Posted by Bonn1997:
I know you're not asking me but I'll give a resounding yes anyway. As long as superstar position players like Teix are gonna be abundant in the FA market (and I see no reason for that to change), I have no reluctance trading a position player for a Cy Young level pitcher in his prime. I like Hughes a lot and would give him up for only something very special. IMO, however, the odds are in favor of Halladay giving us more Cy Young level starting pitching seasons than Hughes. I'd rather include Cano than Hughes even if we have to eat some of Cano's salary, play Pena and potentially Hinske at 2nd base, and sign the best available FA at 2nd base, though.
I am agreement with this post
The other thing is I am a firm believer in matching the length of assets. The way the Yankees are currently built, they're at this weird level where they'll always be competitive but fail to make the post season or come up short in the post season. I'm okay with given up future production of guys that need to learn the ropes, almost or are already ready for the bigs, and not ready to contribute to a contender yet and who knows if they'll ever produce. You can do that with one or two players, but I don't like it when half the team is a bunch of vets with 150,000 miles and the other half hasn't been driven off the lot.
A playoff rotation of CC, Halladay, and Burnett does it for me in a way where I would be a one man bukkake show that makes Peter North look like an amateur