[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

College basketball and nba draft thread 2022
Author Thread
martin
Posts: 76034
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/21/2022  6:11 PM
Good for the kid, dammit for the Knicks

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 76034
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/21/2022  6:57 PM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

5/21/2022  7:36 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/21/2022  7:48 PM
martin wrote:Good for the kid, dammit for the Knicks

I call draft shenanigans. I like Dyson but no way is he going top #5. He’s still not nba strong and has to leap with both feat to dunk. Plus when he shoots he dips the ball down a bit. He looks like a lottery pick but the same flaws that had him mocked to around 10 are all still on display here. Then you consider his below average vertical he put up for his size and it becomes even more unlikely he’s going top 5.

I actually think he needs a year of NBA weight training and work on his shot and he’ll be pretty good, but unlike a GM my job isn’t on the line if he doesn’t and you take him 1-5. Of all the things he does that little dip before he shoot is the red flag that he needs better conditioning. I understand he is still growing too.

Right now I have both Davis and Mathurin as better knick prospects. I like Dyson early and think his fit would be great, but there are real holes to his game. If the Knicks draft him they are drafting him for his future, which doesn’t line up with this FO. They like guys who won player awards in college and showed at least a year of growth while in college. Flipside the Knicks do have a lot of depth, and Dyson long term could be a better player than Mathurin and Davis if he gets NBA strength. Sort of like Obi who honestly needed a year of conditioning though he was drafted in his 20’s.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/22/2022  8:20 AM
martin wrote:

He looks like he’s more explosive than Daniels. I watched jalen brown last night— he’s kind of the company I see. He’s also right hand dominant but it doesn’t matter— he still gets his. 6-8 w a7-2 wingspan 220 pounds is an nba sf who can guard 1-5

RIP Crushalot😞
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/22/2022  8:29 AM
Never seen a draft so wide open at top. Literally 5 guys have a chance
RIP Crushalot😞
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

5/22/2022  8:39 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
martin wrote:

He looks like he’s more explosive than Daniels. I watched jalen brown last night— he’s kind of the company I see. He’s also right hand dominant but it doesn’t matter— he still gets his. 6-8 w a7-2 wingspan 220 pounds is an nba sf who can guard 1-5

I hope the knicks work him out! I agree there is definitely a physical presence he would bring to the wing.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748

5/22/2022  1:46 PM
martin wrote:Good for the kid, dammit for the Knicks

Same **** every year. Last year was Josh Giddey, this year its DD.

The Future is Bright!
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748

5/22/2022  2:33 PM
Philc1 wrote:
TPercy wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:

still tiny.

Still the best option at 11 by far


No more wing players who are mediocre shooters

How? He isn't close to being the best player available.

The Future is Bright!
Philc1
Posts: 28292
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

5/22/2022  9:19 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/22/2022  9:19 PM
TPercy wrote:
Philc1 wrote:
TPercy wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:

still tiny.

Still the best option at 11 by far


No more wing players who are mediocre shooters

How? He isn't close to being the best player available.

He’s the second best pg in the draft after Ivey and we desperately need pg


Enough with the SG/SF who can’t shoot.

ESOMKnicks
Posts: 21420
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/14/2015
Member: #6064

5/23/2022  6:19 AM
Philc1 wrote:
He’s the second best pg in the draft after Ivey and we desperately need pg


Enough with the SG/SF who can’t shoot.

Second best PG in the draft is hardly the same as the PG we need. Can we not find better value than a 6'0" guard who cannot break his mean 1-on-1, is a woeful FT shooter and could be a major defensive liability?

There is one Trae Young, and then there have been multiple 6'1" and under point guards who may have prospered for a couple of seasons due to their energy and quickness, but then fizzled out.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39761
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/23/2022  7:24 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
martin wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:This kid is getting some buzz..

Why is he getting buzz, didn't quite stand out to me but I haven't watched closely

Had a good combine.



Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39761
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/23/2022  7:25 AM
Philc1 wrote:
TPercy wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:

still tiny.

Still the best option at 11 by far


No more wing players who are mediocre shooters

A wing player that can shoot

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
KnickDanger
Posts: 24375
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/30/2017
Member: #7578

5/23/2022  9:47 AM
Okay, I went to like a dozen mock draft sites last evening, from the respected to the fringe. After the first five or six players you have anybody going everywhere. Practically each site had a different projected pick for the Knicks. This is not a complaint - makes it interesting!
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39761
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/23/2022  11:29 AM
Another interesting prospect.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/23/2022  3:52 PM
The more I’ve watched the tapes the more inclined I’m gonna be to picking jaden Ivey 1. I know he’s fallen to 4 in many mocks. He did not play great down the stretch but to me it’s
Ivey 1
Shaden sharp 2
Jabari Smith 3
Benedict mathurin 4
RIP Crushalot😞
Chandler
Posts: 26774
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

5/23/2022  4:11 PM
At the extreme risk of provoking some off-color remark from TripleThreat, the comments about Tati Eason's hand size reminded me of Kawhi. Also not known for his offense coming out of college

So while I still want the FO to put a premium on brains and heart (want a real alpha), they should also consider hand size and avoid Duke (unless they're convinced they're looking at Tatum 2.0)

(5)(7)
Knixkik
Posts: 35412
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
5/23/2022  8:40 PM
BRIGGS wrote:The more I’ve watched the tapes the more inclined I’m gonna be to picking jaden Ivey 1. I know he’s fallen to 4 in many mocks. He did not play great down the stretch but to me it’s
Ivey 1
Shaden sharp 2
Jabari Smith 3
Benedict mathurin 4

As far as guys who might be there at 11, I see the hype with the measurement on Daniels and Eason, but I see very little on Johnny Davis. He measured nearly 6’6 in shoes with good length at about 6’9 wingspan. Nothing crazy but he’s a very good basketball player. Only 20 years old, proven 3 level shooter/ scorer and a very good defensive player. He’s a true 2-way wing and they are hard to find. His height solidified his ability to play both wing positions, so he’s not boxed into a specific role. He’s a guy who is easy to picture as a major contributors for a contender when you consider his profile. And he has a high floor.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39761
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/23/2022  11:00 PM
Another guy who did well on the athletic measurements of the combine. The 11th pick is probably too high to draft him, but y'all know how Brock likes to move up and down the draft board.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
martin
Posts: 76034
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/24/2022  8:55 AM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/24/2022  7:46 PM
My pick #42 Justin Lewis 6-7 240 SF Marquette

RIP Crushalot😞
College basketball and nba draft thread 2022

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy