Definitely Paul. He's a player considered top-3 by most scouts. If he drops, I don't care if plays the same position as 2 of our top players. Use him as a trading chip.

Maybe get Brezec and some other help from Charlotte or whatever. We'll consider that later. :)

Posted by metra:

Frye's not bad, but he's not the solution. Camby needed Ewing and Frye needs a big. Since we can't get any proven bigs (maybe Fran V) let's just go to Granger or Graham. Either of those players would make me happy. Especially Graham though, to make up for our lack of D in Q, Craw and Marbs.

When reality hits hard in about two years, when you notice how good Bynum will be in this league and how guys like Frye will develop into role players, it will be quite sickening.

Frye=undersized C with poor base strength, very average athletic ability, and lacks focus drive intensity and mental and physical toughness. I mean when you play 30 games a year--you should PLAY 30 games hard-did Frye play hard 30 out of 30-how about 15 out of 30 and its proven throughout his college career.

WTF?! Where's Chris Paul?! Did someone's cousin hear a rumor Paul decided he's going to retire?! The guy who said this is unrealistic is right. Not that this would ever happen, but if the teams with picks 3-7 all smoke crack before the draft then we take Paul and trade him to a team that isn't on drugs and needs a point guard. And no, this isn't a sceanrio where we should take Bynum. I don't care what Bynum's brother says about it either.