Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by oohah:
No that's just your assumption of what you think I will feel and has nothing to do with me.
I will be happy to see a future. Record is unimportant.
Politics Bippity! You're a natural!
Actually it wasn't an assumption but a question--and you answered it. When LB wins 35 you will be happy.
Somehow or another his 35 wins will be different from someone elses 35...just like his 23 are different from someone elses. Somehow you have seperated the record from the future outlook. The laws of sports stand on their head in the Bippity-verse!
oohah
[Edited by - oohah on 05-11-2006 2:26 PM]
ooh aah and no point have I said I would be happy with any amount of wins. So not sure where you come up with this stuff but once again it is you thrusting your thoughts and opinions upon me.
Back in 2000 we won 45 some odd games and almost beat Toronto in the playoffs. That was the year Latrell blamed the rest of the team for losing the series. That was also the year I started screaming and yelling that we were going backwards and that ultimately we would implode. If you had been posting with me all this time you would realize this is not new from my perspective. The only thing that is new is taht there is just a different poster accusing me of being happy if we win 35 games under Brown. Back then they said Chaney, and after that they said Wilkens. Now you are saying Brown.
Again, wins is insignificant. It's just another thing for fans to sing and brag about. Progress is important. If we win 50 games with LB and have the same atmosphere we are going to just implode again eventually. But if the culture of this organization changes regardless of record than it is a good thing. Once again, you will ignore that I am saying...........I dont' give a flying rat's asse about Larry Brown. I can't make it anymore clear. If he is fired tomorrow I will not celebrate and I will not cry. But I will watch the organizations reaction. IF we decide to bring in another proven successful guy who wants changes you will see me satisfied. IF you see another guy brought in to appease the players you will hear me biotch like you heard me biotch with Chaney and Lenny and Herb. The names mean nothing to me. I don't care about any of them. I care about the Knicks. I care about changes. How those changes come about are irrelevant. But they must occur and they are.
PS: not one time did I say that winning 23 games was a strategy of LB's. Where do you guys come up with this stuff. Do you reach a conclusion even before your finish reading the post. You know that would kill you on the SAT's.
Whoo-boy! Don't even know where you are going with most of this. But I do know this:
A few weeks ago you stated in no uncertain terms that you "worshipped LB"! And yes, you used the word worship! So spare me!
You can insult my intelligence as much as you want. You can defend everything LB does and canonize him while simultaneously saying you don't care about him.
But you still won't answer the question: Will you be happy when LB wins 35? Or is there some other magical measure that only you can see?
Now maybe you can answer the question instead of dodging it out like Ricochet Rabbit! You know, your inability/unwillingness to answer a question straight will hurt your test scores when you are getting you Masters in: "Everythin' wut LB duz is right, and ever'body what dudn't see it dudn't read muh posts fullee"
Now bring on the rhetoric!
oohah
[Edited by - oohah on 05-11-2006 3:05 PM]