Franco, I do give him the benefit of the doubt. And I did comp him to Draymond so in Oak fashion your making an argument where I have none.

My stance is not of propaganda or fondness of the past.
IN a sense, OG is the evolution of Oak. Built like a brick **** house but I guess longer wingspan, and a very good 3pt shot.
Josh Hart has the heart of "Oak" but brings coast to coast penetration and longer range streaky shooting.
Dray is the point forward at times and passing keeps the ball moving.
Oak in todays game would have to have added one of these elements. He did not have the foot speed, reach, handle, or passing b
ut it was not needed. Young ewing be player today but have a shorter career? Thing is would he have had the offensive fundamentals if he came out after his freshman year? Likely not. John Thompson really polished him over 4 years and he took the league by storm with his offensive game! Perhaps better sports medicine etc could have have kept his knees a bit better. Not to diss Ewing, but maybe he more like Miles turner if he had the range and had to choose his spots more? Turner can protect the rim. Ewing was a better athlete earlier in his career and could do it all. Thing is, players today don't. They are managed.
We'd have loved Embiid if he was a knick. Your not gonna tell me Oak was not dirty at times are you?? LOL
SO many factors era to era to consider.