umynot wrote:Melo2NYK wrote:umynot wrote:Melo2NYK wrote:misterearl wrote:Money Can't Buy You Loveor Chemistry
umynot and oldfan - you both are on it.
This entire slurpfest over Carmelo is driven by amateur GM bed-wetters who are never happy with what they have, and the media, who is always looking to drum up the next juicy headline.
Neither of those two have anything to do with building a championship rotation of complimentary skills. The former is always poring over the next perceived fantasy and the latter is more concerned with making a deadline than any serious effort towards sports journalism. The stone cold truth is the new Knicks don't need Carmelo to grow as a team. He stunts that process by commanding more attention. Carmelo is Al Harrington with a slightly better shooting percentage.
The new Knicks are set at every position except lead guard and center. If Mozgov ever recovers from his jet lag, center becomes less an issue. The next person who dares mention Landry Fields, Gallo or The Mayor in any (cough) "trade package" will face the unbridled wrath of The Answer Man.
Al Harrington has never carried a team, that much is for sure. Melo is a bonafide star and has dealt with that pressure. Their games are similar but OJ Mayo also has a similar game to Kobe Bryant. I don't think anyone is going to get the two confused.
And you criticize "Melo to NY" supporters for not being concerned with building a championship rotation; that "we don't need Carmelo to grow as a team." You mean to tell me that you honestly think that this is a championship caliber team in the making, without upgrades?
First we dont really know what we have YET my dude.......
But that being said we do know this....... We are 14-9....... WOW after losing six in a row in first 11
We have won 10 of 11
We are 4th ranked offense in NBA not in East in NBA..... We know that we are playing as well as I'll say generously 6 teams in NBA....
Mavs Heat Lakers San Antonio and the Celtis have been playing as well or better ball then us!!
We know we can SCORE with anyone in the WORLD!.....
So with what we Know what does Melo offer us?
More scoring? Just doesn't make sense unless its for Chandler AR Walker and Loose ends .....
Then you bring Gallo of Bench as go to guy in relief of Melo Fields and Amare......
Other then that waiting to see what we really need is the smart move...... Melo is just STARFUKCING
I love Melo and His game don't get me wrong and if we had already made trade I would be excited he was here
But the way we are playing it's too HUGE a risk to give up too much to get him is my honest opinion
Dude, look at the teams we been playing. There might only be two teams (Bulls, Hornets) that were above .500. Even more unraveling is the fact that all of thoe teams sucked defensively, allowing our offense to score at will. All we have proved is that we are no longer bottom-feeders. But what happens when we play the big boy's? We need Melo because he adds that bona-fide stud that helps legitimize our roster.
San Antonio lost to the Clippers last week.....
Golden State was UNDEFEATED at home till we showed up.....
Miami has won six in a row and only Utah was a good team .....
Wins are WIns.......
I'm not saying we are a finished product......
I'm saying Melo for the farm DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!!
Mayo is def more a need then Melo...... As is a Center PF type who stays healthy and bangs the boards
like reggie evans.....
Marc Gasol and Mayo and then you could trade Curry AR CHANDLER TD Walker and Mozgov and we would have
a solid rotation and a contending team
Felton / Mayo
Mayo/ Fields
Gallo/ Fields/ Williams
Amare/ Gallo / Williams
Gasol / Turiaf
That trade helps us better then Melo 10 fold!!
Oh and Mayo in this offense would be sicker then Melo IMO
Dude, if you want to debate with someone you got to frst read what they say. I, nor anyone else, has suggested giving up the farm for Melo. My standing offer would be Curry, Gallo and Randolph (Walker if need be). That is pennies on the dollar for one of the league's best. We don't even play Curry, Randolph or Walker.
And what exactly makes you think Marc Gasol would work in our system? I thought we learned our lesson that conventional big men don't work in SSOL.
As for the first of your article:
1.) The Warriors didn't have David Lee when we played them. They only won something like 1-9 without him.
2.) When the Clippers consistently beat upper-echelon teams, get back to me. Hell, we beat the Celtics last year and that didn't mean much of anything.
3.) Miami has the same concerns as our team about whether they can legitimately compete against the best. The difference between us and them is the fact that they have the best player in the world surrounded by 2 of the 10 best players in the league.