[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

College basketball and nba draft thread 2022
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 21 of 38 « First‹ Previous 19  20  21  22  23 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
5/16/2022  3:03 PM
Chandler wrote:we are going to get the number 1 pick -- i feel it in my bones

you better get yourself to an orthopedist . . .
AUTOADVERT
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39769
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
5/16/2022  3:29 PM
Marv wrote:
Chandler wrote:we are going to get the number 1 pick -- i feel it in my bones

you better get yourself to an orthopedist . . .


.....psyche!

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
martin
Posts: 76049
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/16/2022  9:23 PM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Philc1
Posts: 28295
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897
5/17/2022  8:48 AM
Even if we don’t finally get lucky and get a top 3 pick which becomes Ivey we can still draft the second best pg in the draft at 11 Kennedy Chandler
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39769
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
5/17/2022  8:50 AM
Philc1 wrote:Even if we don’t finally get lucky and get a top 3 pick which becomes Ivey we can still draft the second best pg in the draft at 11 Kennedy Chandler

I feel guys like Ty Ty and Chandler might be a reach at 11, but would make more sense if they trade down.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Philc1
Posts: 28295
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897
5/17/2022  9:29 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:
Philc1 wrote:Even if we don’t finally get lucky and get a top 3 pick which becomes Ivey we can still draft the second best pg in the draft at 11 Kennedy Chandler

I feel guys like Ty Ty and Chandler might be a reach at 11, but would make more sense if they trade down.

Please, no more wing players who aren’t great shooters. And no Centers, we have a Center just do the smart thing and pay him
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748
5/17/2022  3:10 PM
The Future is Bright!
BillTheButcher
Posts: 20633
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/5/2016
Member: #6326
5/17/2022  8:23 PM
Give me Dyson Daniels
[IMG]http://i1167.photobucket.com/albums/q636/shemmue0311/member15202.png[/IMG]
Philc1
Posts: 28295
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897
5/17/2022  8:52 PM
Give me Kennedy Chandler
KnickDanger
Posts: 24375
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/30/2017
Member: #7578
5/17/2022  11:02 PM
I don’t see that big of a difference between players predicted in the top 5 and those who will seemingly be available at 11. Dyson, Tyty - someone who can help move the ball, play defense, make a shot.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39769
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
5/18/2022  7:14 AM
TPercy wrote:

Man, those shooting percentages really dropped over the course of the season. I'm worried about how much offensive initiation and shot creation he'll be able to provide.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39769
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
5/18/2022  7:16 AM
A possible second rounder or FA? Not really big on Kai.
https://empiresportsmedia.com/new-york-knicks/philippines-7-4-unicorn-kai-sotto-to-work-out-with-knicks/
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39769
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
5/18/2022  7:25 AM
Apparently killed at G-League Ignite camp.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
martin
Posts: 76049
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/18/2022  8:29 AM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Panos
Posts: 30058
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
5/18/2022  8:44 AM
Imagine this guy and Obi filling the lanes with a real PG...
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053
5/18/2022  8:47 AM
Panos wrote:Imagine this guy and Obi filling the lanes with a real PG...

I don’t see him getting past both the Blazers and the Pelicans.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39769
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
5/18/2022  8:47 AM
Panos wrote:Imagine this guy and Obi filling the lanes with a real PG...

I try to dull my imagination as much as possible with the Knicks. It only leads to disappointment.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053
5/18/2022  8:49 AM    LAST EDITED: 5/18/2022  8:52 AM
martin wrote:

I like it. First mock I see that has the Spurs taking Duren which makes a lot of sense for them. I can see either them or the blazers grabbing the second best center this year.

Johnny Davis makes sense for DC too that on the low might want to grab him to Be a potential Beal replacement.

Dyson for the Knicks makes sense, they need connective tissue, and honestly the way Thibs runs his rotation a guy who can be plugged 1-3 is the only way they might play this year.


The only caveat I have is this mock didn’t include Kendall Brown who should go either late teens or the 20’s.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
Knixkik
Posts: 35414
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
5/18/2022  8:51 AM
martin wrote:

After seeing the Knicks hold still at 11, I’m ready to have more opinions of who they should draft. Knicks would be very fortunate if either Johnny Davis or Dyson Daniels is there. Davis is a winner, a 2-way player and fits the Thibs archetype of wings that develop well for him. Butler, Barrett, deng etc. Daniels is an oversized playmaker who can be some version of Marcus Smart and Lonzo Ball in terms of connecting players who can play multiple position in a lot of different lineups and serve as a defensive stopper and glue guy on offense. Either player can play alongside Brunson if we made that push, or Quickley and Rose if we stick with that at PG and want to develop in-house. I’m still open to the other wings Mathurin, Branham, and Agbaji, but Davis and Daniels hold particular interest when you look at guys who are excelling in the playoffs and guys who fit the culture the Knicks are clearly pushing towards.
Knixkik
Posts: 35414
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
5/18/2022  8:51 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:
TPercy wrote:

Man, those shooting percentages really dropped over the course of the season. I'm worried about how much offensive initiation and shot creation he'll be able to provide.

He was playing injured at that point.
Page 21 of 38 « First‹ Previous 19  20  21  22  23 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
College basketball and nba draft thread 2022
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy