Posted by islesfan:

Posted by joec32033:

Posted by islesfan:

And Isiah and his advisors opened that door when they decided to let his son bring up his character to the press. And the repercussions are being played out on this thread.

I really don't think Isiah and his advisors had any choice in his kid coming out....I think Isiah's "son" (I would like to see some proof) saw the guy responsible (or whom he thinks is responsible, if this isn't a scam) for his birth (notice I didn't say father), and his resentment got the best of him and he decided to be opportunistic and perhaps get even.

I meant the other male whose birth Isiah was responsible for.

And sorry if you thought I was being standoffish.

Posted by Rich:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by Rich:

I meant opening the door in court.

There's no such bar out of court, as we can see.

If Isiah and his pr team wants to make him out to be such a good person who would never do anything like what he's accused of then don't blame others for making comments that contradict their claims.

You're missing my point. In any court proceeding, the goal is to determine whether or not the accused is liable/guilty as charged. Character evidence tends to prejudice the finders of fact (i.e., the jury).

That's what we are seeing on this thread. Whether or not a person has done questionable things in the past, doesn't necessarily mean they did something wrong in any particular instance.

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by joec32033:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by Bonn1997:

If I may offer my two cents, maybe a decent compromise is to move this to the O/T thread?

I'll offer my two cents and say that's a reasonable compromise

My two cents says your two cents isn't worth two cents.

Asswipe.

Would you offer a clarification on who you are calling names?

Bonn = Asswipe

Feel better?