[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

MARBURY POLL


Author Poll
bobs3304
Posts: 4827
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
What will Marbury's fate be? Consider ALL options before voting...
Keep Marbury ONLY IF LARRY BROWN IS OUR HEAD COACH
Keep Marbury NO MATTER WHAT
Trade Marbury IF LARRY ISN'T OUR NEXT COACH
Trade Marbury NO MATTER WHAT
View Results


Author Thread
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/12/2005  8:34 PM
Posted by bobs3304:


NYK is absolutely right. It's the same thing I've been preaching all week. We ARE one legit big man away from being contenders, assuming Larry Brown climbs on board as well. But the problem is that it will be VERY difficult for Isiah to land that "Sheed" sort of player this summer...

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 07/12/2005 20:27:58]

Nope, your right Bobs. I think the only way that Isiah can get that kind of player is at the trade deadline of this year, when TT and Penny are at the real peak of their value with their contracts. It will be interesting to see if the Clips keep Brand if they are having another losing season... I know they lost Bobby Simmons who was an integral part of their success so they might be in for a tough year. Who knows what could happen at the trade deadline.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
AUTOADVERT
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/12/2005  8:35 PM
Posted by bobs3304:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Kwame has the potential to do everything Rasheed can do and much more (okay, except hit 3 pt shots)

If our goal is to contend for a championship next season (with Larry on board and Steph staying), then you look to get an experienced, LEGIT Big to man the paint, not a 22 y/o phenom that is all potential but no substance. When Detroit traded for Sheed, he already had a good 8 seasons under his belt and had established himself as an elite player in the league...

There's no one out there other than Elton Brand and Zach Randolph and I'm not sure we can get either. Gooden is more realistic but not nearly as good
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
7/12/2005  8:38 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:


Nope, your right Bobs. I think the only way that Isiah can get that kind of player is at the trade deadline of this year, when TT and Penny are at the real peak of their value with their contracts. It will be interesting to see if the Clips keep Brand if they are having another losing season... I know they lost Bobby Simmons who was an integral part of their success so they might be in for a tough year. Who knows what could happen at the trade deadline.

Ya, I also agree. Unless Isiah could pull off a last-minute deal for Magloire or someone of his caliber, then he'll probably bring in a Stephen Hunter, in the hopes of landing that legit Big later on in the year. Only problem is that Zeke might look to shop Marbury if he can't in fact trade for a real Center within the next few months. When he lashed out at Chad Fraud, he did so b/c his patience had been tested. I think Isiah would REALLY prefer to shoot for the playoffs, but as it's looking now......NOT SO GOOD.

Btw: something else to consider is that our bench is pretty depleted when you take into consideration that we can't be pressuring the rookies to perform right away. It'll take them atleast a year or two to adapt to the NBA game. No sense in rushing things when it's just not in the cards for us.

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 07/12/2005 20:41:37]
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/12/2005  8:38 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by bobs3304:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Kwame has the potential to do everything Rasheed can do and much more (okay, except hit 3 pt shots)

If our goal is to contend for a championship next season (with Larry on board and Steph staying), then you look to get an experienced, LEGIT Big to man the paint, not a 22 y/o phenom that is all potential but no substance. When Detroit traded for Sheed, he already had a good 8 seasons under his belt and had established himself as an elite player in the league...

There's no one out there other than Elton Brand and Zach Randolph and I'm not sure we can get either. Gooden is more realistic but not nearly as good

I'm not so sure about that right now Guns. With the expiring contracts that the Knicks have in TT and Penny(both huge deals that can bring a top player) and role players like Malik, JYD and a good young talent in Sweetney the Knicks have a excellent chance of getting a Brand or Randolph. Brand would be the obvious choice but I think peopel are underestimating Zach Randolph on this board.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
7/12/2005  8:39 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

By tying Brown and Marbury together, a lot of people I think are making a mistake. Your coach shouldn't determine what you do with your olympian/franchise player. Either Marbury's good for the franchise or he isn't. I've obviously argued that keeping him is the better choice, but I don't think the choice should depend on what Larry does.

Without Larry Brown, Chauncey Billups would never have been the Finals MVP. He pushed him to a higher plateua...
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
7/12/2005  8:44 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:


I'm not so sure about that right now Guns. With the expiring contracts that the Knicks have in TT and Penny(both huge deals that can bring a top player) and role players like Malik, JYD and a good young talent in Sweetney the Knicks have a excellent chance of getting a Brand or Randolph. Brand would be the obvious choice but I think peopel are underestimating Zach Randolph on this board.

How so? I've watched Randolph, and this guy can't even average a block per game. Not only that, but he's only 6-9, and what we REALLY need is a Center. Granted, we could find a cheap Big to man the paint for 20 MPG, but if we're using expiring contracts, I'd expect him to be a force in the middle. Randolph is like the Eddy Curry version of PF's, only he's more selfish...
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/12/2005  8:52 PM
Posted by bobs3304:
Posted by nyk4ever:


I'm not so sure about that right now Guns. With the expiring contracts that the Knicks have in TT and Penny(both huge deals that can bring a top player) and role players like Malik, JYD and a good young talent in Sweetney the Knicks have a excellent chance of getting a Brand or Randolph. Brand would be the obvious choice but I think peopel are underestimating Zach Randolph on this board.

How so? I've watched Randolph, and this guy can't even average a block per game. Not only that, but he's only 6-9, and what we REALLY need is a Center. Granted, we could find a cheap Big to man the paint for 20 MPG, but if we're using expiring contracts, I'd expect him to be a force in the middle. Randolph is like the Eddy Curry version of PF's, only he's more selfish...

Hmm, I disagree Bobs. I don't necessarily the Knicks need a center, I think they need someone that can score down low at a high rate and rebound the ball at a high rate, both of which Zach does. He also plays pretty good post defense against other PFs. I think if the Knicks had someone like Zach at the 4 that they could live with Channing starting at the 5. OR...they could sign someone else next offseason that could play the 5 or have a big role at the 5 off the bench. I really think Zach is underestimated, he's been extremely consistent the last 2 years, he'd be the post man the Knicks have been looking for since Big Pat left.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07/12/2005 20:52:44]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
7/12/2005  8:55 PM
He's talented for sure, I agree there. I question his attitude more than his skills...


And that contract............it's a screamer.


Chris Tucker takes one look at his contract and says:

"Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyym!"
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/12/2005  8:57 PM
Posted by bobs3304:
Posted by nyk4ever:


I'm not so sure about that right now Guns. With the expiring contracts that the Knicks have in TT and Penny(both huge deals that can bring a top player) and role players like Malik, JYD and a good young talent in Sweetney the Knicks have a excellent chance of getting a Brand or Randolph. Brand would be the obvious choice but I think peopel are underestimating Zach Randolph on this board.


How so? I've watched Randolph, and this guy can't even average a block per game. Not only that, but he's only 6-9, and what we REALLY need is a Center. Granted, we could find a cheap Big to man the paint for 20 MPG, but if we're using expiring contracts, I'd expect him to be a force in the middle. Randolph is like the Eddy Curry version of PF's, only he's more selfish...

you want a center than you need to really suck and land the next Tim Duncan, shaq, ewing, olajuwan. Magloire and co won't get you a championship unless you bring in larry brown, rasheed and ben wallace. You have to do the next best thing by go after a superstar frontcourt player even if its a PF. Winning championships is not only about defending the paint its about scoring inside as well. just ask the spurs, lakers, rockets & pistons
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/12/2005  9:00 PM
Posted by bobs3304:

He's talented for sure, I agree there. I question his attitude more than his skills...


And that contract............it's a screamer.


Chris Tucker takes one look at his contract and says:

"Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyym!"

Haha, DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYM.. but yeah thats true. Your going to have to pay for the good players though right, I wouldnt have a problem with Isiah taking on that contract becuase he's still extremely young (23) and extremely productive. I think we're going to have to say agree to disagree.

Just a quick thought on your attitude point though. I was just doing a little research on Zach and came across this article.

http://blazertalk.blogspot.com/2004_12_19_blazertalk_archive.html

It basically says that there is this one reporter(Jason Quick) in Portland that singlehandly got Sheed the image and perception that he had in Portland and is the polar opposite in Detroit now.. many people in Portland feel that Quick has moved on to do the same thing with Zach now and his image perception is a complete 180 of what it is. Just a little food for thought.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07/12/2005 21:01:01]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
7/12/2005  9:01 PM
again, I completely agree. But Frye, IMHO, is nowhere near ready to play Center, let alone start. We'd have to get Jerome James AND another Center to man the paint.

Randolph is a great low post threat, but he has serious issues like PASSING, or for that matter, NOT PASSING. And he's not really a team player. He whines quite a bit, and very selfish - calls for the ball far too much, and that was part of the reason why the Blazers' offense was so stagnant last seasaon...
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
7/12/2005  9:02 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

By tying Brown and Marbury together, a lot of people I think are making a mistake. Your coach shouldn't determine what you do with your olympian/franchise player. Either Marbury's good for the franchise or he isn't. I've obviously argued that keeping him is the better choice, but I don't think the choice should depend on what Larry does.
Well you have to look at it like this, Dell Harris had Kobe and Shaq and they were a good team but couldn't win it all. As soon as the Zen master arrives, they win m,ultiple championships with basically the same players.
The coach means a whole helluvalot!
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/12/2005  9:05 PM
Posted by bobs3304:

again, I completely agree. But Frye, IMHO, is nowhere near ready to play Center, let alone start. We'd have to get Jerome James AND another Center to man the paint.

Randolph is a great low post threat, but he has serious issues like PASSING, or for that matter, NOT PASSING. And he's not really a team player. He whines quite a bit, and very selfish - calls for the ball far too much, and that was part of the reason why the Blazers' offense was so stagnant last seasaon...

We'll have to agree to disagree, I think. I agree though, hopefully Zach does alot of growing up but I think part of the reason he played that way on the court is becuase Mo Cheeks could not get through to those players. I think Zach is going to play huge for Nate McMillan, someone who gets everything out of his players BUT of course as I say that, I don't think Zach would be able to play under a Herb Williams... Larry Brown would have to be the coach of the Knicks for that to truly work.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
7/12/2005  9:06 PM
Good read. I guess the issue with Randolph is less to do with a selfish attitude than with a willingness to buy into a TEAM concept. But I would certainly trade for him if the asking price wasn't too steep.


Question for you: Hypothetically, do you still go after Randolph if Isiah can't land Larry and then decides to deal Marbury? I know Randolph is young, but his contract is big and is counter-productive when you're trying to normalize the cap...

And like you just said, it would be far better to have a coach like Larry Brown in his presence than your everday Herb Williams...

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 07/12/2005 21:07:37]
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/12/2005  9:14 PM
Posted by bobs3304:

Good read. I guess the issue with Randolph is less to do with a selfish attitude than with a willingness to buy into a TEAM concept. But I would certainly trade for him if the asking price wasn't too steep.


Question for you: Hypothetically, do you still go after Randolph if Isiah can't land Larry and then decides to deal Marbury? I know Randolph is young, but his contract is big and is counter-productive when you're trying to normalize the cap...

And like you just said, it would be far better to have a coach like Larry Brown in his presence than your everday Herb Williams...

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 07/12/2005 21:07:37]

To answer your first hypothetical question, if Isiah couldn't get Larry Brown, I would still consider getting Zach Randolph, in hopes that Herb would be able to coach him but I'd be weary. The only reason I'd do it is becuase I think the tandem of him Steph would be too good to pass up, Stephon is NOT someone that Zach Randolph can tell to take a walk so I think he'd be ok team wise.

To answer your other hypothetical question about getting Zach if Steph is traded. No, I wouldnt do that. If Steph is traded for someone like Al Harrington then I'll be set with that and hoping to use the contracts for a better big man like Elton Brand or hopes of signing someone.

I'll make it clear though, trading Stephon is not a road that I want to go down right now, I don't think it does the Knicks any good.

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/12/2005  9:16 PM
same poll, same results.
all kool aid all the time.
HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
7/12/2005  9:22 PM
I'm not surprised at those results, though.

I too agree to keep Stephon here. IMO he'll be a good fit with the rooks.
Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
Panos
Posts: 30131
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
7/12/2005  9:50 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by gunsnewing:


these arguments are about Isiah convincing Dolan that the best way to rebuild, SINCE HE IS REBUILDING, is with high lottery picks through the draft and with cap room so that you can fill the holes. jeez people are so afraid of being a lottery team for a few years. It makes no sense to me considering we're not getting far with this team ever

It makes no sense to you becuase your not the one who is making a ton of money off the Knicks, they are a business asset to Dolan and right now his business is putting money in his pockets. I don't see anyway that Dolan risk losing seasons to have a winner and lose money. I guarentee you that he's happy where the team is now.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07/12/2005 19:41:57]

This logic is absurd. Yes, this is a business and Dolan wants to
make money. Part of making money is lowering your expenses.
There are two sides to the coin. So while Indiana, Miami, Chicago,
Detriot (last year's CHAMPS!), New Jersey, Seattle, Houston, Sacramento, Washington, Boston, Denver, Pheonix
and SAN ANTONIO (the CHAMPS!!!)
made the playoffs all paying $45M-65M, the Knicks paid $102M
which comes to like $160M after luxury taxes!!!

Now you tell me what business man would not want to cut into
that cost structure. Give me a break.
NOW, add to that the benefit of actually being able to sign
Free Agents, I think the choice is clear for any business man.

(Caveat: this numbers may not be complete accurate, I cannot
vouch for the web site I got them from, but I think the illustrate
the point)

2004-05 Team Payrolls
Team Payroll
1. New York Knicks $102,442,544
2. Dallas Mavericks $91,553,496
3. Portland Trailblazers $83,671,312
4. Philadelphia 76ers $71,951,888
5. Minnesota Timberwolves $70,060,920
6. Memphis Grizzlies $67,010,824
7. Orlando Magic $66,445,252
8. Indiana Pacers $65,792,068
9. Los Angeles Lakers $65,059,100
10. Boston Celtics $64,577,356
11. Sacramento Kings $61,807,688
12. Toronto Raptors $61,703,772
13. Houston Rockets $60,222,300
14. Miami Heat $58,949,072
15. Chicago Bulls $57,276,136
16. Milwaukee Bucks $57,137,128
17. New Orleans Hornets $56,572,880
18. Golden State Warriors $54,943,724
19. New Jersey Nets $54,729,028
20. Detroit Pistons $54,574,980
21. Seattle Sonics $53,821,300
22. Washington Wizards $49,547,056
23. Cleveland Cavaliers $49,175,272
24. San Antonio Spurs $47,149,172
25. Los Angeles Clippers $45,170,768
26. Denver Nuggets $45,621,812
27. Phoenix Suns $44,256,720
28. Utah Jazz $43,160,808
29. Atlanta Hawks $40,684,848
30. Charlotte Bobcats $23,380,124
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/12/2005  9:55 PM
Posted by Panos:

This logic is absurd. Yes, this is a business and Dolan wants to
make money. Part of making money is lowering your expenses.
There are two sides to the coin. So while Indiana, Miami, Chicago,
Detriot (last year's CHAMPS!), New Jersey, Seattle, Houston, Sacramento, Washington, Boston, Denver, Pheonix
and SAN ANTONIO (the CHAMPS!!!)
made the playoffs all paying $45M-65M, the Knicks paid $102M
which comes to like $160M after luxury taxes!!!

Now you tell me what business man would not want to cut into
that cost structure. Give me a break.
NOW, add to that the benefit of actually being able to sign
Free Agents, I think the choice is clear for any business man.

(Caveat: this numbers may not be complete accurate, I cannot
vouch for the web site I got them from, but I think the illustrate
the point)

2004-05 Team Payrolls
Team Payroll
1. New York Knicks $102,442,544
2. Dallas Mavericks $91,553,496
3. Portland Trailblazers $83,671,312
4. Philadelphia 76ers $71,951,888
5. Minnesota Timberwolves $70,060,920
6. Memphis Grizzlies $67,010,824
7. Orlando Magic $66,445,252
8. Indiana Pacers $65,792,068
9. Los Angeles Lakers $65,059,100
10. Boston Celtics $64,577,356
11. Sacramento Kings $61,807,688
12. Toronto Raptors $61,703,772
13. Houston Rockets $60,222,300
14. Miami Heat $58,949,072
15. Chicago Bulls $57,276,136
16. Milwaukee Bucks $57,137,128
17. New Orleans Hornets $56,572,880
18. Golden State Warriors $54,943,724
19. New Jersey Nets $54,729,028
20. Detroit Pistons $54,574,980
21. Seattle Sonics $53,821,300
22. Washington Wizards $49,547,056
23. Cleveland Cavaliers $49,175,272
24. San Antonio Spurs $47,149,172
25. Los Angeles Clippers $45,170,768
26. Denver Nuggets $45,621,812
27. Phoenix Suns $44,256,720
28. Utah Jazz $43,160,808
29. Atlanta Hawks $40,684,848
30. Charlotte Bobcats $23,380,124
And the logic that IS NOT absurd is the fact that the Knicks are still one of the most profitable teams in the NBA year in and year out becuase.....THEY SELL TICKETS!!! you can't sell tickets with a 20 win team. Jimmy Dolan makes money off this team with a 102 million dollar payroll, its been noted and its been on this board before in various thread. I remember reading he made an absurd amount of money last year off the Knicks and Rangers(Madison Square Garden.) He doesn't care what the team does as long as the butts are in the seats.


[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07/12/2005 22:01:07]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
7/12/2005  10:02 PM
While I'm not gonna go as far as to say that Dolan's business sense interferes in Isiah's plans for the future, it's def. become clear that he is no Stein-bummer. The Yanks are very fortunate they have an owner that WANTS to win, and will stop at nothing to do so...

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 07/12/2005 22:02:55]
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
MARBURY POLL

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy