[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Where the heck is Hillary Clinton?
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/9/2016  2:27 PM
earthmansurfer wrote:
nixluva wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
holfresh wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:So, what of these "polls". It was brought up how Brexit was wrong and that our polls were oversampled. Is it another coincidence or is there something to it?
I mean, all of the MSM polls, wrong??? This is probably what Trump meant about corruption.

No one really knows. The polling average had Hillary up by 3.3 and it looks like it's going to be closer to 0.1. Nate Silver at 538 did say there was a pretty high chance (greater than 10%) that Hillary would win the popular vote but lose the electoral vote.

We seem to be near the historically high end regarding result/poll deviation. http://www.gallup.com/poll/9442/Election-Polls-Accuracy-Record-Presidential-Elections.aspx (edit)

As a service, for the sake of future elections, this needs to be looked into and see exactly how these (specific) results were achieved. A part of going forward and healing, is seeing where things are broken and fixing them, making things better all round - more transparent, etc. We need to get back trust in our system. We need more transparency.

We need to be careful, because if polls can easily be influenced, the affect on the outcome of a vote could, in part, steered. Another tool in the chest of corruption.

So you are concerned about polls and not about a Republican majority in the Supreme Court allowing laws to change so the Republicans in their districts can systemically close 860 polling stations in minority districts across the South in battleground states, to restrict minorities access to voting..You aren't concerned that the Supreme Court has ushered in Citizen's United to allow the rich both foreign and domestic to influence our election more so than the average citizen..You had zero problem watching Russia weight in on our election process by hacking the DNC databases are releasing vital campaign strategies..And lastly, You had no problem with the FBI releasing critical leaks on the eve of the election to help the republican candidate..But it's the POLLS that keeps you up at night, where we need more transparency...Right...

Again, why is this a "this or that" argument (false dilemma)? Can't we work on all of these things?
I'm not the opposition.

You're misguided if you think this election was about fixing corruption or polls or "draining the swamp". That's all BS for the masses that bought that tripe. The same people that have been in government are STILL in government but now they have even more power to screw the people.

Please someone explain how things are better today for the people just cuz Trump is President? Trump is just a figurehead and the real power is still in the same hands. There has been no real change except now Big Business is in total control.

Who backed the Republicans that have been in the House and the Senate??? The same Koch Brothers and other Big Business leaders. They could give a crap about "the people "!

Nixluva - You don't know and yet you speak with certainty. If you want to give up before he even gets in office that is on you. I wouldn't have given up had Hillary won.
Trump is the first non politician to be in office since when? Was Reagan a politician after acting? We have a chance, I'll take that over a known corrupt quantity.


The sad part is that I DO KNOW that The Congress is made up of the very same Republicans that have been there for YEARS and they are bought and paid for by Big Business like the Koch Brothers. That's always been their thing and they have not changed even if Trump was selling his populist spiel to RED America. These voters have put their trust in Trump and he will not be able to overcome the wishes of the House and Senate Republicans. He will soon learn that his power is very limited.
AUTOADVERT
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

11/9/2016  2:29 PM
nixluva wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
nixluva wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
holfresh wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:So, what of these "polls". It was brought up how Brexit was wrong and that our polls were oversampled. Is it another coincidence or is there something to it?
I mean, all of the MSM polls, wrong??? This is probably what Trump meant about corruption.

No one really knows. The polling average had Hillary up by 3.3 and it looks like it's going to be closer to 0.1. Nate Silver at 538 did say there was a pretty high chance (greater than 10%) that Hillary would win the popular vote but lose the electoral vote.

We seem to be near the historically high end regarding result/poll deviation. http://www.gallup.com/poll/9442/Election-Polls-Accuracy-Record-Presidential-Elections.aspx (edit)

As a service, for the sake of future elections, this needs to be looked into and see exactly how these (specific) results were achieved. A part of going forward and healing, is seeing where things are broken and fixing them, making things better all round - more transparent, etc. We need to get back trust in our system. We need more transparency.

We need to be careful, because if polls can easily be influenced, the affect on the outcome of a vote could, in part, steered. Another tool in the chest of corruption.

So you are concerned about polls and not about a Republican majority in the Supreme Court allowing laws to change so the Republicans in their districts can systemically close 860 polling stations in minority districts across the South in battleground states, to restrict minorities access to voting..You aren't concerned that the Supreme Court has ushered in Citizen's United to allow the rich both foreign and domestic to influence our election more so than the average citizen..You had zero problem watching Russia weight in on our election process by hacking the DNC databases are releasing vital campaign strategies..And lastly, You had no problem with the FBI releasing critical leaks on the eve of the election to help the republican candidate..But it's the POLLS that keeps you up at night, where we need more transparency...Right...

Again, why is this a "this or that" argument (false dilemma)? Can't we work on all of these things?
I'm not the opposition.

You're misguided if you think this election was about fixing corruption or polls or "draining the swamp". That's all BS for the masses that bought that tripe. The same people that have been in government are STILL in government but now they have even more power to screw the people.

Please someone explain how things are better today for the people just cuz Trump is President? Trump is just a figurehead and the real power is still in the same hands. There has been no real change except now Big Business is in total control.

Who backed the Republicans that have been in the House and the Senate??? The same Koch Brothers and other Big Business leaders. They could give a crap about "the people "!

Nixluva - You don't know and yet you speak with certainty. If you want to give up before he even gets in office that is on you. I wouldn't have given up had Hillary won.
Trump is the first non politician to be in office since when? Was Reagan a politician after acting? We have a chance, I'll take that over a known corrupt quantity.


The sad part is that I DO KNOW that The Congress is made up of the very same Republicans that have been there for YEARS and they are bought and paid for by Big Business like the Koch Brothers. That's always been their thing and they have not changed even if Trump was selling his populist spiel to RED America. These voters have put their trust in Trump and he will not be able to overcome the wishes of the House and Senate Republicans. He will soon learn that his power is very limited.

I don't know man. A lot of folks in Congress owe their election to Trump now. Because their jobs are up for election again in 2 years while Trump isn't for 4 years.

Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/9/2016  2:30 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Wow, Republicans control the ENTIRE country - they have the Presidency, The Senate, the House, the Governorships, the State Congresses. Unless Trump surprises us and is more moderate than he seemed, I think the country is going to move very far to the right for many decades.

America's first independent President. It's the best thing to ever happen to us

You are naive. The real Power is in the House and Senate and Trump is not a serious Policy man. The same old Republicans that have been in power all these years will be running the show. You will not get the change you were promised because Trump can't "drain the swamp". All he gets to do is change the Drapes in the Oval Office. It's all about the House and Senate and those people have not changed.

Papabear
Posts: 24373
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

11/9/2016  2:31 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/9/2016  2:39 PM
nixluva wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
holfresh wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:So, what of these "polls". It was brought up how Brexit was wrong and that our polls were oversampled. Is it another coincidence or is there something to it?
I mean, all of the MSM polls, wrong??? This is probably what Trump meant about corruption.

No one really knows. The polling average had Hillary up by 3.3 and it looks like it's going to be closer to 0.1. Nate Silver at 538 did say there was a pretty high chance (greater than 10%) that Hillary would win the popular vote but lose the electoral vote.

We seem to be near the historically high end regarding result/poll deviation. http://www.gallup.com/poll/9442/Election-Polls-Accuracy-Record-Presidential-Elections.aspx (edit)

As a service, for the sake of future elections, this needs to be looked into and see exactly how these (specific) results were achieved. A part of going forward and healing, is seeing where things are broken and fixing them, making things better all round - more transparent, etc. We need to get back trust in our system. We need more transparency.

We need to be careful, because if polls can easily be influenced, the affect on the outcome of a vote could, in part, steered. Another tool in the chest of corruption.

So you are concerned about polls and not about a Republican majority in the Supreme Court allowing laws to change so the Republicans in their districts can systemically close 860 polling stations in minority districts across the South in battleground states, to restrict minorities access to voting..You aren't concerned that the Supreme Court has ushered in Citizen's United to allow the rich both foreign and domestic to influence our election more so than the average citizen..You had zero problem watching Russia weight in on our election process by hacking the DNC databases are releasing vital campaign strategies..And lastly, You had no problem with the FBI releasing critical leaks on the eve of the election to help the republican candidate..But it's the POLLS that keeps you up at night, where we need more transparency...Right...

Again, why is this a "this or that" argument (false dilemma)? Can't we work on all of these things?
I'm not the opposition.

You're misguided if you think this election was about fixing corruption or polls or "draining the swamp". That's all BS for the masses that bought that tripe. The same people that have been in government are STILL in government but now they have even more power to screw the people.

Please someone explain how things are better today for the people just cuz Trump is President? Trump is just a figurehead and the real power is still in the same hands. There has been no real change except now Big Business is in total control.

Who backed the Republicans that have been in the House and the Senate??? The same Koch Brothers and other Big Business leaders. They could give a crap about "the people "!


Papabear Says

I agree and now we will see what Trump will do and he wont be draining the swamp. The rich will get richer and the jobs aren't coming back and for anyone who thinks so is a fool. Trump scammed the white none working , black none working and Latino none working class and only time will tell. The only thing he will be draining is the pockets of the middle working class.

Papabear
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

11/9/2016  2:34 PM
Trump wants an infrastructure bill. Pelosi already saying she wants to work on this with Trump Administration. How does Freedom Caucus cut the government types respond to this? Will be one of the first battles, along with Obamacare.
Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/9/2016  2:34 PM
DrAlphaeus wrote:
nixluva wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
nixluva wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
holfresh wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:So, what of these "polls". It was brought up how Brexit was wrong and that our polls were oversampled. Is it another coincidence or is there something to it?
I mean, all of the MSM polls, wrong??? This is probably what Trump meant about corruption.

No one really knows. The polling average had Hillary up by 3.3 and it looks like it's going to be closer to 0.1. Nate Silver at 538 did say there was a pretty high chance (greater than 10%) that Hillary would win the popular vote but lose the electoral vote.

We seem to be near the historically high end regarding result/poll deviation. http://www.gallup.com/poll/9442/Election-Polls-Accuracy-Record-Presidential-Elections.aspx (edit)

As a service, for the sake of future elections, this needs to be looked into and see exactly how these (specific) results were achieved. A part of going forward and healing, is seeing where things are broken and fixing them, making things better all round - more transparent, etc. We need to get back trust in our system. We need more transparency.

We need to be careful, because if polls can easily be influenced, the affect on the outcome of a vote could, in part, steered. Another tool in the chest of corruption.

So you are concerned about polls and not about a Republican majority in the Supreme Court allowing laws to change so the Republicans in their districts can systemically close 860 polling stations in minority districts across the South in battleground states, to restrict minorities access to voting..You aren't concerned that the Supreme Court has ushered in Citizen's United to allow the rich both foreign and domestic to influence our election more so than the average citizen..You had zero problem watching Russia weight in on our election process by hacking the DNC databases are releasing vital campaign strategies..And lastly, You had no problem with the FBI releasing critical leaks on the eve of the election to help the republican candidate..But it's the POLLS that keeps you up at night, where we need more transparency...Right...

Again, why is this a "this or that" argument (false dilemma)? Can't we work on all of these things?
I'm not the opposition.

You're misguided if you think this election was about fixing corruption or polls or "draining the swamp". That's all BS for the masses that bought that tripe. The same people that have been in government are STILL in government but now they have even more power to screw the people.

Please someone explain how things are better today for the people just cuz Trump is President? Trump is just a figurehead and the real power is still in the same hands. There has been no real change except now Big Business is in total control.

Who backed the Republicans that have been in the House and the Senate??? The same Koch Brothers and other Big Business leaders. They could give a crap about "the people "!

Nixluva - You don't know and yet you speak with certainty. If you want to give up before he even gets in office that is on you. I wouldn't have given up had Hillary won.
Trump is the first non politician to be in office since when? Was Reagan a politician after acting? We have a chance, I'll take that over a known corrupt quantity.


The sad part is that I DO KNOW that The Congress is made up of the very same Republicans that have been there for YEARS and they are bought and paid for by Big Business like the Koch Brothers. That's always been their thing and they have not changed even if Trump was selling his populist spiel to RED America. These voters have put their trust in Trump and he will not be able to overcome the wishes of the House and Senate Republicans. He will soon learn that his power is very limited.

I don't know man. A lot of folks in Congress owe their election to Trump now. Because their jobs are up for election again in 2 years while Trump isn't for 4 years.


You've got to understand how it works. These Congressmen will not face opposition in their Gerrymandered Districts, except maybe to their right. Also there aren't enough of them up for election to really give Trump any leverage. Trump will find out he's nearly powerless and the Bully Pulpit can only do so much for him.
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

11/9/2016  2:37 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/9/2016  2:37 PM
GustavBahler wrote:From writer Thomas Frank on why Hillary lost.


Start at the top. Why, oh why, did it have to be Hillary Clinton? Yes, she has an impressive resume; yes, she worked hard on the campaign trail. But she was exactly the wrong candidate for this angry, populist moment. An insider when the country was screaming for an outsider. A technocrat who offered fine-tuning when the country wanted to take a sledgehammer to the machine.

She was the Democratic candidate because it was her turn and because a Clinton victory would have moved every Democrat in Washington up a notch. Whether or not she would win was always a secondary matter, something that was taken for granted. Had winning been the party’s number one concern, several more suitable candidates were ready to go. There was Joe Biden, with his powerful plainspoken style, and there was Bernie Sanders, an inspiring and largely scandal-free figure. Each of them would probably have beaten Trump, but neither of them would really have served the interests of the party insiders. …

To try to put over such a nominee while screaming that the Republican is a rightwing monster is to court disbelief. If Trump is a fascist, as liberals often said, Democrats should have put in their strongest player to stop him, not a party hack they’d chosen because it was her turn. Choosing her indicated either that Democrats didn’t mean what they said about Trump’s riskiness, that their opportunism took precedence over the country’s well-being, or maybe both.

Clinton’s supporters among the media didn’t help much, either. It always struck me as strange that such an unpopular candidate enjoyed such robust and unanimous endorsements from the editorial and opinion pages of the nation’s papers, but it was the quality of the media’s enthusiasm that really harmed her. With the same arguments repeated over and over, two or three times a day, with nuance and contrary views all deleted, the act of opening the newspaper started to feel like tuning in to a Cold War propaganda station. Here’s what it consisted of:

• Hillary was virtually without flaws. She was a peerless leader clad in saintly white, a super-lawyer, a caring benefactor of women and children, a warrior for social justice.
• Her scandals weren’t real.
• The economy was doing well / America was already great.
• Working-class people weren’t supporting Trump.
• And if they were, it was only because they were botched humans. Racism was the only conceivable reason for lining up with the Republican candidate.

How did the journalists’ crusade fail? The fourth estate came together in an unprecedented professional consensus. They chose insulting the other side over trying to understand what motivated them. They transformed opinion writing into a vehicle for high moral boasting. What could possibly have gone wrong with such an approach?

Put this question in slightly more general terms and you are confronting the single great mystery of 2016. The American white-collar class just spent the year rallying around a super-competent professional (who really wasn’t all that competent) and either insulting or silencing everyone who didn’t accept their assessment. And then they lost. Maybe it’s time to consider whether there’s something about shrill self-righteousness, shouted from a position of high social status, that turns people away.

The even larger problem is that there is a kind of chronic complacency that has been rotting American liberalism for years, a hubris that tells Democrats they need do nothing different, they need deliver nothing really to anyone – except their friends on the Google jet and those nice people at Goldman. The rest of us are treated as though we have nowhere else to go and no role to play except to vote enthusiastically on the grounds that these Democrats are the “last thing standing” between us and the end of the world. It is a liberalism of the rich, it has failed the middle class, and now it has failed on its own terms of electability. Enough with these comfortable Democrats and their cozy Washington system. Enough with Clintonism and its prideful air of professional-class virtue. Enough!

Michael Moore had a similar take about this a week ago....

Papabear
Posts: 24373
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

11/9/2016  2:37 PM
gunsnewing wrote:And Trump didn't even need full support from his own party. America has spoken!

Papabear Says

Lets see after a couple of years. The same corrupt people are still in the Senate and Congress. Their plan is no secret, lower taxes for the rich and the jobs will come. Good Luck.

Papabear
GustavBahler
Posts: 42814
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

11/9/2016  2:38 PM
Welpee wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:Glad to hear Trump has taken the high road so far, has talked about things like infrastructure improvements. Would like to hear how he is going to pay for it while cutting taxes. Hope this isnt another failed attempt to prove that trickle down economics work. Its right up there with alchemy.
How long will it last?

Your guess is as good as mine. My guess would be until the Dems start fighting his platform. Who knows if that will happen?

nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
11/9/2016  2:39 PM
nixluva wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Wow, Republicans control the ENTIRE country - they have the Presidency, The Senate, the House, the Governorships, the State Congresses. Unless Trump surprises us and is more moderate than he seemed, I think the country is going to move very far to the right for many decades.

America's first independent President. It's the best thing to ever happen to us

You are naive. The real Power is in the House and Senate and Trump is not a serious Policy man. The same old Republicans that have been in power all these years will be running the show. You will not get the change you were promised because Trump can't "drain the swamp". All he gets to do is change the Drapes in the Oval Office. It's all about the House and Senate and those people have not changed.

if clinton had won, you would NEVER call her powerless, so why are you calling trump powerless? your post is saying who the president is doesn't matter, because the house and senate are the same. you should try alleviating your bias every now and then.

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

11/9/2016  2:41 PM
nixluva wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
nixluva wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
nixluva wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
holfresh wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:So, what of these "polls". It was brought up how Brexit was wrong and that our polls were oversampled. Is it another coincidence or is there something to it?
I mean, all of the MSM polls, wrong??? This is probably what Trump meant about corruption.

No one really knows. The polling average had Hillary up by 3.3 and it looks like it's going to be closer to 0.1. Nate Silver at 538 did say there was a pretty high chance (greater than 10%) that Hillary would win the popular vote but lose the electoral vote.

We seem to be near the historically high end regarding result/poll deviation. http://www.gallup.com/poll/9442/Election-Polls-Accuracy-Record-Presidential-Elections.aspx (edit)

As a service, for the sake of future elections, this needs to be looked into and see exactly how these (specific) results were achieved. A part of going forward and healing, is seeing where things are broken and fixing them, making things better all round - more transparent, etc. We need to get back trust in our system. We need more transparency.

We need to be careful, because if polls can easily be influenced, the affect on the outcome of a vote could, in part, steered. Another tool in the chest of corruption.

So you are concerned about polls and not about a Republican majority in the Supreme Court allowing laws to change so the Republicans in their districts can systemically close 860 polling stations in minority districts across the South in battleground states, to restrict minorities access to voting..You aren't concerned that the Supreme Court has ushered in Citizen's United to allow the rich both foreign and domestic to influence our election more so than the average citizen..You had zero problem watching Russia weight in on our election process by hacking the DNC databases are releasing vital campaign strategies..And lastly, You had no problem with the FBI releasing critical leaks on the eve of the election to help the republican candidate..But it's the POLLS that keeps you up at night, where we need more transparency...Right...

Again, why is this a "this or that" argument (false dilemma)? Can't we work on all of these things?
I'm not the opposition.

You're misguided if you think this election was about fixing corruption or polls or "draining the swamp". That's all BS for the masses that bought that tripe. The same people that have been in government are STILL in government but now they have even more power to screw the people.

Please someone explain how things are better today for the people just cuz Trump is President? Trump is just a figurehead and the real power is still in the same hands. There has been no real change except now Big Business is in total control.

Who backed the Republicans that have been in the House and the Senate??? The same Koch Brothers and other Big Business leaders. They could give a crap about "the people "!

Nixluva - You don't know and yet you speak with certainty. If you want to give up before he even gets in office that is on you. I wouldn't have given up had Hillary won.
Trump is the first non politician to be in office since when? Was Reagan a politician after acting? We have a chance, I'll take that over a known corrupt quantity.


The sad part is that I DO KNOW that The Congress is made up of the very same Republicans that have been there for YEARS and they are bought and paid for by Big Business like the Koch Brothers. That's always been their thing and they have not changed even if Trump was selling his populist spiel to RED America. These voters have put their trust in Trump and he will not be able to overcome the wishes of the House and Senate Republicans. He will soon learn that his power is very limited.

I don't know man. A lot of folks in Congress owe their election to Trump now. Because their jobs are up for election again in 2 years while Trump isn't for 4 years.


You've got to understand how it works. These Congressmen will not face opposition in their Gerrymandered Districts, except maybe to their right. Also there aren't enough of them up for election to really give Trump any leverage. Trump will find out he's nearly powerless and the Bully Pulpit can only do so much for him.

I think we need to take a moment to have the humility that we aren't certain "how it works" here going forward. The Bully Pulpit he has been amazingly powerful at.

Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/9/2016  2:47 PM
DrAlphaeus wrote:Trump wants an infrastructure bill. Pelosi already saying she wants to work on this with Trump Administration. How does Freedom Caucus cut the government types respond to this? Will be one of the first battles, along with Obamacare.

McConnell was talking about Deficit Neutral bills and really any "Infrastructure Bill" is really a Massive Stimulus which they don't believe in. Why wouldn't the Congress have worked with Obama on his Infrastructure Bill if they were truly interested in rebuilding America??? It's simple for one thing they could give a crap and 2 they would NEVER want to give Obama a win like that.

All of these Republicans are the same ones who threatened not to raise the Debt Ceiling and go into default. They have been pushing Tax cuts and Spending Cuts. Remember the Sequester??? That's what they believe in and it would be a major about face to now all of a sudden agree to a huge spending bill for Trumps Infrastructure Plan which he said was twice as big as Hillary's!!!

JesseDark
Posts: 22780
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2003
Member: #467
11/9/2016  2:47 PM
This loss feel likes

Bring back dee-fense
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/9/2016  2:52 PM
nyk4ever wrote:
nixluva wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Wow, Republicans control the ENTIRE country - they have the Presidency, The Senate, the House, the Governorships, the State Congresses. Unless Trump surprises us and is more moderate than he seemed, I think the country is going to move very far to the right for many decades.

America's first independent President. It's the best thing to ever happen to us

You are naive. The real Power is in the House and Senate and Trump is not a serious Policy man. The same old Republicans that have been in power all these years will be running the show. You will not get the change you were promised because Trump can't "drain the swamp". All he gets to do is change the Drapes in the Oval Office. It's all about the House and Senate and those people have not changed.

if clinton had won, you would NEVER call her powerless, so why are you calling trump powerless? your post is saying who the president is doesn't matter, because the house and senate are the same. you should try alleviating your bias every now and then.


You don't know what you're talking about!!! If Clinton had won and won the Senate that would be a different situation. Sure there would've been divided government but some things that Dems want would get done. Trump of course has the powers given to the Executive but right now Trump has his NON Conservative plans which call for massive spending and he doesn't have a way to pay for any of it. The Republicans will not give him what he wants which means he will not be able to directly do what he promised his voters.

Now the only way it happens is if the Republicans abandon their fiscal responsibility and Cut Taxes but give him his money unpaid for. That would lead to Economic ruin. You can't do both massive Tax Cuts and Major Spending Bills like Infrastructure.

DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

11/9/2016  2:53 PM
nixluva wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:Trump wants an infrastructure bill. Pelosi already saying she wants to work on this with Trump Administration. How does Freedom Caucus cut the government types respond to this? Will be one of the first battles, along with Obamacare.

McConnell was talking about Deficit Neutral bills and really any "Infrastructure Bill" is really a Massive Stimulus which they don't believe in. Why wouldn't the Congress have worked with Obama on his Infrastructure Bill if they were truly interested in rebuilding America??? It's simple for one thing they could give a crap and 2 they would NEVER want to give Obama a win like that.

All of these Republicans are the same ones who threatened not to raise the Debt Ceiling and go into default. They have been pushing Tax cuts and Spending Cuts. Remember the Sequester??? That's what they believe in and it would be a major about face to now all of a sudden agree to a huge spending bill for Trumps Infrastructure Plan which he said was twice as big as Hillary's!!!

Yea I don't know how it is going to work, how it's going to be sold, how they will say it will be paid for. By eliminating a couple of cabinet-level departments? Quid pro quo for tax reform or a Supreme Court justice of a particular stripe?

The congressional Republicans may be the same but it's a new landscape. I don't know how it will work, but anyone still assuming how things will work right now might be fooling themselves, no offense.

Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

11/9/2016  3:02 PM
nixluva wrote:
nyk4ever wrote:
nixluva wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Wow, Republicans control the ENTIRE country - they have the Presidency, The Senate, the House, the Governorships, the State Congresses. Unless Trump surprises us and is more moderate than he seemed, I think the country is going to move very far to the right for many decades.

America's first independent President. It's the best thing to ever happen to us

You are naive. The real Power is in the House and Senate and Trump is not a serious Policy man. The same old Republicans that have been in power all these years will be running the show. You will not get the change you were promised because Trump can't "drain the swamp". All he gets to do is change the Drapes in the Oval Office. It's all about the House and Senate and those people have not changed.

if clinton had won, you would NEVER call her powerless, so why are you calling trump powerless? your post is saying who the president is doesn't matter, because the house and senate are the same. you should try alleviating your bias every now and then.


You don't know what you're talking about!!! If Clinton had won and won the Senate that would be a different situation. Sure there would've been divided government but some things that Dems want would get done. Trump of course has the powers given to the Executive but right now Trump has his NON Conservative plans which call for massive spending and he doesn't have a way to pay for any of it. The Republicans will not give him what he wants which means he will not be able to directly do what he promised his voters.

Now the only way it happens is if the Republicans abandon their fiscal responsibility and Cut Taxes but give him his money unpaid for. That would lead to Economic ruin. You can't do both massive Tax Cuts and Major Spending Bills like Infrastructure.

Welp, here is his "contract with the American voter":
https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf

Donald Trump’s Contract
with the American Voter

What follows is my 100-day action plan to Make America Great Again.
It is a contract between myself and the American voter — and begins with restoring honesty and accountability, and bringing change to Washington.

On the first day of my term of office, my administration will immediately pursue the following:

Six measures to clean up the
corruption and special interest
collusion in Washington, DC:
★ FIRST, propose a constitutional amendment to
impose term limits on all members of Congress.
★ SECOND, a hiring freeze on all federal employees
to reduce the federal workforce through attrition
(exempting military, public safety, and public health).
★ THIRD, a requirement that for every new federal regulation,
two existing regulations must be eliminated.
★ FOURTH, a fi ve-year ban on White House and
Congressional offi cials becoming lobbyists after they
leave government service.
★ FIFTH, a lifetime ban on White House offi cials lobbying
on behalf of a foreign government.
★ SIXTH, a complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising
money for American elections.

Seven actions to protect
American workers:
★ FIRST, I will announce my intention to renegotiate
NAFTA or withdraw from the deal under Article 2205.
★ SECOND, I will announce our withdrawal from the
Trans-Pacifi c Partnership.
★ THIRD, I will direct the Secretary of the Treasury to label
China a currency manipulator.
★ FOURTH, I will direct the Secretary of
Commerce and U.S. Trade Representative to
identify all foreign trading abuses that unfairly
impact American workers and direct them to
use every tool under American and international
law to end those abuses immediately.
★ FIFTH, I will lift the restrictions on the
production of $50 trillion dollars’ worth of
job-producing American energy reserves,
including shale, oil, natural gas and clean coal.
★ SIXTH, lift the Obama-Clinton roadblocks and allow vital
energy infrastructure projects, like the Keystone Pipeline,
to move forward.
★ SEVENTH, cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate
change programs and use the money to fi x America’s
water and environmental infrastructure.
Five actions to restore security
and the constitutional rule of law:
★ FIRST, cancel every unconstitutional executive action,
memorandum and order issued by President Obama.
★ SECOND, begin the process of selecting a replacement
for Justice Scalia from one of the 20 judges on my list,
who will uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution.
★ THIRD, cancel all federal funding to sanctuary cities.
★ FOURTH, begin removing the more than two million
criminal illegal immigrants from the country and cancel
visas to foreign countries that won’t take them back.
★ FIFTH, suspend immigration from terror-prone regions
where vetting cannot safely occur. All vetting of people
coming into our country will be considered “extreme vetting.”

There is back page of various acts he plans to implement. This is the starting point right now when talking about Trump's policy and the way forward.

Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/9/2016  3:02 PM
DrAlphaeus wrote:
nixluva wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:Trump wants an infrastructure bill. Pelosi already saying she wants to work on this with Trump Administration. How does Freedom Caucus cut the government types respond to this? Will be one of the first battles, along with Obamacare.

McConnell was talking about Deficit Neutral bills and really any "Infrastructure Bill" is really a Massive Stimulus which they don't believe in. Why wouldn't the Congress have worked with Obama on his Infrastructure Bill if they were truly interested in rebuilding America??? It's simple for one thing they could give a crap and 2 they would NEVER want to give Obama a win like that.

All of these Republicans are the same ones who threatened not to raise the Debt Ceiling and go into default. They have been pushing Tax cuts and Spending Cuts. Remember the Sequester??? That's what they believe in and it would be a major about face to now all of a sudden agree to a huge spending bill for Trumps Infrastructure Plan which he said was twice as big as Hillary's!!!

Yea I don't know how it is going to work, how it's going to be sold, how they will say it will be paid for. By eliminating a couple of cabinet-level departments? Quid pro quo for tax reform or a Supreme Court justice of a particular stripe?

The congressional Republicans may be the same but it's a new landscape. I don't know how it will work, but anyone still assuming how things will work right now might be fooling themselves, no offense.

I'm not fooling myself. I'm going by what Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell have said!!! Trump will get the Tax Cuts cuz that fits into Republican plans. A lot of the stuff he proposed will be forgotten over time and they'll pretend he never promised it to his voters. They'll throw some window dressing out there to make it seem like they're doing something for the people. They know how to do this.

DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

11/9/2016  3:03 PM
How does he get congressional term limits enacted for instance? He's already looking to weaken the power of Congress. It's going to be interesting, guys. But we need to open our eyes to what's happening and not assume how things are going to play out. That's how we got here.
Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

11/9/2016  3:08 PM
JesseDark wrote:This loss feel likes

Ha..So true...

DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

11/9/2016  3:10 PM
nixluva wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
nixluva wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:Trump wants an infrastructure bill. Pelosi already saying she wants to work on this with Trump Administration. How does Freedom Caucus cut the government types respond to this? Will be one of the first battles, along with Obamacare.

McConnell was talking about Deficit Neutral bills and really any "Infrastructure Bill" is really a Massive Stimulus which they don't believe in. Why wouldn't the Congress have worked with Obama on his Infrastructure Bill if they were truly interested in rebuilding America??? It's simple for one thing they could give a crap and 2 they would NEVER want to give Obama a win like that.

All of these Republicans are the same ones who threatened not to raise the Debt Ceiling and go into default. They have been pushing Tax cuts and Spending Cuts. Remember the Sequester??? That's what they believe in and it would be a major about face to now all of a sudden agree to a huge spending bill for Trumps Infrastructure Plan which he said was twice as big as Hillary's!!!

Yea I don't know how it is going to work, how it's going to be sold, how they will say it will be paid for. By eliminating a couple of cabinet-level departments? Quid pro quo for tax reform or a Supreme Court justice of a particular stripe?

The congressional Republicans may be the same but it's a new landscape. I don't know how it will work, but anyone still assuming how things will work right now might be fooling themselves, no offense.

I'm not fooling myself. I'm going by what Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell have said!!! Trump will get the Tax Cuts cuz that fits into Republican plans. A lot of the stuff he proposed will be forgotten over time and they'll pretend he never promised it to his voters. They'll throw some window dressing out there to make it seem like they're doing something for the people. They know how to do this.

You may be right. Up to Democratic Party or what's left to call him out on this, but will people listen to them? Or will they be too busy fighting amongst themselves? This DNC / superdelegates / Wikileaks / buddy buddy cozy relationship between the leadership and the media has shown that the leadership has its head so far up its ass it couldn't adequately respond to the situation on the ground. Old guard has little clout.

I can't help to think of the period after Reconstruction in terms of the reversal of certain political battles. First election since 1965 no Voters Rights Act. "Hope" turns into despair. This is very deep stuff.

Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
Where the heck is Hillary Clinton?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy