I can't see how we would promise both our late first rounders already, but if this is the case, it wouldn't be such a bad thing.
Last year we made a promise to Frye pretty early and everybody including myself didn't approve -- we're more enamored with the unknown, the guy's that haven't had the ups and downs of a college career.
To me, getting two guys who play defense and come from solid programs would be an incredible draft. These guys will bang, defend, and do the little things. Boone could end up being a great defensive power forward next to Curry or Frye. He doesn't need the ball on offense and can defend the best opposing post player. I'm just in love with Lowry and feel like he is going to be a great leader, run a team to perfection without putting up great stats, but more importantly make a tremendous impact disrupting the other team's point. It's a HUGE advantage if you can stop the other point from penetrating, especially in today's league.
Posted by BRIGGS:
i think this is a mistake i think we shouldve kept our eyes open these kids werent going back to school anyway, so if they were there--they were there is that was the knicks opinion---its just the way things are run, its why the management is terrible and we will continue to suffer theyre way to rigid in their thinking-they always think they have everyone else beat out---- josh boone is a reasonable pick at 29 IF no one else fell OR other attractive options presented themselves, but lowry at 20 is absurd given we already have nate.
i still would much rather get into trade dialogue for JR Smith and this is coming from a guy who usually wanst to keep the pick[s] we couldve possibly paired the picks with a vet and moved up for someone much more apealling--i just believe we took options off the table--im almost convinced they have done this.
[Edited by - BRIGGS on 06-15-2006 2:42 PM]