dk7th wrote:misterearl wrote:chillax?Did the lock down defense remind you of anything from the Mike Woodson playbook during the Boston series?
36-4.
36-4.
the defense was not great in the first half and there was a bulk of unforced turnovers by the pacers-- several offensive fouls among them-- that kept the score closer than it should have been. miller even remarked how casual the knicks were, they lacked focus and intensity. that clearly changed in the second half, and prigioni's contributions really catalysed and galvanized the team. it's also great to see shumpert blossoming for us.
Mostof the turnovers were forced due to trapping out off of the PNR, and high ball pressure making the interior passes much longer than they were in game 1. Also, Reggie remarked about our lack of intensity it was during the early parts of the 3rd Q when we let the Pacers climb into the lead. We did let up a bit, but we turned it back on mid-3rd Q and took off from there.
Shump is playing with a lot of confidence right now,and Im happy to see he's not thinking about the knee at all. If we can get JR back on track along with Shump, we will be alright...