[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

LIVE from secion 404...and why we need to ship marbury out ASAP
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
12/27/2005  2:51 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

djsunync: We seem to think there are an abundance of stars that can take that kind of beating without losing confidence. I would say that 30+ years without a title probably means there aren't. I just don't understand where our arrogance comes from when we never win. If we don't get Ewing in the lottery what would this team have won since the early 70's?

Why is it so hard to support our best players?

The evidence is right in front of your eyes

1.)15 years of great play. Then we run Ewing out of town(don't ever forget the see Ew later signs) and we go from title contender to high lottery.

2.)We call Houston a bumb and say anyone can replace him. We boo him at charity events. We ignore one of the biggest shots in team history. We now have gone from having one of the top 3 shooters in the world to a team that can't make a jumper outside of 15 feet and now is a low lottery team.

3.) Now we are targeting our next star.

4.) When Marbs is gone the wrath will turn on Curry and Frye and the cycle of no championship banners will continue.

We are the only fans in the league that worship our role players

bip, you're making good and valid arguments. but i think those on the other side of the fence are making valid arguments as well. it's a tough question - is it the chicken or the egg?

i don't mind changing my mind b/c i don't give a crap if i'm right or wrong. but speaking for myself, i'm a BIG guy in terms of how people respond in adversity. steph is going through a tremendous amount of it here...and he's wilting to it. i feel bad for him as a person. i have compassion for him. but at the end of the day, i want this team to win. i have NO CLUE how good our young guys are...but with marbury on this team, sulking around, i don't think we can truly assess them. it sucks for steph.

but it's not going to stop. you know it. and i know it. it's ny. we don't support anybody unless they win. "what have you done for me lately?" that's the ny mantra...but it's what seperates our fanbase than everywhere else. it's the city's mentality. what can we do about it? why should we be supportive when the transit workers go on strike against the city and in the meantime, the city giving us all a big "FU" in the process? cold and harsh - that's nyc and that's it's fanbase.

[Edited by - djsunyc on 12-27-2005 2:56 PM]
AUTOADVERT
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
12/27/2005  3:01 PM
I was at the game. This is only the second game I've been to. I guess I was kind of tired anyway, but I didn't realize how much energy it takes as a fan to cheer your team on when they're playing badly. A lot of the time, the Knicks fans were quiet.

It is disheartening when the other team keeps running back door plays and dunking, or making uncontested 3 pointers.

I think there was one period during the mini-run, about 4 possessions, when the Knicks played some good defense and the crowd got involved, but it didn't last.

From what I can see, the Knicks problems begin and end on defense. If they played better D and left it all out on the floor, I don't think the fans would be booing them, win or lose.

The Knicks defense has been atrocious. That's the biggest problem they have.
https:// It's not so hard.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
12/27/2005  3:08 PM
I'm kinda with Bip. This is behavior Stephon has been doing since he was with Minnesota. And it's almost the same as Allan Houston who rarely seemed to be outwardly excited or mad or anything. In fact, at times he just looked flat out depressed even though he wasn't. But that's just not what translates onto the court. Marbury had HUGE baskets and he couldn't help that Curry is a friggin' pansy, Ariza has no clue what to do with the basketball, AD is 98 years old, James and Q suck, and the rest of his teammates are just either too inconsistent or inexperienced. And on top of that, the fans are blaming Marbury for all of this.

This is my ONE knock on Marbury from last nights game on the court. Even before the game started, me, DJ, everyone in the garden including Marbury knew that our starting lineup was just a disaster in the making. We didn't have any guys who could put the ball in the hoop. He should have just tried doing things himself a little earlier, but that's my only knock. He can't help that he's going up against J Kidd.

I will point this out again. I am NOT a Marbury lover. There were times when he pissed me off a lot, mainly from last season and his defense and him getting in fights with KT and that best pg in the league comment, but that's in the past. LB says he's playing his heart out. I see him playing his heart out. He's not a leader. I also notice that when things go well, he's cheering for his teammates as loud as anyone. I mean, maybe the losing has gone to his head. Hasn't it gotton to yours? So what he looks like a deadman on the bench. He looks like a star on the court, and that's what matters to me.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
12/27/2005  3:12 PM
And again, I will re state this point. Allan Houston was almost the same as Marbury, in terms of his demeaner. He rarely looked happy. Not angry, but certainly not happy, and this dated back to Detroit, and I'm sure his whole life. We rarely talked about it when the Knicks were winning, but he was the same. Sure he'd show signs of life in that face, but it was still almost expressionless. but we didn't notice until that big contract he got and we started losing.

Same crap with Stephon. That one half a season we made that run to the first round of the playoffs, nobody took note that he had that expressionless face b/c we were winning a little more and showing some life.

If we were winning right now, I betcha you guys would be saying "Ohhhh, that stone cold look on Stephons eyes is amazing. Nobody better than him to represent Brooklyyyyyyyyyyyn!!!!!"
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/27/2005  4:09 PM
It's all about winning. When we are losing we always target our main guy and this is why no GM is going to instantly tear it down and go out and sign all the top free-agents. It unfortunately takes a special person to play and lead in NY. Pat was that guy. But there aren't too many of them filing for free-agency. The chances of one of them up and signing with us just because we have money under the cap when they know they will get boo'd is not a guarantee. I'm not saying it wouldn't happen but I'm saying the treatment of Pat, Houston and Marbs is an indication that it would not be the guaranteed success some seem to think it would be. My guess is we'd be able to overpay for another flawed star.

Basketball jones: I'm disheartened by that too. My basketball team plays with unbeleivalbe passion and grit and I'm still disheartened by them 90% of the time. Imagine how I feel abou the Knicks. But I don't boo Stephon for that when my team is making a run.
I just hope that people will like me
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
12/27/2005  4:13 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

It's all about winning. When we are losing we always target our main guy and this is why no GM is going to instantly tear it down and go out and sign all the top free-agents. It unfortunately takes a special person to play and lead in NY. Pat was that guy. But there aren't too many of them filing for free-agency. The chances of one of them up and signing with us just because we have money under the cap when they know they will get boo'd is not a guarantee. I'm not saying it wouldn't happen but I'm saying the treatment of Pat, Houston and Marbs is an indication that it would not be the guaranteed success some seem to think it would be. My guess is we'd be able to overpay for another flawed star.

Basketball jones: I'm disheartened by that too. My basketball team plays with unbeleivalbe passion and grit and I'm still disheartened by them 90% of the time. Imagine how I feel abou the Knicks. But I don't boo Stephon for that when my team is making a run.

I never said Marbury should be booed.
https:// It's not so hard.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/27/2005  4:34 PM
Don't take it personal. I did not mean you boo'd. I am not angry with you. I am angry with the fans that boo a single player who has 21 pts and 5 assits when our team is in the midst of a last ditch comeback effort.

Nate and Craw played very well down the stretch and Marbs was boo'd for it. Yet when we beat Utah, STeph hits huge shots, carries us for a stretch, Craw is unstoppable I don't hear anyone booing Nate.

Our offense stinks when Marbs is on the court with Antonio "all thumbs" Davis, Quentin "ouch my back" Richardson, Trevor "one move" Ariza and Jerome "give me more food" James. Until Crawford comes in and turns this bunch into an offensive juggernaut I am not giving the guy praise for his leadership. If Nate doesn't go 5 for his first 5 on three pointers we never were in that game.
I just hope that people will like me
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
12/27/2005  5:22 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

And again, I will re state this point. Allan Houston was almost the same as Marbury, in terms of his demeaner. He rarely looked happy. Not angry, but certainly not happy, and this dated back to Detroit, and I'm sure his whole life. We rarely talked about it when the Knicks were winning, but he was the same. Sure he'd show signs of life in that face, but it was still almost expressionless. but we didn't notice until that big contract he got and we started losing.

Same crap with Stephon.


Exactly. Thank you. It's very easy to identify a goat and magnify all his flaws when things are going wrong. But when things are going wrong with a basketball team, it's usually because of a complex constellation of failures. Unfortunately, there's some kind of momentum now where the mob has found its effigy to beat and is gaining in numbers. Its logic is tortured and fractured at best, never accounting for context and frequently relying on "intuition," but that doesn't matter-- the mob never likes to think. As an unfortunate consequence, not only are the Knicks almost unwatchable, but this board is almost unreadable.

[Edited by - tomverve on 12-27-2005 5:25 PM]
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
12/27/2005  5:40 PM
Posted by tomverve:



the mob never likes to think. As an unfortunate consequence, not only are the Knicks almost unwatchable, .

[Edited by - tomverve on 12-27-2005 5:25 PM]

wait hold on a second, are you saying that its the fan's fault that the knicks are playing badly?

[Edited by - SlimPack on 12-27-2005 5:40 PM]
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
12/27/2005  5:56 PM
Posted by SlimPack:

wait hold on a second, are you saying that its the fan's fault that the knicks are playing badly?


um. no.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
12/27/2005  6:19 PM
Posted by tomverve:
Posted by SlimPack:

wait hold on a second, are you saying that its the fan's fault that the knicks are playing badly?


um. no.

Oh I think I get it, you meant that the home games are unwatchable becuase of the ignorant booing, ok nevermind

[Edited by - SlimPack on 12-27-2005 6:24 PM]
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/27/2005  6:55 PM
Posted by tomverve:
Posted by Allanfan20:

And again, I will re state this point. Allan Houston was almost the same as Marbury, in terms of his demeaner. He rarely looked happy. Not angry, but certainly not happy, and this dated back to Detroit, and I'm sure his whole life. We rarely talked about it when the Knicks were winning, but he was the same. Sure he'd show signs of life in that face, but it was still almost expressionless. but we didn't notice until that big contract he got and we started losing.

Same crap with Stephon.


Exactly. Thank you. It's very easy to identify a goat and magnify all his flaws when things are going wrong. But when things are going wrong with a basketball team, it's usually because of a complex constellation of failures. Unfortunately, there's some kind of momentum now where the mob has found its effigy to beat and is gaining in numbers. Its logic is tortured and fractured at best, never accounting for context and frequently relying on "intuition," but that doesn't matter-- the mob never likes to think. As an unfortunate consequence, not only are the Knicks almost unwatchable, but this board is almost unreadable.

[Edited by - tomverve on 12-27-2005 5:25 PM]


Great post!
I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/27/2005  6:58 PM
Posted by SlimPack:
Posted by tomverve:



the mob never likes to think. As an unfortunate consequence, not only are the Knicks almost unwatchable, .

[Edited by - tomverve on 12-27-2005 5:25 PM]

wait hold on a second, are you saying that its the fan's fault that the knicks are playing badly?

[Edited by - SlimPack on 12-27-2005 5:40 PM]



An example of what TomVerve just stated. Noone has stated we are losing because of the booing. What some are saying is that the booing is misplaced and directed at one guy when it should be directed at the whole ship. This is allowing the ship to hide behind that one guy.

I thought the booing last night came at the worst possible moment and did nothing to help the team whatsoever. Marbs will not be aa leader now that we boo'd. It did nothign but cause more of a media circus which will ultimately lead to more instability and more trades and firings for more "saviors".
I just hope that people will like me
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
12/27/2005  7:25 PM
i'm sorry but i'm not buying it.

is booing marbury fair? you know what? damn right it's fair. the team is losing and he's the face of the franchise. he sits there with a towel on his head. you know what? i don't want to cheer that. mob mentality? what mentality? that our team is 7-20 and booing is hurting them? i'm sorry fellas, i'm not buying it. is marbury the reason we're 7-20? hell no, and anybody who says that doesn't know what they're talking about. i hold him to a different standard b/c of what he's getting paid and what he's supposed to be on this team. i do not seperate the contract from the player b/c in the nba, contracts MATTER.

so we're supposed to sit there and support them. cheer them on? sure, let's do that. if that was the case, layden would still be here. (you get my point)

the booing of marbury was bad. but everyone has a right to voice their displeasure and there are more and more people that are starting to dislike marbury. if you think they are being swayed by the media then there's no reason trying to discuss this.

i'm coming from a different perspective. i don't hear the announcers. i don't hear the commentators. i just watch the games b/c i'm there live. you don't hear the fans at the arena on a night in and night out basis and their reactions to certain things. the complaining about steph has been going on since the beginning of the season. do you know how many times i heard "pass the ball steph" from people that have been season ticket holders for over 15 years? how many times i hear "come on steph!" these are guys that have been in those seats for the 69 championship season. the energy of the crowd is different when the young guys are in. they...we...have every right to boo marbury if we want to. and in my case, it has NOTHING to do with all this stuff from the media - it has to do with what i see on the court.

i don't like the "mob mentality" reference. i'd like to think each and every person has their own opinion and have their reasons for it. things happen for a reason. remember, we're talking about steph. this has been the same thing with him for his ENTIRE CAREER. so it's either EVERY SINGLE COACH AND GM he's played under fault, or maybe, just maybe, it's him.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/27/2005  7:33 PM
I would agree with you if we hadn't done the same thing to Patrick Ewing and Allan HOuston. This is why I don't think your argument carries weight. We target one player and go after that player incessantly. Meanwhile management hides behind this player counting their money. Boo the team, boo the organization but singling out a player for all our ills and thinking the next guy is our savior is what Ny Knicks ball is all about.
I just hope that people will like me
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
12/27/2005  8:27 PM
Posted by Bippity10:


What some are saying is that the booing is misplaced and directed at one guy when it should be directed at the whole ship. This is allowing the ship to hide behind that one guy.

this isnt really true, last night was either the first or second time the crowd boo'd marbury individually, they usually just boo the entire team, and nate robinson and some other players have been indivisually boo'd before too.
Posted by Bippity10:

It did nothign but cause more of a media circus which will ultimately lead to more instability and more trades and firings for more "saviors".

so far it hasnt really been talked about in the media, also are you sure that the media has the power to cuase trades and firings? becuase I'm not. also I've never heard of the media cuasing team instability either.I would think that the players and coaches know more about whats going on than the media does.





[Edited by - SlimPack on 12-27-2005 8:46 PM]
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/27/2005  8:42 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

Blueseats: I sat behind the bench for about 10 games during 2002/2003 and the fans down there were so relentlessly awful towards Allan that it was pathetic. Again this is what we did with Ewing. After the fact we all pretend that the bad treatment never happened. Forget it then, we treated Allan like gold.

I'll take your word for that. I was up in the blues, Sec 422 Row A, and we didn't get too personal up there, except to the opponents.

I would not condone booing Patrick or Allan, cause I never doubted their hearts were in the right place.

That said, even though I'm big on a traditional rebuild, when it was time for Patrick to go I supported the trade rather than letting the contract expire. Why? Precisely because the Garden was becoming brutal on him, and I wanted him to go out with dignity.

But Steph has not left his soul on the floor for us like Patrick; I don't think it's fair to compare them or fans relationship to them, other than to note that perhaps NY likes media savvy people. One of the reasons Isiah got off to such a fast start with the populace after Layden.

And regarding the fans mistreatment of Ewing, I think that began before 94. I think it began before my reign in 92. I don't know the details but supposedly it started on a Patrick Ewing poster night, when fans threw his image at him on the floor for a loss, possibly back in the 80s. Yes, very unfair indeed. But again, up where I sat there was none of that. Like many, Ewing wasn't my favorite Knick, Oakley was, but none of us in Sec 422 disrespected Pat, even at the end.
I have no problem with booing. I have no problem with fans being tough on players. I have no problem with NY being the toughest place on the planet to play. But at least boo when it's warranted. Right now Steph is taking a very undeserved beating. He is not any different today as a person than he was 2 years ago when we cheered him. He pouted then, and he pouts now. HE didn't lead then, and he doesn't lead now. Yet two years ago we cheered him as a savior, as the reason we went going from the doldrums to the playoffs. Now we are losing and people are magically inventing things, like how he is behaving on the bench and on the court etc. The same shiot we did to Patrick and Allan.

We cheered him differently in 03 because we thought he was a changed person. But since that time we learn he's still turning off his teammates, power-struggling with coaches, and still looking like he hates basketball, just like he did waaay back in New Jersey. Some of us thought he was a better PG than he is, some of us thought he was more ready for leadership than he is, some of us thought he was a better defender than he is, some of us thought he could do more for this team than he has. There were a lot of reasons for our faith in him at the time.

But for many of us there is so little of that faith left, and for that part of our disappointment that he is responsible for, like appearing unmotivated and detached, he hears complaints. I know you don't see it, but what I see is a guy who plays very nonchalant unless he's going for his own. I see a man who takes little joy in setting up his teammates or making an offense tick. I see a guy who shows little passion for defense or lose balls. I see a guy who needs to be told to act like a man. I see a guy who on arrival asks to be judged on wins, then complains how unfair it is to be judged on wins. I see a guy who last year only practiced by invitation. i see a guy who told a HOF coach (Wilkens) to 'stick it' with his coaching. I see a guy who buys friends with cars and suits but fosters little commraderie on-court. I see a guy who wears a towel like blinders when he's on the bench. I see a guy who rarely says "my bad" to take pressure off a teammate or to help them feel like they'll get 'em next time. I see a player who looks like he's dying to be on another team in another city, regardless of what city he's in.

Steph was booed because fans have come to expect a downward momentum shift when he re-enters a game because of energy and chemistry deficiencies. Because our mediocre alternative PGs both seem able to outplay him. Because of his apparent disinterest in his teammates when he's napping under his towel. Because Isiah gifted him with the best coach in the game and two of the best bigmen he could find and Steph hasn't shown a proclivity to embrace them. Because Steph looks like he's checking out and he needs a reality check from the fanbase.

This isn't a free ride, Steph needs to earn it every night. I don't care about the GM in his pocket or his sometimes impressive stat-lines, Steph looks like he's been mailing it in. That's not gonna cut it for anyone on this team. Last night was Steph's turn, but when Frye, Jamal, or whoever starts looking like they don't want to be here they're gonna get an earful too.

[Edited by - BlueSeats on 12-27-2005 9:29 PM]
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/28/2005  7:17 AM
Fans also see that Jamal's playing solid D.
I just hope that people will like me
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
12/28/2005  9:09 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

i'm sorry but i'm not buying it.

is booing marbury fair? you know what? damn right it's fair. the team is losing and he's the face of the franchise. he sits there with a towel on his head. you know what? i don't want to cheer that. mob mentality? what mentality? that our team is 7-20 and booing is hurting them? i'm sorry fellas, i'm not buying it. is marbury the reason we're 7-20? hell no, and anybody who says that doesn't know what they're talking about. i hold him to a different standard b/c of what he's getting paid and what he's supposed to be on this team. i do not seperate the contract from the player b/c in the nba, contracts MATTER.

so we're supposed to sit there and support them. cheer them on? sure, let's do that. if that was the case, layden would still be here. (you get my point)

the booing of marbury was bad. but everyone has a right to voice their displeasure and there are more and more people that are starting to dislike marbury. if you think they are being swayed by the media then there's no reason trying to discuss this.

i'm coming from a different perspective. i don't hear the announcers. i don't hear the commentators. i just watch the games b/c i'm there live. you don't hear the fans at the arena on a night in and night out basis and their reactions to certain things. the complaining about steph has been going on since the beginning of the season. do you know how many times i heard "pass the ball steph" from people that have been season ticket holders for over 15 years? how many times i hear "come on steph!" these are guys that have been in those seats for the 69 championship season. the energy of the crowd is different when the young guys are in. they...we...have every right to boo marbury if we want to. and in my case, it has NOTHING to do with all this stuff from the media - it has to do with what i see on the court.

i don't like the "mob mentality" reference. i'd like to think each and every person has their own opinion and have their reasons for it. things happen for a reason. remember, we're talking about steph. this has been the same thing with him for his ENTIRE CAREER. so it's either EVERY SINGLE COACH AND GM he's played under fault, or maybe, just maybe, it's him.
good post. I agree 100%
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/28/2005  9:44 AM
i do not seperate the contract from the player b/c in the nba, contracts MATTER.
Do you expect Penny and AD to be almost as productive as Marbury? Or do contracts matter only when you want them to matter?
LIVE from secion 404...and why we need to ship marbury out ASAP

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy