[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Other games thread.......Place to chat about games on TV not Knicks.
Author Thread
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
3/31/2013  1:55 PM
3G4G wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
3G4G wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:What's overrated about him? He doesn't get a lot of PPG but the team doesn't need that from him. He's very good at everything else.

He is a SG who cant shoot and chokes in the playoffs. Igoudala is 29 yrs old man. Igoudala minus athleticism wont be pretty.

Yet you were the same poster thinking Amar'e eventually would prove to be a difference maker in getting us closer to contention. The irony of your posting lately has been fatality......

Huh. Amare is making 20 millon on the Knicks books. We NEED him to contribute to go anywhere. Can Miami win with Bosh sitting on the bench in a suit in the playoffs? I doubt it.


Iggy will be making almost $16mil next yr if he opts him AND?


The Heat beat the Pacers without Bosh(played only 16min that series) in the semis came back Game 5 against Boston I believe and the series was 2-2....


So your question here has already been answered. Can they do it again? Who knows, they probably need Shane Battier as much as they need Bosh so that's not saying much.

We dont have Wade either. Chandler is not Dwight Howard. Stop them madness man.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
AUTOADVERT
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
3/31/2013  3:40 PM
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
dk7th wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
3G4G wrote:Nuggets 50-24....1 of only 4 teams in the league with 50

Looking forward to you being just as impressed when the Knicks hit 50 wins. Though I expect you'll come up with some sort of excuse as to why it doesn't actually count.

nix play in a weaker EC and had a very easy schedule relative to denver's this season. even if they finish with the same record the nuggets will be universally considered the better team and deservedly so.

this should not be too hard to accept.

the only thing certain stubborn nix fans will be able to hang their beanies on is if the nuggets don't go further than the knicks in the playoffs.

I think there's about a 3 to 1 exchange rate - 1 playoff series win in the west = about 3 in the east.

this is an excellent way to look at it.

So you're both already trying to cover yourselves if Denver don't do anything in the playoffs?

Denver has done great this season- I just don't get why everything they do and achieve is fantastic, but everything we do and achieve somehow doesn't count. We're looking at 50 wins plus despite significant injuries to Amar'e, Felton and Sheed, injuries to Melo and Tyson and Kurt and Camby. If someone had said before preseason we'd have all those injuries, no one would have predicted we'd win over 50 games.

it's rare in a season that is too long by at least 12 games that you'll find a team that is not going to suffer injuries. it just so happens that the knicks are more injury-prone because they were forced to acquire very old players and cheap contracts.

injuries can't be used as an excuse.

when one team acquires a marquee player by trade and not through free agency they are forced to go into win-now mode at the expense of trading away valuable assets that could be developed were the team forced into win-now mode.

the fact that the knicks are nowhere near winning now translates to disappointment. the fact that denver is a better team already furthers the disappointment.

now if you decide to poo-poo the nuggets' regular-season record then the same should be said of the knicks record too.

so far as covering myself i don't know what you mean. right now the nuggets have exceeded my expectations and the knicks have not.

if the nuggets fail to secure home court then that's on them. the only teams that they may have trouble against are the two teams ahead of them.

meanwhile the knicks are showing they have a pulse. i have to hand it to smith, he's turned it around and looks great out there. but this ain't the playoffs. he is guilty until proven innocent until he shows he can do stuff in the playoffs. meanwhile it's still supposedly melo's team and i still foresee a futile masturbatory exercise on his part. it's hard for a leopard to change his spots especially when teams invite him to indulge in his favorite activity. i wish woodson would get on his case and demand he chuck less and facilitate more.

I am going to go out on a limb make an assumption that the team that you are referring to is the Knicks and the star they acquired through trade was Melo. As has been discussed numerous times the Knicks goal was to acquire a second star. As soon as they struck out they began the pursuit of Melo as did other teams. There was no way Melo would have been a Knick if the Knicks did not trade for him and there was no way that he would have gone into free agency as both Melo and his team were very motivated to make a trade that benefitted both parties. Once the trade was made and the Knicks had two star players in their prime not trying to win now would be pointless. As far as health concerns, you are right that older players break down but the Knicks core, Shump, Felton, Tyson, Melo, JR, Stat and Novak are players that would either be considered young or in their prime. Signing older vets is something that teams that are going to the playoffs and intend to have a good run do.
In regards to Denver they have had a fantastic season and they were smart to build around Lawson. They have buitl a team that suits their running style. However, to imply that the trade is the reason that they are doing so well would sell that roster short. It is nice to see Gallinari looking like the player he was supposed to be when the Knicks drafted him and it is nice that he is healthy. However, being healthy has not been the norm for his career. Chandler when healthy is very good and as a fan he is the player I miss most because of the trade. Moz has done nothing in Denver.

at this point it seems like chandler has missed as many games as gallinari. i could be wrong. your "building around" statement is questionable. the team is an extension of the coach's approach and will. they found players they wanted that fit the style of the coach. that's smart. gallinari should be better than he is and it's that 3-point shot that is holding him back. to get to the next level he has to achieve 40% from three. then he an all-star. meanwhile his long-range shooting could prove fatal in the playoffs. but then he isn't alone. lawson and iguodala need to tighten up their games too. good news is they are all still young.

and the knicks? they didn't take the denver route of coaching style dictating roster. they acquired talent willy-nilly with no thought to the coach's style of play and no thought to find talent that fits or core players who are even capable of meshing. they behaved like monkeys flinging their poopy at a blank canvas. someone came along and called it "art" and many people take it as such.

They built around Lawson. Iggy and Melo are the same age. As far as how the Knicks acquired talent they had a flawed plan under Walsh. It didn't work and they scrambled to find a second star. However, having a talented veteran roster is something a good coach should be able to work with. Did the Knicks try to remake the Knicks into Showtime when Riley took over or did Riley look at his rosters strengths and build on that? It always starts with talent. You just need a coach that can work with the talent. The Nuggets built around Lawson and his speed. It was the smart thing to do and gives them a huge home court advantage.

in order for your "build around lawson" assertion to have any weight you'd have to state that he is an all-nba first teamer who makes everybody around him better. but he is not an all-nba first teamer and he is still learning how to make others around him better.

how does getting duped by that stern-era colluder lebron james translate to walsh having a flawed plan in your world? walsh didn't "scramble," he fell back on a plan B. if you want to say that the fallback player was deeply flawed i agree with you, but walsh nonetheless was going to build according to a plan. compared with the top 2 players in the league all other players are flawed if you are talking about "building around X" and the reason is because the league is a bloated, diluted mess. so nowadays and until the league contracts to about 24 teams, the best course of action is to build a balanced roster with a lot of depth and which is an extension of the coach's style of play. that's what denver is doing and the results speak for themselves... at least in the regular season. they have an identity and that is a huge advantage come playoff time. the knicks have no identity and that will spell doom come playoff time. a roster that "has talent" is specious. you should have said that a "roster with talent that fits" should be able to be coached. d'antoni got royally screwed by dolan on that point and woodson has proven absolutely nothing thus far. if he makes it to the ECF then i will be overjoyed-- and of course absolutely wrong about what i am saying right now. but i am almost never wrong about these matters.

riley's knicks: here you build around ewing, another deeply flawed player. riley, seeing ewing's profound limitations as a playmaker in terms of making others around him better, and taking note of his plodding style and his lack of a low post game, was forced to acquire rebounders and defenders for the bulk of his tenure with the knicks. he never really solved the puzzle that was ewing, and when fans lament that ewing never had that second star i shake my head in disgust. ewing was the hub of the wheel of underachievement. to think that he could have gone to the same big man's camp as walton, hakeem and shaq... but refused. i applaud ewing's heart but damn his outsized ego.

again, it's false to say the nuggets built around lawson's speed. a functional franchise builds from the top down. the front office sits down with the coach and asks the coach what sort of players does he need for him to execute his philosophy? the coach says "X" and the the front office goes out and acquires such players. that lawson was already there is happenstance.

just because the knicks' profound dysfunction since february 2010 prevails does not give you the freedom to project your opinion onto another team.

GOOD POST.. I said this so many times, that trying to fight fire with fire in this case was stupid.... if the fastest gun in the west is in your town, you can't run him out with the 10th fastest gun, you better get a posse of skilled rifleman and gun slingers to take care of him... Dolan in his silly mind only cares about ticket sales, any good basketball brain or front office would have realized that you don't combat the celtics and especially the Heat by getting an inferior player to lead your team, and making that team top heavy with flawed players... just makes no sense...


again, it's false to say the nuggets built around lawson's speed. a functional franchise builds from the top down. the front office sits down with the coach and asks the coach what sort of players does he need for him to execute his philosophy? the coach says "X" and the the front office goes out and acquires such players. that lawson was already there is happenstance.

exactly, denver seemed to have a plan and they put it into motion as soon as carmelo and the knicks embarked on this silly love affair....that produced this bastard child we call the knicks right now....

but whatever....... I will leave it alone....

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
3/31/2013  3:43 PM
smackeddog wrote:
3G4G wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:What's overrated about him? He doesn't get a lot of PPG but the team doesn't need that from him. He's very good at everything else.

He is a SG who cant shoot and chokes in the playoffs. Igoudala is 29 yrs old man. Igoudala minus athleticism wont be pretty.

Yet you were the same poster thinking Amar'e eventually would prove to be a difference maker in getting us closer to contention. The irony of your posting lately has been fatality......

Are you disputing anything he just wrote? What do you honestly think will happen to Iggy as his athleticism declines? Has he improved or expanded his game at all over the past 7 or 8 years?

And what fantastic insights have you shared with us this season aside from "Knicks are c***" and "Nuggets are perfect"?


actually he has, he has become a very good passer and pretty good playmaker and he always has been an excellent defender....

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/31/2013  3:45 PM
tkf wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
dk7th wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
3G4G wrote:Nuggets 50-24....1 of only 4 teams in the league with 50

Looking forward to you being just as impressed when the Knicks hit 50 wins. Though I expect you'll come up with some sort of excuse as to why it doesn't actually count.

nix play in a weaker EC and had a very easy schedule relative to denver's this season. even if they finish with the same record the nuggets will be universally considered the better team and deservedly so.

this should not be too hard to accept.

the only thing certain stubborn nix fans will be able to hang their beanies on is if the nuggets don't go further than the knicks in the playoffs.

I think there's about a 3 to 1 exchange rate - 1 playoff series win in the west = about 3 in the east.

this is an excellent way to look at it.

So you're both already trying to cover yourselves if Denver don't do anything in the playoffs?

Denver has done great this season- I just don't get why everything they do and achieve is fantastic, but everything we do and achieve somehow doesn't count. We're looking at 50 wins plus despite significant injuries to Amar'e, Felton and Sheed, injuries to Melo and Tyson and Kurt and Camby. If someone had said before preseason we'd have all those injuries, no one would have predicted we'd win over 50 games.

it's rare in a season that is too long by at least 12 games that you'll find a team that is not going to suffer injuries. it just so happens that the knicks are more injury-prone because they were forced to acquire very old players and cheap contracts.

injuries can't be used as an excuse.

when one team acquires a marquee player by trade and not through free agency they are forced to go into win-now mode at the expense of trading away valuable assets that could be developed were the team forced into win-now mode.

the fact that the knicks are nowhere near winning now translates to disappointment. the fact that denver is a better team already furthers the disappointment.

now if you decide to poo-poo the nuggets' regular-season record then the same should be said of the knicks record too.

so far as covering myself i don't know what you mean. right now the nuggets have exceeded my expectations and the knicks have not.

if the nuggets fail to secure home court then that's on them. the only teams that they may have trouble against are the two teams ahead of them.

meanwhile the knicks are showing they have a pulse. i have to hand it to smith, he's turned it around and looks great out there. but this ain't the playoffs. he is guilty until proven innocent until he shows he can do stuff in the playoffs. meanwhile it's still supposedly melo's team and i still foresee a futile masturbatory exercise on his part. it's hard for a leopard to change his spots especially when teams invite him to indulge in his favorite activity. i wish woodson would get on his case and demand he chuck less and facilitate more.

I am going to go out on a limb make an assumption that the team that you are referring to is the Knicks and the star they acquired through trade was Melo. As has been discussed numerous times the Knicks goal was to acquire a second star. As soon as they struck out they began the pursuit of Melo as did other teams. There was no way Melo would have been a Knick if the Knicks did not trade for him and there was no way that he would have gone into free agency as both Melo and his team were very motivated to make a trade that benefitted both parties. Once the trade was made and the Knicks had two star players in their prime not trying to win now would be pointless. As far as health concerns, you are right that older players break down but the Knicks core, Shump, Felton, Tyson, Melo, JR, Stat and Novak are players that would either be considered young or in their prime. Signing older vets is something that teams that are going to the playoffs and intend to have a good run do.
In regards to Denver they have had a fantastic season and they were smart to build around Lawson. They have buitl a team that suits their running style. However, to imply that the trade is the reason that they are doing so well would sell that roster short. It is nice to see Gallinari looking like the player he was supposed to be when the Knicks drafted him and it is nice that he is healthy. However, being healthy has not been the norm for his career. Chandler when healthy is very good and as a fan he is the player I miss most because of the trade. Moz has done nothing in Denver.

at this point it seems like chandler has missed as many games as gallinari. i could be wrong. your "building around" statement is questionable. the team is an extension of the coach's approach and will. they found players they wanted that fit the style of the coach. that's smart. gallinari should be better than he is and it's that 3-point shot that is holding him back. to get to the next level he has to achieve 40% from three. then he an all-star. meanwhile his long-range shooting could prove fatal in the playoffs. but then he isn't alone. lawson and iguodala need to tighten up their games too. good news is they are all still young.

and the knicks? they didn't take the denver route of coaching style dictating roster. they acquired talent willy-nilly with no thought to the coach's style of play and no thought to find talent that fits or core players who are even capable of meshing. they behaved like monkeys flinging their poopy at a blank canvas. someone came along and called it "art" and many people take it as such.

They built around Lawson. Iggy and Melo are the same age. As far as how the Knicks acquired talent they had a flawed plan under Walsh. It didn't work and they scrambled to find a second star. However, having a talented veteran roster is something a good coach should be able to work with. Did the Knicks try to remake the Knicks into Showtime when Riley took over or did Riley look at his rosters strengths and build on that? It always starts with talent. You just need a coach that can work with the talent. The Nuggets built around Lawson and his speed. It was the smart thing to do and gives them a huge home court advantage.

in order for your "build around lawson" assertion to have any weight you'd have to state that he is an all-nba first teamer who makes everybody around him better. but he is not an all-nba first teamer and he is still learning how to make others around him better.

how does getting duped by that stern-era colluder lebron james translate to walsh having a flawed plan in your world? walsh didn't "scramble," he fell back on a plan B. if you want to say that the fallback player was deeply flawed i agree with you, but walsh nonetheless was going to build according to a plan. compared with the top 2 players in the league all other players are flawed if you are talking about "building around X" and the reason is because the league is a bloated, diluted mess. so nowadays and until the league contracts to about 24 teams, the best course of action is to build a balanced roster with a lot of depth and which is an extension of the coach's style of play. that's what denver is doing and the results speak for themselves... at least in the regular season. they have an identity and that is a huge advantage come playoff time. the knicks have no identity and that will spell doom come playoff time. a roster that "has talent" is specious. you should have said that a "roster with talent that fits" should be able to be coached. d'antoni got royally screwed by dolan on that point and woodson has proven absolutely nothing thus far. if he makes it to the ECF then i will be overjoyed-- and of course absolutely wrong about what i am saying right now. but i am almost never wrong about these matters.

riley's knicks: here you build around ewing, another deeply flawed player. riley, seeing ewing's profound limitations as a playmaker in terms of making others around him better, and taking note of his plodding style and his lack of a low post game, was forced to acquire rebounders and defenders for the bulk of his tenure with the knicks. he never really solved the puzzle that was ewing, and when fans lament that ewing never had that second star i shake my head in disgust. ewing was the hub of the wheel of underachievement. to think that he could have gone to the same big man's camp as walton, hakeem and shaq... but refused. i applaud ewing's heart but damn his outsized ego.

again, it's false to say the nuggets built around lawson's speed. a functional franchise builds from the top down. the front office sits down with the coach and asks the coach what sort of players does he need for him to execute his philosophy? the coach says "X" and the the front office goes out and acquires such players. that lawson was already there is happenstance.

just because the knicks' profound dysfunction since february 2010 prevails does not give you the freedom to project your opinion onto another team.

GOOD POST.. I said this so many times, that trying to fight fire with fire in this case was stupid.... if the fastest gun in the west is in your town, you can't run him out with the 10th fastest gun, you better get a posse of skilled rifleman and gun slingers to take care of him... Dolan in his silly mind only cares about ticket sales, any good basketball brain or front office would have realized that you don't combat the celtics and especially the Heat by getting an inferior player to lead your team, and making that team top heavy with flawed players... just makes no sense...


again, it's false to say the nuggets built around lawson's speed. a functional franchise builds from the top down. the front office sits down with the coach and asks the coach what sort of players does he need for him to execute his philosophy? the coach says "X" and the the front office goes out and acquires such players. that lawson was already there is happenstance.

exactly, denver seemed to have a plan and they put it into motion as soon as carmelo and the knicks embarked on this silly love affair....that produced this bastard child we call the knicks right now....

but whatever....... I will leave it alone....

Their plan was to take advantage of the altitude they play in and build a team that could run teams off of the court and that started with Lawson.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
3/31/2013  3:50 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
tkf wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
dk7th wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
3G4G wrote:Nuggets 50-24....1 of only 4 teams in the league with 50

Looking forward to you being just as impressed when the Knicks hit 50 wins. Though I expect you'll come up with some sort of excuse as to why it doesn't actually count.

nix play in a weaker EC and had a very easy schedule relative to denver's this season. even if they finish with the same record the nuggets will be universally considered the better team and deservedly so.

this should not be too hard to accept.

the only thing certain stubborn nix fans will be able to hang their beanies on is if the nuggets don't go further than the knicks in the playoffs.

I think there's about a 3 to 1 exchange rate - 1 playoff series win in the west = about 3 in the east.

this is an excellent way to look at it.

So you're both already trying to cover yourselves if Denver don't do anything in the playoffs?

Denver has done great this season- I just don't get why everything they do and achieve is fantastic, but everything we do and achieve somehow doesn't count. We're looking at 50 wins plus despite significant injuries to Amar'e, Felton and Sheed, injuries to Melo and Tyson and Kurt and Camby. If someone had said before preseason we'd have all those injuries, no one would have predicted we'd win over 50 games.

it's rare in a season that is too long by at least 12 games that you'll find a team that is not going to suffer injuries. it just so happens that the knicks are more injury-prone because they were forced to acquire very old players and cheap contracts.

injuries can't be used as an excuse.

when one team acquires a marquee player by trade and not through free agency they are forced to go into win-now mode at the expense of trading away valuable assets that could be developed were the team forced into win-now mode.

the fact that the knicks are nowhere near winning now translates to disappointment. the fact that denver is a better team already furthers the disappointment.

now if you decide to poo-poo the nuggets' regular-season record then the same should be said of the knicks record too.

so far as covering myself i don't know what you mean. right now the nuggets have exceeded my expectations and the knicks have not.

if the nuggets fail to secure home court then that's on them. the only teams that they may have trouble against are the two teams ahead of them.

meanwhile the knicks are showing they have a pulse. i have to hand it to smith, he's turned it around and looks great out there. but this ain't the playoffs. he is guilty until proven innocent until he shows he can do stuff in the playoffs. meanwhile it's still supposedly melo's team and i still foresee a futile masturbatory exercise on his part. it's hard for a leopard to change his spots especially when teams invite him to indulge in his favorite activity. i wish woodson would get on his case and demand he chuck less and facilitate more.

I am going to go out on a limb make an assumption that the team that you are referring to is the Knicks and the star they acquired through trade was Melo. As has been discussed numerous times the Knicks goal was to acquire a second star. As soon as they struck out they began the pursuit of Melo as did other teams. There was no way Melo would have been a Knick if the Knicks did not trade for him and there was no way that he would have gone into free agency as both Melo and his team were very motivated to make a trade that benefitted both parties. Once the trade was made and the Knicks had two star players in their prime not trying to win now would be pointless. As far as health concerns, you are right that older players break down but the Knicks core, Shump, Felton, Tyson, Melo, JR, Stat and Novak are players that would either be considered young or in their prime. Signing older vets is something that teams that are going to the playoffs and intend to have a good run do.
In regards to Denver they have had a fantastic season and they were smart to build around Lawson. They have buitl a team that suits their running style. However, to imply that the trade is the reason that they are doing so well would sell that roster short. It is nice to see Gallinari looking like the player he was supposed to be when the Knicks drafted him and it is nice that he is healthy. However, being healthy has not been the norm for his career. Chandler when healthy is very good and as a fan he is the player I miss most because of the trade. Moz has done nothing in Denver.

at this point it seems like chandler has missed as many games as gallinari. i could be wrong. your "building around" statement is questionable. the team is an extension of the coach's approach and will. they found players they wanted that fit the style of the coach. that's smart. gallinari should be better than he is and it's that 3-point shot that is holding him back. to get to the next level he has to achieve 40% from three. then he an all-star. meanwhile his long-range shooting could prove fatal in the playoffs. but then he isn't alone. lawson and iguodala need to tighten up their games too. good news is they are all still young.

and the knicks? they didn't take the denver route of coaching style dictating roster. they acquired talent willy-nilly with no thought to the coach's style of play and no thought to find talent that fits or core players who are even capable of meshing. they behaved like monkeys flinging their poopy at a blank canvas. someone came along and called it "art" and many people take it as such.

They built around Lawson. Iggy and Melo are the same age. As far as how the Knicks acquired talent they had a flawed plan under Walsh. It didn't work and they scrambled to find a second star. However, having a talented veteran roster is something a good coach should be able to work with. Did the Knicks try to remake the Knicks into Showtime when Riley took over or did Riley look at his rosters strengths and build on that? It always starts with talent. You just need a coach that can work with the talent. The Nuggets built around Lawson and his speed. It was the smart thing to do and gives them a huge home court advantage.

in order for your "build around lawson" assertion to have any weight you'd have to state that he is an all-nba first teamer who makes everybody around him better. but he is not an all-nba first teamer and he is still learning how to make others around him better.

how does getting duped by that stern-era colluder lebron james translate to walsh having a flawed plan in your world? walsh didn't "scramble," he fell back on a plan B. if you want to say that the fallback player was deeply flawed i agree with you, but walsh nonetheless was going to build according to a plan. compared with the top 2 players in the league all other players are flawed if you are talking about "building around X" and the reason is because the league is a bloated, diluted mess. so nowadays and until the league contracts to about 24 teams, the best course of action is to build a balanced roster with a lot of depth and which is an extension of the coach's style of play. that's what denver is doing and the results speak for themselves... at least in the regular season. they have an identity and that is a huge advantage come playoff time. the knicks have no identity and that will spell doom come playoff time. a roster that "has talent" is specious. you should have said that a "roster with talent that fits" should be able to be coached. d'antoni got royally screwed by dolan on that point and woodson has proven absolutely nothing thus far. if he makes it to the ECF then i will be overjoyed-- and of course absolutely wrong about what i am saying right now. but i am almost never wrong about these matters.

riley's knicks: here you build around ewing, another deeply flawed player. riley, seeing ewing's profound limitations as a playmaker in terms of making others around him better, and taking note of his plodding style and his lack of a low post game, was forced to acquire rebounders and defenders for the bulk of his tenure with the knicks. he never really solved the puzzle that was ewing, and when fans lament that ewing never had that second star i shake my head in disgust. ewing was the hub of the wheel of underachievement. to think that he could have gone to the same big man's camp as walton, hakeem and shaq... but refused. i applaud ewing's heart but damn his outsized ego.

again, it's false to say the nuggets built around lawson's speed. a functional franchise builds from the top down. the front office sits down with the coach and asks the coach what sort of players does he need for him to execute his philosophy? the coach says "X" and the the front office goes out and acquires such players. that lawson was already there is happenstance.

just because the knicks' profound dysfunction since february 2010 prevails does not give you the freedom to project your opinion onto another team.

GOOD POST.. I said this so many times, that trying to fight fire with fire in this case was stupid.... if the fastest gun in the west is in your town, you can't run him out with the 10th fastest gun, you better get a posse of skilled rifleman and gun slingers to take care of him... Dolan in his silly mind only cares about ticket sales, any good basketball brain or front office would have realized that you don't combat the celtics and especially the Heat by getting an inferior player to lead your team, and making that team top heavy with flawed players... just makes no sense...


again, it's false to say the nuggets built around lawson's speed. a functional franchise builds from the top down. the front office sits down with the coach and asks the coach what sort of players does he need for him to execute his philosophy? the coach says "X" and the the front office goes out and acquires such players. that lawson was already there is happenstance.

exactly, denver seemed to have a plan and they put it into motion as soon as carmelo and the knicks embarked on this silly love affair....that produced this bastard child we call the knicks right now....

but whatever....... I will leave it alone....

Their plan was to take advantage of the altitude they play in and build a team that could run teams off of the court and that started with Lawson.


so you just agreed with dk.. they built around a philosophy..... a style of play and a coach.. lawson just happened to be there already, doesn't mean they build around him.. all of their moves were made to build around their coach and style of play.... which is why they got mcgee, iggy, etc....

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
TeamBall
Posts: 24343
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2012
Member: #4386

3/31/2013  4:04 PM
tkf wrote:so you just agreed with dk.. they built around a philosophy..... a style of play and a coach.. lawson just happened to be there already, doesn't mean they build around him.. all of their moves were made to build around their coach and style of play.... which is why they got mcgee, iggy, etc....

Heres what I dont get: both you and DK believe that the Knicks have done the opposite of the Nuggets in regard to building the team around the coaches style of play, correct? Well, Grunwald did do that with Woodson. It was Donnie Walsh that didnt do that with D'antoni.
Knicksfan: Hypocrite league that fines players after the game for flopping but in the game and with obvious flopping they call the fouls.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
3/31/2013  5:20 PM
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:so you just agreed with dk.. they built around a philosophy..... a style of play and a coach.. lawson just happened to be there already, doesn't mean they build around him.. all of their moves were made to build around their coach and style of play.... which is why they got mcgee, iggy, etc....

Heres what I dont get: both you and DK believe that the Knicks have done the opposite of the Nuggets in regard to building the team around the coaches style of play, correct? Well, Grunwald did do that with Woodson. It was Donnie Walsh that didnt do that with D'antoni.

no not really, what is woodson's philosophy? what is his style? what is the knicks style? what is the knicks identity?

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
3/31/2013  5:23 PM
Ha, ridiculous! Miami get revenge on the Spurs by declaring Wade, Lebron and Chalmers all out with (BS) injuries! Can't wait to see if Stern reacts the same was as he did when the Spurs pulled this manoeuvre earlier in the season...

They will all be magically healed in time for our game, no doubt.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
3/31/2013  5:48 PM
smackeddog wrote:Ha, ridiculous! Miami get revenge on the Spurs by declaring Wade, Lebron and Chalmers all out with (BS) injuries! Can't wait to see if Stern reacts the same was as he did when the Spurs pulled this manoeuvre earlier in the season...

They will all be magically healed in time for our game, no doubt.

Tom Haberstroh @tomhaberstroh

Confirmed: LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Mario Chalmers OUT vs. Spurs. Heat say LeBron has a right hamstring strain suffered in first half in NOH. Wade and Chalmers both right ankle. All day-to-day.
Twitter

Pop stated he was resting his key guys because of fatigue, the heat are doing the same thing, but posting fake injuries not to get fine.

I think your going to see very little of them for the rest of the season because they already wrap up the EC..

Thats cool, let them rest for the next 2 1/2 weeks, fall out of rythem and think they could just turn it on come playoffs.

I always think going into the playoffs with more then 3 days rest can back fire especially if your playing well.

ES
TeamBall
Posts: 24343
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2012
Member: #4386

3/31/2013  6:05 PM
tkf wrote:
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:so you just agreed with dk.. they built around a philosophy..... a style of play and a coach.. lawson just happened to be there already, doesn't mean they build around him.. all of their moves were made to build around their coach and style of play.... which is why they got mcgee, iggy, etc....

Heres what I dont get: both you and DK believe that the Knicks have done the opposite of the Nuggets in regard to building the team around the coaches style of play, correct? Well, Grunwald did do that with Woodson. It was Donnie Walsh that didnt do that with D'antoni.

no not really, what is woodson's philosophy? what is his style? what is the knicks style? what is the knicks identity?


Not really? So Woodson had nothing to do with getting the players on the team?
Knicksfan: Hypocrite league that fines players after the game for flopping but in the game and with obvious flopping they call the fouls.
Nalod
Posts: 71332
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/31/2013  6:34 PM
Iggy opts out?

Maybe to resign a longer deal with denver?

He won't get max money we know. Denver can extend him we know.

Opt out makes no sense for him. In football they call it "restructure".

We'll see.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/31/2013  6:51 PM
Nalod wrote:Iggy opts out?

Maybe to resign a longer deal with denver?

He won't get max money we know. Denver can extend him we know.

Opt out makes no sense for him. In football they call it "restructure".

We'll see.


Opting out and re-signing with Denver makes sense for him. They owe him $15 mil total (all next year). Then he's an FA. If he opts out now, he'll probably get around $40 mil guaranteed over 5 years.
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

3/31/2013  7:16 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:Iggy opts out?

Maybe to resign a longer deal with denver?

He won't get max money we know. Denver can extend him we know.

Opt out makes no sense for him. In football they call it "restructure".

We'll see.


Opting out and re-signing with Denver makes sense for him. They owe him $15 mil total (all next year). Then he's an FA. If he opts out now, he'll probably get around $40 mil guaranteed over 5 years.

Exactly, this is not the NFL whers contracs are not guaranteed in the NBA it's about the long money which equals security.
TeamBall
Posts: 24343
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2012
Member: #4386

3/31/2013  7:18 PM
smackeddog wrote:Ha, ridiculous! Miami get revenge on the Spurs by declaring Wade, Lebron and Chalmers all out with (BS) injuries! Can't wait to see if Stern reacts the same was as he did when the Spurs pulled this manoeuvre earlier in the season...

They will all be magically healed in time for our game, no doubt.


Yep...
Seems like a bit of an insult to Bosh though
Knicksfan: Hypocrite league that fines players after the game for flopping but in the game and with obvious flopping they call the fouls.
Nalod
Posts: 71332
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/31/2013  7:52 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:Iggy opts out?

Maybe to resign a longer deal with denver?

He won't get max money we know. Denver can extend him we know.

Opt out makes no sense for him. In football they call it "restructure".

We'll see.


Opting out and re-signing with Denver makes sense for him. They owe him $15 mil total (all next year). Then he's an FA. If he opts out now, he'll probably get around $40 mil guaranteed over 5 years.

The contract Gerald wallace got is a likely guide. If he wants to be in denver they can figure a way. if he wants money, he'll figure a way.

3G4G
Posts: 23485
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2012
Member: #4333

3/31/2013  8:57 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/31/2013  9:01 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
3G4G wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
3G4G wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:What's overrated about him? He doesn't get a lot of PPG but the team doesn't need that from him. He's very good at everything else.

He is a SG who cant shoot and chokes in the playoffs. Igoudala is 29 yrs old man. Igoudala minus athleticism wont be pretty.

Yet you were the same poster thinking Amar'e eventually would prove to be a difference maker in getting us closer to contention. The irony of your posting lately has been fatality......

Huh. Amare is making 20 millon on the Knicks books. We NEED him to contribute to go anywhere. Can Miami win with Bosh sitting on the bench in a suit in the playoffs? I doubt it.


Iggy will be making almost $16mil next yr if he opts him AND?


The Heat beat the Pacers without Bosh(played only 16min that series) in the semis came back Game 5 against Boston I believe and the series was 2-2....


So your question here has already been answered. Can they do it again? Who knows, they probably need Shane Battier as much as they need Bosh so that's not saying much.

We dont have Wade either. Chandler is not Dwight Howard. Stop them madness man.


Oh so once evidence proved the Heat could progress without Bosh you then say "we don't have Wade either". Should have acknowledged they had Wade in your previous reply I mean how could you forget about him?

Well I can play this game with you....The Heat don't have J.R. Smith A.K.A. James Harden and they don't have a DPOY in Tyson Chandler and since Mario Chalmers and Norris Cole shook Lin but Felton is way better than Lin then I guess we 1 up them there too. So we should be just fine without Amar'e this post-season...

Typical Knicks Fan Bibble Babble Flip-Flop Hypocrisy...what applies to other teams doesn't apply to us and what applies to us doesn't apply to other teams

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
3/31/2013  9:42 PM
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:so you just agreed with dk.. they built around a philosophy..... a style of play and a coach.. lawson just happened to be there already, doesn't mean they build around him.. all of their moves were made to build around their coach and style of play.... which is why they got mcgee, iggy, etc....

Heres what I dont get: both you and DK believe that the Knicks have done the opposite of the Nuggets in regard to building the team around the coaches style of play, correct? Well, Grunwald did do that with Woodson. It was Donnie Walsh that didnt do that with D'antoni.

no not really, what is woodson's philosophy? what is his style? what is the knicks style? what is the knicks identity?


Not really? So Woodson had nothing to do with getting the players on the team?

I don't know teamball can you confirm that he did? supposedly he wanted lin.. what happened with that?

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
TeamBall
Posts: 24343
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2012
Member: #4386

3/31/2013  10:30 PM
tkf wrote:
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:so you just agreed with dk.. they built around a philosophy..... a style of play and a coach.. lawson just happened to be there already, doesn't mean they build around him.. all of their moves were made to build around their coach and style of play.... which is why they got mcgee, iggy, etc....

Heres what I dont get: both you and DK believe that the Knicks have done the opposite of the Nuggets in regard to building the team around the coaches style of play, correct? Well, Grunwald did do that with Woodson. It was Donnie Walsh that didnt do that with D'antoni.

no not really, what is woodson's philosophy? what is his style? what is the knicks style? what is the knicks identity?


Not really? So Woodson had nothing to do with getting the players on the team?

I don't know teamball can you confirm that he did? supposedly he wanted lin.. what happened with that?


He wanted Sheed and he got him. So what does that mean?
Im saying he had input on the roster we have now which means that the Knicks dont just put together rosters without involving their coaches. Do you disagree?
Knicksfan: Hypocrite league that fines players after the game for flopping but in the game and with obvious flopping they call the fouls.
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
3/31/2013  11:21 PM
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:so you just agreed with dk.. they built around a philosophy..... a style of play and a coach.. lawson just happened to be there already, doesn't mean they build around him.. all of their moves were made to build around their coach and style of play.... which is why they got mcgee, iggy, etc....

Heres what I dont get: both you and DK believe that the Knicks have done the opposite of the Nuggets in regard to building the team around the coaches style of play, correct? Well, Grunwald did do that with Woodson. It was Donnie Walsh that didnt do that with D'antoni.

no not really, what is woodson's philosophy? what is his style? what is the knicks style? what is the knicks identity?


Not really? So Woodson had nothing to do with getting the players on the team?

I don't know teamball can you confirm that he did? supposedly he wanted lin.. what happened with that?


He wanted Sheed and he got him. So what does that mean?
Im saying he had input on the roster we have now which means that the Knicks dont just put together rosters without involving their coaches. Do you disagree?

I can't believe this convo is being had.

Woodson loves vets, even stated youngsters dont win chips, vets do.

Didn't play Teague in Atlanta because he was young, and opted for Mike Bibby and Crawford.

This team pretty much was handpicked by Woodson.

TeamBall
Posts: 24343
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2012
Member: #4386

4/1/2013  12:30 PM
knickscity wrote:
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:
TeamBall wrote:
tkf wrote:so you just agreed with dk.. they built around a philosophy..... a style of play and a coach.. lawson just happened to be there already, doesn't mean they build around him.. all of their moves were made to build around their coach and style of play.... which is why they got mcgee, iggy, etc....

Heres what I dont get: both you and DK believe that the Knicks have done the opposite of the Nuggets in regard to building the team around the coaches style of play, correct? Well, Grunwald did do that with Woodson. It was Donnie Walsh that didnt do that with D'antoni.

no not really, what is woodson's philosophy? what is his style? what is the knicks style? what is the knicks identity?


Not really? So Woodson had nothing to do with getting the players on the team?

I don't know teamball can you confirm that he did? supposedly he wanted lin.. what happened with that?


He wanted Sheed and he got him. So what does that mean?
Im saying he had input on the roster we have now which means that the Knicks dont just put together rosters without involving their coaches. Do you disagree?

I can't believe this convo is being had.

Woodson loves vets, even stated youngsters dont win chips, vets do.

Didn't play Teague in Atlanta because he was young, and opted for Mike Bibby and Crawford.

This team pretty much was handpicked by Woodson.


Thats pretty much what im trying to say
Knicksfan: Hypocrite league that fines players after the game for flopping but in the game and with obvious flopping they call the fouls.
Other games thread.......Place to chat about games on TV not Knicks.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy