Panos wrote:BlueKnickers wrote:fitzfarm wrote:No way we do what we did without having inner knowledge that Mitch is coming back. With the draft
Shamet might be gone unless he signs another vet min deal
Clarkson might be back on a vet min
Jose might be back on his po
So loosing Shamet hurts, but nickel is a taller version . And Shamet still might come back if we blow it with Mitch but to me Shamet has always been a good bench player … a Stark’s like player who is a + player on both ends .
Shamet’s player profile is undervalued in today’s nba but also a necessity bench piece .
Huk will be back as a min contract player
So if we sign
Mitch
Clarkson
Jose
Shamet
Do we still have spots to fill?
you shouldn't expect Clarkson to be back
Salary cap issues aside, I think we had too much guard heavy bench last year, 4 guards plus Mitch. We need some additional length/height in the bench rotation, so I'm hoping/expecting that one of Deuce/Shamet/Clarkson gets replaced by Mo or some other SF/PF 6'8" or taller.
For that matter, I wouldn't complain if we upgraded Avocado while we're at it.
To answer your question, if all current contracts are not traded, we have 8 slots to fill by my count
I expect both Shamet and Clarkson to be gone
Big factor for all swing players is Mo is going to get minutes and this may skew the aggregated balance of minutes towards more frontcourt minutes as a whole
The Kayil pick now intrigues me, because he brings more size to our backcourt
As does McCullar at the same height
Yes, I'd trade Jose in a heartbeat, but they seem to be working on some kind of accommodation for him which would have to mean a lower salary next season, perhaps for more years.
In general, our backcourt should be getting bigger with a priority on ball handling and defense