Knixkik wrote:dk7th wrote:Knixkik wrote:dk7th wrote:smackeddog wrote:tkf wrote:Knixkik wrote:Very few players in the league could lead the Knicks to a 54 win season with chandler and JR are their next best players. Melo does need to step up in the playoffs but he has absolutely proven to be a star in this league. We will see if he can continue to improve. This is a big year as he should have a little more help with Bargnani.
YOU ARE forgetting the great start that guys like jason kidd had, JR had a career year, that helped the knicks get to 54 wins... this myth that carmelo dragged the knicks to 54 wins is hilarious...
And BTW chandler does have a ring, starting at center for DAllas...difference is, their franchise player is flat out better than ours... hands down..
So you're saying Melo had nothing to do with those 54 wins (despite taking all those inefficient shots), it was JR's doing. So you genuinely believe that we won 54 game INSPITE of Melo?
It was weird how you disappeared during that win streak at the end of the season...
you're missing the point here... during the regular season you want to develop chemistry, cohesion, resilience. melo simply goes on a hot streak or two during the regular season, at least half the time against inferior opponents, and does so at the expense of the things i just listed that you need to have in order to become a true playoff team. he contributes virtually nothing to the building of a playoff team by anything he does during the regular season. this has been the pattern his entire pro career except maybe one season with billups.
it should not be surprising that when you face stiffer competition he is going to be exposed? he's a one-trick pony and that is just not going to be good enough, especially when you have defenders who are capable of guarding him one on one and drive him into even worse efficiency. he is not worth a penny over 14 million dollars but he is expecting twice that... and wants help to boot?!? you just can't make this **** up.
Your argument is really that he does it "half the time against inferior opponents", really? Dude this is the NBA, everyone can play and defend. On top of it, you have no specific data in mind you are going off of, it is just a weak assumption on your part. Come on.
math is not your friend it seems. it's an epidemic around here, i am discovering.
if a league has 30 teams then half of those teams are going to be inferior, or less than 41 wins. that the playoffs reward 16 teams-- or more than half-- with playoff berths, does not mean that there are yet no 15 inferior teams. and since the EC is the inferior conference, and the knicks play the majority of their games in that conference, that means that their opposition is assuredly inferior half the time. moreover, since it is a team game and a collective effort, your "everyone can play and defend" is disingenuous. the eye test alone shows the falseness of the assertion, while the records of half the teams back this up.
paraphrasing, in a league with an even number of teams you will always have half who are inferior and half who are superior, excluding those teams who win 41 games.
savvy? please say yes
You completely missed the point. You are suggesting his hot streaks are more often against inferior competition and I am saying you have no metrics to suggest that. It seems like your bases for this argument is he is in the eastern conference and the eastern conference has fewer strong teams. Seems to forget he dominated just the same in the western conference. I am saying his performance has no baring on the teams he played, and you have no evidence to suggest otherwise, just some silly theory.
lets try this again:
1) every season you have 30 teams you have 15 teams who are .500 or less. yes or no?
2) every season the nba rewards mediocrity by allowing 16 teams into the playoffs. yes or no?
3) in the recent past the eastern conference has had a greater aggregate of teams with inferior records than western teams. yes or no?
4) the knicks play the majority of their games against eastern conference teams. yes or no?
5) carmelo anthony in 2012-13 played a majority of his games against eastern conference teams, the majority of which are sub .500 teams. last season he played against 9 eastern conference teams and 6 western conference teams which had 41 or fewer wins. 32 games against eastern conference teams and 12 games against western conference teams for a grand total of 44 games against opponents whose records were 41 games or fewer. yes or no?
the answer to all these questions is "yes."
hence:
what the numbers suggest is that he accrues his "empty calorie" numbers in the regular season against a majority of 41-win and less opponents. this is the trend. if you insist on breaking it down on a game by game basis i may find time to do so.
what his playoff numbers suggest is that, when faced with superior competition, ie. teams with better-than 41-win records, he comes up short. if you insist on breaking it down on a game by game basis i may find time to do so.
in the meantime i would suggest that a general picture of his performance is compelling evidence for the particulars you seem eager to poo-poo as some silly theory.
knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%