Posted by diderotn:
This statement below is crazy...
He DID help the team out more than hurt them. And next to Marbury, HE WAS the Knicks best player this year.
I know you didn't really like Kurt, but sheesh man.
Who was a better player besides Marbury? Crawford? He couldn't play defense and his shot selection was absolutely abyssmal. KT played defense hard. He was never a good perimeter defender, but his low post D was always real good and his help was also good. Not all NBA, but still real good. Nobody else on the Knicks was quite as good on D, and next to Marbury, he was the most consistent on offense. Please explain to me how that's crazy? Is it crazy that yes, he was our second best player? You know it. Is it crazy that he's relied on as our best big man? Yep. But he did well in his role and I had no knocks on him. He did everything he could. Toast to Kurt.
I guess b/c he got a nice post about him by me, I think he's right there with the Ewings and Willis's though. *Sigh*
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute