Posted by WOODMANnYk:
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by WOODMANnYk:
Posted by holfresh:
Bro, if Larry wins 35 games next year it's still a failure, because team would have been exactly where Larry met it two years before....And he got there with nuff drama to go with it....The only way Larry can be a success after this year is 40-45 wins and threaten to get to the second round of the playoffs...Any thing short of that is a failure on a scale never seen in New York....This coming year is huge for that guy and his legacy...Blame Marbs all you want this year...We will see who is the scapegoat next year...
[Edited by - holfresh on 04-15-2006 2:36 PM]
you still did not answer my question... both San antonio and philly finished better than the prior last season..
As a matter of fact, S.A. 21 - 61 one yr, next yr, over 50 wins.. Knicks can do the same..
Not only blaming marbs.. Several people in the organization such as the buffoon owner, the horrible GM and yeah the coach as well is @ fault.
if you have a coach that wants you to play a specific way and you can't do it then the coach will find someone else that will be able to orchestrate his system efficiently on the floor..
[Edited by - WOODMANnYk on 04-15-2006 2:45 PM]
I think you may need to look at David Robinson before you run off to credit Larry Brown with that turn around....You are dreaming if you think it's only Larry's system makes people win and not the players on the court...By the way, the Pistons seems to be orchestrating their offense efficiently without Brown...
You need a franchise player to make those turn arounds..Coaches are not able to have that type of impact without players....
[Edited by - holfresh on 04-15-2006 2:56 PM]
Oh, so you're saying that David Robinson did it by himself with the Spurs.. who else do you know on that team?? WHat about Philly??? 31 - 51 one yr, next yr(strike shortened season) 28 - 22.. next yr after that, 49-33.
What are you gonna tell me now, "Oh, don't forget, they had Iverson" just know that these teams followed the Brown's system and ended up quite successful.
Don't forget the nets, clippers and Nuggets which he coached and did well ...
1009- 798 record as coach..
As for the Pistons, they didn't have a franchise player on their squad, they had role players and please don't tell me billups or any of the wallaces were franchise players...
[Edited by - WOODMANnYk on 04-15-2006 3:23 PM]
If you going to came at me with Larry turning aroud SA, then please don't ommit that fact that David Robinson was drafted that year....Along with him, they traded for Terry Cummings, I think they drafted Sean Elliot in the same year, David Wingate, Knicks gave them Rod Strickland on a platter for Maurice Cheeks who had like 3 games left in him....Willie Anderson was playing allstar type ball at that time....Don't give me that Larry turned it around stuff...
Sheed was the difference in Detroit, they won 50 games 2 consecutive season b4 Larry got there... The Pistion look even better now without Larry and I am rooting for them to win it this year because everyone thought it was all Larry there as well...
Yeah, Iverson is one of the all time greats in teh sport, the east was weak at the time...but lets ignore that, it must be Larry....
[Edited by - holfresh on 04-15-2006 3:38 PM]