Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39742 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
Nalod
Posts: 71065 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() Philc1 wrote:technomaster wrote:Philc1 wrote:Swishfm3 wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Simple as that ESPN predictions were slanted toward Cavs. Of 18 writers that voted, 14 picked Cav's. Of them, 9 were in seven. The other 5 were Cav's in 6. Is that saying "No chance"? 5 predicted knicks win series Not sure I understand your obsession with what how media has depicted us. Its not like in the last 20plus year we have earned the respect or the benefit of the doubt on the court or off it. I do agree both franchises are on the upswing going forward. |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39742 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() VDesai wrote:Not saying Mitch hasn't been a beast, but somehow that stat feels off. For example, yesterday's 3rd Q- Mitch was on the floor and the Cavs got at least a half dozen layups or dunks. I guess they are only counting this when Mitch is positioned at the rim? Doesn't seem that far-fetched. Cavs are shouting less than 50 percent on shots 6 feet and less that Mitch defends. I can't find the methodology NBA university uses. Imma roll with it. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
Nalod
Posts: 71065 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() newyorknewyork wrote:Allen and Mitch have been compared for a while now. Noone should be rating Allen over Mitch at this point. Well, as long as we not counting points, or rebound avg, or assists, then on rim protection alone its a good look! |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39742 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Nalod wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Allen and Mitch have been compared for a while now. Noone should be rating Allen over Mitch at this point. It's a lot closer when you factor in minutes played, pace, etc. Is Mitch better? Don't really care. Is Mitch getting in that @$$ this series? Hell yeah. Would I rather have Mitch on his contract? Another 'Hell Yeah! ' Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30101 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
![]() Nalod wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Allen and Mitch have been compared for a while now. Noone should be rating Allen over Mitch at this point. They are playing head to head directly this exact moment. And Mitch is winning this matchup clean, when it matters and seasons are on the line. Didn't say Allen was a bum. So Cleveland's deal for him and contract isn't necessarily relevant to my comment. https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|
Nalod
Posts: 71065 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() newyorknewyork wrote:Nalod wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Allen and Mitch have been compared for a while now. Noone should be rating Allen over Mitch at this point. Your not incorrect. The schematic of our wings setting picks and pulling Allen out is creating havoc for Clev defense: The Knicks have adopted this strategy because it directly takes Cleveland’s two best defenders, Allen and Evan Mobley, out of the action. https://www.theringer.com/2023/4/24/23695748/jalen-brunson-knicks-cavaliers You said: "Noone should be rating Allen over Mitch at this point." |