i think that one of the problems over melo's career is that it took a good while to figure out what sort of player he was and where he fits on the court. if you win a college title your freshman year and then decide to enter the draft you are going to run the risk of perplexing front offices for a while. is it outlandish to say that melo possessed talent but was in fact pretty raw? here "raw" means "not complete." without four years of college coaching in a good program it is hard to imagine anyone emerging as a complete player upon his arrival to the nba. and if you are incomplete then it is quite difficult to build a decent team around you. also, how coachable was melo? this is a factor too.
add to this that he was playing against bigger and stronger athletes than he had experienced in high school and one year of college and you'd have an identity crisis of sorts, of the tweener variety. that's part of the argument here: is he a power forward or a small forward?
that said, it seems that the knicks front office and coaching staff have done their best to surround melo with the sorts of players that allow melo to be melo, ie be comfortable doing what he does and not asking him to expand his game-- something that he has historically had poor results with.
it will be interesting to see how durant fares now for contrast sake.
knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%