And I'm not quite sure that your statement effectively negates my contention that the Knicks may be higher seeded had Anthony played better, earlier.

ChuckBuck wrote:

MozelGovCocktail wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:EWwwww, Woodson almost has the same win total of MDA in half the games. That's embarassing!

There are Knicks fans that are embarrased to finish 7 or 8. Had Anthony applied himself earlier, perhaps the sight would be set on 3 or 4.

Without Anthony, the Knicks don't make the playoffs...

MozelGovCocktail wrote:I wouldn't really debate that, unless you provide a player(s) in his replacement.

And I'm not quite sure that your statement effectively negates my contention that the Knicks may be higher seeded had Anthony played better, earlier.

ChuckBuck wrote:

MozelGovCocktail wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:EWwwww, Woodson almost has the same win total of MDA in half the games. That's embarassing!

There are Knicks fans that are embarrased to finish 7 or 8. Had Anthony applied himself earlier, perhaps the sight would be set on 3 or 4.

Without Anthony, the Knicks don't make the playoffs...

They don't make the playoffs. Not with the 18-24 coaching, no.

MozelGovCocktail wrote:After an injury to Stoudemire, Anthony proceedingly flourished at the 4.

With regard to player placement, would D'Antoni have done things differently had that situation presented itself to him?

ChuckBuck wrote:

MozelGovCocktail wrote:I wouldn't really debate that, unless you provide a player(s) in his replacement.

And I'm not quite sure that your statement effectively negates my contention that the Knicks may be higher seeded had Anthony played better, earlier.

ChuckBuck wrote:

MozelGovCocktail wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:EWwwww, Woodson almost has the same win total of MDA in half the games. That's embarassing!

There are Knicks fans that are embarrased to finish 7 or 8. Had Anthony applied himself earlier, perhaps the sight would be set on 3 or 4.

Without Anthony, the Knicks don't make the playoffs...

They don't make the playoffs. Not with the 18-24 coaching, no.

D'Antoni would not put Melo in the low post. He would stick to the speedball offense with Jeremy Lin as his centerpiece.

knicks1248 wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:

misterearl wrote:Have You Actually SEEN The MDA Playbook?

knicks1248 wrote:Its pretty obvious he knows the buttons to press..but he shouldnt get all the credit..were still running mda's play book

First off, last night's win lifted the Knicks to a 15-5 record with Mike Woodson, a stunning little statistic, particularly when you consider that they were 18-24 under Mike D'Antoni. (And that included the Linsanity run.) That means that if the Knicks can win three of their last four games, Woodson would have as many wins this season as D'Antoni, in eighteen fewer games.

MDA's Playbook Is A Pamphlet

Mike Woodson's playbook is no book at all. It is a pragmatic approach to putting young men in the best position to suceed. It is the culmination of Bobby Knight, Red Holzman, Larry Brown and all his bright moments, bumps and bruises along the way.

Red sums up the so-called "playbook" up best.

"On offense you do what you want. On defense, you do what I want."

15-5. baby.

+1

Dude the entire playbook..there was 100s of times they would miss tyson off they double screen..tyson as they first screener cutting to they basket while everyones focus on they ball handler...I mean they first 7 wks that's play was there..Td never even looked tyson way...and lin was turning it over more then he could execute the play..

Well it's the coach's JOB to realize his PG doesn't see that play or run that play well and adjust to something that's simpler that he can run effectively. Any blind person could see TD had no vision.

FoeDiddy wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:

misterearl wrote:Have You Actually SEEN The MDA Playbook?

knicks1248 wrote:Its pretty obvious he knows the buttons to press..but he shouldnt get all the credit..were still running mda's play book

First off, last night's win lifted the Knicks to a 15-5 record with Mike Woodson, a stunning little statistic, particularly when you consider that they were 18-24 under Mike D'Antoni. (And that included the Linsanity run.) That means that if the Knicks can win three of their last four games, Woodson would have as many wins this season as D'Antoni, in eighteen fewer games.

MDA's Playbook Is A Pamphlet

Mike Woodson's playbook is no book at all. It is a pragmatic approach to putting young men in the best position to suceed. It is the culmination of Bobby Knight, Red Holzman, Larry Brown and all his bright moments, bumps and bruises along the way.

Red sums up the so-called "playbook" up best.

"On offense you do what you want. On defense, you do what I want."

15-5. baby.

+1

Dude the entire playbook..there was 100s of times they would miss tyson off they double screen..tyson as they first screener cutting to they basket while everyones focus on they ball handler...I mean they first 7 wks that's play was there..Td never even looked tyson way...and lin was turning it over more then he could execute the play..

Well it's the coach's JOB to realize his PG doesn't see that play or run that play well and adjust to something that's simpler that he can run effectively. Any blind person could see TD had no vision.

MozelGovCocktail wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:EWwwww, Woodson almost has the same win total of MDA in half the games. That's embarassing!

There are Knicks fans that are embarrased to finish 7 or 8. Had Anthony applied himself earlier, perhaps the sight would be set on 3 or 4.

Anthony only averaged 15pts per game on under 40% shooting for the first 7 games under Woodson. Yet we still were 6-1 during that stretch. Was he trying to sabotage Woodson too?

If MDA coached like Woodson then perhaps the sight would be set on the 1-3 seed.

ChuckBuck wrote:

MozelGovCocktail wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:EWwwww, Woodson almost has the same win total of MDA in half the games. That's embarassing!

There are Knicks fans that are embarrased to finish 7 or 8. Had Anthony applied himself earlier, perhaps the sight would be set on 3 or 4.

Without Anthony, the Knicks don't make the playoffs...

mrKnickShot wrote:

babyKnicks wrote:

newyorknewyork wrote:

MozelGovCocktail wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:EWwwww, Woodson almost has the same win total of MDA in half the games. That's embarassing!

There are Knicks fans that are embarrased to finish 7 or 8. Had Anthony applied himself earlier, perhaps the sight would be set on 3 or 4.

Anthony only averaged 15pts per game on under 40% shooting for the first 7 games under Woodson. Yet we still were 6-1 during that stretch. Was he trying to sabotage Woodson too?

If MDA coached like Woodson then perhaps the sight would be set on the 1-3 seed.

In case you missed it and wanted to reply.

He probably wanted to make sure that he liked woody as a coach before he decided not to dog it further.

Or he was hurt.