[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Mark this post and check back in 2 years
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/29/2006  11:27 AM
the reason i hated the Sweetney pick was because we already had 4 undersized PF's on the roster when we took him... i had no personal vendetta against Sweetney, but i believe i WAS clamoring for them to address their need at the SF position instead... both Jarvis Hayes & Josh Howard were available for the taking, but Layden passed up on both of them.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
buddapaw
Posts: 23220
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 2/22/2006
Member: #1101

6/29/2006  11:29 AM
I'm getting ill here, too much use of the word Layden. Please stop
"Low Percentage Shots r US, these are our Knicks" "NY KNICKS the cure for basketball fanatic"
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
6/29/2006  11:48 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by franco12:

[quote]Posted by BRIGGS:


i know who this player is. He a skinny hustle player who has 0 offensive skills other than dunking. he may flash some at SL but when it comes to the big show he will get exposed. there is very little market for this type of player in todays game of advancing skill players.

he scored 3 OR LESS points EIGHT times this year and for all of his rebounding prowless he mamaged double figures 6 times. and as for character, well, give him time hes no angel

Sounds almost like Bruce Bowen and he's managed to stay in the league all these years. Granted, Bruce has been able to knock down threes, but he has always been the guy you didn't need to cover or had to double off, thus, he is wide open.




Mark it down. In a league that is heavily reliant upon skills, a player like this is a dinosaur. Unless you are a 7 foot shot blocker the scrapper is a position that is going wayside. But when you take pick 50 at 20 dont you expect backlash?



What if this guy is the Michael Redd of this years draft? Someone who would most likely have been picked in the second round for whatever reason, but who would have established himself as worthy of a first round pick?

Would you be bashing Isiah if he had in Redds draft picked him? Right now, you would.

I have an open mind- I think I would have preferred Josh Boone- but, I am willing to wait and see what this guy does bring to the table.

Isiah has had decent drafts- I think its the one thing he gets even from his critics.

Now- I will grant you this- that Isiah has reached a bit for this guy, and if he doesn't impress, he will be due criticism. The pressure is on this guy to perform this year.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
6/29/2006  11:52 AM
Briggs - haw many games did you actually watch Blakman play?

jusr curious
once a knick always a knick
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
6/29/2006  11:53 AM
same amount as bynum.
all kool aid all the time.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38586
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
6/29/2006  12:22 PM
If popcorn man really wanted this kid but then heard that the Suns were taking him at 21, why is this such a reach. If he believed in this kid so much, why would he gamble that he could be there at 29?
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/29/2006  12:32 PM
i think we have to look at it this way: our future is in frye and curry's hands. two big men that need the ball delivered to them at the right spots.

that's why we needed to draft marcus williams. a core of marcus, frye, and curry - that's what we would've been looking at.

we had to think big picture here but we didn't b/c isiah is one his one year deadline. his lame duck status hurt us yesterday in teh draft.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/29/2006  12:36 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

i think we have to look at it this way: our future is in frye and curry's hands. two big men that need the ball delivered to them at the right spots.

that's why we needed to draft marcus williams. a core of marcus, frye, and curry - that's what we would've been looking at.

we had to think big picture here but we didn't b/c isiah is one his one year deadline. his lame duck status hurt us yesterday in teh draft.

I like Marcus' game, but you know, I like Marbury's game too. For all the people here who constantly harp on defense and a players attitude, pining away for Marcus is a little ridiculous. Guys here constantly harp about a players attitude, etc, but that never seems to be a consideration come draft time. Why not?
¿ △ ?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/29/2006  12:37 PM
Posted by misterearl:

Briggs - haw many games did you actually watch Blakman play?

jusr curious

Ive seen him play several times--ill tell you exactly who he reminds me of a slightly smaller trevor ariza who is a tad bit more filled out. but trevor was/is a better nba prospect and we took him in the mid 40s

tell me different but dont say ron artest please.
RIP Crushalot😞
firefly
Posts: 23253
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
6/29/2006  12:38 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

i think we have to look at it this way: our future is in frye and curry's hands. two big men that need the ball delivered to them at the right spots.

that's why we needed to draft marcus williams. a core of marcus, frye, and curry - that's what we would've been looking at.

we had to think big picture here but we didn't b/c isiah is one his one year deadline. his lame duck status hurt us yesterday in teh draft.

I have no expectations of our 2 picks this year. I hope they do well, I can see what Isiah saw in them to pick them and based on what they have shown, I hope that they will do well for the Knicks. But your saying that we should have picked a player to not only beat out Marbury and Francis for the starting PG spot, but to run the point as a rookie PG and help Curry and Frye succeed.

I just want to say at this stage, that I dont believe Marcus Williams can do that now, and it's a helluva lot of pressure to put on a rookie, regardless.
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/29/2006  12:44 PM
Posted by firefly:
Posted by djsunyc:

i think we have to look at it this way: our future is in frye and curry's hands. two big men that need the ball delivered to them at the right spots.

that's why we needed to draft marcus williams. a core of marcus, frye, and curry - that's what we would've been looking at.

we had to think big picture here but we didn't b/c isiah is one his one year deadline. his lame duck status hurt us yesterday in teh draft.

I have no expectations of our 2 picks this year. I hope they do well, I can see what Isiah saw in them to pick them and based on what they have shown, I hope that they will do well for the Knicks. But your saying that we should have picked a player to not only beat out Marbury and Francis for the starting PG spot, but to run the point as a rookie PG and help Curry and Frye succeed.

I just want to say at this stage, that I dont believe Marcus Williams can do that now, and it's a helluva lot of pressure to put on a rookie, regardless.

marcus would not play for us this year. it's a move for the future. there would be ZERO pressure on him.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41012
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/29/2006  12:46 PM
Balkman is 6'6 which means he's not playing PF in the NBA and he's going to be playing SF. So now the Knicks are adding a player to play SF who has absolutely no offensive skills in a league where offensive skills are becoming more and more important. Ontop of that he's going to be guarding guys taller then him nightly. Taking a risk like this is ok at pick 29 or the second round but NOT when their is better talent on the board.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/29/2006  12:59 PM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by firefly:
Posted by djsunyc:

i think we have to look at it this way: our future is in frye and curry's hands. two big men that need the ball delivered to them at the right spots.

that's why we needed to draft marcus williams. a core of marcus, frye, and curry - that's what we would've been looking at.

we had to think big picture here but we didn't b/c isiah is one his one year deadline. his lame duck status hurt us yesterday in teh draft.

I have no expectations of our 2 picks this year. I hope they do well, I can see what Isiah saw in them to pick them and based on what they have shown, I hope that they will do well for the Knicks. But your saying that we should have picked a player to not only beat out Marbury and Francis for the starting PG spot, but to run the point as a rookie PG and help Curry and Frye succeed.

I just want to say at this stage, that I dont believe Marcus Williams can do that now, and it's a helluva lot of pressure to put on a rookie, regardless.

marcus would not play for us this year. it's a move for the future. there would be ZERO pressure on him.

you think a lotto talent would be happy not playing? it wouldn't have made sense unless we were going to run a five guard lineup.
¿ △ ?
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/29/2006  1:08 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by firefly:
Posted by djsunyc:

i think we have to look at it this way: our future is in frye and curry's hands. two big men that need the ball delivered to them at the right spots.

that's why we needed to draft marcus williams. a core of marcus, frye, and curry - that's what we would've been looking at.

we had to think big picture here but we didn't b/c isiah is one his one year deadline. his lame duck status hurt us yesterday in teh draft.

I have no expectations of our 2 picks this year. I hope they do well, I can see what Isiah saw in them to pick them and based on what they have shown, I hope that they will do well for the Knicks. But your saying that we should have picked a player to not only beat out Marbury and Francis for the starting PG spot, but to run the point as a rookie PG and help Curry and Frye succeed.

I just want to say at this stage, that I dont believe Marcus Williams can do that now, and it's a helluva lot of pressure to put on a rookie, regardless.

marcus would not play for us this year. it's a move for the future. there would be ZERO pressure on him.

you think a lotto talent would be happy not playing? it wouldn't have made sense unless we were going to run a five guard lineup.

#20 and #29 were not playing this year. isiah has to win now. two rooks were not getting minutes.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
6/29/2006  2:36 PM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by firefly:
Posted by djsunyc:

i think we have to look at it this way: our future is in frye and curry's hands. two big men that need the ball delivered to them at the right spots.

that's why we needed to draft marcus williams. a core of marcus, frye, and curry - that's what we would've been looking at.

we had to think big picture here but we didn't b/c isiah is one his one year deadline. his lame duck status hurt us yesterday in teh draft.

I have no expectations of our 2 picks this year. I hope they do well, I can see what Isiah saw in them to pick them and based on what they have shown, I hope that they will do well for the Knicks. But your saying that we should have picked a player to not only beat out Marbury and Francis for the starting PG spot, but to run the point as a rookie PG and help Curry and Frye succeed.

I just want to say at this stage, that I dont believe Marcus Williams can do that now, and it's a helluva lot of pressure to put on a rookie, regardless.

marcus would not play for us this year. it's a move for the future. there would be ZERO pressure on him.

I would get more excited about Williams not getting drafted if 21 GMs, many of those who actually need a pg didn't pass on him. I am more worry that teams that he heavily workout for decided to pass. It can't just be a character thing with him, there has to be more there. I am really surprise at this draft for a number of reasons. Strange draft.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/29/2006  2:42 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by firefly:
Posted by djsunyc:

i think we have to look at it this way: our future is in frye and curry's hands. two big men that need the ball delivered to them at the right spots.

that's why we needed to draft marcus williams. a core of marcus, frye, and curry - that's what we would've been looking at.

we had to think big picture here but we didn't b/c isiah is one his one year deadline. his lame duck status hurt us yesterday in teh draft.

I have no expectations of our 2 picks this year. I hope they do well, I can see what Isiah saw in them to pick them and based on what they have shown, I hope that they will do well for the Knicks. But your saying that we should have picked a player to not only beat out Marbury and Francis for the starting PG spot, but to run the point as a rookie PG and help Curry and Frye succeed.

I just want to say at this stage, that I dont believe Marcus Williams can do that now, and it's a helluva lot of pressure to put on a rookie, regardless.

marcus would not play for us this year. it's a move for the future. there would be ZERO pressure on him.

I would get more excited about Williams not getting drafted if 21 GMs, many of those who actually need a pg didn't pass on him. I am more worry that teams that he heavily workout for decided to pass. It can't just be a character thing with him, there has to be more there. I am really surprise at this draft for a number of reasons. Strange draft.

if isiah took him, almost every knick fan would be thrilled.

i was at the draft. after 15 was announced, then 16, then 17, etc. the buzz in the garden was building. it may sound dramatic but it was. myself and about 5-6 other people around me were saying "there's no way marcus is going to drop to us." 18...then 19...the place was seriously going nuts. if they took marcus, EVERYBODY would've been happy. everybody would've defended the pick. we all would've been saying, i can't believe we got a lotto talent at #20 - we're lucky. there was sense of hope in the building like we were finally going to catch a break. but then when stern announced ronald mcbalkman, the crowd turned into a lynch mob. it was brutal. people were cursing all over the place. tough site. and i figured it would be the same on the boards as well.

but it's not just about PR, he really was a better talent than balkman and we should've drafted him. with all our young exciting players that like to score, what better than a young pg that likes to pass?
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
6/29/2006  2:51 PM
if isiah took him, almost every knick fan would be thrilled.

i was at the draft. after 15 was announced, then 16, then 17, etc. the buzz in the garden was building. it may sound dramatic but it was. myself and about 5-6 other people around me were saying "there's no way marcus is going to drop to us." 18...then 19...the place was seriously going nuts. if they took marcus, EVERYBODY would've been happy. everybody would've defended the pick. we all would've been saying, i can't believe we got a lotto talent at #20 - we're lucky. there was sense of hope in the building like we were finally going to catch a break. but then when stern announced ronald mcbalkman, the crowd turned into a lynch mob. it was brutal. people were cursing all over the place. tough site. and i figured it would be the same on the boards as well.

but it's not just about PR, he really was a better talent than balkman and we should've drafted him. with all our young exciting players that like to score, what better than a young pg that likes to pass?

I would not have been thrilled DJ. I have been on the record ever since as saying that Williams is overrated.

Don't forget how the Suns fans booed Dan Majerle when he was picked...

oohah



[Edited by - oohah on 06-29-2006 2:51 PM]
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
rain
Posts: 20762
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2002
Member: #353
USA
6/29/2006  3:00 PM
If the guy is a lock-down defender at the 2-3, and can chip in 6-8 rebounds a game, he's worth the pick. We need role-players in the worst way. Comparing him to Ron-Ron and Rodman is a mistake. Hopefully we have a taller Bruce Bowen who can block some shots and check Dwayne Wade. I would have liked Lowry at this spot.. and was speechless at this pick, I hope I was wrong.

[Edited by - rain on 06-29-2006 12:04 PM]
martin
Posts: 80979
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/29/2006  3:09 PM
Posted by firefly:
Posted by Solace:
Originally posted by TMS:

[quote]Originally posted by Solace:

Solace, the reason some people are keeping an open mind about Isiah's pick is because he's had a good past history of drafting good talent in the recent past for this organization... Scott Layden's draft picks for this organization all have not amounted to jack squat in the NBA... is Mike Sweetney at #9 a value pick in your eyes? it isn't to me... Maciej Lampe? Milos Vujanic? Slavko Vranes? have they done anything in the NBA to date? in comparison, i think Isiah's earned at least the benefit of the doubt from last year's draft... let's see how this guy Balkman turns out before we bash him... he could be a nice player we all end up liking... who knows? if he's a bust, then that's the time you can rag on Isiah for making the pick.

Unfair comparisons. Sweetney was considered the BPA at the time at #9. I still would take Sweetney back on the Knicks as the backup PF in a heartbeat. I know you hate Sweetney for some reason, but yo'uve consistently hated him since the day he was drafted. That's fine, but others would disagree. The only other option would've been Collison, who hasn't turned into much either. Lampe at #30 was a steal and was a major piece in our trade to get Marbury. Vujanic at #36 was a steal. Vujanic never came over, but that was because he was roadblocked by the Knicks having THREE point guards and then roadblocked by Steve Nash. He was only coming here to be a starter, but he wasn't given an opportunity to even go to a team where he could get minutes.

Slavko wound up being a bad pick, but at #39 it's not unreasonable to take a project and have him bust. If we took Balkman at #39, nobody has any complaints. Again, the bashing isn't against Balkman. It's against Isiah for taking him AT SUCH A REACH.

Layden got guys who could've gone lottery and did it with high second rounders. Isiah used late first rounders and got guys who could've gone late second round. That's the difference and it's a huge one.

All I want to know is..... are you saying that Layden is a better drafter then Isiah? Think about your credibility before you answer.

[Edited by - firefly on 06-29-2006 11:27 AM]

layden had some VERY good drafts with Utah (although his Dad was probably equally as responsible for input on many)
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/29/2006  4:03 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:

I would get more excited about Williams not getting drafted if 21 GMs, many of those who actually need a pg didn't pass on him. I am more worry that teams that he heavily workout for decided to pass. It can't just be a character thing with him, there has to be more there. I am really surprise at this draft for a number of reasons. Strange draft.

that's exactly what crossed my mind too... these GM's have to know something that we don't.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Mark this post and check back in 2 years

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy