meloshouldgo wrote:Ask for specifics and I get Rudy G. HA
How about you respond in three sentences or less exactly what laws she broke? What national secrets she shared and how it compromised our security. Go ahead you connect the dots, I can't do that since there are no dots. And I can't read your mind.

No generic BS - point out the actual crime

I am not asking about Huma Abedin, I am asking what laws Hillary broke. I am also asking that you point out exactly what the classified material was and when it was classified that is before or after her sharing it.

Go ahead connect the dots.

That has been done through out this thread - connecting dots. I'll let a prosecutor lay it out for you. I don't have the time right now to do your work. I was nice enough to post a short video for you.
Watch the video, do some research. It is a big old mess and she is probably going to prison regarding this.

And understand, Clinton most likely tried to separate herself from SOME of the illegal activities, so you have to bring those around her into things.
But don't worry, whether you do or don't, she broke the law and will see jail time. That will probably quiet this thread down and bring the country together.

Actually, just found this (check article for more info on explanation of laws she can be indicted for), so you can start somewhere, but I do have to run shortly....
1.) 18 U.S. Code § 793 – Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information 18 U.S. Code § 798 – Disclosure of classified information
2.) U.S. Code § 1924 – Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
3.) 18 U.S. Code § 2071(b) — Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
4.) 18 U.S. Code § 641 – Public money, property or records
5.) 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees
6.) 18 U.S. Code § 1519 — Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations
7.) 18 U.S. Code § 1031 — Fraud against the United States
18 U.S. Code § 1343 – Fraud by wire, radio or television
18 U.S. Code § 1346 — Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”
18 U.S. Code § 371 – Conspiracy to defraud the United States
8.) 18 U.S. Code § 371 – Conspiracy to commit a federal offense

and those are just from 2015...

http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/21/eight-laws-hillary-clinton-could-be-indicted-for-breaking/

earthmansurfer wrote:

Welpee wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

djsunyc wrote:

Fraction magic anyone?

Expert of voter fraud in Bev Harris says Hillary tried to steal election but lost. Start at 3:30 mark:: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is5GrQwevhg
Votes were held back in Detroit, Wisconson, Michigan and Milwaukee, PE, and a bit more.
13% of illegals admit they vote, and quite a few were caught this election. http://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/poll-13-of-illegal-aliens-admit-they-vote/
Soros connected to voting machine in 16 States.
5 or so States are still not releasing the scanned images of the ballots as required by law. (Indiana, Virginia, Washington st., Utah, Kansas)
There is evidence Hillary Stole 5 States but still lost (and yeah, MSM is dying now -The NY Times have issued and apology for their coverage)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrqZvzGZuCo

I welcome a recount but I think there is a reason Clinton hasn't asked for one. Hillary Cheated and still lost.

http://www.votefraud.org/
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

Dude, you are an example of what scares me moving forward. You get all of your information from partisan sources that just confirm what you already want to believe versus seeking out more objective information that are more likely to give you the truth. That's why in four years Trump could cause WWIII, return us to slavery, and create a second depression and you would still find a way to justify that he's was the greatest president ever.

You are an example of how corrupt governments and corporations get away with what they do. Because you look to them for your news and you don't question them.

There is nothing wrong, it should be mandatory, to investigate, watch, check - those who are in charge of our voting systems and everything around them.

Here is an interesting Reuters article "Vote for Trump or face Nuclear War: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-russian-trump-idUSKCN12C28Q
(I do think Reuters is an acceptable news source for you?)

Americans should vote for Donald Trump as president next month or risk being dragged into a nuclear war, according to a Russian ultra-nationalist ally of President Vladimir Putin who likes to compare himself to the U.S. Republican candidate.

Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a flamboyant veteran lawmaker known for his fiery rhetoric, told Reuters in an interview that Trump was the only person able to de-escalate dangerous tensions between Moscow and Washington.

By contrast, Trump's Democratic rival Hillary Clinton could spark World War Three, said Zhirinovsky, who received a top state award from Putin after his pro-Kremlin Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) came third in Russia's parliamentary election last month.

And since Trump has been elected, regarding war tension:

Defcon nuclear threat REDUCED to safest level following Donald Trump victory
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/732135/donald-trump-election-defcon-reduced-level-5-safest-level

And others feel the same way. I was asked by many here, "Why does Clinton mean WWIII" and I gave many answers. Experts feel the same way.

Do you really need to hear this on CNN to believe it? And why, when CNN was talking about Trump, do they show a clip of the Reagan assassination attempt? https://sendvid.com/j93whpei

But don't worry, after this last election, because they care (and edit) so much, Google and Facebook will steer you away from "fake" news, basically things not approved by them and their algorithms. Fun to watch this corruption try to hold on. http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/15/technology/facebook-google-fake-news-presidential-election/index.html

Here is where you're wrong, I TOTAllY question ALL sources of information and I try to do my own research. When I hear something somebody say something on CNN I try to check it out on my own or at minimum check out the source they're quoting. Unfortunately the majority of information from the sources you post are widely debunked and proven either inaccurate or at minimum a gross distortion or taken out of context. And basically all you do is say everything you don't agree with is corrupt. That's part of the brainwashing that you're a victim of but don't know it.

Show me where you have done your own independent research on ANY piece of info you posted. And I'm not talking about college paper level research because because a lot of these things just takes a couple of minutes on the internet to fact check.

Welpee wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Democrats won the Senate popular vote by 6 million votes but Republicans control the Senate 52-48.
As Paul Waldman (Wash Post) put it, Republicans are now a minority party with near absolute power

"Democracy" at it's finest. And none of the Electoral College defenders have bother to answer my question on why we do not apply this same system for electing governors. Give each county electoral votes versus straight popular vote if this system is so great.

Crickets.

Is it still "Democracy" when the true vote totals of the electorate isn't reflected in it's leadership?

I've heard it all now.

Vmart wrote:

holfresh wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Democrats won the Senate popular vote by 6 million votes but Republicans control the Senate 52-48.
As Paul Waldman (Wash Post) put it, Republicans are now a minority party with near absolute power

Hillary leads the popular vote by roughly 1.2 mil and growing..Trump is heading to an Electoral College blowout...Doesn't this give anyone pause that the majority of the country isn't being represented by the people they voted for??...Shouldn't the other side be concerned if we all truly believe in Democracy. I was shock at the silence at Russian interference in our election from both parties..

The Electoral college reflects the true votes of the states. Do you want one state determine the outcome of the election because that is what is going to happen. What does a Californian have to do with a New Yorker or a Texan. These three state would garner majority of the attention politicians would cater to these populace state. How does a person from Wyoming or North Dakota get represented. The rule of the election is to get as many electorals as possible Hillary didn't do it and that is why she lost.

I don't want any intolerant liberals or extreme conservatives. I'm for the middle ground that is when our country is at its best.

The politicians in Washington should be representatives of the people, not of real estate...Also, if the country is going more conservative or liberal, it's not anyone's call as to try to maintain balance..It's up to the people voting..

Vmart wrote:

holfresh wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Democrats won the Senate popular vote by 6 million votes but Republicans control the Senate 52-48.
As Paul Waldman (Wash Post) put it, Republicans are now a minority party with near absolute power

Hillary leads the popular vote by roughly 1.2 mil and growing..Trump is heading to an Electoral College blowout...Doesn't this give anyone pause that the majority of the country isn't being represented by the people they voted for??...Shouldn't the other side be concerned if we all truly believe in Democracy. I was shock at the silence at Russian interference in our election from both parties..

The Electoral college reflects the true votes of the states. Do you want one state determine the outcome of the election because that is what is going to happen. What does a Californian have to do with a New Yorker or a Texan. These three state would garner majority of the attention politicians would cater to these populace state. How does a person from Wyoming or North Dakota get represented. The rule of the election is to get as many electorals as possible Hillary didn't do it and that is why she lost.

I don't want any intolerant liberals or extreme conservatives. I'm for the middle ground that is when our country is at its best.

reub wrote:Saying that Trump didn't win the popular vote (which ignores the 3 million votes by illegal aliens) and only won because of the electoral college is like saying that the Warriors and Cavs only win games because they make more 3 point shots when their opponents actually make more overall baskets.

arkrud wrote:

holfresh wrote:

Welpee wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Democrats won the Senate popular vote by 6 million votes but Republicans control the Senate 52-48.
As Paul Waldman (Wash Post) put it, Republicans are now a minority party with near absolute power

"Democracy" at it's finest. And none of the Electoral College defenders have bother to answer my question on why we do not apply this same system for electing governors. Give each county electoral votes versus straight popular vote if this system is so great.

Crickets.

Is it still "Democracy" when the true vote totals of the electorate isn't reflected in it's leadership?

US thanks God is NOT a Democracy. US is Republic.
Republic is ruled by the power of elites.
And US is a FEDERAL state not mono-state.
States committed to the united country on specific conditions that they will be represented in central government adequately regardless of population size.
If this going to be changed every State will have a right to reconsider Union membership.
Only referendum in each state can practically accomplish this.
So - I am asking again.
Do you advocating for dissolution of United States based on political and cultural differences between Red and Blue States?

It is completely understandable that people will always advocate for government which will be good for them personalty and for the group of people they represent culturally. The strength of this country guarantied by political system established in Constitution is that the demands of personalities and population groups will not be satisfied at the expense of any other people and groups.
This order was fought for in Civil War, and in many wars after, and this is what people were always willing to give their life for.
This not going to go away until this country stands on its own. The fact that so many minorities and personalities were able to successfully fight for their rights and achieve equality is self-evident success of this country.
There always will be some who want to take advantage of the system in many ways so the fight is never over.

fishmike wrote:

Vmart wrote:

holfresh wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Democrats won the Senate popular vote by 6 million votes but Republicans control the Senate 52-48.
As Paul Waldman (Wash Post) put it, Republicans are now a minority party with near absolute power

Hillary leads the popular vote by roughly 1.2 mil and growing..Trump is heading to an Electoral College blowout...Doesn't this give anyone pause that the majority of the country isn't being represented by the people they voted for??...Shouldn't the other side be concerned if we all truly believe in Democracy. I was shock at the silence at Russian interference in our election from both parties..

The Electoral college reflects the true votes of the states. Do you want one state determine the outcome of the election because that is what is going to happen. What does a Californian have to do with a New Yorker or a Texan. These three state would garner majority of the attention politicians would cater to these populace state. How does a person from Wyoming or North Dakota get represented. The rule of the election is to get as many electorals as possible Hillary didn't do it and that is why she lost.

I don't want any intolerant liberals or extreme conservatives. I'm for the middle ground that is when our country is at its best.

LMAO... still thinking Trump is was the better choice? Man some people are in for a rude awakening. If you are white and rich America will indeed be great again.