Noah is a good kid and will make a good role player on a good team, but when I read all this ridiculous hype of how good he is going to be, because he can jump over shorter less athletic college kids make me laugh. I like Horford better, NBA body, he actually has a post game of some sort, is a good passer and Billy donovan said he hs the highest bball IQ of any player he has ever coached, not bad considering he had mike miller there also....
but what I find really shameless is to write him off as Dan Gadz, watch him show he is actually a focal point, a leader, and then proceed to tip toe around your prior statement on the foot not lodged in your mouth and try to draw others into a Horford-Noah debate.
this is the nonesense I am talking about, Dan Gadzurich was a similar player at UCLA and he actually had a post game, but we are supposed to believe that Noah will be better because some bandwagon rider feels it is shameless to compare him to a player that actually played a more refined game than he did in college? dude wake up, dan gadzurich was a good player at UCLA, go back and watch the tapes.. If noah is as good as gads is he will be lucky... very lucky...
watch him show he is actually a focal point, a leader
my lord, there are a lot of focal points and leaders out there, farmar from UCLA is one, Horford, Green are all leaders on that team, just because the kid flies around with his hair waving does not make him a leader, just because he likes to run his mouth doesn't make him a leader either, you are really putting on a good comedy act... No need to make this a Horford Noah debate, anyone in their right mind will notice the Horford is just the better player...
[Edited by - tkf on 04-04-2006 09:59 AM]
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF