[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Draft Board as of now
Author Thread
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/15/2005  1:03 AM
I agree Rain, and to me Frye shed the passive label when he stepped up in big games, particularly the tournie. Also, when they played the top 5 ranked Washington Huskies this year, Frye stepped up and scored 30pts. When he played Bogut, he stepped up.

To say he's like Brian Cook isn't remotely fair. That's like me saying Bynum reminds me of Diop just because their measurements are similar. But A) Cook and Frye do not have the same measurements, Frye is taller with a much longer standing reach, B) Cook played outside in college, was never the rebounder or shotblocker that Frye is (cook blocked 13 shots his senoir year, Frye blocked 70.), C) Frye has a post game and shot 56% from the field his senior year, Cook has an outside only game and shot 46% from the field his senior year. They're different players.

Are there guys I want more than Frye? Yes, Granger, maybe Graham, but other than that, looking at the guys in our range...gimme Frye. Now, if you're saying the Knicks have no shot at a championship for at least six years, I agree. If you think you have no chance at a championship with this core, do you say F it and grab Bynum, knowing there is a 1 in 100 chance he develops into a franchise player and aim to build aroud him? It'd be ballsy, and I doubt Isiah would stick around to see Bynum start a game. I agree there is a reward, but the series of events that would have to occur to make Bynum a star depend mostly on his work ethic, which I know nothing about. If Isiah sits down with the kid and feels he's driven (i.e. the exact opposite of Mike Olowokandi), then, fine, draft him.

But right now, Isiah feels that way about Frye, and honestly, Frye is a big upgrade from Nazr. And when Nazr was healthy, this team was 16-13. I can live with a slightly better record than that and continued development from Ariza and Crawford and a solid pick at 30.
¿ △ ?
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/15/2005  1:06 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:


Great post Briggs. There shouldn't be any doubt about Bynum's potential, its as high or higher then anyone in this draft and it's for good reason. When your a 7'1 285 pound beast at age 17 and have shown that there are skills, albeit raw, but still solid skills then scouts are going to drool over you. I dont blame Calhoun for wanting Bynum back, why the heck wouldn't he, he's going to make UConn the undeniable favorite for 2 years with Rudy Gay and Josh Boone. My first choice at 8 is Green, my second is Bynum and my third is Granger. Are the Knicks going to get any of them? I think the best chance is for Bynum as long as he stays in the dradft but if Isiah passes up on Bynum for Channing Frye then I will be an extremely pissed off Knicks fan because Frye will NEVER and I mean NEVER be anything more then a 14/8 player in this league and thats IF he becomes a starter somewhere.

Frye is the "safe" pick in most people's estimation but he's anything but safe to me, his bodytype, his offensive skills and his sometime showing up and sometime disappearing demeanor make him extremely risky to me. Give me Danny Granger or Byum ANY DAY over Frye.

Granger is gone by 8. Long gone. Bynum is a reach. 14 and 8 from a center would be grand. Brad Miller averages 15 and 9. Anyone who tells you Brad Miller isn't a top five center in this league is insane.
¿ △ ?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/15/2005  1:13 AM
I also said that Frye would be lucky if he ever did that because I don't think he'll ever be a starter on a good team. I don't like anything about Fryes game, absolutely nothing. I'd take Brad Miller in an instant but Channing Frye is no Brad Miller, not even close and never will be.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/15/2005  1:23 AM
Posted by crzymdups:

I agree Rain, and to me Frye shed the passive label when he stepped up in big games, particularly the tournie. Also, when they played the top 5 ranked Washington Huskies this year, Frye stepped up and scored 30pts. When he played Bogut, he stepped up.

To say he's like Brian Cook isn't remotely fair. That's like me saying Bynum reminds me of Diop just because their measurements are similar. But A) Cook and Frye do not have the same measurements, Frye is taller with a much longer standing reach, B) Cook played outside in college, was never the rebounder or shotblocker that Frye is (cook blocked 13 shots his senoir year, Frye blocked 70.), C) Frye has a post game and shot 56% from the field his senior year, Cook has an outside only game and shot 46% from the field his senior year. They're different players.

Are there guys I want more than Frye? Yes, Granger, maybe Graham, but other than that, looking at the guys in our range...gimme Frye. Now, if you're saying the Knicks have no shot at a championship for at least six years, I agree. If you think you have no chance at a championship with this core, do you say F it and grab Bynum, knowing there is a 1 in 100 chance he develops into a franchise player and aim to build aroud him? It'd be ballsy, and I doubt Isiah would stick around to see Bynum start a game. I agree there is a reward, but the series of events that would have to occur to make Bynum a star depend mostly on his work ethic, which I know nothing about. If Isiah sits down with the kid and feels he's driven (i.e. the exact opposite of Mike Olowokandi), then, fine, draft him.

But right now, Isiah feels that way about Frye, and honestly, Frye is a big upgrade from Nazr. And when Nazr was healthy, this team was 16-13. I can live with a slightly better record than that and continued development from Ariza and Crawford and a solid pick at 30.

Boy you are really expecting a lot from Frye. Certainly I wont tell you Nazr is all world, but Channing Frye doesnt have a chance to put up ANYWHERE near the numbers Nazr was putting up in the first 30 games. I mean look at his numbers from the first 30

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3272/gamelog

You think Channing will have games like 25 points 18 rebounds?
RIP Crushalot😞
rain
Posts: 20762
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2002
Member: #353
USA
6/15/2005  1:29 AM
What's not to like about Frye's "game". He's athletic, he's long, he's fundamentally sound, he passes out of a double team, he's a good passer, he moves well laterally, he's in good shape..

His aggressiveness and desire are the questions... I agree with that.

Arizona's guards dominated the ball.. Salim Stoudamire and Hassan Adams were not exactly ball sharing. Frye sulked at first but.. towards the end of the year asserted himself.. and Arizona started to be a more balanced team that made a run in the Tourney.

The Brian Cook comparison is awful. He's half the athlete Frye is.

And crzy.. Washington was a very good but very small team that Frye should have had a good game against.

I'd rather have Granger.. and I hope he's there when we pick. But I'm getting the feeling that Chicago's success will dictate a player like Granger rising... he'll at least paint the picture of saving a job or two.

Smoke Screens are flying .. fan beware.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/15/2005  1:44 AM
Frye and Brian cook have just about the same measurements

Brian Cook
6-9 1/2
6-10 1/4
234
7-2
9-1


where si the big difference anyway? both prefer the perimeter, both have weak bases, both dont rebound the ball, both players get lost, both are tweeners
RIP Crushalot😞
rain
Posts: 20762
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2002
Member: #353
USA
6/15/2005  2:25 AM
Brain Cook is nailed to the floor.
Cook has no foot speed end to end.
He has no lateral movement.
Brian Cook cannot defend, not even in weak-side help.
Brian Cook has no post moves. He's an outside shooting role player..

Frye can jump. Laterally he can slide and help.
Frye can run the floor well. He is presence blocking shots.
Frye has a nice drop step, nice hook shot, he is willing and able
passer. Did he use these tools on consistent basis? No...

It's a bad comparison. If Frye was a poor athlete, he'd be
talked about as second rounder. The tape must have shown something..
The Pac-ten games I saw showed a player that disappeared.. not
player that didn't have talent.. he has physical skills and
very good fundamentals.

While were at it.. Nazr is what, 28 years old?
Last I checked 30 games is not a season. The knock on him
before he was a knick, was consistency. Which continued.

When he was dealt.. the team was more competitive.
Next to Tim Duncan, his value is much more.





Ira
Posts: 24688
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
6/15/2005  2:51 AM
To go back to the original question, we take Green in that situation. If Green is gone, we take Webster.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/15/2005  2:56 AM
[quote]
Posted by rain:

Brain Cook is nailed to the floor.
Cook has no foot speed end to end.
He has no lateral movement.
Brian Cook cannot defend, not even in weak-side help.
Brian Cook has no post moves. He's an outside shooting role player..

Frye can jump. Laterally he can slide and help.
Frye can run the floor well. He is presence blocking shots.
Frye has a nice drop step, nice hook shot, he is willing and able
passer. Did he use these tools on consistent basis? No...

It's a bad comparison. If Frye was a poor athlete, he'd be
talked about as second rounder. The tape must have shown something..
The Pac-ten games I saw showed a player that disappeared.. not
player that didn't have talent.. he has physical skills and
very good fundamentals.

While were at it.. Nazr is what, 28 years old?
Last I checked 30 games is not a season. The knock on him
before he was a knick, was consistency. Which continued.

When he was dealt.. the team was more competitive.
Next to Tim Duncan, his value is much more.





what are you saying that i havent said? Frye is a better athlete, but he doesn't possess great athletsicm. Its very hard to get an exact match of a player, and Frye is more of a post player than cook for sure, BUT
that doesnt take away many of the folluwing traits

gets lost in many games
mental and physical toughness
tweener size-almost exact
base strength
preference for perimeter based play
shies from contact

these are traits they share, and lets be fair, Channing frye was a late first round pick until his final 8 games in college--no different from where Brain Cook went. Yes their games are different, but its the many traits they share that are scary.

Channing is going to come into this league and be forced to play a position he is to small for and not tough enough to play. He is not the athlete like a Ben Wallace, he has moderate athletiscm.
Most NBA C will have 2 inches + on him and when he drops back to the mid 230s considerable weight. He is NOT Marcus Camby, Marcus has more toughness in his left toe.
RIP Crushalot😞
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/15/2005  7:27 AM
a couple things. I agree 100% about the Camby comparison. Camby may have been hurt all the time, but thats because he was too tough for his own body. He played hard and tough every night, his problem was his frame coundnt absorb the punishment. I just dont see that kind of reckless toughness from Frye.

He's essentially Nazr's height but I dont see him with Nazr's body. NM is strong athletic big guy. Very rugged. Not as skilled as Frye but better physically for the NBA.

I think Frye will be a good role player for us, much like Collins is a good role player for the Nets. If thats our goal with this pick then so be it.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/15/2005  7:28 AM
I will say this: in all sports when you ask guys to do things they arent comfortable doing, or havent done in the past bad things tend to happen. Frye doesnt play like an NBA center, and more than Raef does.

He can score though... I will give him that
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
6/15/2005  8:54 AM
If Frye is the next Jason Stiffins then picking him at 8 is terrible.

Collins has been gettin worse every year you know. All he is, is a diry no athletic ability, no game goon.

A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
6/15/2005  9:07 AM
Posted by metra:

I agree with Briggs on this one. I dont think Isiah is sneaky enough to stay half a week somewhere and then have a small ass newspaper report it just to make a smokescreen.. I think it would be much easier just to make up some BS to Berman or Ford.

Obviously, no one knows who Isiah will pick but he def genuinely likes Frye.
He did it before in Toronto.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
6/15/2005  9:31 AM
Did I just hear someone call Nazr athletic?
Did someone insinuate that Frye was taking steroids?


The madness has got to stop!
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/15/2005  9:38 AM
Nazr is very athletic. Think about the putback dunks, and filling the lane on fast breaks. The 8 blocks against the Nets, the 20 point 15 rebound games. The guy is big and is very athletic.

He's also got BAD footwork, bad hands and a low basketball IQ. All that = nice role player next to Duncan. Not so good starting center for Knicks
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
6/15/2005  9:48 AM
Nazr is alot of things, 'very athletic' is not one of them by a long shot. Nazr's jumping ability is definitely below average. His dunks were due to his long arms more than anything else. His 8 blocks against NJ were an aberation. Tony Delk scored 50 once, thats not indicative of his overall skill level.

Nazr never dunked on anyone, and missed more dunks than I would expect a guy 6-10 to miss. I liked him while he was here, and kind of wish we still had him, but the trade was fair, and I am happy for him that he was put into a winning situation, and may get a ring.



BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/15/2005  10:16 AM
[quote]
Posted by simrud:

If Frye is the next Jason Stiffins then picking him at 8 is terrible.

Collins has been gettin worse every year you know. All he is, is a diry no athletic ability, no game goon.



Frye is a much better skill player than Jason Collins[who i dont like] but atleast Collins has a natural 5 body which allows him to be a banger. This is where it gets tricky picking a small C, because on the D end he is going to make guys like Jason Collins look a whole lot better than they really are. When 7-0 260 and 6-10 235 collide, there is going to be some giving. Ill give it to Frye, he sure made the best of the last 10 games of the season. before those last 10 games, he was sitting at pick 25. he goes on to shoot 75% in the last 8-9, gets lucky with James Augstine hurt and was able to abuse Roger Powell[all of 6-6 230] and Jack Ingram at will in the NCAA, he made his money. Its very much like the rise of John Wallace and Dontae Jones, although Channing will go higher because he is a true C?

Well as any Knick fan, Im going to pull for Channing to hopefully play at upisde, but if he fails, my response would be terminating a lot of personell. Frye better be able to go from day 1 as a 4 year CBB guy and pick 8, no excuses.
RIP Crushalot😞
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/15/2005  11:30 AM
[quote]Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by simrud:

If Frye is the next Jason Stiffins then picking him at 8 is terrible.

Collins has been gettin worse every year you know. All he is, is a diry no athletic ability, no game goon.



Frye is a much better skill player than Jason Collins[who i dont like] but atleast Collins has a natural 5 body which allows him to be a banger. This is where it gets tricky picking a small C, because on the D end he is going to make guys like Jason Collins look a whole lot better than they really are. When 7-0 260 and 6-10 235 collide, there is going to be some giving. Ill give it to Frye, he sure made the best of the last 10 games of the season. before those last 10 games, he was sitting at pick 25. he goes on to shoot 75% in the last 8-9, gets lucky with James Augstine hurt and was able to abuse Roger Powell[all of 6-6 230] and Jack Ingram at will in the NCAA, he made his money. Its very much like the rise of John Wallace and Dontae Jones, although Channing will go higher because he is a true C?

Well as any Knick fan, Im going to pull for Channing to hopefully play at upisde, but if he fails, my response would be terminating a lot of personell. Frye better be able to go from day 1 as a 4 year CBB guy and pick 8, no excuses.

You know as well as I do Briggs that we don't agree on a whole lot of roster moves and draft picks and whatever scenario you want to draw upon but this is one thing I adamently agree with you. While I think we both disagree about players ALOT we both watch a ton of college basketball and know most most of these kids in and out. This is my last post on anything that has to do with Channing Frye until draft day has come and gone. If Channing is a Knick, I will be extremely disappointed because he will NEVER and I mean NEVER EVER live up to being picked in the Top10 picks of this draft or any other draft he could have entered. He will not cut it in the NBA, he is a 6'10 guy with a 6'0 guys body and thats not what you want from your starting center.

Frye didn't bang inside in college against guys that were routinely smaller then him and you think he's going to do that in the Pros? In fact he didnt do much in college, his best move on offense is a One Dribble into the lane and lay it up. If you think he'll be able to get that off in the pro's against the likes of Shaq, Duncan, Ben Wallace, basically every bigman you can think of then your extremely wrong. Channing would mike a nice backup and a pretty good role player in this league. Drafing him 8th and expecting him to become a 17 and 10 player, it's just not going to happen.

SAY NO TO CHANNING!

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 06/15/2005 11:32:57]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
martin
Posts: 76560
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/15/2005  11:35 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by BRIGGS:

[quote]Posted by simrud:

If Frye is the next Jason Stiffins then picking him at 8 is terrible.

Collins has been gettin worse every year you know. All he is, is a diry no athletic ability, no game goon.



Frye is a much better skill player than Jason Collins[who i dont like] but atleast Collins has a natural 5 body which allows him to be a banger. This is where it gets tricky picking a small C, because on the D end he is going to make guys like Jason Collins look a whole lot better than they really are. When 7-0 260 and 6-10 235 collide, there is going to be some giving. Ill give it to Frye, he sure made the best of the last 10 games of the season. before those last 10 games, he was sitting at pick 25. he goes on to shoot 75% in the last 8-9, gets lucky with James Augstine hurt and was able to abuse Roger Powell[all of 6-6 230] and Jack Ingram at will in the NCAA, he made his money. Its very much like the rise of John Wallace and Dontae Jones, although Channing will go higher because he is a true C?

Well as any Knick fan, Im going to pull for Channing to hopefully play at upisde, but if he fails, my response would be terminating a lot of personell. Frye better be able to go from day 1 as a 4 year CBB guy and pick 8, no excuses.

You know as well as I do Briggs that we don't agree on a whole lot of roster moves and draft picks and whatever scenario you want to draw upon but this is one thing I adamently agree with you. While I think we both disagree about players ALOT we both watch a ton of college basketball and know most most of these kids in and out. This is my last post on anything that has to do with Channing Frye until draft day has come and gone. If Channing is a Knick, I will be extremely disappointed because he will NEVER and I mean NEVER EVER live up to being picked in the Top10 picks of this draft or any other draft he could have entered. He will not cut it in the NBA, he is a 6'10 guy with a 6'0 guys body and thats not what you want from your starting center.

Frye didn't bang inside in college against guys that were routinely smaller then him and you think he's going to do that in the Pros? In fact he didnt do much in college, his best move on offense is a One Dribble into the lane and lay it up. If you think he'll be able to get that off in the pro's against the likes of Shaq, Duncan, Ben Wallace, basically every bigman you can think of then your extremely wrong. Channing would mike a nice backup and a pretty good role player in this league. Drafing him 8th and expecting him to become a 17 and 10 player, it's just not going to happen.

SAY NO TO CHANNING!

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 06/15/2005 11:32:57]

skinnier, taller TT? I don't like the sound of that.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/15/2005  11:43 AM
No offense, guys, but I have extreme faith in Isiah's talent evaluation. If Isiah looks at Bynum, Granger, Wright, Webster, Warrick, Blatche, Taft, Green, Ellis, Simien, etc and decides Frye is his guy, I trust that. (Knicks are working out Blatche today).

Frye didn't bang in the post in college because that's not the system Olsen favors. He favors quick decisions with the ball. One dribble, then shoot or pass unless the ball was in Salim Stoudimire's hands. Look at Jefferson's numbers at Arizona - 11ppg and 4rpg, nothing to write home about - but looking back, Jefferson could arguably be the best player from that draft.

Zeke has never made a catastrophic mistake in the draft like you guys are predicting Frye to be, so IF he takes him, can we all agree to have a little patience to see how he fits with the actual team and how his game actually translates?

For all the Bynum hype, how do we know he has the mental makeup to be anything more than Yinka Dare or Dasagana Diop. Judging players on their physical attributes is nice, but it only tells you so much. Look at all the power forwards every year that are built like Elton Brand and get compared to him. None of them ever have the success Elton did. There is more to evaluating a player than size, strength and length. Strength, in particular, can be worked on and Frye has the frame to add more and he's working with the best trainer in basketball. And IF he comes to the Knicks, he'll be working with one of the best big man coaches in the league in Agguire. Sorry, but I trust Zeke to evaluate talent in the draft.
¿ △ ?
Draft Board as of now

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy