[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Bobby Simmons with full MLE start 2G
Author Thread
bigpimpin
Posts: 22176
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 11/17/2004
Member: #801
USA
3/24/2005  6:50 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by bigpimpin:

the Clippers have said that they are going to lock up Simmons and let Maggette walk
how do you let Maggette walk when they just signed him to a long term contract over the summer? If you mean they would trade Maggette, I would love to get my hands on him OR on Simmons...you think the Clips would take Sweets and an expiring contract for Maggette? The clips have like NO bad contracts at all...

Maybe Penny and Sweets and a lottery protected first rounder for Maggette, Wilcox, Jaric and filler

joec, i only repeated what i heard the clippers say
"Anyone who sits around waiting to hit the lottery, whether basketball or real life, in order to better their position is a loser."
AUTOADVERT
bigpimpin
Posts: 22176
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 11/17/2004
Member: #801
USA
3/24/2005  6:54 PM
i hope i am not the only one who has the nerves to admit to Briggs that we rather see trevor Ariza at sf for the Knicks than richard simmons. i mean bobbie simmons


the knicks need an inside presence. we don't need a pg, a sg, a sf

we need someone to do work inside the low blocks and i'm not talking about mike fat albert sweetney EITHER!
"Anyone who sits around waiting to hit the lottery, whether basketball or real life, in order to better their position is a loser."
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/24/2005  7:37 PM
i don't think simmons is anything special. sure he's doing okay on a bad team but he's not a star. Doesn't excite me as much as a desmond mason would for example. Problably because simmons will be too overweight to play SG in a couple of years. He's really a SF. bad FG%. I don't think he'll make us any better
VDesai
Posts: 42819
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
3/24/2005  7:43 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:

i don't think simmons is anything special. sure he's doing okay on a bad team but he's not a star. Doesn't excite me as much as a desmond mason would for example. Problably because simmons will be too overweight to play SG in a couple of years. He's really a SF. bad FG%. I don't think he'll make us any better

Simmons shoots 47.6% Last time I checked that was a really good percentage for a perimeter player scoring around 17 a game...
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/24/2005  7:50 PM
there's more too it. I just dont think he'll put up those numbers on a team with less talent as the Knicks.
joec32033
Posts: 30615
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
3/24/2005  8:35 PM
Posted by bigpimpin:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by bigpimpin:

the Clippers have said that they are going to lock up Simmons and let Maggette walk
how do you let Maggette walk when they just signed him to a long term contract over the summer? If you mean they would trade Maggette, I would love to get my hands on him OR on Simmons...you think the Clips would take Sweets and an expiring contract for Maggette? The clips have like NO bad contracts at all...

Maybe Penny and Sweets and a lottery protected first rounder for Maggette, Wilcox, Jaric and filler

joec, i only repeated what i heard the clippers say

I remember the report...I posted about a trade for Maggette after I read about it on hoopshype about 2 weeks ago......The article said something about Brand and Maggette not getting along. I was just confused about you saying they would let Maggette walk....Trading Maggette is different than letting him walk...no big deal...
~You can't run from who you are.~
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/24/2005  10:59 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:

i don't think simmons is anything special. sure he's doing okay on a bad team but he's not a star. Doesn't excite me as much as a desmond mason would for example. Problably because simmons will be too overweight to play SG in a couple of years. He's really a SF. bad FG%. I don't think he'll make us any better
OK maybe Mike Redd will sign for the mLE. Get real. We NEED a big 2G and I really believe he can be had for the MLE. Just think about what the MLE has netted the last couple of years, Bobby Simmons would be a frikin coup. The reason why its smart to target him
A. hes an unrestricted FA[that is huge]
B. Hes young[24] and hes proven it over a full year
C. hes big 6-6 230 and athletic with a variety of skills, also a great rebounder
D. there is a slew of top tier 2Gs on the FA table i.e Johnson, Allen, Hughes, Redd etc.....
E. there is a supply of big men that will set the market well over what we can pay, but that will eat into the cap sapce for the few teams that have it.
F. Its a reasonable cost/contract
G. He can slide over from 2 to 3 in case TT is hurt
H. He is a good defensive player
I. Takes shots when they are there for him, otherwise will move the ball--doesnt take bad shots like Crawford.


RIP Crushalot😞
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/24/2005  11:01 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:

there's more too it. I just dont think he'll put up those numbers on a team with less talent as the Knicks.

thats kind of goofy since the knicks ahvent been over .500 in 4 years. I guess everyone stinks. Remember the Clippers actually have a better record than us!
RIP Crushalot😞
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
3/24/2005  11:37 PM
this is funny cuz like 2 weeks ago i was think the knicks should make a run a b. sims. heres his stats 17pt 6rebs 3 assist. 48%field goal 45% 3pt 85% ft. now if this guy isnt worth picking up who is. i seen him play. he's not a razzle dazzle type but he gets the job done. plus he averages one turnover per game. crawford and marbury rarely have a game with one turnover
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
3/24/2005  11:39 PM
I haven't had the chance to see Simmons play, but he does have some nice stats. How much of a natural 2 is he? He seems just a bit heavy. Here are some other SGs for comparison:

Houston: 6-6, 205
Kobe: 6-6, 220
McGrady: 6-8, 210
Allen: 6-5, 205
Carter: 6-6, 220

I'd take Simmons for the MLE if he could reproduce the season he's had this year, easy. The question is if he'll reproduce it, or if it's somewhat of a fluke/contract year thing. It's kind of tough to pay big bucks to a guy who's only had one good season under his belt.

If this season is indicative of the type of play Simmons can put up long term, he probably deserves (and very well could get) a bit more than the MLE. The MLE is set at the average player salary, and the average PER of NBA players is set at 15. So a PER of 17 should get you slightly more than the MLE. However, given the relatively small number of teams with big cap room this offseason and the relatively high number of FA SGs this offseason, Simmons could easily slip through the cracks.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
3/24/2005  11:48 PM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

this is funny cuz like 2 weeks ago i was think the knicks should make a run a b. sims. heres his stats 17pt 6rebs 3 assist. 48%field goal 45% 3pt 85% ft. now if this guy isnt worth picking up who is. i seen him play. he's not a razzle dazzle type but he gets the job done. plus he averages one turnover per game. crawford and marbury rarely have a game with one turnover

marbury has had quite a few games where he has had 1 or no turnovers at all, plus both marbs and crawford handle the ball twice as much as simmons, so that is not even a fair comparison..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
3/24/2005  11:51 PM
true true. but i still think Sims is a great pickup. if we dont get him i think we should try and get flip murray http://unlimited.nba.free.fr/freeagentseng.htm
martin
Posts: 76537
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/24/2005  11:56 PM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

true true. but i still think Sims is a great pickup. if we dont get him i think we should try and get flip murray http://unlimited.nba.free.fr/freeagentseng.htm

well this is a first, referencing a french (or whatever) site about American basketball. Sweet.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
3/25/2005  12:11 AM
Actually, according to knickerblogger.net, Simmons' Turnover rate (9.2) is almost identical to Marbury's (9.5) and Crawford's (9.3). Unfortunately, I'm having trouble tracking down how TO-r is calculated. But KB's got some good stats, so this one seems meaningful. I imagine it takes TOs per 40 minutes, adjusts for pace, and then divides by Usage rate, or something like that.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/25/2005  12:20 AM
Posted by tomverve:

I haven't had the chance to see Simmons play, but he does have some nice stats. How much of a natural 2 is he? He seems just a bit heavy. Here are some other SGs for comparison:

Houston: 6-6, 205
Kobe: 6-6, 220
McGrady: 6-8, 210
Allen: 6-5, 205
Carter: 6-6, 220

I'd take Simmons for the MLE if he could reproduce the season he's had this year, easy. The question is if he'll reproduce it, or if it's somewhat of a fluke/contract year thing. It's kind of tough to pay big bucks to a guy who's only had one good season under his belt.

If this season is indicative of the type of play Simmons can put up long term, he probably deserves (and very well could get) a bit more than the MLE. The MLE is set at the average player salary, and the average PER of NBA players is set at 15. So a PER of 17 should get you slightly more than the MLE. However, given the relatively small number of teams with big cap room this offseason and the relatively high number of FA SGs this offseason, Simmons could easily slip through the cracks.

good post. you said everything I was trying to say. Whether he's worth the MLE or not I think we can do better with the draft and save a lot of money. I just have a feeling that he will be just another player on the Knicks. He kinda caught teams off guard this year because on a team with such a talented starting 5 the defense has been to busy trying to stop brand and maggette.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
3/25/2005  12:34 AM
Briggs, man, you always come up with great stuff. I love this idea.

I completely agree: bigs are far more likely to be overvalued than SG. Simmons may not be a TRUE SG, but he can easily play there and he'll be a guy who can guard the Vince Carters, RJs, Kobes, Tmacs of the world. We don't need Simmons to come and be a scorer, but his size, solid athleticism, youth, defense and rebounding will be welcome.

People need to get over this idea that we're going to swipe some superstar for the MLE. We'd be lucky to get Simmons, in fact. But it's more in the realm of possibility than say, Larry Hughes.

One caveat: I'd want to start Simmons at SF or bring him off the bench. I think Craw and Marbury need to start together. Right now, Craw is the defacto point guard and Marbury is playing off the ball, and it's working insanely well. I think Marbury needs to play with another guy with playmaking skills, because it makes his skill set (drive and dish) all the more valuable. Obviously, there'll be times when we want to D up and Simmons would play the SG, but I think one of the few chances this team has to be special will be the continued development of Crawford.

If the Simmons thing seems unrealistic (and it might be as they are talking about making a full MLE contract more like 4yrs $22 rather than 6yrs $40 in the new CBA), I would advocate drafting Julius Hodges, a long, rangy slasher who can play D, with the 28th pick.

I really like the idea of snagging Petro with the first pick.
¿ △ ?
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/25/2005  12:45 AM
who says we're going to swipe a top-notch SG with the MLE? maybe split it between shotblocking center and a backup PG. SG can be addressed through the draft since it is deep at the guard position and it would be very inexpensive. I rather take a chance on finding the next arenas than spending money on another potential shandon anderson situation. plus I'm not even sure he's a SG
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
3/25/2005  12:50 AM
Posted by gunsnewing:

who says we're going to swipe a top-notch SG with the MLE? maybe split it between shotblocking center and a backup PG. SG can be addressed through the draft since it is deep at the guard position and it would be very inexpensive. I rather take a chance on finding the next arenas than spending money on another potential shandon anderson situation. plus I'm not even sure he's a SG

A) Shandon was good. Ya know who looks like a young Shandon? Trevor. Shan just had a falling out with Zeke and got exposed playing the two, which he can't do.

B) Simmons has played the two all year, with Corey at the three and he has not gotten exposed: the Clips have had a solid season and lost just as many if not more heartbreakers than the Knicks.

C) which shotblocking center do you propose to add for half of the MLE? which back up pointguard? This is what we have to address with the three draft picks we have this year, we can't keep adding players. We'll already have to cut some people to fit the draft picks. I'd love to add Stephen Hunter for the MLE (full or 75%, half won't get it done), but people seem reluctant to sign a 23yr old 7 footer and instead lust after Samuel Dalembert who Philly will probably max out this summer.
¿ △ ?
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/25/2005  1:01 AM
all right im just looking to argue lol

I like simmons i was keeping up with his stats in preseason and picked him for most of my fantasy teams.

Simmons for the MLE would be a steal when you consider the scrubs who make 7,8,9 million dollars a year.

I wouldn't give him more the 5-6mil a year though just incase this is a fluke year
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
3/25/2005  1:03 AM
Posted by crzymdups:

A) Shandon was good.

Blasphemy! Shamdon had a pretty decent 02/03 season for us, but even then, his PER topped out at 13.4. That was sandwiched between PERs of 8.0 and 10.1-- truly dreadful. Definitely NOT anywhere close to his contract value. I doubt Simmons would ever play that badly for us, but it is a legitimate fear that he might be playing a bit over his head this season to get a fat contract.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
Bobby Simmons with full MLE start 2G

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy