fiscal insanity.

BUT, just because you have an array of talent, doesn't mean you have a winning ballclub. Im not into excuses.
RIP Crushalot😞
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/21/2006  11:31 AM
Now who is being literal...you can't have it both ways bip.

You say I'm being literal, and then you say read what I wrote.

then you say i don't want to go from 23 wins to championship, but then say 40 wins is short sighted.

Back and forth, back and forth.

You just don't see that there is a direction, I fully understand that, Ewing has installed that kind of blind hatred for anything that does not resemble progress...but I'm telling you, progress is measured in other places than the win column, and last year I saw progress and I'm seeing even more progress.

The questionable moves that i berate are completely different than the ones others berate.

I want reezy back, he was 20 year's old, and had we not traded for franchise. I'll take balkman as an adequate replacement, but we would not have had to draft balkman had we never traded Ariza.

The moT trade I was for because we needed a low post scorer, someone that could actually post up and score or turn around and hit the jumper, and mot showed flashes of that, so I wasn't against that trade, I actually manned up.

Jerome james, I loved the move when it was made, and that was from a pure "we finally have a center" perspective. Speaking with my seattle buddies, they mentioned that he was a center, nothing more, nothing less.

Then we got curry, frye and lee and I was like, oh well, another MLE in the ****ter, happens to the best teams.

So, that sucked, but there is still time, as I felt that if LB had just come back this year and learned to play with what he had we'd be successfull, same goes to Jerome...he get's used in positions to excel as opposed to being put out there to embarrass himself (like asking marbury to take the last shot while he's been on the bench the entire game and the hottest hand in crawford should have taken the shot).

This new coaching style is what we've been calling for all along...I have no issue with nate robinson being crazy as starks was...it's that fire that makes him a crowd favorite.

I like the bitching and moaning, it's cool, don't want to stop you from expressing your opinion, but it's just that you sound like my friends that are actual Net fans (net season ticket holders). You say the same things they say...you don't defend, you just bash.

Then after your longwinded post you sprinkle in a little opposite opinion so you can say, that's not what I said, if you look in my post I did say "i hope the knicks succeed" so I was always rooting for them to succeed.

no way jose...you are either in or not in, but to play the back and forth card is inconsistent and you will be called on it each and every time.

if you don't want to be taken out of context, Proof read.
Posted by Bippity10:

I read all the posts pretty thoroughly. I am yet to read one person who says that the Knicks should go from 23 wins to a title. Yet Mr Earl and Hoss are convinced this is the case. Weird.

all kool aid all the time.
we're going with the same team that won 23 games--we are not winning more than 32

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy