[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

wow, RV, Holfresh, you "guys" the Pistons arent better without Larry Brown
Author Thread
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/3/2006  3:14 PM
Posted by holfresh:



Another fact you keep ignoring is the Knicks being 23-59 under Brown...U keep ignoring the fact that he lost his team during the season...U keep ignoring the fact that attempted a coup and failed...U keep ignoring the fact that this would be the second time he is being fired in consecutive years...

Another fact is that teams under Brown in their first year, are usually pretty bad. Why does the Knicks poor record only fall on the shoulders of Larry Brown? Maybe just maybe the record should fall on Isiah Thomas since he is the one that constructed the team for 2.5 years through trades and drafting. MAYBE the record should fall on the shoulders of the GM and Steve Mills since they are running the organization but no you'd rather blame the coach for trying to teach basketball the way that wins.

And yes, I would please like you to prove your "FACT" that Brown tried to stage a coup. I'll be waiting a long time for that evidence.



[Edited by - nyk4ever on 06-03-2006 3:15 PM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
AUTOADVERT
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/3/2006  3:14 PM
two names of younger guys traded by LB were larry hughes and tim thomas. it's funny tho, b/c those two players never really helped a team win anything significant. you can say larry was part of a 45 win wizards team, who let him go. (didn't really help cle all that much). and tim with fresh legs off of 1 month of bball is doing OK in the playoffs 9 years into his career.

what's the point, i think it's fair to say that lb knows who can help a team legitimately win and who can't. so if he dumped larry hughes and tim thomas, there were good reasons to. and after he traded those guys, the team went on to win more games the following years. meanwhile, hughes, while accumulating stats, did really help his teams overachieve and neither did tim.

marbury was 26 years old and was eventually replaced by a 30 year old.

you see, it's not all about age. it's about who can help you WIN and legitimately WIN. guys like lb, riles - those guys have been around long enough to know. so if they want a "young" guy traded, it's for good reason.
rojasmas
Posts: 21207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/25/2004
Member: #639
6/3/2006  3:41 PM
Tim Thomas helped Milwaukee almost beat an Indiana team that played the Lakers in the finals. He was the best player on the Bucks in that series on a team that included Ray Allen, Sam Cassell and Big Dog. He also was a key cog on that same team which lost to the 76'ers in 7 games in the east conference finals the following year. If Big Dog didn't choke and miss an open 5 footer in the lane in the 6th game, they win that series. So you are selling TT a little short in only mentioning this year's playoff run.
We could be the Dallas Mavs of the East.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
6/3/2006  3:48 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by holfresh:
Another fact you keep ignoring is the Knicks being 23-59 under Brown...U keep ignoring the fact that he lost his team during the season...U keep ignoring the fact that [he] attempted a coup and failed...U keep ignoring the fact that this would be the second time he is being fired in consecutive years...

Oh boy, I can't wait till oohah demands you prove that one.



I don't think that Oohah would argue that Brown tried to undermine Isiah from day one...The guy who got him a 5o mil contract...He tried to go over his head to get approval on trades after Isiah said no to his request...Dolan told him that meeting won't be neccessary...Tell me Blueseats, what would happen to u if you pulled that stunt at your current job....


Show me where LB went over isiah's head specifically on trade deals. All I remember is LB asking dolan for a one on one when it was widely thought either he or Thomas would get canned. A one on one with one's boss is not all that uncommon and something Isiah probably gets whenever he wants.

I think there's greater evidence that isiah undermines his coaches, but you make your case first.

Actually it was pointed out to him by demanding to speak with Dolan one on one is going over Thomas' head. He responded that he didn't mean that and said that he now wants Thomas present. Blue you will not win that one, Brown is notorious for pulling those stunts. He did it to Joe Dumars and Billy King. Blue you fail to realize is that Thomas is Brown's boss. I know he is getting paid more than him but basically, he is his boss. I don't know about where you work but skipping level of managements to talk with the owner of a organization or company is uncommon. It is uncommon in the NBA. IMO, I do believe Brown was trying to get Thomas fired, so he could bring in Calipari. Brown was more or less fired by the Spurs for similar antics. Like Marbury, Brown got his own share of baggage.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

6/3/2006  4:06 PM
Thanks for the names, DJ.

TT and Hughes.

I think we all know what TT is about. I actually like the guy but he;s been passed around and probably will continue to be and we all understand why: he's an enigma. All-star caliber one week, lost the next. And a little fugazy upstairs.

Hughes I like, but he was behind Iverson.

If the idea is to keep acquiring guys who are clones of each other rather than addressing needs and filling holes I really think most decent coaches will be a bad fit with that philosophy.

These trades kinds of trades are hardly unique to LB.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

6/3/2006  5:15 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Actually it was pointed out to him by demanding to speak with Dolan one on one is going over Thomas' head. He responded that he didn't mean that and said that he now wants Thomas present. Blue you will not win that one, Brown is notorious for pulling those stunts. He did it to Joe Dumars and Billy King. Blue you fail to realize is that Thomas is Brown's boss. I know he is getting paid more than him but basically, he is his boss. I don't know about where you work but skipping level of managements to talk with the owner of a organization or company is uncommon. It is uncommon in the NBA. IMO, I do believe Brown was trying to get Thomas fired, so he could bring in Calipari. Brown was more or less fired by the Spurs for similar antics. Like Marbury, Brown got his own share of baggage.

If Phil, Riley, D'Antoni, Popovich, even Avery, ask for a sit down with the owner, even a one-on-one, do you make make the same conjectures about it? I doubt it. So until you show me something more substantial than that at some point in the season he asked for a sit-down I gonna take it all as stereotyping.

-----

That said, lets also address the alternative scenario.

In pre-season just about everyone knew Brown's challenge this year was to see if Isiah could share power with him and if Marbury would buy in. I think both were answered in the negative.

Brown saw Chaney escorted out by security, Wilkens overridden on trades, Wilkens allowed zero assistants of his own, Wilkens shat on by Marbury, Isiah giving half-time lectures undermining Wilkens authority, Wilkens understanding he couldn't work with Isiah and quitting, Herb trailed along, etc.

He also knew Marbury was someone he didn't care for from their time together in the Olympics, but he just witnessed Isiah cursing out the media just for asking if he we shopping Marbury:

Thomas, the team president, was frequently profane in his first public comments on the speculation surrounding Marbury, which began with an article in The New York Times on Saturday. A Western Conference team executive and a player agent had independently said that Marbury was being made available by the Knicks.

Similar reports have since surfaced in other news media outlets, all citing unnamed team executives around the league.

"That is so far from the truth," Thomas said testily, a few minutes after the Knicks played their first summer league game here. "And I'm ashamed for you guys that you even have to ask me that, because there is absolutely no truth to it at all."

Thomas and Marbury are next-door neighbors in Westchester County, and are known to be close. Marbury, a former All-Star, was Thomas's first major acquisition after he took over operations 19 months ago.

Asked if he needed to reassure Marbury about his future, Thomas said: "He and I and all of New York City know where I stand with him and where he stands with me. In my neighborhood, we say, 'We don't get down like that. We don't roll like that.' "

Marbury, Thomas said, has "never been in play," and the Knicks will "never put him in play."


So LB certainly may have come in knowing he'd have a an uphill battle for a fair say in this organization, as no coach has yet had one while isiah has been here.

And it appears it might not have taken Isiah long for Isiah to resist:

According to an assistant coach, Thomas has been subverting Brown's authority with the players almost from the moment his coach began to undermine (read: devalue) his roster to the media. We're talking very early in the season.

From then on, there was hostility among the troops. "It's like two competing militias in Lebanon," underlined an extremist view of the scene.


This was the same scenario AD spoke of upon being traded:

"Larry and Isiah, they need to get on the same page," Davis said of coach Larry Brown and Isiah Thomas, the Knicks' president. "Is the team going younger or older? What are they doing? Where's the team going?"

"I was telling the guys, this was the first time I've got to run up and down and enjoy myself in a long time. It was nice to see some fresh faces and see guys who really cared about playing and listening to their coach, trying to do everything they can to help each other and to win basketball games."



Personally, in an organization that doesn't know what it's doing I don't think it's a bad idea for the owner to know what a HOF coach thinks. He certainly needs to know more than just what Isiah and Mills think and I hope Colangleo gave him some things to chew on, like to stop it with the Marburys, Hardaways and Francises of the league, and to hire a coach who fits your vision and to then HELP that coach.

IF (big if) there really is a direction here that Larry absolutely doesn't fit then Dolan needs to just admit his own starphuching mistakes and eat his contract and move on. Brown was a known entity and if Isiah/Dolan didn't want him to participate in shaping the team and wanted someone just to tow the party line and act as a figure head they should have just hired Herb and pissed in his ear. But when you beg the coach and his wife to join the club and promise to get him guys who'll play for him and then balk and undermine him you need to pay to undo the mistakes that you made.

Brown trying to round out this roster and bring in players who want to compete is not an evil deed, but if Isiah and Dolan are purely committed to running this place like a rehab center and will never give up on their "patients" then maybe they don't need a coach at all and should just hire a counselor and probation officer for the players to meet with once a month and then let Steph coach.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

6/3/2006  6:35 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

two names of younger guys traded by LB were larry hughes and tim thomas. it's funny tho, b/c those two players never really helped a team win anything significant. you can say larry was part of a 45 win wizards team, who let him go. (didn't really help cle all that much). and tim with fresh legs off of 1 month of bball is doing OK in the playoffs 9 years into his career.

what's the point, i think it's fair to say that lb knows who can help a team legitimately win and who can't. so if he dumped larry hughes and tim thomas, there were good reasons to. and after he traded those guys, the team went on to win more games the following years. meanwhile, hughes, while accumulating stats, did really help his teams overachieve and neither did tim.

marbury was 26 years old and was eventually replaced by a 30 year old.

you see, it's not all about age. it's about who can help you WIN and legitimately WIN. guys like lb, riles - those guys have been around long enough to know. so if they want a "young" guy traded, it's for good reason.



There were reports that he ask for Iverson and Billups to be traded as well but was overruled...

Here's a quote from one of the articles you posted:

"He'll want to make a few (moves), right away. Larry will want to bring in guys he's comfortable with. He's going to want to have a say in personnel. That's the way Larry is. He'll go in and ask to have guys traded. But Donnie Walsh used to tell him, 'We're not going to do what you want. I will not destroy this team.' "
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
6/3/2006  7:28 PM
The regular season is about building an arsenal of plays and defining roles for each play. The teams with the 2 or 3 plays that generally succeed against most of the league win the most games. In the playoffs, its about selecting plays in your arsenal carefully - if the opposing team is determined to stop your top play there are likely other weakness that become exposed. You have to remain flexible to keep maximizing the strengths of your team.

Flip didn't do that. Hamilton guarded Wade far too much - that killed his offense. And Wade wast at 70% shooting by game 4. Prince appeared to be their no.1 offensive option and he's only their 3rd/4th best offensive option depending on how hurt Rasheed was. Chanucey/Rasheed pick and rolls were not utilized enough and Rasheed never rolled for that matter. Or if Shaq was on Ben (as he was for most of the series), then use Ben in pick and rolls, crash the boards and swing the ball to Rip on the weak side.

And Ben should have guarded Haslem on defense. Rasheed should have played Shaq despite ankle problems - Ben is then free on the weakside to rotate to Wade or help on Shaq. The idea is that 1) you help with your players that recover quickly and 2) the help should come from players who shoot poorly from three.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
6/3/2006  8:22 PM
All the crap about Brown is all heresay. Brown wanted this, Brown wanted that. Bullshiat. Brown has won in many places before, period.

Thomas failed at every ventrue. Toronto, CBA, Indiana.
So did Marbury, Francis, etc.

So you can come up with your pathetic excuses all you want, but in the end, the entire world sees things for that they are, and is laughing at the inept Knick organization.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
Nalod
Posts: 71931
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/3/2006  9:10 PM
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by fishmike:

well I had to listen to these guys bash another Knick coach all season long in finding ways to protect and defend our soft players. Saying the Pistons are better w/o Larry was one of the things said. Guess thats not really true huh? Maybe after 20 years of losing and 15 coaches it will sink in the problem is with the guys on the court. Maybe



How do you guys look at yourselves in the mirror and say it Flips fualt and not LB's fault, How?..



I don't like to look in the mirror anymore!


"mirror mirror on the wall whos the fairest coach of them all?"

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30255
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
6/3/2006  9:22 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

two names of younger guys traded by LB were larry hughes and tim thomas. it's funny tho, b/c those two players never really helped a team win anything significant. you can say larry was part of a 45 win wizards team, who let him go. (didn't really help cle all that much). and tim with fresh legs off of 1 month of bball is doing OK in the playoffs 9 years into his career.

what's the point, i think it's fair to say that lb knows who can help a team legitimately win and who can't. so if he dumped larry hughes and tim thomas, there were good reasons to. and after he traded those guys, the team went on to win more games the following years. meanwhile, hughes, while accumulating stats, did really help his teams overachieve and neither did tim.

marbury was 26 years old and was eventually replaced by a 30 year old.

you see, it's not all about age. it's about who can help you WIN and legitimately WIN. guys like lb, riles - those guys have been around long enough to know. so if they want a "young" guy traded, it's for good reason.

It goes like this a guy like Tim Thomas is a guy that LB will trade away. A guy like Ty Prince is a guy that LB will work with an develop.

LB wants young defense first, unselfish players, atheltic players. Young or old at every position.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

6/3/2006  10:21 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by djsunyc:

two names of younger guys traded by LB were larry hughes and tim thomas. it's funny tho, b/c those two players never really helped a team win anything significant. you can say larry was part of a 45 win wizards team, who let him go. (didn't really help cle all that much). and tim with fresh legs off of 1 month of bball is doing OK in the playoffs 9 years into his career.

what's the point, i think it's fair to say that lb knows who can help a team legitimately win and who can't. so if he dumped larry hughes and tim thomas, there were good reasons to. and after he traded those guys, the team went on to win more games the following years. meanwhile, hughes, while accumulating stats, did really help his teams overachieve and neither did tim.

marbury was 26 years old and was eventually replaced by a 30 year old.

you see, it's not all about age. it's about who can help you WIN and legitimately WIN. guys like lb, riles - those guys have been around long enough to know. so if they want a "young" guy traded, it's for good reason.

It goes like this a guy like Tim Thomas is a guy that LB will trade away. A guy like Ty Prince is a guy that LB will work with an develop.

LB wants young defense first, unselfish players, atheltic players. Young or old at every position.

Bingo!

nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/3/2006  10:23 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by djsunyc:

two names of younger guys traded by LB were larry hughes and tim thomas. it's funny tho, b/c those two players never really helped a team win anything significant. you can say larry was part of a 45 win wizards team, who let him go. (didn't really help cle all that much). and tim with fresh legs off of 1 month of bball is doing OK in the playoffs 9 years into his career.

what's the point, i think it's fair to say that lb knows who can help a team legitimately win and who can't. so if he dumped larry hughes and tim thomas, there were good reasons to. and after he traded those guys, the team went on to win more games the following years. meanwhile, hughes, while accumulating stats, did really help his teams overachieve and neither did tim.

marbury was 26 years old and was eventually replaced by a 30 year old.

you see, it's not all about age. it's about who can help you WIN and legitimately WIN. guys like lb, riles - those guys have been around long enough to know. so if they want a "young" guy traded, it's for good reason.

It goes like this a guy like Tim Thomas is a guy that LB will trade away. A guy like Ty Prince is a guy that LB will work with an develop.

LB wants young defense first, unselfish players, atheltic players. Young or old at every position.

I def. agree with that sentiment. What you just said is more or less what I've been trying to convey to many people on this board for awhile now.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

6/3/2006  10:40 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by djsunyc:

two names of younger guys traded by LB were larry hughes and tim thomas. it's funny tho, b/c those two players never really helped a team win anything significant. you can say larry was part of a 45 win wizards team, who let him go. (didn't really help cle all that much). and tim with fresh legs off of 1 month of bball is doing OK in the playoffs 9 years into his career.

what's the point, i think it's fair to say that lb knows who can help a team legitimately win and who can't. so if he dumped larry hughes and tim thomas, there were good reasons to. and after he traded those guys, the team went on to win more games the following years. meanwhile, hughes, while accumulating stats, did really help his teams overachieve and neither did tim.

marbury was 26 years old and was eventually replaced by a 30 year old.

you see, it's not all about age. it's about who can help you WIN and legitimately WIN. guys like lb, riles - those guys have been around long enough to know. so if they want a "young" guy traded, it's for good reason.

It goes like this a guy like Tim Thomas is a guy that LB will trade away. A guy like Ty Prince is a guy that LB will work with an develop.

LB wants young defense first, unselfish players, atheltic players. Young or old at every position.



Larry Hughs is one of the best defenders at his position in the league...That didn't stops Larry from trading him....

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

6/3/2006  10:41 PM

Ariza was one of the better defender on the Knicks...Larry didn't havfe a problem seeing him go...

OldFan
Posts: 21456
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2003
Member: #446
6/3/2006  11:05 PM
Posted by holfresh:


Ariza was one of the better defender on the Knicks...Larry didn't havfe a problem seeing him go...


Ariza was at Best an average defender - with little understanding of the game and a bad attitude. When he makes his first all defensive team - you can bring this up again.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

6/3/2006  11:10 PM
Posted by OldFan:
Posted by holfresh:


Ariza was one of the better defender on the Knicks...Larry didn't havfe a problem seeing him go...


Ariza was at Best an average defender - with little understanding of the game and a bad attitude. When he makes his first all defensive team - you can bring this up again.



Nonsense...the guy had a great attitude...He was the best defender on the Knicks..Looking at the PHX
Dallas series, you can never have enough 6'8" defenders on your team...Now you are resorting to trashing one of the better young kids in the league to make you coach look good...

Come on...

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/3/2006  11:14 PM
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by OldFan:
Posted by holfresh:


Ariza was one of the better defender on the Knicks...Larry didn't havfe a problem seeing him go...


Ariza was at Best an average defender - with little understanding of the game and a bad attitude. When he makes his first all defensive team - you can bring this up again.



Nonsense...the guy had a great attitude...He was the best defender on the Knicks..Looking at the PHX
Dallas series, you can never have enough 6'8" defenders on your team...Now you are resorting to trashing one of the better young kids in the league to make you coach look good...

Come on...


i liked ariza. but i also think we were very excited over guys like frank, ariza, and sweets b/c they were the first sniff of young players we had here in a long time. ariza still could become a good player but he was CRAZY raw. like others said, he didn't have a handle, he didn't have a jumpshot, and unless he dunked, he couldn't really finish. he could not have played for pheonix this year b/c they require skill players at each position. and with the addition of qyntel, and lee who we were trying to make a SF, ariza was the odd man out. you have NO idea if he had a great attitude or not. nobody does outside of the players and the coaches.

losing ariza doesn't kill us since we have qyntel and david. let's see if orlando re-signs him long term.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
6/3/2006  11:16 PM
Hughes is not a good defender. He gets steals, if you think gettin a lot of steals is a sure indicator of being a lockdown defender you need to learn the game.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

6/3/2006  11:19 PM
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by djsunyc:

two names of younger guys traded by LB were larry hughes and tim thomas. it's funny tho, b/c those two players never really helped a team win anything significant. you can say larry was part of a 45 win wizards team, who let him go. (didn't really help cle all that much). and tim with fresh legs off of 1 month of bball is doing OK in the playoffs 9 years into his career.

what's the point, i think it's fair to say that lb knows who can help a team legitimately win and who can't. so if he dumped larry hughes and tim thomas, there were good reasons to. and after he traded those guys, the team went on to win more games the following years. meanwhile, hughes, while accumulating stats, did really help his teams overachieve and neither did tim.

marbury was 26 years old and was eventually replaced by a 30 year old.

you see, it's not all about age. it's about who can help you WIN and legitimately WIN. guys like lb, riles - those guys have been around long enough to know. so if they want a "young" guy traded, it's for good reason.

It goes like this a guy like Tim Thomas is a guy that LB will trade away. A guy like Ty Prince is a guy that LB will work with an develop.

LB wants young defense first, unselfish players, atheltic players. Young or old at every position.



Larry Hughs is one of the best defenders at his position in the league...That didn't stops Larry from trading him....


So you prefer him buried behind Iverson?

BTW, they also went to the finals the following season.

wow, RV, Holfresh, you "guys" the Pistons arent better without Larry Brown

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy