nixluva wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:nixluva wrote:mreinman wrote:nixluva wrote:Malcolm wrote:If I were Fisher . . . I wouldn't run another end of game play for Carmelo for the rest of the season.It reinforces too many habits that Knicks want to get away from.
If we had a GOOD breakdown PG who was dependable you could let him create and open things up for MELO or someone else. This is the missing link. Jerian isn't ready but we can't rely on Jose to break down a D.
of course that is a big problem but there are many problems.
Love that they are getting further and further away from the triangle. The less they run it the better they look.
They didn't go away from the Triangle! You really don't know what you're looking at. It's clear to me that you don't understand the Triangle. Just cuz they pushed the ball and got some easier buckets doesn't mean they weren't running the Triangle.
they ran pNr almost exclusively.
So now you will say that PnR is the damn triangle.
Everything is the triangle?
The Melo/KP pick and roll at the top of the key was an actual good adjustment by Fisher. And definitely not the Triangle.
you don't know what you were watching!! that was the modified PnR triangle! Its all triangles!
Make jokes but you are only proving your ignorance on this subject! If you want to go into a debate on the Triangle lets make a thread were you can break it all down for us.
you win ... don't give a sh1t about the triangle.
what I can tell you is that I was to see PnR exclusively. Anything else is stupid at this point and aint working.
Yes lets play triangle fuk-play and see what rolo can create? Please .... no more! Modern offense / Pnr pnr pnr pnr pnr
so here is what phil is thinking ....