[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

This has to be one of the funniest pro-LB posts ever-
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 3 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/19/2006  2:39 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by crzymdups:

How about Bogut getting time over Magloire? Chris Paul getting time over Speedy Claxon? You'll notice that when Antonio Davis went to Toronto he didn't start over Charlie Villenueva.

Those are great examples too. It's absurd to think you should start lazy bums over hard working superior young players just because the young ones are young. I think Larry Brown has too many screen names on this forum!


[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07-19-2006 2:37 PM]

It's not just Brown. It's almost every single coach in the NBA.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
AUTOADVERT
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/19/2006  2:46 PM
Woops. BALEETED!

[Edited by - Solace on 07-19-2006 2:47 PM]
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/19/2006  2:47 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by crzymdups:

How about Bogut getting time over Magloire? Chris Paul getting time over Speedy Claxon? You'll notice that when Antonio Davis went to Toronto he didn't start over Charlie Villenueva.

Those are great examples too. It's absurd to think you should start lazy bums over hard working superior young players just because the young ones are young. I think Larry Brown has too many screen names on this forum!

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07-19-2006 2:37 PM]


How is that a great example? I mean he did name rookies, so I guess we'll give him points for that.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/19/2006  2:59 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Those are great examples too. It's absurd to think you should start lazy bums over hard working superior young players just because the young ones are young. I think Larry Brown has too many screen names on this forum!

whoa are the lazy bums that started over Frye and Lee and Nate?

[Edited by - rvhoss on 07-19-2006 3:01 PM]
all kool aid all the time.
martin
Posts: 80220
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/19/2006  3:01 PM
AD and rose are lazy bums? They fit into the rebounding/defense first mentality of LB. They made up for the siv that are out SG/PG combo's and helped Curry for his weaknesses.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
martin
Posts: 80220
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/19/2006  3:02 PM
^ whoops, looks like RV edited his post to remove AD/Malik for my reply.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/19/2006  3:04 PM
Posted by UltimateKnicks Board God & Programmer:

^ whoops, looks like RV edited his post to remove AD/Malik/Bonn's mom for my reply.

That's why you use quote, so you can keep an accurate record of what the person said before.

[Edited by - Solace on 07-19-2006 3:04 PM]
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/19/2006  3:06 PM
Mo Taylor is undeniably a lazy bum. I don't mind having Malik around for team spirit and stuff, but he shouldn't play. And AD was godawful and he wasn't really hustling in NY. He had the worst plus/minus in the entire league before the January winstreak (to be fair, he did appear to be trying more in early January...)

Point is, nothing, nothing, warranted Malik, AD and certainly MoT to be playing over DLee and Frye.
¿ △ ?
martin
Posts: 80220
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/19/2006  3:08 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by UltimateKnicks Board God & Programmer:

^ whoops, looks like RV edited his post to remove AD/Malik/Bonn's mom for my reply.

That's why you use quote, so you can keep an accurate record of what the person said before.

[Edited by - Solace on 07-19-2006 3:04 PM]

LOL, damn the quick reply.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/19/2006  3:08 PM
Yeah, sorry about that...I read the lazy part after I posted the response, they weren't lazy, they were just bumbs, then I rethought even entering this argument because I have no opinion really on MPG as much as roles. I didn't even think MoT was that lazy as he seemed to hustle out there as much as his out of shape body could and he always hit that open jumper...I feel he's a good back up for Frye's game as they play the same style.

So, that's what was there.

No biggy.
Posted by martin:

AD and rose are lazy bums? They fit into the rebounding/defense first mentality of LB. They made up for the siv that are out SG/PG combo's and helped Curry for his weaknesses.



[Edited by - rvhoss on 07-19-2006 3:09 PM]
all kool aid all the time.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
7/19/2006  7:30 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

How about Bogut getting time over Magloire? Chris Paul getting time over Speedy Claxon? You'll notice that when Antonio Davis went to Toronto he didn't start over Charlie Villenueva.

Magloire started next to Bogut.

did AD even suit up for Toronto?
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/19/2006  8:13 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

Mo Taylor is undeniably a lazy bum. I don't mind having Malik around for team spirit and stuff, but he shouldn't play. And AD was godawful and he wasn't really hustling in NY. He had the worst plus/minus in the entire league before the January winstreak (to be fair, he did appear to be trying more in early January...)

Point is, nothing, nothing, warranted Malik, AD and certainly MoT to be playing over DLee and Frye.

PF/Cs taking min away from D Lee and Frye:
Lazy bums: Mo T, JJ, Eddy Curry
Incompetent bums: AD, Malik
martin
Posts: 80220
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/19/2006  8:33 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by crzymdups:

Mo Taylor is undeniably a lazy bum. I don't mind having Malik around for team spirit and stuff, but he shouldn't play. And AD was godawful and he wasn't really hustling in NY. He had the worst plus/minus in the entire league before the January winstreak (to be fair, he did appear to be trying more in early January...)

Point is, nothing, nothing, warranted Malik, AD and certainly MoT to be playing over DLee and Frye.

PF/Cs taking min away from D Lee and Frye:
Lazy bums: Mo T, JJ, Eddy Curry
Incompetent bums: AD, Malik

I can agree with you on MoT, but JJ and Curry? Curry HAS to play, just no way around it. You don't give away 2 consequtive first rounders to sit a guy. JJ? He didn't play enough to really say he took minutes away, and again, you really have to try to give him some minutes for the contact that he just got.

If AD/Malik don't play, who plays D? How directs the D?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/19/2006  9:53 PM
JJ played almost 500 minutes. Curry has to learn to get in shape and play hard. Maybe he'd play harder if he knew he had to. I'm not sure you *have* to play anyone but you definitely don't have to start someone and play him around 35 minutes (when he's not in foul trouble).
If AD/Malik don't play, who plays D?
If they do play, who plays D?
martin
Posts: 80220
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/19/2006  10:05 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

JJ played almost 500 minutes. Curry has to learn to get in shape and play hard. Maybe he'd play harder if he knew he had to. I'm not sure you *have* to play anyone but you definitely don't have to start someone and play him around 35 minutes (when he's not in foul trouble).
If AD/Malik don't play, who plays D?
If they do play, who plays D?

Curry averaged 25 minutes a game and JJ had 44 games at 9 minutes a clip. They weren't stealing anyones minutes.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/19/2006  10:12 PM
They weren't stealing anyones minutes.
You mean no one else would have been allowed on the court instead of them? We'd have to play 4 on 5?! Wow
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/20/2006  2:07 AM
Larry bround thetened jj with a hot dog so jj played better
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Page 3 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 
« Reply To Topic
This has to be one of the funniest pro-LB posts ever-
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy