[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Game Thread: Knicks vs Knuggs. Wilson vs. JR, Melo vs. gallo, Moz vs. Sheed..........
Author Thread
NUPE
Posts: 21221
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/29/2012
Member: #4205

12/10/2012  12:47 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
NUPE wrote:Knicks: 15 - 5. That is the only stat that I care for. Haters, you know who you are, can go sit in a corner. LMAO!

Who do you think you're arguing against? Is there anyone who said the team is not 15-5 or is playing poorly?

The kids yammering about TS%, FG%, win shares and other assorted irrelevant stats throughout this thread.

AUTOADVERT
NUPE
Posts: 21221
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/29/2012
Member: #4205

12/10/2012  1:02 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/10/2012  1:05 PM
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!

FoeDiddy
Posts: 22619
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2008
Member: #2350

12/10/2012  1:21 PM
dk7th wrote:
FoeDiddy wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
dk7th wrote:carmelo hits his career average with 54.7TS% the knicks will struggle like they did. 24FGA too many but 16FTA helps. 1 assist

knicks as a team also shot 54.7

gallo 70.2%TS 9 boards 3 assists; but their problem is iguodala underachieving (5 TO) and that lawson turnover killed them

nuggets as a team 62.5%TS

Translation

Gallo played a good game but it is other players fault that Denver lost. Uh huh. If Gallo is so good he should be able to put the team on his back to win.

What Gallo is doing is called STAT PADDING. See Shareef Abdur Rahim. Great stats lots of losses.

gallo played a very efficient good game. melo made a couple of great baskets on him late. it was a good duel.

22 points off turnovers for the knicks: that is a key statistic.

faried 0 offensive boards this is underachieving for faried as he is the second best offensive rebounder in the league.
iguodala 5 turnovers and 3 assists it is usually the other way around isn't it. he, like melo, could also afford to be more efficient.
gallo fired up an air ball. that was the only glaring error.
lawson lost the ball at the end while the nuggets had a chance. that was the game right there.

how about mentioning that the knicks won despite JR going 5-19 and the dope Felton was 4-15?

The knicks won despite playing awful. That's awesome.

Denver shot 55 pct.

when the ball doesn't move players like smith and felton suffer. problem is they themselves contribute to the lack of ball movement.

all they need to do is focus on making the extra pass.

if there is a flaw in lawson's game i would say that he too should focus on making the extra pass in the half court. that and learning how to maintain his dribble. his is a youthful game not a veteran game. but then nobody can stay in front of him.

Felton and JR ARE the reason for lack of ball movement (very often). I don't care for either. Still hope the knicks win with them.

The knicks in general don't make the extra pass and it is certainly frustrated. Sometimes you have to take the good with the bad and just hope that the good wins out.

Melo is not really my type of player since I always played PG and he is a hog. I also appreciate that we have an unstoppable crunch time player and a guy who can carry a team. I try to appreciate him for what he is. His defense has certainly improved and I credit Woody for that. JR plays pretty good D too buy his offense makes me cringe.

Felton is just ....... Felton

any point guard worth his salt will have less than 1:1 ratio of usg/assist rate.

the benchmark is nash with a 1:3 ratio.
chris paul is 1:2
kidd here is 1:2
stockton 2:5
thomas .67:1
rondo 1:2
marbury .70:1
felton .74:1

the two latter players are uncomfortably close to a 1:1 ratio to be truly effective as orchestrators and facilitators.

melo 3:1

"ball hog" is apt.

Why are you comparing Melo to Point Guards..he is a small forward/Power forward...his main job isn't to get others involved..that's a bonus. How do his numbers compare to other Small forwards/power forwards in the league?

unfavorably

lebron .87:1 in the scoring point guard range, incredibly
durant 1.45:1 in the elite shooting guard range
gallo 1.70:1
pierce 1.55:1
horford 1.36:1
josh smith 1.5:1
joe johnson 1.26:1
wallace 1.27:1
deng 1.74:1
boozer 2:1
gay 2.26:1 he may be being overrated this year
d. lee 1.42:1

get the picture?

He's better than Gallo, Pierce, Horford, Josh Smith, Joe Johnson, Gerald Wallace, Deng, Boozer, Gay and David Lee. I think that stat is somewhat useful but doesn't tell the true story of a player effectiveness. Someone like Landry Fields would have a better ratio then Melo cause he is the 4 or 5th option on the team. Melo being the #1 option on his team makes his ratio lower. Lebron is a different beast with different skill sets. Can he pass more..sure...but every player has a flaw in their game.

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/10/2012  1:27 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/10/2012  1:29 PM
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!

if the knicks don't win this year, where do you expect this team to go in a confrence that is young and improving and the knicks having 3 guys crossing the 40 year old barrier? no picks, and no young talent going forward to improve from withing... we can talk shumpert but we have to see how that knee does,other than that, what you see is what you get.. we have to win now!!!!

I ask you where is the room for improvement after this season if we don't win.... and honestly the troll argument is old.. put on your big boy pants and answer my question..

if the knicks trashed their future to just win a division, then it is an ultimate failure .. end of story...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
3G4G
Posts: 23485
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2012
Member: #4333

12/10/2012  1:37 PM
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!


So you like the Sixers/Hawks results past couple yrs except no future or youth?

FoeDiddy
Posts: 22619
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2008
Member: #2350

12/10/2012  1:41 PM
tkf wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!

if the knicks don't win this year, where do you expect this team to go in a confrence that is young and improving and the knicks having 3 guys crossing the 40 year old barrier? no picks, and no young talent going forward to improve from withing... we can talk shumpert but we have to see how that knee does,other than that, what you see is what you get.. we have to win now!!!!

I ask you where is the room for improvement after this season if we don't win.... and honestly the troll argument is old.. put on your big boy pants and answer my question..

if the knicks trashed their future to just win a division, then it is an ultimate failure .. end of story...

Those old guys are not the nucleus of the team. The Nucleus has 3 years. The role players are replaceable. Look at the heat, Wade is on the downturn of career, Celtics same thing. Every team has their issues. You make it seem like the Knicks front office can never make moves to improve the team. Their are clever ways to improve you team and the thing about having a winning program like Woodson is growing, players of quality will take less to come here over the years.

NUPE
Posts: 21221
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/29/2012
Member: #4205

12/10/2012  1:42 PM
tkf wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!

if the knicks don't win this year, where do you expect this team to go in a confrence that is young and improving and the knicks having 3 guys crossing the 40 year old barrier? no picks, and no young talent going forward to improve from withing... we can talk shumpert but we have to see how that knee does,other than that, what you see is what you get.. we have to win now!!!!

I ask you where is the room for improvement after this season if we don't win.... and honestly the troll argument is old.. put on your big boy pants and answer my question..

if the knicks trashed their future to just win a division, then it is an ultimate failure .. end of story...

You always bring up youth and draft picks as if that is the key to winning or improvement in the short term. Yet, most of the top teams in the NBA are older and have been older year in and year out (except the Thunder who to date have no actually won a thing).

As for the Knicks, their core players are far far far from old, excluding Kidd, who will most likely come off the bench eventually. This team is not reliant on Kurt Thomas, Rasheed Wallace, Marcus Camby, Prigioni, etc. The core Knick team (Melo, Felton, Amar'e, Chandler, Shumpert, Novak, Brewer, JR Smith) should be able to play at a high level through their current contracts and some well beyond that. This whole the Knicks are old claim is so massively overblown and its been proven by the fact that the Knicks are beating young teams this year despite the alleged oncoming onslaught of Dementia and Alzheimer's.

If the Knicks can win their division and a round in the playoffs - this year - that would be a great considering the last decade of futility. I believe they can do much more than that but what I listed would be beyond failure to me. You are free to set your own bar for failure, just don't pretend it is universal for all people.

NUPE
Posts: 21221
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/29/2012
Member: #4205

12/10/2012  1:44 PM
3G4G wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!


So you like the Sixers/Hawks results past couple yrs except no future or youth?

The sixers and hawks have not been as putrid as the Knicks the last decade. I don't see how you can go from not winning a playoff series in a decade to the Knicks must win now or they suck. The Knicks have a lot of room to improve based on their futility the last decade.

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/10/2012  1:46 PM
FoeDiddy wrote:
tkf wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!

if the knicks don't win this year, where do you expect this team to go in a confrence that is young and improving and the knicks having 3 guys crossing the 40 year old barrier? no picks, and no young talent going forward to improve from withing... we can talk shumpert but we have to see how that knee does,other than that, what you see is what you get.. we have to win now!!!!

I ask you where is the room for improvement after this season if we don't win.... and honestly the troll argument is old.. put on your big boy pants and answer my question..

if the knicks trashed their future to just win a division, then it is an ultimate failure .. end of story...

Those old guys are not the nucleus of the team. The Nucleus has 3 years. The role players are replaceable. Look at the heat, Wade is on the downturn of career, Celtics same thing. Every team has their issues. You make it seem like the Knicks front office can never make moves to improve the team. Their are clever ways to improve you team and the thing about having a winning program like Woodson is growing, players of quality will take less to come here over the years.

right now, kidd is the knicks MVP.. lets be honest with outselves.. the role players are replaceable.. so you are expecting the knicks to turn this team over every year? and who are you counting as the nuclues? amare? are we sure about his healthy? felton? are you confident with that? the east is getting younger and better... and our window is closing.. this is not some 3-4 year project.. this is two years max.. this year and next...

I agree every team has their issues, but those teams are already proven.. that is the difference.. and to be honest, it would be great to have a declining wade with lebron and bosh.. it would be great to have an aging celts team but have Rondo.... I am just not as confident as you are with our level of franchise talent... Give me a lebron and rondo and i would feel better about things going forward... this is where we differ and i respect your opinion...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
3G4G
Posts: 23485
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2012
Member: #4333

12/10/2012  1:53 PM
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!

if the knicks don't win this year, where do you expect this team to go in a confrence that is young and improving and the knicks having 3 guys crossing the 40 year old barrier? no picks, and no young talent going forward to improve from withing... we can talk shumpert but we have to see how that knee does,other than that, what you see is what you get.. we have to win now!!!!

I ask you where is the room for improvement after this season if we don't win.... and honestly the troll argument is old.. put on your big boy pants and answer my question..

if the knicks trashed their future to just win a division, then it is an ultimate failure .. end of story...

You always bring up youth and draft picks as if that is the key to winning or improvement in the short term. Yet, most of the top teams in the NBA are older and have been older year in and year out (except the Thunder who to date have no actually won a thing).


You'll find in almost every case they added youth to their team....

Spurs(Kawhai,Blair,Neal,Green,Splitter)
Lakers(Ebanks,Morris,Hill,Meeks)
Mavs(Boobwah,Mayo,Wright,Collison)
Memphis(Alligator Arms,Pondexter,Selby,Ellington,Arthur,Speights)

(although inverted)
Clippers(Bledsoe,Griffin,Jordan,Thompkins)

Which means when their vets fall off they have something to work with going forward and/or trade with exception to maybe the Lakers....all teams having picks and/or Cap Space to go with.

NUPE
Posts: 21221
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/29/2012
Member: #4205

12/10/2012  1:55 PM
tkf wrote:right now, kidd is the knicks MVP..
Your opinion rather than fact. Also, since most analyst have Melo #2 or #3 in MVP rankings while Kidd is nowhere to be found, I'd say your opinion is less than that of the minority.

tkf wrote:lets be honest with outselves.. the role players are replaceable.. so you are expecting the knicks to turn this team over every year?
Most Knick players are locked into contracts that extend beyond this year. Others, like JR will likely resign with NYK. The point you are attempting to make is not applicable to this NYK team.

tkf wrote:I agree every team has their issues, but those teams are already proven.. that is the difference.. and to be honest, it would be great to have a declining wade with lebron and bosh.. it would be great to have an aging celts team but have Rondo.... I am just not as confident as you are with our level of franchise talent... Give me a lebron and rondo and i would feel better about things going forward... this is where we differ and i respect your opinion...

There is only one LeBron and Rondo is not even the type of player you could build a team around, imo. The Knicks right now have Chandler, Kidd, Melo, Felton and Amar'e locked in for a few more years. That is a very sound nucleus. Amar'e has some health issues but so does Wade.

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/10/2012  1:56 PM
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!

if the knicks don't win this year, where do you expect this team to go in a confrence that is young and improving and the knicks having 3 guys crossing the 40 year old barrier? no picks, and no young talent going forward to improve from withing... we can talk shumpert but we have to see how that knee does,other than that, what you see is what you get.. we have to win now!!!!

I ask you where is the room for improvement after this season if we don't win.... and honestly the troll argument is old.. put on your big boy pants and answer my question..

if the knicks trashed their future to just win a division, then it is an ultimate failure .. end of story...

You always bring up youth and draft picks as if that is the key to winning or improvement in the short term. Yet, most of the top teams in the NBA are older and have been older year in and year out (except the Thunder who to date have no actually won a thing).

As for the Knicks, their core players are far far far from old, excluding Kidd, who will most likely come off the bench eventually. This team is not reliant on Kurt Thomas, Rasheed Wallace, Marcus Camby, Prigioni, etc. The core Knick team (Melo, Felton, Amar'e, Chandler, Shumpert, Novak, Brewer, JR Smith) should be able to play at a high level through their current contracts and some well beyond that. This whole the Knicks are old claim is so massively overblown and its been proven by the fact that the Knicks are beating young teams this year despite the alleged oncoming onslaught of Dementia and Alzheimer's.

If the Knicks can win their division and a round in the playoffs - this year - that would be a great considering the last decade of futility. I believe they can do much more than that but what I listed would be beyond failure to me. You are free to set your own bar for failure, just don't pretend it is universal for all people.

But where do you go from there.. we almost have to assume that kid will be slightly less effective, amare and his knees, what about that? we can hope to have a healthy shumpert back, but will we keep him? history dictates that we don't.... carmelo and chandler have a lot of years on their bodies, you can see the lack of explosion carmelo has now, guy gets his shot blocked a lot... brewer isn't a long term solution, we don't have to picks to replace guys like that and improve from within.... that is important man... Teams in the east are getting better.. Just look at this.. the hawks gutted a lot of their team, and their best player, or highest paid player, and so far they are just 1 game or so behind us, and they are supposedly retooling/ rebuilding, they have picks, cap space and a pretty good team right now to go with that.. don't you think they will improve? my point is, I have been a fan for over 35 years, we gave up so much to be where we are now.. I am not a fan of the direction or way we went about things, but now the stakes are high... and there is no way around that... I know we haven't won much in years, but that is no excuse to lower expectations, we made a lot of moves, gave away a bit of young talent, and picks, as well as flexibility... we signed guys to generous deals, this is not some 4 year plan my man.. this is NOW..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
FoeDiddy
Posts: 22619
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2008
Member: #2350

12/10/2012  1:58 PM
tkf wrote:
FoeDiddy wrote:
tkf wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!

if the knicks don't win this year, where do you expect this team to go in a confrence that is young and improving and the knicks having 3 guys crossing the 40 year old barrier? no picks, and no young talent going forward to improve from withing... we can talk shumpert but we have to see how that knee does,other than that, what you see is what you get.. we have to win now!!!!

I ask you where is the room for improvement after this season if we don't win.... and honestly the troll argument is old.. put on your big boy pants and answer my question..

if the knicks trashed their future to just win a division, then it is an ultimate failure .. end of story...

Those old guys are not the nucleus of the team. The Nucleus has 3 years. The role players are replaceable. Look at the heat, Wade is on the downturn of career, Celtics same thing. Every team has their issues. You make it seem like the Knicks front office can never make moves to improve the team. Their are clever ways to improve you team and the thing about having a winning program like Woodson is growing, players of quality will take less to come here over the years.

right now, kidd is the knicks MVP.. lets be honest with outselves.. the role players are replaceable.. so you are expecting the knicks to turn this team over every year? and who are you counting as the nuclues? amare? are we sure about his healthy? felton? are you confident with that? the east is getting younger and better... and our window is closing.. this is not some 3-4 year project.. this is two years max.. this year and next...

I agree every team has their issues, but those teams are already proven.. that is the difference.. and to be honest, it would be great to have a declining wade with lebron and bosh.. it would be great to have an aging celts team but have Rondo.... I am just not as confident as you are with our level of franchise talent... Give me a lebron and rondo and i would feel better about things going forward... this is where we differ and i respect your opinion...

I can't say Kidd is the MVP. He is a very important part to our success but MVP is overblown. Melo is and it's not close. Yes we got away with it against the Heat but look at the play against the Bulls. Bulls game is a easy win with Melo on the court. Whole team against the Bulls were shooting contested shots because we didn't have one player that warranted a double team to open things up. With no Melo every team would play us like that. With someone like Melo it's not only the points you look at but the opportunities he opens up for others because of his special skill set.

I agree on Lebron but i'm gonna wait on the verdict for Rondo. I'm not sure yet he is a player you can build a franchise around. He was tossed in a perfect situation playing with 3 HOF right out of college. You put him out of college on a team like Knicks (pre-Melo) or Bobcats and Im almost certain he is just okay right now and not this Great player he is now. Guys like Lebron or Melo regardless of where they got drafted were gonna be stars.

What team is getting younger and better with no question marks? Sixers?? You trust Bynum's health?? Milwaukee?? couple of years ago Bogut was their future and now what?? Monta Ellis & Brandon Jennings?? Bobcats?? you trust that team?? Every team has their questions regardless of youth. You make it seem like Knicks are the only one's with concerns.

FoeDiddy
Posts: 22619
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2008
Member: #2350

12/10/2012  2:01 PM
3G4G wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!

if the knicks don't win this year, where do you expect this team to go in a confrence that is young and improving and the knicks having 3 guys crossing the 40 year old barrier? no picks, and no young talent going forward to improve from withing... we can talk shumpert but we have to see how that knee does,other than that, what you see is what you get.. we have to win now!!!!

I ask you where is the room for improvement after this season if we don't win.... and honestly the troll argument is old.. put on your big boy pants and answer my question..

if the knicks trashed their future to just win a division, then it is an ultimate failure .. end of story...

You always bring up youth and draft picks as if that is the key to winning or improvement in the short term. Yet, most of the top teams in the NBA are older and have been older year in and year out (except the Thunder who to date have no actually won a thing).


You'll find in almost every case they added youth to their team....

Spurs(Kawhai,Blair,Neal,Green,Splitter)
Lakers(Ebanks,Morris,Hill,Meeks)
Mavs(Boobwah,Mayo,Wright,Collison)
Memphis(Alligator Arms,Pondexter,Selby,Ellington,Arthur,Speights)

(although inverted)
Clippers(Bledsoe,Griffin,Jordan,Thompkins)

Which means when their vets fall off they have something to work with going forward and/or trade with exception to maybe the Lakers....all teams having picks and/or Cap Space to go with.

LOL...all those players can easily be had. That is a group of replaceables if I ever saw one. Outside of Mayo you are telling me the Knicks can't get any of those guys or type of guys in years to come??

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/10/2012  2:04 PM
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:right now, kidd is the knicks MVP..
Your opinion rather than fact. Also, since most analyst have Melo #2 or #3 in MVP rankings while Kidd is nowhere to be found, I'd say your opinion is less than that of the minority.

tkf wrote:lets be honest with outselves.. the role players are replaceable.. so you are expecting the knicks to turn this team over every year?
Most Knick players are locked into contracts that extend beyond this year. Others, like JR will likely resign with NYK. The point you are attempting to make is not applicable to this NYK team.

tkf wrote:I agree every team has their issues, but those teams are already proven.. that is the difference.. and to be honest, it would be great to have a declining wade with lebron and bosh.. it would be great to have an aging celts team but have Rondo.... I am just not as confident as you are with our level of franchise talent... Give me a lebron and rondo and i would feel better about things going forward... this is where we differ and i respect your opinion...

There is only one LeBron and Rondo is not even the type of player you could build a team around, imo. The Knicks right now have Chandler, Kidd, Melo, Felton and Amar'e locked in for a few more years. That is a very sound nucleus. Amar'e has some health issues but so does Wade.

most analyst like who? I think you pay way too much attention to these mock rankings.. they have somewhat little value as that is not the actual voting... and a bit premature...kidd's value to the knicks has been immeasurable.... so sure, that is my opinion, I never said it was a fact...

the fact that camby, kidd and novak are locked into long term deals is not a good thing.. camby looks shot, novak we overpaid for and kidd I wonder how much he has left.. I really like this guy, but i don't see this level of play for a whole year, moreso 3...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
3G4G
Posts: 23485
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2012
Member: #4333

12/10/2012  2:10 PM
FoeDiddy wrote:
3G4G wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!

if the knicks don't win this year, where do you expect this team to go in a confrence that is young and improving and the knicks having 3 guys crossing the 40 year old barrier? no picks, and no young talent going forward to improve from withing... we can talk shumpert but we have to see how that knee does,other than that, what you see is what you get.. we have to win now!!!!

I ask you where is the room for improvement after this season if we don't win.... and honestly the troll argument is old.. put on your big boy pants and answer my question..

if the knicks trashed their future to just win a division, then it is an ultimate failure .. end of story...

You always bring up youth and draft picks as if that is the key to winning or improvement in the short term. Yet, most of the top teams in the NBA are older and have been older year in and year out (except the Thunder who to date have no actually won a thing).


You'll find in almost every case they added youth to their team....

Spurs(Kawhai,Blair,Neal,Green,Splitter)
Lakers(Ebanks,Morris,Hill,Meeks)
Mavs(Boobwah,Mayo,Wright,Collison)
Memphis(Alligator Arms,Pondexter,Selby,Ellington,Arthur,Speights)

(although inverted)
Clippers(Bledsoe,Griffin,Jordan,Thompkins)

Which means when their vets fall off they have something to work with going forward and/or trade with exception to maybe the Lakers....all teams having picks and/or Cap Space to go with.

LOL...all those players can easily be had. That is a group of replaceables if I ever saw one. Outside of Mayo you are telling me the Knicks can't get any of those guys or type of guys in years to come??

The problem is these teams already have them and can flip them or improve with them, meanwhile we don't so we'll be behind trying to play catchup in 2yrs. Also those other teams will be able to duplicate anything we do in terms of rebuild, if not moreso.

We have a pretty good record so as it stands the 2013 pick won't be that good and supposedly the draft may not be strong the next 2yrs. Even if so that 2013 isn't sniffing any playing time on this team. The team we have now is the team we have for the next 2-3yrs then it bottoms completely the heck out. It's going to fall off harder than...


Vince Young

Steve Bumchise

Jermain Taylor

yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

12/10/2012  2:11 PM
tkf wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:right now, kidd is the knicks MVP..
Your opinion rather than fact. Also, since most analyst have Melo #2 or #3 in MVP rankings while Kidd is nowhere to be found, I'd say your opinion is less than that of the minority.

tkf wrote:lets be honest with outselves.. the role players are replaceable.. so you are expecting the knicks to turn this team over every year?
Most Knick players are locked into contracts that extend beyond this year. Others, like JR will likely resign with NYK. The point you are attempting to make is not applicable to this NYK team.

tkf wrote:I agree every team has their issues, but those teams are already proven.. that is the difference.. and to be honest, it would be great to have a declining wade with lebron and bosh.. it would be great to have an aging celts team but have Rondo.... I am just not as confident as you are with our level of franchise talent... Give me a lebron and rondo and i would feel better about things going forward... this is where we differ and i respect your opinion...

There is only one LeBron and Rondo is not even the type of player you could build a team around, imo. The Knicks right now have Chandler, Kidd, Melo, Felton and Amar'e locked in for a few more years. That is a very sound nucleus. Amar'e has some health issues but so does Wade.

most analyst like who? I think you pay way too much attention to these mock rankings.. they have somewhat little value as that is not the actual voting... and a bit premature...kidd's value to the knicks has been immeasurable.... so sure, that is my opinion, I never said it was a fact...

the fact that camby, kidd and novak are locked into long term deals is not a good thing.. camby looks shot, novak we overpaid for and kidd I wonder how much he has left.. I really like this guy, but i don't see this level of play for a whole year, moreso 3...

what do you mean?

NUPE
Posts: 21221
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/29/2012
Member: #4205

12/10/2012  2:11 PM
3G4G wrote:
You'll find in almost every case they added youth to their team....

Spurs(Kawhai,Blair,Neal,Green,Splitter)
Lakers(Ebanks,Morris,Hill,Meeks)
Mavs(Boobwah,Mayo,Wright,Collison)
Memphis(Alligator Arms,Pondexter,Selby,Ellington,Arthur,Speights)

(although inverted)
Clippers(Bledsoe,Griffin,Jordan,Thompkins)

Which means when their vets fall off they have something to work with going forward and/or trade with exception to maybe the Lakers....all teams having picks and/or Cap Space to go with.

The only players listed that have any consistent impact are Mayo, Griffin and Jordan. Bledsoe may be a stud eventually if he ever gets to start. That is a whooping four players out of the 23 you listed that are even worth mentioning. LoL!

NYDiva
Posts: 21168
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/14/2012
Member: #4387

12/10/2012  2:11 PM
3G4G wrote:
Hersports85 wrote:
3G4G wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
dk7th wrote:the knicks went on a 12-0 run with melo on the bench and gallo on the bench. hard for you to acknowledge that for some reason so i repeat it for you.

how is gallo supposed to facilitate when lawson is on the floor? if you are going to ask a rhetorical question at least make it a valid one and not misdirection.

this "putting the team on his back" stuff is where you go into profound fool's gold mode.

When Gallo came in the score was 92-88 in favor of the Knicks. Who gives a **** about whether it was a 50-0 run. The game was winnable for Denver.

Gallo choked and Melo lit his ass up. Gallo is a shooter. He had plenty of opportunities to let that 3 ball fly and match Melo's output those last 4 minutes but didn't.

Keep it real man.


Melo did his thing during winning time....but the team took control of the game with him on the bench and basically ran the offense through Kidd who had a more significant impact overall in the game.

Melo is having a good season, he's getting recognized for the things he's doing well which is primarily scoring but the Knicks are having success with contributions coming from everyone.

Good post. I don't think anyone can argue with this. No one is trying to say Melo is Jordan, it's just frustrating when some posters try to pretend that Melo is doing nothing to contribute to the success we are having and trying to point out the littlest things to make a point or further an agenda.


It has more to do with going over the top with credit he deserves. Like saying against the Bulls had we had Melo we would have won, well had the Bulls had Rose what then?

Then if you say well it would have been nice to have a healthy Shumpert well what if the Bulls had a healthy Rip Hamilton? Then if you say well it would have been nice to have Amar'e then what if Taj Gibson doesn't get ejected?


There was way too much Melo this Melo that before one game was even played this year and then as it got underway it continued to increase beyond. It would be nice to see more balance when discussing him mixing it with discussion of other Knicks.

I'm not really sure why it's a problem to believe that if the Knicks had had Melo vs the Bulls, they'd have won. They needed scoring in the worst way that night and their star player who averages 27 points per game was out. Seems to me that one is a no-brainer. Sometimes you can stave off playing without your star/superstar - other guys get hot, and you win. Other times, you need what he offers the club. The Bulls have already had a preseason without Rose and a month in the regs without him. They've figured out how to gut out wins without Rose (slow down the tempo to a snails pace, make the game as ugly as possible, strong D, etc.) Would they have benefited from him being out there? Of course! But the situation is not exactly the same. Bringing up Rose is more akin to using the fact that the Knicks don't have Amar'e as an excuse as to why they lost a game, when they've already been used to not playing without him and have been successful. Makes sense? (This is not to say that Rose & Amar'e are on the same level as players, it's just giving an example.)

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/10/2012  2:12 PM
FoeDiddy wrote:
tkf wrote:
FoeDiddy wrote:
tkf wrote:
NUPE wrote:
tkf wrote:

nah, I understand the process, I enjoy watching those teams, they will be fine... you see this is not that deep for me.. the knicks have to win NOW, those teams don't...... you still a fan...

So says you. The Knicks have not won their division, a playoff series or the conference in how long?!?!? There is a lot of room for improvement and success this season without winning it all. The must win now mantra is simply a pathetic attempt on your part to reserve the right to claim this season is a failure. I see what you are doing, troll!

if the knicks don't win this year, where do you expect this team to go in a confrence that is young and improving and the knicks having 3 guys crossing the 40 year old barrier? no picks, and no young talent going forward to improve from withing... we can talk shumpert but we have to see how that knee does,other than that, what you see is what you get.. we have to win now!!!!

I ask you where is the room for improvement after this season if we don't win.... and honestly the troll argument is old.. put on your big boy pants and answer my question..

if the knicks trashed their future to just win a division, then it is an ultimate failure .. end of story...

Those old guys are not the nucleus of the team. The Nucleus has 3 years. The role players are replaceable. Look at the heat, Wade is on the downturn of career, Celtics same thing. Every team has their issues. You make it seem like the Knicks front office can never make moves to improve the team. Their are clever ways to improve you team and the thing about having a winning program like Woodson is growing, players of quality will take less to come here over the years.

right now, kidd is the knicks MVP.. lets be honest with outselves.. the role players are replaceable.. so you are expecting the knicks to turn this team over every year? and who are you counting as the nuclues? amare? are we sure about his healthy? felton? are you confident with that? the east is getting younger and better... and our window is closing.. this is not some 3-4 year project.. this is two years max.. this year and next...

I agree every team has their issues, but those teams are already proven.. that is the difference.. and to be honest, it would be great to have a declining wade with lebron and bosh.. it would be great to have an aging celts team but have Rondo.... I am just not as confident as you are with our level of franchise talent... Give me a lebron and rondo and i would feel better about things going forward... this is where we differ and i respect your opinion...

I can't say Kidd is the MVP. He is a very important part to our success but MVP is overblown. Melo is and it's not close. Yes we got away with it against the Heat but look at the play against the Bulls. Bulls game is a easy win with Melo on the court. Whole team against the Bulls were shooting contested shots because we didn't have one player that warranted a double team to open things up. With no Melo every team would play us like that. With someone like Melo it's not only the points you look at but the opportunities he opens up for others because of his special skill set.

I agree on Lebron but i'm gonna wait on the verdict for Rondo. I'm not sure yet he is a player you can build a franchise around. He was tossed in a perfect situation playing with 3 HOF right out of college. You put him out of college on a team like Knicks (pre-Melo) or Bobcats and Im almost certain he is just okay right now and not this Great player he is now. Guys like Lebron or Melo regardless of where they got drafted were gonna be stars.

What team is getting younger and better with no question marks? Sixers?? You trust Bynum's health?? Milwaukee?? couple of years ago Bogut was their future and now what?? Monta Ellis & Brandon Jennings?? Bobcats?? you trust that team?? Every team has their questions regardless of youth. You make it seem like Knicks are the only one's with concerns.

aS i said every team has concerns, just some to a lesser extent... Time is always a factor when talking sports... the sixers best players best years are ahead of them this gives the team the time to make the necessary adjustments... we don't have that luxury... it doesn't mean we are doomed, it means we have to get it done now!! we don't have the luxury of having moral victories of winning the division, the hawks do, the sixers do the pacers do.. we don't....

funny you mention the bobcats... they gave us the business the other night until they imploded, but talent for talent, they whooped us it seems, but lets look at them, what do they need? time, maturity, some vets.. they have the resources to get vets, the flexibilty of time to get better.. so it doesn't matter if I trust them, they went from atrocious last year, to ok, they can compete on any night this year... that is a Huge jump.... where do they go from here? who knows, but they are building the resorces to put themselves in position for a long run.. we put oursleves in position for a short run... and we did so during a time in which the celts are still viable and lebron is still.. lebron...

As far as rondo goes... You can build around his skillset... I do somewhat question his temper, the guy has become a bit unstable, or maybe he was always that way... worth keeping an eye on..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Game Thread: Knicks vs Knuggs. Wilson vs. JR, Melo vs. gallo, Moz vs. Sheed..........

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy