Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39512 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Knicksfan wrote:martin wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Are you suggesting KAT is in the same stratosphere as Jokic? KAT shoots at an elite level. That's not a lot of things. KAT is a flawed star, like many in the league. Heck, Jokic is flawed. But he's still miles ahead of KAT in terms of impact. Yes, I'm hating on Towns because he's not a plus defender. The premise I'm hearing is that KAT is this stretch 5 who will lead the team to the promise land. But, how accurate is that if you can't defend the position full-time. The reason KP works is that he provides elite rim protection. As of now, all I can say is that team traded a borderline All NBA PF and a starting level SG for a borderline All NBA PF. I don't think it moves the needle. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27303 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 4/29/2005 Member: #893 USA |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Knicksfan wrote:martin wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: I could see KAT taking the next step here in NY. Yes. Same stratosphere as Jokic and Embiid? Not yet. But not out of realm of possibility. “Speak softly and carry a big stick” - KAT
|
Rookie
Posts: 26893 Alba Posts: 28 Joined: 10/15/2008 Member: #2274 |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Knicksfan wrote:martin wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Yes, I am suggesting Towns is in the same stratosphere as Jokic on the defensive end. Are you suggesting Jokic is in the same stratosphere as Towns from 3pt range? |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39512 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Knicksfan wrote:martin wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: No, but I'm suggesting Jokic is a better player. A way better player. Imma go out of my way and say the words "KAT for MVP have never been uttered. This is like saying DDV is close to Devin Booker because he's a better three point shooter. Jokic functions at such a high level on offense that it more than makes up for his defense. KAT isn't at that level. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
Rookie
Posts: 26893 Alba Posts: 28 Joined: 10/15/2008 Member: #2274 |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Knicksfan wrote:martin wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Maybe you watched this already, it was posted earlier in this thread but I dunno. Look what Towns brings with his offensive skillset and tell me that this isn’t a great fit for this team. |
martin
Posts: 75063 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:blkexec wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: That’s not how any of that works though, right? Even Mitch in his first 3 seasons wasn’t very fundamental on defense and he got all that defensive talent. It’s took iHart 1.5 years behind Mitch to even get a flow starting. And that Minny team had a lots of bad, young defenders and players. IQ and McBrinde weren’t bad their first couple of years, they were inexperienced. Same with Brunson. Jalen is near MVP level but also maybe trade bait or short contract worthy until 3 years ago. Things take time. Thibs understood that if Minny had a chance, it would be through offense, so that’s where they concentrated. I don’t think that’s a hard perspective to understand why a coach may lean into a team’s perceived strengths to get wins, especially when you are young and the team has turnover. That’s the circumstance of every rebuilding team. Similarly, Melo is not a bad player cause he was surrounded by bad players with those crappy Knicks teams, just circumstances. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39512 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() martin wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:blkexec wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: In this case, I'd say that's exactly how it's worked for several years. KAT is bad at drop coverage and instead of fighting it, the Wolves decided to bring in Gobert. KAT is entering year 10 now. It's unlikely that he becomes a defensive center. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39512 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Knicksfan wrote:martin wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: I'm not arguing KAT is a scrub. My thing is, I don't really see him as center. If he's not a center, then what's the point? Even if you argue he's better than Randle, I'll pushback on anyone who says he Donte and a fake first round pick levels better than Randle. So what if Donte is unhappy. Trade him for a pick it a legit backup center. This move is lateral. We traded a borderline All NBA PF for another borderline All NBA PF. The difference is we're stuck with a borderline All NBA PF making $50M a year. You know what happens if he doesn't workout? The team is stuck with him. He's untradable for the next 3 years. Even if you extend Randle for 3/$40M, Randle and Donte combined still wouldn't take up as much cap space. If you're going to push all your chips in, I'd expect morenthan KAT. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
Rookie
Posts: 26893 Alba Posts: 28 Joined: 10/15/2008 Member: #2274 |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Rookie wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Knicksfan wrote:martin wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: We won 50 games this last season. With this trade I am very comfortable predicting a 56 win season, so yes, I think the trade makes us a better team. We struggled in the playoffs against Miami. Our offense is better now and not as stagnant. I have zero worries we are a better team than Miami with this trade. We barely beat Philly with a hobbled Embiid. This team with Towns is better than the Sixers and Indiana....Cleveland, Orlando and Milwaukee. We will also match up against Boston very well. With this trade, we are a better team so no, this was not a lateral move |
martin
Posts: 75063 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|