[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

how about offering both picks to New Orleans for JR Smith?
Author Thread
Mac
Posts: 20767
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/8/2003
Member: #470
Japan
3/5/2005  12:35 AM
Maybe its just me, but I'd rather the Knicks target T Outlaw. Great shotblocking instincts.
AUTOADVERT
KNICKSdom
Posts: 20799
Alba Posts: 8
Joined: 1/17/2004
Member: #545
USA
3/5/2005  8:39 AM
I wouldn't trade all those picks for JR Smith. He is a good prospect that show flashes of superstardom but we have someone like Ariza to groom into a similar player if not great like Smith. Besides I want to see the Knicks draft their own guys for a change. I think this draft will be good and I want to see Isiah do his draft thing.
Knicks are happening and have a Unicorn.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
3/5/2005  1:05 PM
I will take JR Smith if he can guard in the post and shot block. Other than that, I have no use for a SG on a team that lacks size in the post. If this lottery pick is not use to obtain a 6'11" or higher athletic PF/C than it will be time for Isiah to move on.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/5/2005  2:04 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:

I will take JR Smith if he can guard in the post and shot block. Other than that, I have no use for a SG on a team that lacks size in the post. If this lottery pick is not use to obtain a 6'11" or higher athletic PF/C than it will be time for Isiah to move on.

there more to it then just having a center to block shots. He's not going to block 50 shots per gsme. You need perimeter defense. Something Marbury and Crawford know nothing about. Get a strong 6'6'' SG and make Crawford the 6th man. He'll get plenty of minutes as the backup 1&2.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
3/5/2005  3:07 PM
If you are hoping to see any defense ever, you have to trade both Marbury and Craw.

Actually make that if you are willnig to see a hardworking winning team ever.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
3/5/2005  9:23 PM
Actually, I am willing to part with Crawf to tell you the truth. He is undersize and he is a liability at the SG position. He was brought in to replace Houston, but as a SG, he is too small. We should have gone after Larry Hughes instead, but Isiah failed at trying to get him......He didn't even consider bringing Hughes in. That boy would have been pretty good with Marburry, because he does things that Marburry doesn't do well. Crawf doesn't defend, and most of all, he is extremely inconsitant....


Posted by simrud:

If you are hoping to see any defense ever, you have to trade both Marbury and Craw.

Actually make that if you are willnig to see a hardworking winning team ever.
The true Knickabocker..........
how about offering both picks to New Orleans for JR Smith?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy