Posted by tkf:
Posted by djsunyc:
it's not about swift or sar here. it's about signing a 25 year old to the MLE as opposed to a hasbeen in vin and a 30 year old career 5/3 player. that's my gripe.
So you rather we sign Swift or SAr and take minutes from Lee and sweetney. Frye can play some center and PF minutes, so his development will not be hurt with James. But why do we need swift or SAR, can you give me a good reason why we need any of those two guys?
i didn't want SAR. swift would've helped but it's the concept i'm talking about. why aren't we spending the MLE on a player that'll give us more bang for the buck instead of taking a HUGE HUGE gamble on a 16 min a night 30 year old? that's my point. sign a 25 year old. or sign a proven commodity. only thing james has proven is that he's highly unreliable and can't stay on the floor.
and i like james. he'll help. but we overpaid and that's the point of this debate.
personally, i wish we didn't do ANYTHING, and just let frye and sweets playe the game. maybe use the LLE on dale davis or something like that.
[Edited by - djsunyc on 07/19/2005 10:38:04]