[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

simple question--do you have expectations of making the playoffs next year?
Author Thread
kshortell
Posts: 20009
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/8/2005
Member: #954
8/9/2005  12:52 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

I expect playoffs. whether they're ready to win more than a game or two remains to be seen.

I would say this:

* missing the playoffs = huge failure

* making the playoffs, one round and done = meets expectations

* advance to second round = huge success
I fully agree. With one or two more moves, the Knicks could threaten to push into the second round.
"This is the bad time." - Henry Hill
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/9/2005  1:07 PM
Posted by fishmike:

one note...
last year:
Marbury/Moochie
Houston/Crawford/Penny
TT/JYD/Ariza
KT/Sweetney
Nazr/Baker

Coming off a playoff berth we added Crawford and Ariza. TT had a solid 2nd half before he got hurt in the playoffs. Houston had made one semi successfull comeback before colliding with whoever and hurting the knee again. Vin Baker visited the Wizard of Oz and got a new heart. Ariza had great promise and after SL and camp looked like a 2nd round steal. Sweetney lost weight was looked great in the offseason. Crawford was the combo gaurd we needed next to Marbury and was great insurance for Houston. Penny showed he could still be a valuable bench player.

I heard things like great backcourt, super deep, players with upside, bla bla bla. Hell, I was pretty excited to be 15-12 after 1/3 of the season. Well as we all know we went on to win 33 games.

Now I like what we have done in this offseason but can anyone say have have added a single impact player? We lost our most productive and consistant frontcourt player. We added a SG who's shot < 40% for 3 years in a row, 3 rookies, a 30 year old center that misses tons of games and averages 3.6 fouls per 17 minutes and a HOF coach.

Man.. I REALLY want to believe this team has really turned a corner but why should I?

Good question, but I think we ARE better. Four major holes last year have been filled:

1) Shotblocking - we didn't have anyone averaging even 1 block per game. Now we have James and Frye, who at worst should give us three blocks a game (combined). This will help contain a lot of Marbury and Craw's defensive lapses. When guys come to the paint now, there will be one or two big bodies there to make contact, block a shot, alter a shot, make a slasher think for a second before taking it to the rim. This is huge, in my opinion. Maybe it backfires and James plays like crap and Frye is a bust, but I think they'll combine for about 3.5 to 4.0 blocks a night and VASTLY improve our D.

2) Backup PG - may seem minor, but it led to Marbury playing too many minutes and the +/- for the backup PGs (Moochie and Jackson) was -12!!! If Nate can play even (I think he'll have a very good +/-), then Marbury can rest longer and he won't come back from the bench with the team in the whole. Another big improvement.

3) Depth - We THOUGHT we were deep last year, and we may be wrong again, but bottom line: last year Jermaine Jackson was our backup at PG and SG in Feb, Mar, Apr. Now, we have have Nate, Q, Marbury and Craw to man those spots and they're all in their 20s. In the front court, after the Nazr trade, we had no centers and plenty of small PFs. Now we have one legit center in James, one guy who can play there in Frye. We also have Lee and Frye to play the 4. They're long and athletic and will help the defense immensely. I think the fact that a lot of our depth is young is very big. We're not depending on Allan or Penny anymore, who are two of the big reasons we went in the tank when Jamal got injured.

4) Coaching. I was never a fan of the Lenny move. It reeked of panic. I love the Larry Brown move. I think he'll play the guys who play hard and it will be great for the development of Lee, Trevor, Nate and Frye. Our defense will almost certainly be better.

bonus - we have two huge expiring deals to add a major piece in February after Brown gets a feel for the team.

Now, there is the drawback of losing Kurt and Nazr to deal with, but if you look at the fact that we got Q, Nate, Lee, Malik and a #1 pick to replace them, I think we'll be okay.

I'm not saying we'll win the first round (though, if the rooks develop and we make a deadline move, you never know), but I do think this will be an immensely entertaining team that actually has room to improve from within for once. I'm happy with the offseason. Now if it would just end.

[Edited by - crzymdups on 08/09/2005 13:11:09]
¿ △ ?
Nalod
Posts: 71396
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/9/2005  1:16 PM
Posted by fishmike:

one note...
last year:
Marbury/Moochie
Houston/Crawford/Penny
TT/JYD/Ariza
KT/Sweetney
Nazr/Baker

Coming off a playoff berth we added Crawford and Ariza. TT had a solid 2nd half before he got hurt in the playoffs. Houston had made one semi successfull comeback before colliding with whoever and hurting the knee again. Vin Baker visited the Wizard of Oz and got a new heart. Ariza had great promise and after SL and camp looked like a 2nd round steal. Sweetney lost weight was looked great in the offseason. Crawford was the combo gaurd we needed next to Marbury and was great insurance for Houston. Penny showed he could still be a valuable bench player.

I heard things like great backcourt, super deep, players with upside, bla bla bla. Hell, I was pretty excited to be 15-12 after 1/3 of the season. Well as we all know we went on to win 33 games.

Now I like what we have done in this offseason but can anyone say have have added a single impact player? We lost our most productive and consistant frontcourt player. We added a SG who's shot < 40% for 3 years in a row, 3 rookies, a 30 year old center that misses tons of games and averages 3.6 fouls per 17 minutes and a HOF coach.

Man.. I REALLY want to believe this team has really turned a corner but why should I?

Ok, very slowly: "fill pitcher with 2 quarts of cold water, mix in contents of package, stir until suger is diluted. Pour over ice. Repeat as needed.


You do have a point. Larry says it could be awful before it gets much better! I guess your point is correct until it actually improves not on paper or in our hopes, but actually on the basketball court, not the court of public opinion.
fishmike
Posts: 53868
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/9/2005  1:30 PM
crzymdups agree on all your points and if the offseason ended now I would give Isiah a B+

We are bigger, faster and more talented, and we will be better coached. I wouldnt even be suprised if LB does a Rick Carlisle and takes a 32-50 team to 50-32. Anything is possible. I think we are as good as Seattle was last year. We lack the shooter that they have however... time will tell
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
8/9/2005  1:37 PM
Nets, celtics or whoever happens to win the atlantic, or the number 7 seed, the aformentioned and bulls, wizards, sixers, etc.

I see 3 or 7 seed.
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by rvhoss:

Marbs/Craw
Q/Craw
TT/Ariza/Q
Rose/LEE
James/FRYE

me likey alot

The above tight rotation get's us to the second round IMHO.

Just wondering but who do you see that rotation beating in the first round? Just name a few teams.
all kool aid all the time.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/9/2005  1:37 PM
i think we're still looking at a team that should finish around .500 - maybe 43,45 wins. there is no way we are worse than last season, no possible way.

but the knicks motto should be this:

knicks 05/06 - ALL QUESTIONS

b/c we have no clue how everybody will play nor LB's effect.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
8/9/2005  1:39 PM
The Knicks will NOT make the playoffs with the current roster.

Unless:

A) Sweetney, Crawford, James, Q play MUCH better than they have in their respective careers.

B) The whole team starts taking steroids.

C)Ariza Turns into a star...

D)Isiah makes some trades to improve the front court.

E)The rookies are the real deal and all 3 make a substatial impact at their respective positions.

If 2 of these things happen the Knicks have a shot at making the playoffs. If 3 do they can make the 2nd round. I separated Ariza from the rest because I think he is a budding star, and will show the most improvement in the front court this year. I don't know that he will be a "star" this year though.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/9/2005  2:34 PM
[quote]
Posted by oohah:

The Knicks will NOT make the playoffs with the current roster.

Unless:

A) Sweetney, Crawford, James, Q play MUCH better than they have in their respective careers.

B) The whole team starts taking steroids.

C)Ariza Turns into a star...

D)Isiah makes some trades to improve the front court.

E)The rookies are the real deal and all 3 make a substatial impact at their respective positions.

If 2 of these things happen the Knicks have a shot at making the playoffs. If 3 do they can make the 2nd round. I separated Ariza from the rest because I think he is a budding star, and will show the most improvement in the front court this year. I don't know that he will be a "star" this year though.

oohah


better hope that ariza does not turn into a star this year [and i dont think he will, his offensive game is way to raw]bUT if he does, he wont be a Knick the following year because we can only pay him, owning just his early bird rights. if a team likes him enough, he is gone.no 20 FA will EVER take LESS. Bobby Simmons made out as a 1 year wonder, we would rather see trevor play well, but not to the level that would put him on the market above an MLE. I read the entire CBA agreement on draftexpress website and while there is a form of the new arenas rule in there, it would not pertain to Ariza. It's up there to read for anyone who wants to. It doesnt say Arenas rule, but there is a slight diversion from the old CBA, but not in trevor's case.
RIP Crushalot&#128542;
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
8/9/2005  3:15 PM
Good point about Ariza, Briggs. While I want to see him do well I don't want to see him do that well because he is already turning heads in the league where he shouldn't right now. And he loves his hometown area. If I am Isiah I would take a chance on signing him with the LLE for a couple of years.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/9/2005  3:17 PM
[quote]Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by oohah:

The Knicks will NOT make the playoffs with the current roster.

Unless:

A) Sweetney, Crawford, James, Q play MUCH better than they have in their respective careers.

B) The whole team starts taking steroids.

C)Ariza Turns into a star...

D)Isiah makes some trades to improve the front court.

E)The rookies are the real deal and all 3 make a substatial impact at their respective positions.

If 2 of these things happen the Knicks have a shot at making the playoffs. If 3 do they can make the 2nd round. I separated Ariza from the rest because I think he is a budding star, and will show the most improvement in the front court this year. I don't know that he will be a "star" this year though.

oohah


better hope that ariza does not turn into a star this year [and i dont think he will, his offensive game is way to raw]bUT if he does, he wont be a Knick the following year because we can only pay him, owning just his early bird rights. if a team likes him enough, he is gone.no 20 FA will EVER take LESS. Bobby Simmons made out as a 1 year wonder, we would rather see trevor play well, but not to the level that would put him on the market above an MLE. I read the entire CBA agreement on draftexpress website and while there is a form of the new arenas rule in there, it would not pertain to Ariza. It's up there to read for anyone who wants to. It doesnt say Arenas rule, but there is a slight diversion from the old CBA, but not in trevor's case.
You can't seriously be worried about this? Given the depth of the team at the 2/3 and the coach, I don't think Ariza can get enough playing time for a team to offer him more than the MLE. If he's going to have a Bobby Simons season, he'll have to beat out two of TT, Q-Rich, and Jamal to start and average 30 plus mpg and put up 15 PPG, 5 RPG, 3 assists, 2 steals

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 08/09/2005 15:17:45]
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
8/9/2005  3:24 PM
I think that you can expect that on a LB team there won't be any outrageous scoring years from any one player. The fact that they will play better D and be more conservative on O should lead to a game with fewer possessions. Unless they play uptempo and push the ball a lot. With the amount of team speed we have that is a possibility. I just think that we only need for the TEAM to play solid D and the offense will take care of itself. We have players that will get out on the break off of stops and steals and there will be a lot more easy offense next year.

I just think too many of us are stuck in the past and can't see how this team will have improved over the previous years. We haven't had this much talent and depth along with a great coach since JVG left. You don't always need superstars to win. You DO need solid team play and a lot of really good players. I think the Knicks fit thhat bill.
rojasmas
Posts: 21207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/25/2004
Member: #639
8/9/2005  5:37 PM
With the great Larry Brown pulling the strings, there's no reason we can't win 55 games. Truthfully, I think 45 is more realistic.
We could be the Dallas Mavs of the East.
Bobby
Posts: 22094
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/18/2003
Member: #408
USA
8/9/2005  8:23 PM
zeke has finally made a selection that is the most important piece in turning knicks on the road to success.....hire a great coach.

great coaches do a few things very well.....win, continue to win and make playoffs
"Like they always say, New York is the Mecca of basketball,"I read that in Michael Jordan books my whole life and I played here in the Big East tournament, so it's always fun to play in the Mecca of basketball."---Rip Hamilton
firefly
Posts: 23229
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
8/10/2005  9:09 AM
Posted by nixluva:

I think that you can expect that on a LB team there won't be any outrageous scoring years from any one player. The fact that they will play better D and be more conservative on O should lead to a game with fewer possessions. Unless they play uptempo and push the ball a lot. With the amount of team speed we have that is a possibility. I just think that we only need for the TEAM to play solid D and the offense will take care of itself. We have players that will get out on the break off of stops and steals and there will be a lot more easy offense next year.

I just think too many of us are stuck in the past and can't see how this team will have improved over the previous years. We haven't had this much talent and depth along with a great coach since JVG left. You don't always need superstars to win. You DO need solid team play and a lot of really good players. I think the Knicks fit thhat bill.


You're getting a little too hung up on the Larry Brown from Detroit. Don't forget that Iverson averaged over 30 ppg when Larry was coaching him, and put up over 25 shots a game. Thats not to say that Marbury or Crawford are going to turn into AI, cuz their not, I just think that people need to realize that the way Larry played the Pistons is not always the way Larry plays. He played guard oriented in Philly, D oriented in Detroit. Personally, I hope he plays post oriented ball here, because I think that if Sweetney is told to take 10-15 shots a game, he will, and still average almost 60%.

[Edited by - firefly on 08/10/2005 09:11:14]
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
8/10/2005  10:18 AM
Posted by firefly:
Posted by nixluva:

I think that you can expect that on a LB team there won't be any outrageous scoring years from any one player. The fact that they will play better D and be more conservative on O should lead to a game with fewer possessions. Unless they play uptempo and push the ball a lot. With the amount of team speed we have that is a possibility. I just think that we only need for the TEAM to play solid D and the offense will take care of itself. We have players that will get out on the break off of stops and steals and there will be a lot more easy offense next year.

I just think too many of us are stuck in the past and can't see how this team will have improved over the previous years. We haven't had this much talent and depth along with a great coach since JVG left. You don't always need superstars to win. You DO need solid team play and a lot of really good players. I think the Knicks fit thhat bill.


You're getting a little too hung up on the Larry Brown from Detroit. Don't forget that Iverson averaged over 30 ppg when Larry was coaching him, and put up over 25 shots a game. Thats not to say that Marbury or Crawford are going to turn into AI, cuz their not, I just think that people need to realize that the way Larry played the Pistons is not always the way Larry plays. He played guard oriented in Philly, D oriented in Detroit. Personally, I hope he plays post oriented ball here, because I think that if Sweetney is told to take 10-15 shots a game, he will, and still average almost 60%.

[Edited by - firefly on 08/10/2005 09:11:14]

No you misread me. If anything i've written in other posts how flexible Larry can be. I just think that he'll tighten up the offense a bit, meaning less wild shots from deep and more inside play, more passing and patience. That doesn't mean they won't run cuz he like to run off of a good defensive stand, but when the D is back he will want the Knicks to play smart and run good plays. This won't be the PHX Suns next year.

He went with the Guard oriented offense in Philly due to the players he had on the Roster and likewise he was different in Indy with a more well rounded team. We have a lot more team speed and quickness than the Pistons, with Steph, JC, Ariza, N8 etc. I'm not sure how he'll use that, but its likely to be a factor in how the team plays. I'm sure that the speed will stand out in practice and he'll look to use it. However we have some good post up players too and i'm sure he'll look to use Sweets, Q, James, TT etc. for the advantage they'll have in posting up.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
8/10/2005  10:59 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by BRIGGS:

[quote]Posted by oohah:

The Knicks will NOT make the playoffs with the current roster.

Unless:

A) Sweetney, Crawford, James, Q play MUCH better than they have in their respective careers.

B) The whole team starts taking steroids.

C)Ariza Turns into a star...

D)Isiah makes some trades to improve the front court.

E)The rookies are the real deal and all 3 make a substatial impact at their respective positions.

If 2 of these things happen the Knicks have a shot at making the playoffs. If 3 do they can make the 2nd round. I separated Ariza from the rest because I think he is a budding star, and will show the most improvement in the front court this year. I don't know that he will be a "star" this year though.

oohah


better hope that ariza does not turn into a star this year [and i dont think he will, his offensive game is way to raw]bUT if he does, he wont be a Knick the following year because we can only pay him, owning just his early bird rights. if a team likes him enough, he is gone.no 20 FA will EVER take LESS. Bobby Simmons made out as a 1 year wonder, we would rather see trevor play well, but not to the level that would put him on the market above an MLE. I read the entire CBA agreement on draftexpress website and while there is a form of the new arenas rule in there, it would not pertain to Ariza. It's up there to read for anyone who wants to. It doesnt say Arenas rule, but there is a slight diversion from the old CBA, but not in trevor's case.
You can't seriously be worried about this? Given the depth of the team at the 2/3 and the coach, I don't think Ariza can get enough playing time for a team to offer him more than the MLE. If he's going to have a Bobby Simons season, he'll have to beat out two of TT, Q-Rich, and Jamal to start and average 30 plus mpg and put up 15 PPG, 5 RPG, 3 assists, 2 steals

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 08/09/2005 15:17:45]

It really depends on how Larry looks at it. Ariza is still raw as hell and doesn't have that J quite yet. If Larry looks at it like that, he wont get much playing time. If Larry cares mostly about his energy, hustle, and defense, then he'll get some playing time, maybe 20- 25 mpg. Either way, I think he starts.

I said last March, April, May and June that I think it would be absolutely wise to just use the MLE to extend Ariza, no matter what. There was no careful thought whatsoever in that Jerome James signing.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
8/10/2005  11:12 AM
you are dead wrong.

We needed a center, we signed a center.

Use the MLE on Ariza?

So, not only would we be in the EXACT same position we are now, but we would not have a Center.

I don't think any careful thought was put into your statement.

Much more thought was put into the JJ signing than you might think.

I'm positive 10 games were lost because of our lack of center.

No games were lost because of Ariza's lack of playing time.
all kool aid all the time.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
8/10/2005  11:17 AM
btw...Ariza is one of my favorite knicks...last night I tried to play the knicks as they are on nba2k5 xbox live.

I used Houston as Q and sent craw to the bench.

Playing against some tough squads from the west I lost, but the crowd was on their feet. I used a ton of Rose (and he even hustles in that game) and sweets can really back em down (even in last year's version), and JYD had a great put back in the 4th for me to bring the garden to their feet (I almost broke my...well, use your imagination).

I didn't use MoT cause sweets got me the offensive post presence I needed, and ofcourse, no david lee or Frye.

Used TT at PF/C a ton (height only and post up ability) because I didn't want to use Kurt at all.

I got one blowout, and got to use Ariza...He's damn fast, and damn fun. And everyone knows, sports video games don't lie.

Also, Dalembert is effing fast.

I see rose starting this coming year and moT getting squeezed out by the youthful Sweetney (from a good program that LB respects)


[Edited by - rvhoss on 08/10/2005 11:18:36]
all kool aid all the time.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/10/2005  12:14 PM
There was no careful thought whatsoever in that Jerome James signing.
huh? How do you know how much careful thought was put into the signing?
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
8/10/2005  1:24 PM
I'm telling you, these two guys woke up on the wrong side of the bed today.

Is there anybody in the league that signed a contract in the last year and a half and makes less money then james (both annually and/or over the length of their deal) and is better?

maybe there is, maybe there isn't, but you guys are kind of forgetting what the market value actually is for a 7 foot starting center.

I mean, doleac signed for the MLE...JJ is better than him.

You want an impact player, open up your check book, because the going rate is $10 mill a year atleast 5 years. and then you're only getting 10/10/2.

Until you can assist me in understanding your definitions of market value for a starting center, then you really have no argument whatsoever, just a big fat opinion (like the rest of us).

But try to add some legs to your opinion...the "do nothing" argument is stupid.
all kool aid all the time.
simple question--do you have expectations of making the playoffs next year?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy