[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

3 team trade for Big Z
Author Thread
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
4/17/2005  4:40 PM
Kwazi, I really don't by into the idea that players at age 30 fall apart. Big men especially tend to be thee most durable players in the game. The percentage of guys who played near 40 or past 40, has to show that bigs are more likely to get there than other players.

Furthermore, if we get Z AND draft a big, I think it would be a great situation for a young big man to learn from. A young big that likely would not be getting serious minutes anyway. He will be practicing day in and day otu against the center with the best skill set of any center in the NBA. If we sign Big Z for 3 or 4 years at around 10-11 mil per, that makes sense to me. It also makes sense since we will have another young talent developing under him and aguirre.

I think if we traded for Kwame Brown and had him here as a part of that situation, it would be great for us. No one knows what the future holds, health wise, but we do know he has been fine for the past 3 seasons and has ptu up numbers that are only 2nd to Shaq as a center.

He is not the fastest guy out, but that doesn't mean we can't run with him out there. Kareem was slow as molases and the Lakers still ran the hell out of other teams.

It is a risk, but there are no talented big men, who aren't risks in some form or another. The risk could be a health risk (curry), or it could be a talent risk (Kwame), either way you are taking a chance, and you are going to pay big bucks and sometimes a high draft pick for it too. All of these moves are risks.
AUTOADVERT
Kwazimodal
Posts: 20896
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 8/3/2004
Member: #728
4/17/2005  6:03 PM
You raise some interesting points Killa4luv,but you guys are bringing up names like Sabonis and Jabbar.Two of the greatest centers to ever play the game,thats why they were still in the league at or near 40.Another exception was Robert Parrish but he was a freak of nature.

Most of the centers that did maintain a certain level of production past 30 were also mobile big men.Z certainly is not.He will only get slower.

Most hang around until their mid 30s with their production starting to drop at 30.Guys like Ratliff,Dale Davis,even Ostertag but most of their minutes were cut long before they got there.Im sure you can find some exceptions but that just what they are,exceptions.

Its not like that movie "Logan's Run" where a bright flashing light on their hand forces the coach cut their minutes when they reach 30,there is a reason for it.They arent the same player they were before.

Again,If it were for the MLE I would have no problem with it.Id even be happy to see him in a Knicks uni but it wont be.Not even close,and it wont be for one or two years it will be somewhere in the 5-6 year range and very expensive.The only way I would throw some big money at him is if the contract were no more than 3 years tops.At least if he breaks down we would only be on the hook for a couple of years and trade his expiring contract.

Like I said in another post,it wont matter how Z is playing,in NY you play according to your salary and until that changes we should pass on him because noone will have the opportunity to take his place if he fails and has a long term deal.

Id much rather try going through a few draft picks or trade for a prospect or a veteran center with the MLE.

I dont know where you guys get the idea that Z will suddenly turn into Yoda and mentor young players.He was known for most of his career as a soft underperformer.Its only in the last couple of years that he has made an impact,not exactly the example we should be looking for.

I know Lebron likes him,but he is wise beyond his years and doesnt need Z to mentor him.

Im not going to even go into Kwame because he will be another expensive proposition and he has been underwhelming to say the least.If the Knicks can get him on the cheap then why not.No big deal.

The margin for error on this team is much too slim to be giving a big long term contract to a 30 year old starting center unless he is a superstar.

I know you guys are frustrated and would like to see a more competitive team,so would I but you are talking about the kind of risks that have bit this team in the arse before big time.The kind of risks that got Knick executives run out of town and killed the Knicks competitiveness for years.
joec32033
Posts: 30615
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
4/17/2005  6:52 PM
just my 2 cents. we can get guys that do what Z does for cheapewr than what Z wants. If we were to be able to trade KT and Taylor for Z in a sign and trade I would consider it, but I wouldn't sign him straight up, even for the MLE. A lineup of Z-Taft and Ariza may be interesting to watch also, and Sweets being used as trade bait to get rid of some unwanted high slaraied cap filler....
~You can't run from who you are.~
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
4/17/2005  7:16 PM
Do you call Sabonis a mobile big man? He was thee slowest least athletic center in this whole discussion. You couldn't slip a piece of paper under his feet when he was shooting his 'jump' shot. It was great jumpshot though.

Big Z is more athletic than Sabonis was. Ratliff, Dale Davis, and ostertag combined couldn't hold Z's jock strap. They were not skilled big men which is why their minutes fell as they got older, they have less to contribute.

My point really is that at 7-3, he doesn't need a tremendous level of athleticism to be good as he gets older. He is already highly skilled in the post, and outside, I don't see declining athleticism significantly hurting his game. Thats my main point, he is still bigger and better than pretty much everyone at the position in the league, and he can shoot over most of them. That situation is not likely to change much in the next 4 years.

I would do a 4 year contract with him for some good money.

We can't get a player with his skills cheaper, there are none. The only other route we have is getting a still young underachiever like Kwame, and trying to develop him. We are gonna draft some bigs regardless, I just think Z would be a nice addition if he didn't have a 7 year contract, we agree on that.

What other bigs do you think we should be looking at, that we will have a shot at? Give me a list off the top of your head, because as far as I can see there is Eddy Curry (heart), Dan Gadzuric (raw), Kwame (potential bust), Dalembert (raw), Tyson Chandler (raw), Big Z (polished, older, expensive), Draft full of 2-3 year projects (and we will be drafting some bigs regardless of what we do). If Z can hold us down at the 5 for 2-3 years while a big is developing behind him, that would be great.

Kwazimodal
Posts: 20896
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 8/3/2004
Member: #728
4/17/2005  8:11 PM
Cmon now be serious,I never said Sabonis was mobile.I was refering to the players that werent superstars.You were the one using hall of famers in comparison to a slightly above average center.

Dale Davis cant hold Z's jockstrap? In his prime he was averaging almost a double double,holds many of the Pacers NBA single season and all time records,Ratliff in his prime was averaging 12/8 with almost 4 blocks per game.A couple of more buckets a game for a 7'3 inch big man over players 4 inches shorter is not that impressive.

Ostertag was a throw in to illustrate my point that most centers start to decline statistically around 30.Not that he was ever special to begin with,no doubt.

You say there is noone out there cheaper with his stats so we have to sign a 30 year old to a big long term deal? Sorry dude but thats what got us into this mess in the first place,thinking that we had to overpay and sign this or that player to long term deal because there is noone at this moment available.

And what if there isnt anyone else available at this moment? Does that mean we have to shoot ourselves in the foot again and over commit to another overpriced aging veteran to a long term deal?I say overpriced because that the only way we will probably get him.

Players will become available over the next couple of years if not through the draft then trades and free agency they always do.The reason we are usually out of the running is because mgmt panics because they believe that no one better will ever come along for many years and we have to put all our chips in and when someone better and younger does come along we are screwed.

Like I said,3 years tops but I doubt he would take it which is fine with me.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
4/17/2005  8:35 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:

Do you call Sabonis a mobile big man? He was thee slowest least athletic center in this whole discussion. You couldn't slip a piece of paper under his feet when he was shooting his 'jump' shot. It was great jumpshot though.

Big Z is more athletic than Sabonis was. Ratliff, Dale Davis, and ostertag combined couldn't hold Z's jock strap. They were not skilled big men which is why their minutes fell as they got older, they have less to contribute.

My point really is that at 7-3, he doesn't need a tremendous level of athleticism to be good as he gets older. He is already highly skilled in the post, and outside, I don't see declining athleticism significantly hurting his game. Thats my main point, he is still bigger and better than pretty much everyone at the position in the league, and he can shoot over most of them. That situation is not likely to change much in the next 4 years.

I would do a 4 year contract with him for some good money.

We can't get a player with his skills cheaper, there are none. The only other route we have is getting a still young underachiever like Kwame, and trying to develop him. We are gonna draft some bigs regardless, I just think Z would be a nice addition if he didn't have a 7 year contract, we agree on that.

What other bigs do you think we should be looking at, that we will have a shot at? Give me a list off the top of your head, because as far as I can see there is Eddy Curry (heart), Dan Gadzuric (raw), Kwame (potential bust), Dalembert (raw), Tyson Chandler (raw), Big Z (polished, older, expensive), Draft full of 2-3 year projects (and we will be drafting some bigs regardless of what we do). If Z can hold us down at the 5 for 2-3 years while a big is developing behind him, that would be great.

exactly what I'm saying. i don't know how people think we can do better than Z assuming we can even afford him. I would gladly give him Tim Thomas type money at around $10-12mil per year. He deserves it especially when you have guys like Foyle/Dampier making $9-12mil

Like I said before what Center can even attempt to hold Z's jock strap? There are none unless we somehow get Bogut. I rather pay Z then Kwame who will be a major bust and even if he finally matures offensively and picks up his intensity on offensehe will never be a good defensive Center you need your Center to be. So we would still be looking to add a center!
joec32033
Posts: 30615
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
4/17/2005  8:50 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by Killa4luv:

Do you call Sabonis a mobile big man? He was thee slowest least athletic center in this whole discussion. You couldn't slip a piece of paper under his feet when he was shooting his 'jump' shot. It was great jumpshot though.

Big Z is more athletic than Sabonis was. Ratliff, Dale Davis, and ostertag combined couldn't hold Z's jock strap. They were not skilled big men which is why their minutes fell as they got older, they have less to contribute.

My point really is that at 7-3, he doesn't need a tremendous level of athleticism to be good as he gets older. He is already highly skilled in the post, and outside, I don't see declining athleticism significantly hurting his game. Thats my main point, he is still bigger and better than pretty much everyone at the position in the league, and he can shoot over most of them. That situation is not likely to change much in the next 4 years.

I would do a 4 year contract with him for some good money.

We can't get a player with his skills cheaper, there are none. The only other route we have is getting a still young underachiever like Kwame, and trying to develop him. We are gonna draft some bigs regardless, I just think Z would be a nice addition if he didn't have a 7 year contract, we agree on that.

What other bigs do you think we should be looking at, that we will have a shot at? Give me a list off the top of your head, because as far as I can see there is Eddy Curry (heart), Dan Gadzuric (raw), Kwame (potential bust), Dalembert (raw), Tyson Chandler (raw), Big Z (polished, older, expensive), Draft full of 2-3 year projects (and we will be drafting some bigs regardless of what we do). If Z can hold us down at the 5 for 2-3 years while a big is developing behind him, that would be great.

exactly what I'm saying. i don't know how people think we can do better than Z assuming we can even afford him. I would gladly give him Tim Thomas type money at around $10-12mil per year. He deserves it especially when you have guys like Foyle/Dampier making $9-12mil

Like I said before what Center can even attempt to hold Z's jock strap? There are none unless we somehow get Bogut. I rather pay Z then Kwame who will be a major bust and even if he finally matures offensively and picks up his intensity on offensehe will never be a good defensive Center you need your Center to be. So we would still be looking to add a center!

At this point I think everyone is arguing symantics. I don't think anyone is really saying no way to Z, just that we don't want to overpay for him. I would do a KT and Taylor for Z trade, I may even Consider Sweets and Taylor for Z...but I, personally, refuse to part with a core of our roster (or overpay through a sign and trade)
~You can't run from who you are.~
Kwazimodal
Posts: 20896
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 8/3/2004
Member: #728
4/17/2005  9:14 PM
If they do sign him to a long term expensive deal Im holding gunsewing and killa personally responsible!

[Edited by - kwazimodal on 04/17/2005 21:15:10]
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
4/17/2005  10:43 PM
Posted by Kwazimodal:

If they do sign him to a long term expensive deal Im holding gunsewing and killa personally responsible!

[Edited by - kwazimodal on 04/17/2005 21:15:10]
LOL!!! Nah, I don't have a problem paying big money, I just have a problem with the long term aspect of it. 4 years or less, imo. But if he comes and he helps us immensely, hold us responsible for that too!
Kwazimodal
Posts: 20896
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 8/3/2004
Member: #728
4/17/2005  10:47 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by Kwazimodal:

If they do sign him to a long term expensive deal Im holding gunsewing and killa personally responsible!

[Edited by - kwazimodal on 04/17/2005 21:15:10]
LOL!!! Nah, I don't have a problem paying big money, I just have a problem with the long term aspect of it. 4 years or less, imo. But if he comes and he helps us immensely, hold us responsible for that too!

Lol.Fair enough.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
4/18/2005  12:25 AM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by Kwazimodal:

If they do sign him to a long term expensive deal Im holding gunsewing and killa personally responsible!

[Edited by - kwazimodal on 04/17/2005 21:15:10]
LOL!!! Nah, I don't have a problem paying big money, I just have a problem with the long term aspect of it. 4 years or less, imo. But if he comes and he helps us immensely, hold us responsible for that too!

I was gonna say the same thing lol
it looks like you're ask confident as I am that Z would help us immensely
3 team trade for Big Z

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy