Posted by Allanfan20:
To me, these Chicago camp results mean little. There were a ton of guys who do great in these camps and don't really turn out to be much, and nice versa. If it doesn't translate on the basketball court, then what does it matter? Keith Van Horn is a really athletic guy, and he never turned into that monster.
As for Frye, he is athletic, but he gets pushed around all the time, according to Briggs, so what does it matter there?
"According to Briggs"? Have you seen this kid play? He's going to be a tremendous shotblocker. He's just as long as Bogut, similar vertical and is far quicker and stronger. I mean, come on. And to question his heart, fine, but he did step up in the tournie big time against the number one team in the country AND Zeke came back from Arizona tremendously impressed with Frye. The kid had 24pts, 12rebs and 6 blocks in the biggest game of his career - and this is with Salim Stoudamire shooting more shots than him.
I mean, to those who've seen this kid play and doubt him, fine. There are questions about how well he'll be able to rebound at the next level and he's no post player. But he is a good scorer and a shotblocker, he can be a pressence the same way Dalembert and Chandler are. Doesn't Zeke's talent evaluation mean anything? Doesn't the fact that Golden State and the Lakers both wanted him mean anything? To compare him to KVH? Are you frigging kidding me? Have you seen this kid? He's RIPPED. He's been ripped his whole college career. He's proved he's strong. He's proved he can step up his game, even in an offense that doesn't feature him.
Guys, this is called looking a gift center in the mouth.
[Edited by - crzymdups on 06/16/2005 14:06:33]